Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Moderator: MOD_Command
-
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:59 am
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Submarine #118 - SSN 671 Narwhal
This entry has the "General Description" for an Oberon class diesel sub, in error.
This entry has the "General Description" for an Oberon class diesel sub, in error.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
DB is not the source of the text on platforms.
There's a separate thread.
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3441939
Not obvious or intuitive but follow the link.
Cheers
K
There's a separate thread.
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3441939
Not obvious or intuitive but follow the link.
Cheers
K
ORIGINAL: miller7219
Submarine #118 - SSN 671 Narwhal
This entry has the "General Description" for an Oberon class diesel sub, in error.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Bumping this. The details are not important and developers could create multiple various sized generic cargo units (that are cargo capable of course) to simulate resupply missions. thanks for considering.
ORIGINAL: orca
Is it possible to add a facility unit called generic cargo (of various sizes). It would come in handy for a scenario I am working on.
for example:
generic cargo (small)- cargo mass 5, cargo area 5 -*paradrop capable
generic cargo (medium)- cargo mass 10, cargo area 10
generic cargo (large)- cargo mass 20, cargo area 20
generic cargo (very large)- cargo mass 40, cargo area 40
category- structure
damage points- not important but possibly 1
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2020 5:16 pm
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
<type>New</type>
<summary>Add Hypothetical MC-747 ALBM Aircraft >
<detail> Proposed 747 Variant to Air Launch Minuteman III ICBMs. 4 missiles carried and AAR capable >
<evidence>
https://aviationhumor.net/the-wildest-b ... -concepts/
http://www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com/blog/?p=1316
http://up-ship.com/blog/?p=21336
</evidence>
<summary>Add Hypothetical MC-747 ALBM Aircraft >
<detail> Proposed 747 Variant to Air Launch Minuteman III ICBMs. 4 missiles carried and AAR capable >
<evidence>
https://aviationhumor.net/the-wildest-b ... -concepts/
http://www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com/blog/?p=1316
http://up-ship.com/blog/?p=21336
</evidence>
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?
ORIGINAL: tylerblakebrandon
<type>New</type>
<summary>Add Yasser A2G missile to Iranian F-14s>
<detail>A2G missile created by combining the warhead of an M117 750 lb bomb and a HAWK Missile body, approximate IOC at time of Sedjil HAWK AAM >
<evidence>
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... dUtkk-7R1k
</evidence>
<type>Update</type>
<detail>There is nothing in the article or visible on the web that after this test this became an operational weapon.
On the contrary:<detail>
</evidence>
The most strange weapon on an F-14 was a MIM-23 Hawk SAM coupled with a 750 lb M-117 bomb warhead on Iranian Tomcats. It was a kind of air to ground bomb with 20-24 km range. Due to very low precision, it was not mass produced. #TopGunDay
https://twitter.com/mhmiranusa/status/1260615102237233164/photo/3</evidence>
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?
<type>New</type>
<summary>Inflatable decoys</summary>
<detail>Russia and other countries use inflateble decoys of weapon systems. Can something like that be programmed? Like a S-400 detectable in the visilbe spectrum but no RCS and no emissions?</detail>
<evidence>
</evidence>

<summary>Inflatable decoys</summary>
<detail>Russia and other countries use inflateble decoys of weapon systems. Can something like that be programmed? Like a S-400 detectable in the visilbe spectrum but no RCS and no emissions?</detail>
<evidence>
</evidence>

- Attachments
-
- EgsIeoWoAEtTay.jpg (72.67 KiB) Viewed 388 times
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?
<type>New</type>
<summary>BLU-136 Next Generation Area Attack Weapon</summary>
<detail>The U.S. Air Force is developing a 2,000 lb.-class bomb called BLU-136 that will shower metal fragments on enemy forces as a replacement for cluster munitions, which are being phased out by the Pentagon because they leave unexploded ordnance. This weapon is four-times the size of the BLU-134/B Improved Lethality Warhead, which is now being put into production. The BLU-134 and BLU-136 are different designs. The fragmentation of the BLU-136 is non-explosive, making it a less-hazardous alternative to cluster munitions.
The only problem is that the fragmentation pattern from one of these new weapons simply cannot cover the same area as a cluster bomb, even with the ability to change the height of burst on the fly. The fragments also cannot defeat heavy armor or zero in on a particular target, both features of the Air Force's CBU-105/B Sensor Fuzed Weapon (SFW) anti-armor cluster bomb and its infrared homing BLU-108/B Sensor Fuzed Munitions (SFMs), which the service keeps in inventory specifically to help defeat large formations of enemy tanks and other armored vehicles.
