Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderator: MOD_WarintheWest

User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist

Why do you have to rail units to the North for Refit, can't they refit on depots near the front?

In my observation units on depots don’t take on replacements nearly as effectively as when you place them on a National Supply Source.
It also seems the logistics engine works south to north, so units in Milan get more replacements than units in Vienna, which seem to get more than units in Berlin.

It just seems putting units in Milan they’ll refill all available replacements in a week or two. Excepting the armored cars and other things Germany never seems to have enough of for full TOE.
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

Status of mechanized forces at the end of turn 29 (January 15, 1944)

Image
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

Turn 30
January 22, 1944

Weather report:

Image

No Allied landings yet, but still heavy recon in the Rome to Pescara belt.
Will continue shipping reinforcements here and also try to stage security units to guard the rail junctions.

Image
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

The Guards BR Arm Div is unable to restore lines of communication to the beach.
The Polish infantry take up positions in the foothills after a combined arms attack forces back the German infantry regiment that was picketing the line.
These units will be captured this week.

Image

The Achilles beachhead the Allies again push out the perimeter.
This week General Zangen will evacuate The Heel.

At Death Valley the Allies are slowly trying to batter their way north.
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

Front lines at the beginning of the turn:

Image

9th SS Pzr Div herds the 1/3rd and 2/3rd PO Inf Rgts back to the beach from their position in the hills.
Hasty fails and is followed up with a deliberate.
10th SS Pzr Div tries to clean up and fails, so they are reinforced with the 26th Pzr Div and 90th PzG Div and they succeed in compelling the surrender.
Over 22k POWs processed!

Image

Pivot back to the north, 12th SS PzG Div and 3/17th SS PzG Rgt hit the 1st Tabor Goums FF Mtn Rgt and force them back.

This opens the way for the rest of the 17th SS PzG that was defending in the Heel to withdraw and reform in Termoli.
Which frees 2/1st FJ Rgt to move from Termoli to the north and into light woods off the beaches north of Pescara.

Image

Ground losses for the turn:

Image
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

Operation Valkyrie - saving units in the Heel.
5 regiments defending Taranto and Brindisi are flown out this week.
Total losses in the operation amount to 2 aircraft and 20 men:

Unit, transport cost, transports squadron, type and count:

Image

End of turn positions for Army Group C in central and south Italy.

Image
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

If our estimates are correct shipping losses to date place the Allied troop ship level at 72% of initial, and cargo ships at 90% of same.

Image
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2380
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

Why does your South Italy fortified line have this shape, considering it makes for a long frontline once the allies have catched up? Especially, why not anchornit at Salerno, but have it bulged out to the Southwest?

Your counterattacks are very effective-what does your opponent donwrong? To me it seems
1) Slow beginning gave you time to prepare, then snowball effects.
2)Tactical inaccuracies with the Airforce, allowing you to interdict shipping lanes occasionally.
3) The landings are isolated and too spaced out, therefore not mutually supportive. The beachheads are too small for sufficient force accumulation for a breakout.
4) Tactical inaccuracies with regards to attacks (too many holds), retreat and rout path planning, and reconnaissence (several failed airdrops)

Thanks for the explanations and well done AAR and image editing.
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist

Why does your South Italy fortified line have this shape, considering it makes for a long frontline once the allies have catched up? Especially, why not anchornit at Salerno, but have it bulged out to the Southwest?

Your counterattacks are very effective-what does your opponent donwrong? To me it seems
1) Slow beginning gave you time to prepare, then snowball effects.
2)Tactical inaccuracies with the Airforce, allowing you to interdict shipping lanes occasionally.
3) The landings are isolated and too spaced out, therefore not mutually supportive. The beachheads are too small for sufficient force accumulation for a breakout.
4) Tactical inaccuracies with regards to attacks (too many holds), retreat and rout path planning, and reconnaissence (several failed airdrops)

Thanks for the explanations and well done AAR and image editing.

1) The battles in Sardinia and Corsica did provide time for additional reserves to be on hand, but I try to avoid close run attacks if at all possible. The price of failure is too high, and leaves you weakened to counter attack. The Allies have launched a great deal of hasty attacks, the failure of which has buffed German morale, and probably had a deleterious effect on their own.

2) Kent found himself surprised by the efficacy of the Luftwaffe with their mines and guided missiles in our first go around, and this time he brought everything to bear. The failure to concentrate landings allowed the Germans to decide where to focus, while the Allied naval airpower was spread. I also use the LB force heavily in '43, as the growth of the Allied Air Forces over '44 make them substantially weaker in relative terms. I don't have much hope of contesting sea lanes in the Channel, I expect it would just be asking for a slaughter.

3) As you noted, the landings are not really mutually supporting. Many potential landing spots are strategically hemmed in by geography, and should be avoided. I have maintained from the outset the best place to land is in The Heel, where you can establish breathing space for retreat, and have many airbases on hand to supplement the landing zone airfields. The landing zone temporary depots can also be established on rails, to feed farther north.

4) Kent is aggressive. In some cases the attacks are necessary just to grind down fortifications and defenders, but he does make low odds hasty attacks more often that I ever do.
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

Forgot to explain the fortifications.

