Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

Post Reply
User avatar
KG Erwin
Posts: 8366
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cross Lanes WV USA

Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by KG Erwin »

Other than SPWaW, what games give good sims of the USMC's legendary battles in the Pacific? There was the Squad Battles game, but as far as I'm concerned, SPWaW is it. We have scenarios dealing with Iwo Jima, Peleliu & Tarawa, plus the Watchtower Mega and Bruce Hodgman's separate Guadalcanal mini-campaign. Strangely, no scenarios exist for the penultimate Pacific campaign: Okinawa.

I had hoped for a definitive "With the Old Breed" MegaCampaign, covering the 1st MarDiv from Guadalcanal to Okinawa, but that was not to be. The closest I can come to this is the SPWaW Long Campaign.

Personal note: with Bill Wilder now being retired, the USMC's Pacific War seems to have been neglected in recent years. I discount FPS-type games , so don't bother bringing them up. Sure, on the strategic level, there's WitP, but on the tactical level, there's little to be had.

Why is this? Is the vast Pacific War still so little understood or appreciated? Granted, most land battles were slugfests, with little room for manuever, and no dramatic sweeping movements by fleets of AFVs. Perhaps that's it. It was primarily an infantry war, with tanks in a supporting role.
Image
Cheeks
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 9:15 pm
Location: Ohio Valley

RE: Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by Cheeks »

As you've mentioned, Squad Battles: The Proud & the Few covers the Corps during the WW2 Pacific campaign.

I have played Steel Panthers from its début (any nearly every other program), but this Squad Battles game is by far-and-wide the best tactical game available (not to mention historically accurate).
Turn the other cheek
User avatar
PunkReaper
Posts: 1003
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 6:27 pm
Location: England

RE: Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by PunkReaper »

Doesn't John Tiller's Campaign Series cover the Pacific War?
User avatar
Hertston
Posts: 3317
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2002 3:45 pm
Location: Cornwall, UK

RE: Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by Hertston »

ORIGINAL: Punk Reaper
Doesn't John Tiller's Campaign Series cover the Pacific War?

Yup, what was previously 'Rising Sun'. Probably the best of the three.
User avatar
Erik Rutins
Posts: 39635
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

RE: Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by Erik Rutins »

Yes, definitely give JTCS a try for Pacific tactical battles.
Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC


Image

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.
elcidce
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Lugoff, SC

RE: Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by elcidce »

The Conquest of the Aegean engine will be applied to Guadalcanal eventually when they are through with The Bulge, Normandy, and the East Front. The SW Pacific will be the focus of the first title. The Central Pacific will be the one after that. As the other campaigns are completed more features are added that would make the better suited to the Pacific campaign.

There is a team set up to do the research for it. I have suggested that they move into the Korean war after the Pacific is completed. This still leaves Burma and India to cover as well. I know this is a while off but there are many others that understand the need for these areas to be covered.
The Citadel
G Company
Class of 1991
User avatar
JudgeDredd
Posts: 8362
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 7:28 pm
Location: Scotland

RE: Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by JudgeDredd »

ORIGINAL: elcidce

The Conquest of the Aegean engine will be applied to Guadalcanal eventually when they are through with The Bulge, Normandy, and the East Front. The SW Pacific will be the focus of the first title. The Central Pacific will be the one after that. As the other campaigns are completed more features are added that would make the better suited to the Pacific campaign.

There is a team set up to do the research for it. I have suggested that they move into the Korean war after the Pacific is completed. This still leaves Burma and India to cover as well. I know this is a while off but there are many others that understand the need for these areas to be covered.
Yes but unfortunately at 2+ years dev time, the pacific is looking at least 6 years away! Besides, I would like to see them do (and thought they were going to do) a North Africa set first?
Alba gu' brath
User avatar
Warfare1
Posts: 658
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 7:56 pm

RE: Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by Warfare1 »

The game Pacific General covers what you are looking for. All the game's campaign scenarios have been re-done, which include a campaign for both the US as well as Japan. There are great island battles as well as naval action.