The tests proved that the design of the BLU-136 was effective in area denial and would be very effective against light vehicles, light structures, and personnel. They also showed that the BLU-136 is capable of inflicting fragmentation damage on the equipment and simulated personnel targets at distances in excess of 225 ft. away from the target.
“This was a very easy test because the weapon functioned exactly as it was supposed to,” said Lambert. “All ten BLU-136s dropped as they should and met or exceeded all expectations and requirements.”
The BLU-136 is a 2000-pound class bomb body with form factor and mass properties similar to the BLU-109. When combined with the joint direct attack munition tail kit, the BLU-136 is designated as the GBU-31v11.
“The loading of the weapons and delivery of the BLU-136/GBU-31v11 was the same as any other JDAM loading or delivery for the F-16, thus proving that if/when fielded, the weapon will be virtually ready from day one,” said Lambert. “This also means that the delivery of the GBU-31v11 from any other aircraft will likely require little to no changes in loading or delivery tactics.”</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.acc.af.mil/News/Article-Dis ... -136-bomb/
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military ... lu-136.htm
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/1 ... icy-change
</evidence>
<summary>BLU-136 Next Generation Area Attack Weapon</summary>
<detail>The U.S. Air Force is developing a 2,000 lb.-class bomb called BLU-136 that will shower metal fragments on enemy forces as a replacement for cluster munitions, which are being phased out by the Pentagon because they leave unexploded ordnance. This weapon is four-times the size of the BLU-134/B Improved Lethality Warhead, which is now being put into production. The BLU-134 and BLU-136 are different designs. The fragmentation of the BLU-136 is non-explosive, making it a less-hazardous alternative to cluster munitions.
The only problem is that the fragmentation pattern from one of these new weapons simply cannot cover the same area as a cluster bomb, even with the ability to change the height of burst on the fly. The fragments also cannot defeat heavy armor or zero in on a particular target, both features of the Air Force's CBU-105/B Sensor Fuzed Weapon (SFW) anti-armor cluster bomb and its infrared homing BLU-108/B Sensor Fuzed Munitions (SFMs), which the service keeps in inventory specifically to help defeat large formations of enemy tanks and other armored vehicles.
The tests proved that the design of the BLU-136 was effective in area denial and would be very effective against light vehicles, light structures, and personnel. They also showed that the BLU-136 is capable of inflicting fragmentation damage on the equipment and simulated personnel targets at distances in excess of 225 ft. away from the target.
“This was a very easy test because the weapon functioned exactly as it was supposed to,” said Lambert. “All ten BLU-136s dropped as they should and met or exceeded all expectations and requirements.”
The BLU-136 is a 2000-pound class bomb body with form factor and mass properties similar to the BLU-109. When combined with the joint direct attack munition tail kit, the BLU-136 is designated as the GBU-31v11.
“The loading of the weapons and delivery of the BLU-136/GBU-31v11 was the same as any other JDAM loading or delivery for the F-16, thus proving that if/when fielded, the weapon will be virtually ready from day one,” said Lambert. “This also means that the delivery of the GBU-31v11 from any other aircraft will likely require little to no changes in loading or delivery tactics.”</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.acc.af.mil/News/Article-Dis ... -136-bomb/
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military ... lu-136.htm
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/1 ... icy-change
</evidence>
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2020 5:16 pm
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?
<type>New</type>
<summary>Add Hypothetical Rail Based Peacekeeper ICBM >
<detail> Proposed Mobile Launch Platform for Peacekeeper ICBMs. 2 missiles per train. >
<evidence>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peacekeeper_Rail_Garrison
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGM-118_P ... ng_options
https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit ... rison-car/
</evidence>
<type>New</type>
<summary>Add Hypothetical TEL based Midgetman SICBM >
<detail> Proposed Road Mobile TEL launched small ICBMs.>
<evidence>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MGM-134_Midgetman
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_Mobile_Launcher
http://www.astronautix.com/s/sicbm.html
http://themilitarystandard.com/missile/ ... etails.php
http://themilitarystandard.com/missile/ ... uncher.php
https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/sicbm.htm
</evidence>
<summary>Add Hypothetical Rail Based Peacekeeper ICBM >
<detail> Proposed Mobile Launch Platform for Peacekeeper ICBMs. 2 missiles per train. >
<evidence>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peacekeeper_Rail_Garrison
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGM-118_P ... ng_options
https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit ... rison-car/
</evidence>
<type>New</type>
<summary>Add Hypothetical TEL based Midgetman SICBM >
<detail> Proposed Road Mobile TEL launched small ICBMs.>
<evidence>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MGM-134_Midgetman
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_Mobile_Launcher
http://www.astronautix.com/s/sicbm.html
http://themilitarystandard.com/missile/ ... etails.php
http://themilitarystandard.com/missile/ ... uncher.php
https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/sicbm.htm
</evidence>
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?
