Fugaku

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
steveK
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 9:21 pm

Fugaku

Post by steveK »

I was dissapointed when i didn't find "Nakajima G10N Fugaku"
It was a 4 to 6 engine long range Heavy bomber (Prototype)
It didn't go furher than building and testing the engine for that plane
However if the war would continue until may 1946 Japs might build couple of them. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_G10N
steveK
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 9:21 pm

RE: Fugaku

Post by steveK »

Sorry if i posted double message.
I wasn't sure if my previous post was posted.
steveK
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 9:21 pm

RE: Fugaku

Post by steveK »

RE: Fugaku - 8/10/2009 9:42:16 AM


castor troy
Matrix Legion of Honor

you have to try a mod, IIRC CHS has it included.

_____________________________


n01487477
Matrix Legion of Merit





This is what you really want and need as Japan ... Nemo's EA mod, but not for the faint hearted and not V AI ...


Would be very nice if Dev include this plane in the future patches.



Image
Attachments
fugaku1.jpg
fugaku1.jpg (37.37 KiB) Viewed 134 times
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Fugaku

Post by Terminus »

ORIGINAL: steveK

I was dissapointed when i didn't find "Nakajima G10N Fugaku"
It was a 4 to 6 engine long range Heavy bomber (Prototype)
It didn't go further than building and testing the engine for that plane
However if the war would continue until may 1946 Japs might build couple of them. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_G10N

If the war continued until 5/46, Japan would not be CAPABLE of building such a plane. She wasn't capable of it before either.

But mod away...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: Fugaku

Post by Shark7 »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

ORIGINAL: steveK

I was dissapointed when i didn't find "Nakajima G10N Fugaku"
It was a 4 to 6 engine long range Heavy bomber (Prototype)
It didn't go further than building and testing the engine for that plane
However if the war would continue until may 1946 Japs might build couple of them. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_G10N

If the war continued until 5/46, Japan would not be CAPABLE of building such a plane. She wasn't capable of it before either.

But mod away...

Japan wasn't capable of lots of things, still doesn't mean its not fun to explore the possibilities.

I'm making a mod that does away with the Washington and London Naval treaties. Granted if Japan and Great Britian had built everything on their wish list they'd have bankrupted their countries. Even the US would have been strained to build the wishlists...even without the Tillmans. [X(]

It's still fun. [;)]
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
User avatar
olivier_slith
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 8:00 am
Location: USA
Contact:

RE: Fugaku

Post by olivier_slith »

You could mod into a game that starts in 1936 and start a production war before the actual shooting starts, a little bit a la Hearts of Iron.
User avatar
Sheytan
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:53 pm

RE: Fugaku

Post by Sheytan »

Precisely, if it isnt fun whats the point [;)]
ORIGINAL: Shark7

ORIGINAL: Terminus

ORIGINAL: steveK

I was dissapointed when i didn't find "Nakajima G10N Fugaku"
It was a 4 to 6 engine long range Heavy bomber (Prototype)
It didn't go further than building and testing the engine for that plane
However if the war would continue until may 1946 Japs might build couple of them. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_G10N

If the war continued until 5/46, Japan would not be CAPABLE of building such a plane. She wasn't capable of it before either.

But mod away...

Japan wasn't capable of lots of things, still doesn't mean its not fun to explore the possibilities.

I'm making a mod that does away with the Washington and London Naval treaties. Granted if Japan and Great Britian had built everything on their wish list they'd have bankrupted their countries. Even the US would have been strained to build the wishlists...even without the Tillmans. [X(]

It's still fun. [;)]
sven6345789
Posts: 1068
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 12:45 am
Location: Sandviken, Sweden

RE: Fugaku

Post by sven6345789 »

question: is the G5N in as an option?
Bougainville, November 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. It rained today.

Letter from a U.S. Marine,November 1943
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Fugaku

Post by Terminus »

No.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
Scott_USN
Posts: 718
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 6:32 pm
Location: Eagle River, Alaska USA

RE: Fugaku

Post by Scott_USN »

ORIGINAL: Shark7

ORIGINAL: Terminus

ORIGINAL: steveK

I was dissapointed when i didn't find "Nakajima G10N Fugaku"
It was a 4 to 6 engine long range Heavy bomber (Prototype)
It didn't go further than building and testing the engine for that plane
However if the war would continue until may 1946 Japs might build couple of them. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_G10N

If the war continued until 5/46, Japan would not be CAPABLE of building such a plane. She wasn't capable of it before either.

But mod away...

Japan wasn't capable of lots of things, still doesn't mean its not fun to explore the possibilities.

I'm making a mod that does away with the Washington and London Naval treaties. Granted if Japan and Great Britian had built everything on their wish list they'd have bankrupted their countries. Even the US would have been strained to build the wishlists...even without the Tillmans. [X(]

It's still fun. [;)]


I think he agreed with you


But mod away...


[:D]
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Fugaku

Post by Terminus »

I most certainly agree. AE is one of the most modder friendly games I've ever seen, and once I'm done with my official commitments to it, I'm making my own personal mod.[:)]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Shark7
Posts: 7936
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: The Big Nowhere

RE: Fugaku

Post by Shark7 »

ORIGINAL: sven6345789

question: is the G5N in as an option?

It's not in the official DB, so only if your PBEM opponant agrees to let you mod it in. Mine has done so, and its only a simple matter of doing the data entry and sending it to him for final approval. We're just waiting for the official patch to start our game, one it gives us time to acclamate to the changes and two there is no ponit in having to restart if it can be avoided.
Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”