Guerrilla/spec op units

A military-oriented and sci-fi wargame, set on procedural planets with customizable factions and endless choices.

Moderator: Vic

Post Reply
User avatar
Sieppo
Posts: 933
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:37 am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by Sieppo »

Just an idea: because logistics at least still is a very integral part of the game, would be pretty cool to get rare, expensive and special units that would be hard to detect and also survive without supplies for some time. To use for example to infiltrate and disrupt enemy supply lines (dunno how this could be implemented against the computer). Could be a stratagem also to be attached to small infantry units.
> What is the hardest thing in the universe?
> A diamond?
> No. 500 machine gun men on a mountain.
lloydster4
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:13 pm

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by lloydster4 »

The time and size scale make it a bit difficult to simulate spec ops. Each turn is 2 months, so operating a unit behind enemy lines for 3-4 turns is a bit crazy. Could perhaps be abstracted through strat cards?

Either way, it's probably better to post this in the Suggestions forum.
zgrssd
Posts: 4215
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:02 pm

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by zgrssd »

FYI, we do have a sugestions and feeback forum

"Hard to detect" and "easy to supply" basically involves not flipping and ignoring the Borders. Wich is a major rework of how some stuff works.

On the unit feat front:
- I am 90% sure one of the Unit Decisions has you assign a Spec-Ops Soldier. I think he had a chance to die every attack, due to his dangerous work?
- Band of Brothers/Heart-80 unlocks the "Camo Team" Unit feat. Has a chance to "hide" the unit when attacked.
DW2 Poll:
"Should the Civil and non-Combat Ships loose all or most of their weapon slots?"
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 1&t=382690
User avatar
Malevolence
Posts: 1787
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:12 am

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by Malevolence »

ORIGINAL: zgrssd

"Hard to detect" and "easy to supply" basically involves not flipping and ignoring the Borders. Wich is a major rework of how some stuff works.

He's correct about this part. I think the units and zone borders are very tightly coupled together.

As was also mentioned, cards and such exist, but they are simple events and unit feats.

As to the time scale, actually time scale is ok. Non-conventional and uncoventional warfare is methodical (two of many missions)--entertainment only focuses on the 3-30 minutes of violence that sits in the middle of the conop. I could do yet another suggestion about all this, but I think I've used up all my quarters. I'll let the dev team carry on with their own hopes and dreams.
Nicht kleckern, sondern klotzen!

*Please remember all posts are made by a malevolent, autocratic despot whose rule is marked by unjust severity and arbitrary behavior. Your experiences may vary.
zgrssd
Posts: 4215
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:02 pm

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by zgrssd »

On the unit feat front:
The Sniper Unit Feat can take away enemies XP (by shooting the Officers on the ground).
I would say a commando feat that attacks the enemies supplies would be possible.

Note that for the Sniper I do not know how much XP is lost and if the loss is permanent or just a "no more XP bonus for this combat" style debuff on the affected units.
DW2 Poll:
"Should the Civil and non-Combat Ships loose all or most of their weapon slots?"
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 1&t=382690
lloydster4
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:13 pm

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by lloydster4 »

ORIGINAL: Malevolence
As to the time scale, actually time scale is ok. Non-conventional and uncoventional warfare is methodical

It's a lot easier to be methodical when you're not starving to death. That means you have to either a) establish an alt-logistics mechanic or b) create a unit-type that doesn't require supplies. The former has potential, particularly when combined with aircraft/boats, but the latter creates more problems than it's worth.

demiare
Posts: 470
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2020 4:21 pm

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by demiare »

And don't forget that AI hardly bothered by logistics, so such units will be either useless or broken OP, but in any case they will be much stronger annoyance for player.

I'm against anything that breaking rules MORE while currently player&AI still aren't playing the same game.

Plus in real life guerrilla warfare relied mostly on locals & import of weapons. It's mostly impossible in Shadow Empire as human settlements are very scarce and nobody will sell/gift you weapons&ammo. Paratroopers will both not fill well sci-fi setting (parachute on moon? [:D]) plus IRL are still rely on "normal" army support & logistic as have very limited ammunition.
User avatar
Malevolence
Posts: 1787
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:12 am

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by Malevolence »

ORIGINAL: lloydster4
ORIGINAL: Malevolence
As to the time scale, actually time scale is ok. Non-conventional and uncoventional warfare is methodical

It's a lot easier to be methodical when you're not starving to death. That means you have to either a) establish an alt-logistics mechanic or b) create a unit-type that doesn't require supplies. The former has potential, particularly when combined with aircraft/boats, but the latter creates more problems than it's worth.

Well, I will not be a stick in the mud about it. Logistics is critically important for real special operations forces.

Let's just agree that infiltration and exfiltration work the same as spies.

I have about 20 ready-made posts to talk about SOF vs spies too, if someone decides to implement this idea.

In a previous life (back on 23 May), I wrote the following post before launch, hinting at SOF, clandestine (i.e. spies), and covert operations.