ORIGINAL: Blast33
<type>New</type>
<summary>Inflatable decoys</summary>
<detail>Russia and other countries use inflateble decoys of weapon systems. Can something like that be programmed? Like a S-400 detectable in the visilbe spectrum but no RCS and no emissions?</detail>
<evidence>
</evidence>
![]()
You can do by taking weapons and sensors off an existing platforms in game. If you want electronic decoy leave sensor on.
Don't call it a comeback...
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?
Sure, ha ha so simple and easy. Rename into decoy and ready..
It is much easier than I thougth [8D]
One difference remains is the amount of hitpoints. A tank will not be punctured by scrapnel from nearby bombs and decoys will have different attributes.
Tnx
It is much easier than I thougth [8D]
One difference remains is the amount of hitpoints. A tank will not be punctured by scrapnel from nearby bombs and decoys will have different attributes.
Tnx
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?
ORIGINAL: Blast33
Sure, ha ha so simple and easy. Rename into decoy and ready..
It is much easier than I thougth [8D]
One difference remains is the amount of hitpoints. A tank will not be punctured by scrapnel from nearby bombs and decoys will have different attributes.
Tnx
You can adjust damage by hitting the Damage Ctrl button in UNIT STATUS and then damage or destroy mounts (except sensors). Hopefully this work for you.
Don't call it a comeback...
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?
<type>New</type>
<summary>Add Taiwan Chung Shyang II [Albatross UAV] 2007</summary>
<detail>Taiwan Army use Chung Shyang II (Albatross) UAV from 2007 but full production 2010 until 2017 when they transferred to Navy. Early version appear to have EO and IR sensor. </detail>
<evidence>
http://210.65.127.128/ENG/upload/G_Prod ... 378494.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCSIST_Albatross
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news ... 028c342c60
http://alert5.com/2020/08/27/taiwan-dep ... china-sea/
https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3935762
</evidence>
<summary>Add Taiwan Chung Shyang II [Albatross UAV] 2007</summary>
<detail>Taiwan Army use Chung Shyang II (Albatross) UAV from 2007 but full production 2010 until 2017 when they transferred to Navy. Early version appear to have EO and IR sensor. </detail>
<evidence>
http://210.65.127.128/ENG/upload/G_Prod ... 378494.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCSIST_Albatross
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news ... 028c342c60
http://alert5.com/2020/08/27/taiwan-dep ... china-sea/
https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3935762
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?
<type>New</type>
<summary>Add Phillipine AW,159 Wildcat ASW Helicopter 2019 </summary>
<detail>Phillipines receive new 2 AW159 Wilcats for new Rizal Frigates and Cutters. Copy South Korean Variant #3374. Sipri confirm NLOS and Blue Shark </detail>
<evidence>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AgustaWes ... 59_Wildcat
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/20 ... licopters/
https://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/p ... gister.php
</evidence>
<summary>Add Phillipine AW,159 Wildcat ASW Helicopter 2019 </summary>
<detail>Phillipines receive new 2 AW159 Wilcats for new Rizal Frigates and Cutters. Copy South Korean Variant #3374. Sipri confirm NLOS and Blue Shark </detail>
<evidence>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AgustaWes ... 59_Wildcat
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/20 ... licopters/
https://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/p ... gister.php
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?