In the Allied logistics phase on the turn the Italians surrender, as well as every turn after that in which the below conditions are met, there is a chance that some hexes in Italy, Sardinia and Corsica will change to Allied control. hexes with coordinates x>151 and y>253 or hexes that are part of Corsica or Sardinia may change.
German units in Italy or Corsica can prevent the switchover. All German units prevent a change in any hex that is within a number of hexes of the unit equal to 1+(unit Cv/2). So a German unit with a Cv of 9 would prevent a switchover in any hex within 5 hexes of the unit. Any hex that is not within range of a German unit has a 50 percent chance of switching to Allied control


This isn't worked as described in the manual. In my previous game against Kent I go over it in the AAR (I have maps showing the German control overlay for various units in the rear area). The result is that hexes flip control, the rails are destroyed, and southern depots quit getting supplies. The construction units won't fix the rails in the S. Italy 'rebel zone', so you have to protect them if you want to keep them.
The forts are basically a hacky way to avoid this, and that sector you see south of Foggia with forts on the plains is to ensure my depots in Foggia and the one under 10th Army HQ in the hills continue to get supplies. It's also why you see those Air HQs on rail hexes on the western coast down south.

Image
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

Turn 31
January 29, 1944

Weather report:

Image

The 1st US Arm Div positions itself precariously to cut off the 9th SS Pzr Div.
I setup the defensive spacing hoping for this opportunity to rout an over aggressive move.
Almost 40% of the 1st Armored Division's tanks are lost:

Image


"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

15th Army's LI Mtn Corps will oversee the retreat of a screen of infantry regiments to induce the Allied armor forward toward Foggia and fall back on the Ofanto river line.

Mechanized forces will remain to hold the hills north of the Basento river valley. We can't expect to regain this territory if lost, so it must be held.
H. Goering Pzr Div is railed south to Foggia. Next week it and other mechanized forces will gather in the Basento valley for the sichelschnitt behind the Allied advance.
Barletta has no port facilities, so units trapped here will have no escape path.

Image
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

Germans begin planning to bring up garrison levels in N. Europe for March.

Image

Defensive arrangements in Italy, awaiting the next Allied set of landings to occur.
We've basically finished the Adriatic coastline defenses as well.
Will spend the next few weeks rotating infantry north and south in Italy for refit in Milan.
91st Air Landing Division is in Milan now, but will come south soon.

Image
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

Turn 32
February 5, 1944

Forgot to grab a weather report.
Recon ADs to check Allied reserves:

Image

VP pivot in 1944.

Image
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

Image
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

Turn 33
Feb 12, 1944

Weather report:

Image

2nd SS Pzr Div sent to NW France for refit from Vienna, should push over the garrison requirement for March next week.
I removed the SUs from NW France and cost them almost five garrison points.
May need to put them back depending on refit of the SS Panzers.
114th Jaeger Division still on railcars (transiting Netherlands) from the East Front, needs to unload in NE France next week and they should meet the threshold for garrisons too.
A division from the Netherlands will be freed up to meet NE or NW France needs, otherwise it will go to N Italy.
Toulouse city garrison requirement (March) already met.
For May need Tours (Sec. Rgt) and Druex full city garrison.

Image
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

Valentine’s Day Massacre
Operation Eros, mechanized counteroffensive against the weak Allied center.
The left and right Allied wings have been over extended, and cannot support one another given the distance, terrain and mud.
The weather and time of year also disrupt Allied air supremacy.
Germans instead can focus their own air superiority and achieve a breakthrough against the under strength Allied center and exploit their lack of deployed echelon reserves.
Once the breakthrough is achieved follow on force will exploit north to the Adriatic coast to perform a mirror of the sichelschnitt from the Ardennes in 1940.

It's hard to discern, but the yellow highlighted hexes are still clear, while the remaining hexes are light mud.

Image

2nd BR Inf Bde and 8th IN Inf Div were pushed back by the German mech.
1/15th PzG Rgt grabbed the high ground overlooking the southern approach to provide flank security on the right.
Schmalz PzG Bde then exploited the gap followed by the 10th SS Pzr Div to again batter the 2nd BR Inf Bde into retreat.
90th PzG Div followed Schmalz's footsteps, then separated into regiments and made contact with the 3rd CA Inf Div in Bari (port).
Schmalz advances to the outskirts of Barletta, but doesn’t advance into the city. This blocking position should help hold the neck.

Image
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

Image
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
User avatar
EwaldvonKleist
Posts: 2380
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by EwaldvonKleist »

Sneaky trap. The pocket seems breakable, and I think there also is a chance you will be mauled without achieving surrenders given the CV (which will rise after the Allied logistics phase). St

Looking forward to the continuation!
User avatar
Seminole
Posts: 2237
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:56 am

RE: Kobiyashi Maru - 1943 GC rematch: kentkroeckel (Allies) vs Seminole (Axis)

Post by Seminole »

ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist

Sneaky trap. The pocket seems breakable, and I think there also is a chance you will be mauled without achieving surrenders given the CV (which will rise after the Allied logistics phase).

His CV isn't reflecting isolation status yet.

Units cut off in the opposing players turn don’t gain isolated status until the next player’s turn in the logistics phase.

Isolated units suffer a supply related Cv penalty that is equal to the percentage of needed supplies for non-motorized units or fuel for motorized units times the percentage of needed ammo. Isolated units have their combat value divided by two in addition to any reductions due to actual shortages of supplies, ammunition and fuel. Isolated units will fire only 1/4 as much as they would if they were not isolated in order to save ammunition.

Ammo status at the end of turn 33:

Image

Barletta was just captured, so no Allied depot in the pocket to distribute supplies.

In addition, when calculating the modified Cv ratio to determine whether a defender will be required to retreat, isolated defending units may have their Cv divided by two if they fail certain checks based on their morale, and the distance to the nearest supplied friendly units.
"War is never a technical problem only, and if in pursuing technical solutions you neglect the psychological and the political, then the best technical solutions will be worthless." - Hermann Balck
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”