ORIGINAL: Malevolence

If it was much earlier in development, I would have recommended some added smaller units, perhaps lethal and less so, that don't don't require lines of communication (supply lines) and/or don't actually change boundaries. Perhaps like Tuaregs. The minor factions already exist much like this now.

It's an interesting problem because units also leave a "trail of control-influence" when they move through an adversary’s territory. An enemy unit that moves across the territory impacts the touched hexes during the next turn, even though they are no longer located in those hexes. An enemy unit may have crossed a road two turns ago, but if not re-occupied the effect remains.

This might be a remnant of "world war 2" battlefield modelling. As I wrote elsewhere, these are really battlefields that focus on anti-access and area denial. Very limited “front lines”. Engagements are decisive.

However, there are many approaches and the current rules, in whole, work just as well IMO.

(the search on this forum is really poor)
Nicht kleckern, sondern klotzen!

*Please remember all posts are made by a malevolent, autocratic despot whose rule is marked by unjust severity and arbitrary behavior. Your experiences may vary.
zgrssd
Posts: 4215
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:02 pm

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by zgrssd »

By pure chance, I just got the command Unit Feat in a game:
- does extra damage each combat round
- has a 10% chance to die each combat round

Like a less powerfull - but more reliable - version of the suicide bomber.
DW2 Poll:
"Should the Civil and non-Combat Ships loose all or most of their weapon slots?"
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 1&t=382690
lloydster4
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 8:13 pm

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by lloydster4 »

ORIGINAL: Malevolence
If it was much earlier in development, I would have recommended some added smaller units, perhaps lethal and less so, that don't don't require lines of communication (supply lines) and/or don't actually change boundaries. Perhaps like Tuaregs. The minor factions already exist much like this now.

It's an interesting problem because units also leave a "trail of control-influence" when they move through an adversary’s territory. An enemy unit that moves across the territory impacts the touched hexes during the next turn, even though they are no longer located in those hexes. An enemy unit may have crossed a road two turns ago, but if not re-occupied the effect remains.

I like where your heads at here. There are plenty of examples of 4X-ish games that use on-map agents. The Total War series comes to mind. Having these unconventional assets (assassins, saboteurs, spies, diplomats, etc) represented on the map adds to the player experience, but that's a very complicated additional layer. Idk if it could exist outside of a paid DLC. It's a matter of taste, but I'd prefer only front-line units be represented on the board.

I also find the binary control-influence system to be a small problem. I don't think that troops should be the only assets that exert a Zone of Control. It's easy to imagine abstracted security forces employed by cities, mines, and even roads/railways. You could also have buildable "fort-type" assets that increased hex defense and projected minor control.
JWW
Posts: 1571
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Louisiana, USA

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by JWW »

Guerrillas. Not opposed but might that give the human player too big an advantage against the AI? And would the AI be given the same tactic? Maybe a stratagem card. Similar to rebels. I played the rebel stratagem several times near the end of my last game (see AAR) and could see rebel pockets pop up. I'm not sure how much that helped, but I think it probably helped some.
vlad1492
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 5:14 pm

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by vlad1492 »

Luck hands me some AI Walkers from time to time.
They don't seem to care about logistics and can wander (slowly) all over the map.
zgrssd
Posts: 4215
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:02 pm

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by zgrssd »

ORIGINAL: vlad1492

Luck hands me some AI Walkers from time to time.
They don't seem to care about logistics and can wander (slowly) all over the map.
I just defeated a bunch of a AI walkers. Admitedly, it was on Starting Techlevel 4. But still, it is doable.
DW2 Poll:
"Should the Civil and non-Combat Ships loose all or most of their weapon slots?"
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 1&t=382690
vlad1492
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 5:14 pm

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by vlad1492 »

Sure, they aren't impenetrable. My point is they can raid far from your logistics network since they don't need logi.
User avatar
Malevolence
Posts: 1787
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:12 am

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by Malevolence »

Walkers are good at running forward and establishing boundaries/borders that major regimes will not cross without declaring war. Their ability to cross high mountains like infantry is critical to the mission.

I routinely use them for containment.

If walkers didn't change borders, for me, the game would play very differently and be much more difficult.

That's why guerrillas, sof, etc. should not have the ability to change borders. It's OP.
Nicht kleckern, sondern klotzen!

*Please remember all posts are made by a malevolent, autocratic despot whose rule is marked by unjust severity and arbitrary behavior. Your experiences may vary.
vlad1492
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 5:14 pm

RE: Guerrilla/spec op units

Post by vlad1492 »

I sure like the idea of operatives that can go behind enemy lines.
But how to disrupt their logistics and supply without changing borders?

Maybe a flag 'Commando', allowing units to not establish borders or declare allegience.
Can damage assets, reduce or destroy roads, inspire free folk to stay home or rise up etc.
Give them a 'hide' attribute that scales with tech, and if they get caught a chance to cause a diplomatic incident. Chance to resist interrogation in other words.

Wishful thinking at the moment.
Post Reply

Return to “Shadow Empire”