Supremacy at Sea: WW2

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

jakla1027
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:01 pm
Location: Idaho

RE: Supremacy at Sea: WW2

Post by jakla1027 »

Bump...
User avatar
Max 86
Posts: 698
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:54 pm

RE: Supremacy at Sea: WW2

Post by Max 86 »

http://forums.navalwarfare.net/forumdis ... AT-SEA-WW2

Here is a link to their forums. Not much activity at all and most threads deal with problems or request for missing features. I followed this release pretty closely and what bothered me aboput the whole deal is that NWS stated rather strongy how this game was tested in depth before release and it was obvious after release this could not have been true. I have never heard one positive review for this game and that is if you can even find a review anymore
No problem Chief!
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Supremacy at Sea: WW2

Post by Terminus »

Well, strictly speaking, it WAS tested in depth.

I was there.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
mllange
Posts: 529
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 1:35 am

RE: Supremacy at Sea: WW2

Post by mllange »

ORIGINAL: Max 86

http://forums.navalwarfare.net/forumdis ... AT-SEA-WW2

Here is a link to their forums. Not much activity at all and most threads deal with problems or request for missing features. I followed this release pretty closely and what bothered me aboput the whole deal is that NWS stated rather strongy how this game was tested in depth before release and it was obvious after release this could not have been true. I have never heard one positive review for this game and that is if you can even find a review anymore

I would be somewhat shocked to find that you have even played the game; I've owned it for two years now and it has been in a continuous state of progress (albeit somewhat slowly). The game was fair when I bought it and it is now absolutely enjoyable and unique. Give it a go before passing judgement I say.
There's a simple answer to every complex question - and it's wrong.
-Umberto Eco
Rosseau
Posts: 2947
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:20 am

RE: Supremacy at Sea: WW2

Post by Rosseau »

+1
Anonymous

[Deleted]

Post by Anonymous »

[Deleted by Admins]
ulisin
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:29 am

RE: Supremacy at Sea: WW2

Post by ulisin »

+1
User avatar
Khanti
Posts: 460
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 3:02 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Supremacy at Sea: WW2

Post by Khanti »

Bump on purpose.
If somebody has that game (digital + serial) and really does not want to test / play it, I would gladly use his serial (registration number) and try it. I played NWS Rule the Waves (pre-dreadnoughts and dreadnoughts to 1925) with great pleasure and I'd like to see how it was done with WW2 ships.

(PM please)
═══
There is no such thing as a historically accurate strategy game. Every game stops being historically accurate from the very first move player do. First unit that moves ahistorically, first battle with non-historical results, mean we ride in unknown.
User avatar
Gar-Dog
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2018 3:55 pm

RE: Supremacy at Sea: WW2

Post by Gar-Dog »

Just bought & installed (WIN10); it crashes every time there's a surface combat. Only playable if I avoid surface combat. If it wasn't for that, I think I could learn to like it though the UI is a bit rough. I really do like its strategic focus.

I'm about to give up and buy "War in the Pacific", which looks like it's about as playable and far greater flexibility. I played WitP's prequel, Uncommon Valor, and after getting used to the interface, it was pretty fun. The turns there are every day (SaS allows every hour) and the focus is more operational than strategic (OOB is set by the scenario, economy is limited to supply logistics).
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 17511
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: Supremacy at Sea: WW2

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Gar-Dog

Just bought & installed (WIN10); it crashes every time there's a surface combat. Only playable if I avoid surface combat. If it wasn't for that, I think I could learn to like it though the UI is a bit rough. I really do like its strategic focus.

I'm about to give up and buy "War in the Pacific", which looks like it's about as playable and far greater flexibility. I played WitP's prequel, Uncommon Valor, and after getting used to the interface, it was pretty fun. The turns there are every day (SaS allows every hour) and the focus is more operational than strategic (OOB is set by the scenario, economy is limited to supply logistics).

Try WITP AE but be aware that there are switches needed for that game. You might need switches for the game that you are having problems with.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child
Image
Raikkonen
Posts: 121
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:55 am

RE: Supremacy at Sea: WW2

Post by Raikkonen »

What about the two Steam & Iron games? I've been on the fence on those for months. Anyone have them and play them?
Jason96
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2020 4:24 am

RE: Supremacy at Sea: WW2

Post by Jason96 »

this game needs some graphics at least like Iron Blitz (Sega Saturn) where it shows a short clip e.g. 1 battleship vs 2 cruisers, show the ships firing, damage occuring, then sinking if lost...this is a PC game for crying out loud!!!
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”