[1.10.04] Possible Policy Speech Issue (Low Priority)

Moderator: Vic

Post Reply
mroyer
Posts: 938
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 12:27 pm

[1.10.04] Possible Policy Speech Issue (Low Priority)

Post by mroyer »


Should choice [A] to be +7 to commerce rather than having two enforcement options?
It seems industry more closely aligns with commerce than enforcement.

-Mark R.


Image
Attachments
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (101.94 KiB) Viewed 4 times
zgrssd
Posts: 4208
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:02 pm

RE: [1.10.04] Possible Policy Speech Issue (Low Priority)

Post by zgrssd »

Public Industry is generally not Commerce. Only Private Industiry is realy in the "Commerce" sector.
So I would expect A to be Government.
DW2 Poll:
"Should the Civil and non-Combat Ships loose all or most of their weapon slots?"
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 1&t=382690
mroyer
Posts: 938
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 12:27 pm

RE: [1.10.04] Possible Policy Speech Issue (Low Priority)

Post by mroyer »

ORIGINAL: zgrssd

Public Industry is generally not Commerce. Only Private Industiry is realy in the "Commerce" sector.
So I would expect A to be Government.

Makes sense.
Either way, two enforcements seem off, maybe.
-Mark R.
Don_Kiyote
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:37 am
Location: Trans-Cascadia

RE: [1.10.04] Possible Policy Speech Issue (Low Priority)

Post by Don_Kiyote »

It looks like a Government task.
Unless they are Private Industries, which would be really hard. But that would be Commerce then.
imho
-----
Historically, Socialist government models have been very good at accelerating industrial development. This includes war economies, which are also Socialist.
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”