<type>New</type>
<summary>Add Phillipine A-29B Super Tucano 2020 x6 </summary>
<detail>Phillipines just getting 6 A-29B Super Tucano. Weapons likely dumb bomb and rocket. Can copy #3745 </detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/MaltaAvOutlook/stat ... 4348482561
https://twitter.com/MacFinn44/status/13 ... 61/photo/4
https://twitter.com/MonteroMax/status/1 ... 5375559680
https://twitter.com/MonteroMax/status/1 ... 80/photo/4
https://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/p ... gister.php
</evidence>
<summary>Add Phillipine A-29B Super Tucano 2020 x6 </summary>
<detail>Phillipines just getting 6 A-29B Super Tucano. Weapons likely dumb bomb and rocket. Can copy #3745 </detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/MaltaAvOutlook/stat ... 4348482561
https://twitter.com/MacFinn44/status/13 ... 61/photo/4
https://twitter.com/MonteroMax/status/1 ... 5375559680
https://twitter.com/MonteroMax/status/1 ... 80/photo/4
https://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/p ... gister.php
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?
<type>Update</type>
<summary>SAAR VI use Barak 8 missiles not Barak 1.</summary>
<detail>Entry #3224 should use Barak 8 missiles not Barak 1. </detail>
<evidence>
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/20 ... ins-magen/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sa%27ar_6-class_corvette
</evidence>
<summary>SAAR VI use Barak 8 missiles not Barak 1.</summary>
<detail>Entry #3224 should use Barak 8 missiles not Barak 1. </detail>
<evidence>
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/20 ... ins-magen/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sa%27ar_6-class_corvette
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?
<type>Update</type>
<summary>China SU-30MKI SEAD loadout with YJ-91 KG-700 ECM Pod</summary>
<detail>Look like China newer SU-30MKI SEAD loadout include YJ-91 and KG-700 ECM Pod. Update #635. </detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/RupprechtDeino/stat ... 73/photo/1
</evidence>
<summary>China SU-30MKI SEAD loadout with YJ-91 KG-700 ECM Pod</summary>
<detail>Look like China newer SU-30MKI SEAD loadout include YJ-91 and KG-700 ECM Pod. Update #635. </detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/RupprechtDeino/stat ... 73/photo/1
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 11:48 pm
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Please consider adding the Bell v-247 Vigilant to the simulation.
It is bells new tilt rotor UAV and it would make a very good addition to the simulation.
It has a similar footprint to the Seahawk and could effectively be used as a long range areal reconnaissance and strike platform.
Please consider looking it up, the specs are on Bells website!
thanks
It is bells new tilt rotor UAV and it would make a very good addition to the simulation.
It has a similar footprint to the Seahawk and could effectively be used as a long range areal reconnaissance and strike platform.
Please consider looking it up, the specs are on Bells website!
thanks
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
<type>New</type>
<summary>Vietnamese Yurka Minesweeper now have Pluto Plus USV from 2017</summary>
<detail>Vietnamese Yurka Minesweeper #1598 now have Pluto USV. Add docking facilities. Add Vietnamese Pluto Plus. Can Copy#481 </detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/seawaves_mag/status ... 6105525248
</evidence>
<summary>Vietnamese Yurka Minesweeper now have Pluto Plus USV from 2017</summary>
<detail>Vietnamese Yurka Minesweeper #1598 now have Pluto USV. Add docking facilities. Add Vietnamese Pluto Plus. Can Copy#481 </detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/seawaves_mag/status ... 6105525248
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
<type>Update</type>
<summary>French C.160R now out of service 2020. C.160F and C.160NG updated to R by 1999 so can add 1999 out of service date for them</summary>
<detail>French C.160R Transall #1874 now out of service. #1872, ##774 and #2169 out of service by 1999</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.scramble.nl/military-news/f ... ewell-tour
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transall_C-160
</evidence>
<summary>French C.160R now out of service 2020. C.160F and C.160NG updated to R by 1999 so can add 1999 out of service date for them</summary>
<detail>French C.160R Transall #1874 now out of service. #1872, ##774 and #2169 out of service by 1999</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.scramble.nl/military-news/f ... ewell-tour
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transall_C-160
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
<type>Update</type>
<summary>F 361 Iver Huitfeldt has 4 quad Harpoon launchers not 2</summary>
<detail>Add 2 more Mk141 HarpoonL missile launchers to #2331 F 361 Iver Huitfeldt </detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/CavasShips/status/1 ... 72/photo/1
https://twitter.com/EMASOH_AGENOR/statu ... 69/photo/1
</evidence>
<summary>F 361 Iver Huitfeldt has 4 quad Harpoon launchers not 2</summary>
<detail>Add 2 more Mk141 HarpoonL missile launchers to #2331 F 361 Iver Huitfeldt </detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/CavasShips/status/1 ... 72/photo/1
https://twitter.com/EMASOH_AGENOR/statu ... 69/photo/1
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...