Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Post discussions and advice on TOAW scenario design here.

Moderators: ralphtricky, JAMiAM

User avatar
vahauser
Posts: 1644
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 4:38 pm
Location: Texas

RE: Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Post by vahauser »

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: vahauser

Um. Okay, Curtis...

I've bolded the relevant phrase. My preference is to not double-count the divisional specialists or include them as combat troops at all. That is the adjustment I make to that philosophy.

Since they aren't being double-counted and aren't available for offensive combat, do you actually have a reason for that? Sorry, but I'm not going to just sit by silently while you scurrilously disparage my methods with falsehoods. Defend your claims - if you can.

Where are your disciples come to defend you, oh Curtis?

What? You have no disciples to your cause? Then you must needs redouble your efforts to proselytize the benighted and the heretics.


ColinWright
Posts: 2604
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:28 pm

RE: Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Post by ColinWright »

ORIGINAL: vahauser

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: vahauser

Um. Okay, Curtis...

I've bolded the relevant phrase. My preference is to not double-count the divisional specialists or include them as combat troops at all. That is the adjustment I make to that philosophy.

Since they aren't being double-counted and aren't available for offensive combat, do you actually have a reason for that? Sorry, but I'm not going to just sit by silently while you scurrilously disparage my methods with falsehoods. Defend your claims - if you can.

Where are your disciples come to defend you, oh Curtis?

What? You have no disciples to your cause? Then you must needs redouble your efforts to proselytize the benighted and the heretics.



Curt's not all that good at proselytizing. I'm not even convinced he tries.
I am not Charlie Hebdo
User avatar
vahauser
Posts: 1644
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 4:38 pm
Location: Texas

RE: Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Post by vahauser »

ORIGINAL: ColinWright
Curt's not all that good at proselytizing. I'm not even convinced he tries.

He does seem capable of pontification, boorism, and demagoguery, though.
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 13901
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

RE: Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Post by Curtis Lemay »

ORIGINAL: vahauser

Where are your disciples come to defend you, oh Curtis?

I don't need any. I have the unbeatable advantage of being right.

Again:

I'm not double-counting the rear-area elements since they are in separate units and are debilitated from use offensively. That they can defend themselves if attacked is no different than what they would do in the real world.

And, they are not operating at full frontline proficency since they are de-leveraged by modeling only a fraction of their true numbers.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
User avatar
Curtis Lemay
Posts: 13901
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Houston, TX

RE: Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Post by Curtis Lemay »

ORIGINAL: vahauser

ORIGINAL: ColinWright
Curt's not all that good at proselytizing. I'm not even convinced he tries.

He does seem capable of pontification, boorism, and demagoguery, though.

If defending myself from scurrilous falsehoods constitutes such, then I'm guilty.
My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site
ColinWright
Posts: 2604
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 6:28 pm

RE: Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Post by ColinWright »

...
I am not Charlie Hebdo
User avatar
VHauser
Posts: 252
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 12:23 am

RE: Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Post by VHauser »

Europa 1947 revision
Member since May 2000 (as VictorHauser)
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”