OT : World of Warships

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
patrickl
Posts: 1530
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 6:57 pm
Location: Singapore

OT : World of Warships

Post by patrickl »

Image
Banner designed by rogueusmc
User avatar
jeffk3510
Posts: 4143
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:59 am
Location: Merica

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by jeffk3510 »

I'm sure it will be pretty good.

World of Tanks is good for the most part. Haven't played World of Planes.

Navyfield 1 was OK - haven't tried Navyfield 2
Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.
User avatar
Jorge_Stanbury
Posts: 4345
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Montreal

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by Jorge_Stanbury »

arcadish [:-]
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by Lokasenna »

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

arcadish [:-]

I liked arcades.
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by crsutton »

Does not do much for me. None of them ever did.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
User avatar
Anthropoid
Posts: 3107
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Secret Underground Lair

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by Anthropoid »

Looks like fun.

I stupidly bought this game on Steam produced by a Hungarian studio I believe "Battlestations: Pacific."

Lets just say, there are good arcadish real time strategy games, and there are bad. Battlestations: Pacific fits into the latter category, and that seems to be the consensus by and large. Still I think I only spent $5 on it so not a huge loss.

So there is clearly a market for such things and if it is done well, it seems worthy to me
The x-ray is her siren song. My ship cannot resist her long. Nearer to my deadly goal. Until the black hole. Gains control...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIIlkyZ ... playnext=3
User avatar
jeffk3510
Posts: 4143
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:59 am
Location: Merica

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by jeffk3510 »

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

arcadish [:-]

Very much so, but it is nice to fire up here and there to blow stuff up.
Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.
wdolson
Posts: 7651
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by wdolson »

I have been seeing the World of Tanks/Planes/Warships ads everywhere for a couple of years now. It appears to be an attempt to make a social media war game. About the only thing historical are the weapons. It's otherwise a free for all between weapons.

I don't like real time games to begin with. I play games to relax and games with a time pressure just make me twitchy, which is the opposite of what I'm trying to achieve. So I've given it a pass.

Bill
SCW Development Team
User avatar
rsallen64
Posts: 212
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:20 pm
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by rsallen64 »

I'm with Bill on this one. Although I understand "life" happens in real time, real commanders don't control every aspect of the battlespace on their own. In a game, you're expected to do so, so ultimately I think they're less realistic than other games.
Desert War 1940-1942 Beta Tester
Agressors: Ancient Rome Beta Tester
Flashpoint Campaigns: Southern Storm Beta Tester
User avatar
Lokasenna
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:57 am
Location: Iowan in MD/DC

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by Lokasenna »

My friend and I are probably going to pick this up. Yes, it's just an arcade game with a WW2 naval skin, but that's fine with us. It might be fun. It's entering closed beta this week.
Malagant
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 1:30 am

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by Malagant »

I really enjoy World of Tanks, but I have to say I stopped watching that video when the CV rammed the tin-can...
"La Garde meurt, elle ne se rend pas!"
User avatar
Anthropoid
Posts: 3107
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Secret Underground Lair

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by Anthropoid »

ORIGINAL: Malagant

I really enjoy World of Tanks, but I have to say I stopped watching that video when the CV rammed the tin-can...

Could happen . . . [:D]

Actually, I seem to recall that something along those lines DID happen, at least a few times. I'm sure that collisions were not uncommon; seem to recall that one of the cruisers in one of the Japanese Midway taskforces (I think it was the amphibious tf that got bombed by Midway aircraft?) collided with another one of the ships in the tf and both were pretty badly damaged.

There must have been some instances of large ships literally ramming into smaller ones and causing some damage to the bigger one but totalling the smaller one no?
The x-ray is her siren song. My ship cannot resist her long. Nearer to my deadly goal. Until the black hole. Gains control...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIIlkyZ ... playnext=3
User avatar
John 3rd
Posts: 17497
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:03 pm
Location: La Salle, Colorado

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by John 3rd »

ORIGINAL: wdolson

I have been seeing the World of Tanks/Planes/Warships ads everywhere for a couple of years now. It appears to be an attempt to make a social media war game. About the only thing historical are the weapons. It's otherwise a free for all between weapons.

I don't like real time games to begin with. I play games to relax and games with a time pressure just make me twitchy, which is the opposite of what I'm trying to achieve. So I've given it a pass.

Bill

Second that!
Image

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.
wdolson
Posts: 7651
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by wdolson »

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

My friend and I are probably going to pick this up. Yes, it's just an arcade game with a WW2 naval skin, but that's fine with us. It might be fun. It's entering closed beta this week.

