Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

BDukes
Posts: 2623
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

<type>Update</type>
<summary>New Israeli F-15E entry #4894 seems incomplete update to F-15I [Raam]</summary>
<detail>Name and stats are for F-15E. Should be for F-15I with new Rampage loadout.</detail>
<evidence>
Check entry #4894
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
User avatar
SeaQueen
Posts: 1432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:20 am
Location: Washington D.C.

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by SeaQueen »

NorthernFox
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2013 12:47 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by NorthernFox »

Currently, the Sonobui Loadout is not implemented in South Korean's AW.159 Wildcat #3374

IRL ROKN Wildcat Using 10 Barrel Rotary Sonobuoy Launcher with AN/SSQ-62E #2482 and AN/SSQ-53F DIFAR #2496

Image

This Sonobui launcher is expected to be a product of Italian MES S.p.A's SBDU Sytstem

Image

Loadout should be 10 Sonobuoy with 1 K-745 Torpedo #315
loadout reference image K745withSonobuoy

User avatar
Blast33
Posts: 703
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2018 1:23 pm
Location: Above and beyond

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Blast33 »

<type>Update</type>
<summary>Belgian Air Force decommissioned old Israel-built B-Hunter unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) it bought two decades ago./summary>
<detail>The Belgian Air Force is now eagerly awaiting the arrival of its new capacity of remotely piloted aircraft, General Atomics’ MQ-9B SkyGuardian. In 1998, the Belgian Air Component purchased three B-Hunter UAV-systems, each consisting of six aircraft and two ground control stations. The drones were operational from 2004 in 80 UAV Squadron. Thirteen 13 aircraft were in service until recently.

Two weeks ago, General Atomics was awarded $189 million Belgium MQ-9B SkyGuardian procurement. This contract provides for four MQ-9B unmanned air vehicles, two Certifiable Ground Control Stations, spares and support equipment. It covers design, development, integration and production of the RPAS with its EO/IR video and SAR/GMTI surveillance payloads. The first delivery is scheduled for 2023.</detail>
</evidence> https://www.aviation24.be/military-airc ... unter-uav/
https://www.defenseworld.net/news/27769
</evidence>
User avatar
Blast33
Posts: 703
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2018 1:23 pm
Location: Above and beyond

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Blast33 »

<type>Update</type>
<summary>Over 200 Guard And Reserve F-16s Can Now Carry The Dragon's Eye Radar Pod AN/ASQ-236, Database nr. #3300</summary>
<detail>In a LinkedIn post, Colonel Tim Bailey, the F-16 Systems Program Manager, stated that over 200 Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard Vipers can now carry the advanced radar system. This gives these F-16s a massive leap in all-weather precision engagement and surveillance capability that can be efficiently bolted on and off the aircraft as the mission dictates.

While some of the Air Force's Vipers are getting AN/APG-83 AESA radars, also known as the Scalable Agile Beam Radar (SABR), to replace their mechanically scanned AN/APG-68 radar sets, which will bring fantastic new capabilities to this middle-aged fighter jet force, the Dragon's Eye pod offers plenty of capabilities for those jets that don't get the new radar sets.

It offers additional capabilities that are not perfectly replicated by the AN/APG-83, as well. This includes being optimized for side-scanning and certain ground and surface surveillance and targeting modes. In fact, an F-16 with the new SABR in its nose and a Dragon's Eye pod on its centerline would be an amazingly capable combination, but it will be even more essential for those jets that don't have or are not slated to get a built-in AESA radar.

Aside from the F-16, we know that the AN/ASQ-236 has been flown on AC-130 gunships and B-52s for testing purposes. It isn't clear if either of those types will actually field the pod operationally. </detail>
<evidence>
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... </evidence>
User avatar
Blast33
Posts: 703
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2018 1:23 pm
Location: Above and beyond

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Blast33 »

<type>Update</type>
<summary>Saab has delivered its first GlobalEye early-warning plane to the United Arab Emirates,</summary>
<detail>The primary sensor of the GlobalEye is its Erieye ER airborne early warning (AEW) radar; weighing approximately 1 tonne, it is mounted atop the twinjet's fuselage. Saab has cited up to 450 km (216 nm) range for the AEW radar system when flown at an operating altitude of 30,000ft; in comparison with earlier versions of the Erieye radar, Saab claims it has achieved a 70% increase in detection range, achieved via the use of new technology, such as gallium nitride transmit/receive modules. According to Saab Group, the GlobalEye is capable of detecting and tracking a combination of airborne and surface targets, the latter on both land and sea, while mission times of up to eleven hours in duration are possible. The 450km range of the radar is line of sight and is limited to 450km because of the shape of the earth, the instrumental range is actually 550km.

