E-Truck Stations

Moderator: Vic

Post Reply
Pratapon51
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2020 5:44 pm

E-Truck Stations

Post by Pratapon51 »

Since we can build electric HS trains and design haulers with electric engines, we ought to be able to build E-Truck logistics as well. [:)]
lloydster4
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:13 pm

RE: E-Truck Stations

Post by lloydster4 »

Great idea
User avatar
Malevolence
Posts: 1787
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:12 am

RE: E-Truck Stations

Post by Malevolence »

Indeed.
Nicht kleckern, sondern klotzen!

*Please remember all posts are made by a malevolent, autocratic despot whose rule is marked by unjust severity and arbitrary behavior. Your experiences may vary.
demiare
Posts: 470
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2020 4:21 pm

RE: E-Truck Stations

Post by demiare »

Only if E-Trucks will work differently from HS Stations and be upgrade for basic hubs. I don't want to rebuild WHOLE logistic network :P

But as for myself in that case I would prefer to keep oil-based trucks. Why? As a safety measure - if battles will drain my energy storage my then at least my track logistics will still work on full power. Same reason why I keep Caslon reactors for civilians in Distant World:Universe while my navy get upgraded to Hydrogen ones :)
User avatar
Pymous
Posts: 134
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:12 am
Contact:

RE: E-Truck Stations

Post by Pymous »

Very nice idea. More choice is always great! Based on the planet type / ressources déposits, it would allow more flexibility/diversity in the strategy.
[Mod]Shadow Stratagems Artpack for Shadow Empire game.
Hazard151
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:52 am

RE: E-Truck Stations

Post by Hazard151 »

Energy banks are a thing and grant energy storage equal to 2*(rating of energy bank)^2, as are fuel burning power plants at great efficiency, which burn 1 unit of fuel for more than 1 unit of energy so long as you are above the first level of power plant. Power Plants top out at 24.5k Energy production per turn, and frankly, even if you are pushing hard across the front with highly Energy demanding forces you are extremely likely to meet that demand quite effectively.

Infrastructure is barely a rounding error to an active military conflict anyway drawing on the same resources anyway, so trying to be conservative of a given resource to prevent issues seems to irrelevant. Either your military guzzles everything anyway, and it won't matter, or the production and storage capacity necessary to effectively catch the peaks of military demand for resources causes such a surplus the demands of infrastructure is irrelevant.
zgrssd
Posts: 4210
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:02 pm

RE: E-Truck Stations

Post by zgrssd »

I agree. This should be a sidegrade. Maybe even a switch you can flip?
ORIGINAL: demiare

But as for myself in that case I would prefer to keep oil-based trucks. Why? As a safety measure - if battles will drain my energy storage my then at least my track logistics will still work on full power. Same reason why I keep Caslon reactors for civilians in Distant World:Universe while my navy get upgraded to Hydrogen ones :)
This is not an issue:
Zone deliveries happen before unit Deliveries. And last turns deliveries are used for this turns points.
By the time units get their deliveries, the logistics network already had it's due.

If you run out of energy for Logistics, you have way to little production.
DW2 Poll:
"Should the Civil and non-Combat Ships loose all or most of their weapon slots?"
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 1&t=382690
demiare
Posts: 470
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2020 4:21 pm

RE: E-Truck Stations

Post by demiare »

ORIGINAL: zgrssd

This is not an issue:
Zone deliveries happen before unit Deliveries. And last turns deliveries are used for this turns points.
By the time units get their deliveries, the logistics network already had it's due.

If you run out of energy for Logistics, you have way to little production.

SIGH. Enemy forces could simply cut your logistic and separate your SHQ from your main source of energy. It isn't healthy situation but sometimes you're forced to deal with two-sided wars.
zgrssd
Posts: 4210
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:02 pm

RE: E-Truck Stations

Post by zgrssd »

ORIGINAL: demiare

ORIGINAL: zgrssd

This is not an issue:
Zone deliveries happen before unit Deliveries. And last turns deliveries are used for this turns points.
By the time units get their deliveries, the logistics network already had it's due.

If you run out of energy for Logistics, you have way to little production.

SIGH. Enemy forces could simply cut your logistic and separate your SHQ from your main source of energy. It isn't healthy situation but sometimes you're forced to deal with two-sided wars.
How does that differ from them cutting off your fuel supply?

I like to keep my solar panels distributed anyway. I know energy costs no logistics to move, but a bunch of T1 panels can produce a lot of power. And as you said, it is resistant to being cut off.
DW2 Poll:
"Should the Civil and non-Combat Ships loose all or most of their weapon slots?"
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 1&t=382690
demiare
Posts: 470
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2020 4:21 pm

RE: E-Truck Stations

Post by demiare »

ORIGINAL: zgrssd
How does that differ from them cutting off your fuel supply?

My fuel gathering center could be in different place? [:D] And as I said - it's purely my personal habit. I'm realize that it isn't efficient way to play.
Post Reply

Return to “Suggestions and Feedback”