Some people are better at strategy and some better at tactics. You want your best tacticians on the front line and your best strategy people on the command staff.

Bill
SCW Development Team
User avatar
Chijohnaok2
Posts: 554
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 2:32 am
Location: Florida, USA (formerly Chicago)

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by Chijohnaok2 »

ORIGINAL: Anthropoid

ORIGINAL: Malagant

I really enjoy World of Tanks, but I have to say I stopped watching that video when the CV rammed the tin-can...

Could happen . . . [:D]

Actually, I seem to recall that something along those lines DID happen, at least a few times. I'm sure that collisions were not uncommon; seem to recall that one of the cruisers in one of the Japanese Midway taskforces (I think it was the amphibious tf that got bombed by Midway aircraft?) collided with another one of the ships in the tf and both were pretty badly damaged.

There must have been some instances of large ships literally ramming into smaller ones and causing some damage to the bigger one but totalling the smaller one no?

There was the incident of IJN Amagiri running into PT 109.
Image

Feel free to drop by and chat about whatever is on your mind.
wdolson
Posts: 7651
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by wdolson »

ORIGINAL: Malagant

I really enjoy World of Tanks, but I have to say I stopped watching that video when the CV rammed the tin-can...

Could happen . . . [:D]

Actually, I seem to recall that something along those lines DID happen, at least a few times. I'm sure that collisions were not uncommon; seem to recall that one of the cruisers in one of the Japanese Midway taskforces (I think it was the amphibious tf that got bombed by Midway aircraft?) collided with another one of the ships in the tf and both were pretty badly damaged.
ORIGINAL: Anthropoid
There must have been some instances of large ships literally ramming into smaller ones and causing some damage to the bigger one but totalling the smaller one no?

I think you're thinking about the Mogami and Mikuma which were tasked with bombarding Midway after the carriers were lost before the Japanese retreated entirely. The bombardment was called off and when the cruisers were retreating at high speed to get out of air range before daybreak, they collided. Mogami was more severely damaged and the captain jettisoned the torpedoes. Mikuma kept the torpedoes on board. When the Americans attacked in the morning, the Mikuma's torpedoes went off which led to the sinking of the ship. Mogami was mauled, but escaped. While undergoing repair she was converted to a seaplane cruiser like the Tone and Chikuma.

Collisions have happened many times, some resulted in sinkings and other times just time in repair. The nuclear carrier Enterprise hit two Soviet subs during her career. A number of DDs were sunk due to collisions. When you have ships trying to stay in formation in the dark, while under radio silence, that sort of thing happens, especially with green crews. Refueling accidents also happen. DD 444 USS Ingram was investigating a collision between the USS Buck and a freighter when she was hit by an oil tanker. Two collisions in the same area on the same day. I could see players howl if that happened to them.

Bill

SCW Development Team
User avatar
Barb
Posts: 2503
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:17 am
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by Barb »

RMS Queen Mary slicing through HMS Curacoa and sinking her? HMS Punjabi sunk by HMS King George V... and USS Washington being damaged by explosion of Punjabis Deth charges going off too...
HMAS Melbourne sinking HMAS Voyager in 1964? And the same ship ramming USS Frank E. Evans in 1969?

Collisions happens all the time ... And some are deadly.
Image
User avatar
Rising-Sun
Posts: 2186
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:27 am
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Contact:

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by Rising-Sun »

I like it, it will be open beta sometime end of this year. About a week ago Navy Field 2 came to Steam, it was a fun game and not realistic though. If anyone is interesting let me know we can team up [:D]
Image
User avatar
Anthropoid
Posts: 3107
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Secret Underground Lair

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by Anthropoid »

Mogami and Mikuma, yep! Those are the ones I was thinking about.
The x-ray is her siren song. My ship cannot resist her long. Nearer to my deadly goal. Until the black hole. Gains control...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIIlkyZ ... playnext=3
User avatar
crsutton
Posts: 9590
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 8:56 pm
Location: Maryland

RE: OT : World of Warships

Post by crsutton »

ORIGINAL: wdolson

I have been seeing the World of Tanks/Planes/Warships ads everywhere for a couple of years now. It appears to be an attempt to make a social media war game. About the only thing historical are the weapons. It's otherwise a free for all between weapons.

I don't like real time games to begin with. I play games to relax and games with a time pressure just make me twitchy, which is the opposite of what I'm trying to achieve. So I've given it a pass.

Bill


They are also "pay to upgrade" games in that the game is offered for free but players can pay extra to get better equipment. This those willing to spend the money for upgrades will quickly dominate. Not a bad business model, but makes for a pretty bad game in my eyes.
I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”