In addition to the AEW radar, the GlobalEye is equipped with various additional sensors. These include the Seaspray 7500E maritime surveillance radar, provided by Italian defence conglomerate Leonardo; the Seaspray radar features synthetic-aperture radar and ground-oriented moving target indication modes.[6] The GlobalEye also has an electro-optical/infrared sensor, which is situated underneath the forward fuselage. Other mission equipment includes data links, voice and satellite communications and a command and control suite, the latter comprising five onboard operator stations.

The GlobalEye can be operated without any onboard operators, streaming its surveillance output to ground-based stations instead. According to Saab, the GlobalEye can simultaneously perform airborne, maritime and ground surveillance duties. It has been offered with three layers of capability: the baseline AESA and C2 system for air, land and sea surveillance, along with some electronic intelligence functions; a version with additional infrared and sea-search functionality; and one with a dedicated signals intelligence (SIGINT) system.[

During November 2015, the United Arab Emirates ordered the system, which it refers to as the Swing Role Surveillance System (SRSS), as part of a US$1.27 billion deal.[16][17] During February 2017, the UAE exercised an option to procure an additional third GlobalEye in a deal worth US$238 million.[18][19] According to UAE air force chief Ibrahim Naser Al Alawi, the GlobalEye should be a "strong force multiplier...an early warning radar which is capable also of detecting ballistic missiles, and to cover the whole domain as an air power".[6] By May 2019, lead elements, including ground control stations, had been delivered to the UAE.[12] The UAE took delivery of its first Globaleye as per schedule on 28 April 2020.

Basic Bombardier 6000 data @ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombardier_Global_Express</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.defensenews.com/global/euro ... ne-to-uae/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globaleye
https://twitter.com/fighterpics/status/ ... 1513340931
https://twitter.com/DavidLametti/status ... 4906872832
</evidence>


Image
Attachments
EJhHEqqXUAAXZvH.jpg
EJhHEqqXUAAXZvH.jpg (41.36 KiB) Viewed 791 times
gallycadet
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2020 12:16 am

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by gallycadet »


Requesting that Dragon Eye radar pods be part of an available loadout for Late model USA F-16's. Forums are not allowing me to post a link, but information can be found on The Drive/Warzone website.
BDukes
Posts: 2623
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

<type>New</type>
<summary>Add Sudanese F-5E and F-5F Aircraft</summary>
<detail>Sudan recevied 2 F-5E and 2 F-5F in 1981. Ordered more but could not pay. Can copy any not upgraded F-5E and F entry</detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/HammerOfWar5/status ... 7863862273
http://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/pa ... gister.php
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
tylerblakebrandon
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon May 11, 2020 5:16 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by tylerblakebrandon »

<type>New</type>
<summary>Add Yasser A2G missile to Iranian F-14s>
<detail>A2G missile created by combining the warhead of an M117 750 lb bomb and a HAWK Missile body, approximate IOC at time of Sedjil HAWK AAM >
<evidence>
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... dUtkk-7R1k
</evidence>
tylerblakebrandon
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon May 11, 2020 5:16 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by tylerblakebrandon »

<type>New</type>
<summary>Add A2G Sidewinder Mods for Sweden and Iran>
<detail>A2G missiles created by modifying Sidewinder AAMs, Possible platforms are Iranian Cobra Helicopters and Swedish Gripen fighters >
<evidence>
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/1 ... b7jCYqbzgA

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... w3GFtelw4s
</evidence>
tylerblakebrandon
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon May 11, 2020 5:16 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by tylerblakebrandon »

<type>New</type>
<summary>Add New Supply AOR>
<detail>New Australian AOR >
<evidence>
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/20 ... -rSbr9rwoo
</evidence>

<type>New</type>
<summary>Add River Class OPV to Bahrain>
<detail>HMS Clyde transferred to Bahrain >
<evidence>
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/hms-cly ... abO_HL2vS0
</evidence>

<type>New</type>
<summary>Add planned US National Security Multi-Mission Training Vessel (NSMV) as hypothetical future US T-AH >
<detail>NSMW design for Maritime Academy Training and Humanitarian relief has been proposed as a future hospital ship or active training vessel for USN Surface Fleet >
<evidence>
https://www.forbes.com/sites/craighoope ... 2d9ef867b0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_ ... ion_Vessel

https://www.maritime.dot.gov/national-s ... on-vessels

https://www.naval-technology.com/projec ... on-vessel/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/craighoope ... f51b142932
</evidence>
BDukes
Posts: 2623
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

Don't call it a comeback...
Rory Noonan
Posts: 2418
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:53 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Rory Noonan »

Hello,

Those are nice links. What would you like me to do with the information in them?
Image
Copper274
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2019 6:27 am