Go here for the game:
http://thearmorypacgenforum.yuku.com/fo ... neral.html

and here for lots of campaigns, scenarios:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepage ... rmory.html

Drinking a cool brew; thinking about playing my next wargame....
User avatar
SS Hauptsturmfuhrer
Posts: 358
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 4:01 am

RE: Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by SS Hauptsturmfuhrer »

The Pacific theatre definitely does deserve more attention.  There were a lot of good battles on those islands.  I recently read about Peleliu and they sure had a good shoot'em up there.   I wanna actually go visit the island now even though it is hard to get to and no one really goes there except extreme military fans.
elcidce
Posts: 150
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Lugoff, SC

RE: Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by elcidce »

Does anyone think that there would be interest in creating some campaigns for the battles in Burma, India or New Guinea?

The British and Japanese Indian campaigns would be someting new and interesting I think.
The Citadel
G Company
Class of 1991
User avatar
Yogi the Great
Posts: 1949
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:28 pm
Location: Wisconsin

RE: Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by Yogi the Great »

Speaking of HPS Squad battles series.  Cheaper though at Navalwafare.org

As the follow-up to the popular Proud & Few" Squad Battlesgame, Pacific War continues in the Pacific theater but adds all the changes in the Squad Battles system since "Proud & Few" was released, to include the extremely popular Fast AI Processing.
Hooked Since AH Gettysburg
Mike Parker
Posts: 578
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:43 am
Location: Houston TX

RE: Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by Mike Parker »

I have thought for awhile about how to say this without it being misunderstood.
 
There are not alot of good WWII games featuring the USMC because basically the most intriguing portion of land combat in WWII was in Europe.  And the second most was the Japanese and Chinese.  Neither of which had much to do with the USMC.  The US pacific war is much more about the naval fighting.  I do not mean to downplay the significance or the sacrifice the USMC made, they paid in dear blood for many of the pacific bases we needed.  But in general what makes for a good wargame is not the island land campaigns but the naval campaigns.
 
I wish I could remember the names, but I played a couple of wargames (boardgames) one set in Korea and one in Vietnam both were excellent games that had alot of involvement with Marine formations.
 
For strategy based games its hard to find something that highlights the USMC unfortunately.
User avatar
Yogi the Great
Posts: 1949
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:28 pm
Location: Wisconsin

RE: Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by Yogi the Great »

I do understand that the campaigns in Europe may make for a "better wargame"

However as far as sacrifice a case could be made that those fighting in the paccific had the harder job.  What our soldiers went through there can only be described as hell on earth.  My father was there (Army) came home with a Bronze Star, Purple Heart, Malaria and nightmares to last a lifetime.

I had the Avalon Hill boardgame of Guadalcanal.  Not a bad game.  I agree little in wargames available but the squad based games aren't bad.
Hooked Since AH Gettysburg
User avatar
Greybriar
Posts: 1158
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:54 am

RE: Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by Greybriar »

At the risk of starting something like "My dad can beat up your dad," I beg to differ with you, Yogi. My father fought in the European theatre and saw action in North Africa, Sicily, Italy, and France before being captured in the Luxembourg area. He, too, was wounded--three times. His younger brother was killed during the Battle of the Bulge about the same time my father was captured. Although dad didn't catch malaria, I honestly don't know what all he went through as he wouldn't talk about it.

So I suggest we just say that our fighting men in both the European and Pacific theatres went through hell, shall we?
This war is not about slavery. --Robert E. Lee
User avatar
SS Hauptsturmfuhrer
Posts: 358
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 4:01 am

RE: Game Representation of the USMC in WWII

Post by SS Hauptsturmfuhrer »

There has hardly been a war where soldiers didn't go through hell.  Even in the Falklands, generally considered a cakewalk, the British almost froze to death after tabbing all day and night, and had to attack over open terrain against a more numerous enemy entrenched upon rocky hills.

 I shall cap this discussion with a famous quote....

"The most important qualification of a soldier is fortitude under fatigue and privation. Courage is only second; hardship, poverty and want are the best school for a soldier."- Napoleon Bonaparte (15 August 1769 – 5 May 1821)
Oddly, the source of this well-used quote was the Vancouver Sun.

Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”