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Copper274 »

<type>Update</type>
<summary>France: #2082-LCM no Cargo, #2085-L-Cat wrong cargo</summary>
<detail>#2082-LCM has no cargo capacity at all. #2085-L-Cat is capabil of large cargo with 70sq m area but only 0,12 tons instead of 80 tons.</detail>
<evidence>See wikipedia Engin de débarquement amphibie rapide</evidence>
BDukes
Posts: 2623
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

<type>New</Type>
<summary> Add TL-50(Skydragon 10) SAM systems to Morocco (2017), Rwanda (2014)</summary>
<detail> Chinese sell export HQ-64 system called Skydragon 10. Each TEL have 4 LY60/PL10/DK10A and Radar is IBIS 130/150/200. Pakistan LY-60 #3186 and China HQ-64 search radar (#1708, #1685 Similar)</detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/AnassMedia8/status/ ... 29/photo/1
https://www.africanmilitaryblog.com/201 ... d8f7baa677
https://www.armyrecognition.com/china_c ... 01163.html
http://bastion-opk.ru/sky-dragon-50/ use google translate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LY-60_/_FD-60_/_PL10
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
BDukes
Posts: 2623
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

<type>NEW</type>
<summary>Add FN-16 Manpads to China 2008, Bangladesh 2016,Cameroon 2013.<summary>
<detail> FN-16 is improved version of FN-6 by giving it UV guidance like Stinger. Is more manueveable and longer and longer range 6000 meter. You many want to add FN-6 to Cameroon 2010, Pakistan 2010, Peru 2010, Sudan 2006, Myanmar 2012 </detail>
<evidence>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FN-6
http://www.military-today.com/missiles/fn_6.htm
http://gielladesign.com/2006/11/0010513.pdf
http://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/pa ... gister.php
</evidence>
Don't call it a comeback...
User avatar
Blast33
Posts: 703
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2018 1:23 pm
Location: Above and beyond

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Blast33 »

<type>Update</type>
<summary>The Spice-1000 bomb (#278) and Spice-250 (#3521) also have a manual mode and scene matching for anti-GPS jamming</summary>
<detail>Spice offers day, night and adverse weather capabilities, based on its dual CCD / IIR seeker and advanced scene-matching algorithms. At close-in distances, Spice recognizes the target and correlates it to the intelligence images previously stored in its memory. As a result of this capability, Spice can overcome TLE (Target Location Error) and GPS jamming.

The Spice mission profile can be set to a specific azimuth and dive angle to suit the selected target profile, such as a steep dive angle for target penetration. Spice offers a fully autonomous operation, semi-autonomous mode or manual modes of operation, utilizing a datalink. Manual target acquisition is enabled under conditions where the seeker fails to detect the target (due to deteriorating weather conditions, or other interference), enabling the operator to assist the system in this critical phase. The manual mode enables the weapon system operator to carry ‘man in the loop’ attack for maximum control and agility.

Are these atributes programmable in CMO?</detail>
<evidence>
https://defense-update.com/20030506_raf ... eapon.html
https://www.key.aero/article/israeli-ai ... s-magazine
https://www.indiastrategic.in/2019/06/1 ... cognition/
</evidence>
Attachments
01IsraeliWeapons.jpg
01IsraeliWeapons.jpg (57.11 KiB) Viewed 791 times
User avatar
Gunner98
Posts: 5940
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:49 am
Location: The Great White North!
Contact:

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Gunner98 »

I believe the British Fort Class RFAs are a bit underrated in the DB (#43, #1604)

They should have two flight decks, hangar space for 4x Sea King and RAS capability (6 points).

Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Rosa ... hment_ship

http://www.historicalrfa.org/rfa-fort-g ... nformation

https://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/our-organi ... rt-rosalie

http://www.armedforces.co.uk/navy/listings/l0026.html

Image
Attachments
FortClass1.jpg
FortClass1.jpg (64.48 KiB) Viewed 791 times
Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/
User avatar
zeeschuimer
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 7:48 pm
Location: The Netherlands

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post by zeeschuimer »

I noticed a ships upgrade of two 'Van Speijk' class frigates of the Royal Netherlands Navy that have not been implemented in the database.
Those two ships were fitted with TACTAS towed array SONAR and a masking device (to reduce cavitating of the propellors.
HrMs Evertsen was outfitted likewise in 1988 (page is from Janes Fighting Ships 1986/87)
The VDS was deactivated and only used as mounting point for the towed array to keep it on the right depth and stabile.

Image
Attachments
IsaacSwee..senF815.jpg
IsaacSwee..senF815.jpg (113.96 KiB) Viewed 791 times
Warrant Officer Weapon Electronics(Retired.)
Locked

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”