What size scenarios do you prefer?

The Campaign Series: Middle East 1948-1985 is a new turn-based, tactical wargame that focuses on conflicts in the Middle East.

Moderator: Jason Petho

Post Reply
User avatar
Jason Petho
Posts: 15322
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 10:31 am
Location: Terrace, BC, Canada
Contact:

What size scenarios do you prefer?

Post by Jason Petho »

What size scenarios do you like to play?
scottintacoma
Posts: 192
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:15 am

RE: What size scenarios do you prefer?

Post by scottintacoma »

I like Regiment sized, at least after I have learned the game and played a while. One of the reasons I like the DCG's You can start small, and the grow loarger.
User avatar
Big Ivan
Posts: 1970
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 12:34 am
Location: Mansfield, Ohio USA

RE: What size scenarios do you prefer?

Post by Big Ivan »

Regiment/Brigade for me.

Only reason is real life time constraints. Tough to do larger scenarios with my busy schedule.
Wouldn't be fair to my opponents if I couldn't keep up one to two turns a week.[:)]
Blitz call sign Big Ivan.
User avatar
Crossroads
Posts: 17420
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:57 am

RE: What size scenarios do you prefer?

Post by Crossroads »

I voted for the first four options.

I really like a quick Battalion sized engagement vs HAL when I have a moment or three for that. Lots of fun, and less room for errors should I manage to send the few troops to peril's end.

For H2H one-on-ones I like anything between Regt-to-Div sized scenarios. Investing the time for a PBEM, it is nice there's options available, and that one badly ended skirmish does not dictate the end result.

Corps sized scenarios are then the top of the crop for H2H with teams for both sides. 3-on-3 is my current favorite, and you really need a Corps size event for that. A 2-on-2 can be played with Div sized engagement as well, but for that more the merrier holds out for me as well.

I've seen some true monsters out there, and really appreciate them. I have not tackled anything in that size yet though, so left that option empty.

[:)]
Visit us at: Campaign Series Legion
---
CS: Vietnam 1948-1967 < Available now
CS: Middle East 1948-1985 2.0 < 3.0 In the works
User avatar
jack54
Posts: 1416
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:25 pm
Location: East Tennessee

RE: What size scenarios do you prefer?

Post by jack54 »

1)Battalion for me...I enjoy small scenarios and rarely go larger than first 2 choices.
Avatar: Me borrowing Albert Ball's Nieuport 17

Counter from Bloody April by Terry Simo (GMT)
User avatar
demyansk
Posts: 2844
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:55 pm

RE: What size scenarios do you prefer?

Post by demyansk »

I play the small and medium ones so far.
User avatar
Jason Petho
Posts: 15322
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 10:31 am
Location: Terrace, BC, Canada
Contact:

RE: What size scenarios do you prefer?

Post by Jason Petho »

Thank you for the feedback, everyone!

Every answer helps!
elrond petit pas tapons
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 5:20 pm

RE: What size scenarios do you prefer?

Post by elrond petit pas tapons »

Battalion for me
User avatar
carll11
Posts: 861
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:07 pm

RE: What size scenarios do you prefer?

Post by carll11 »

Monster- larger the better.....
BradK82
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2015 7:52 am

RE: What size scenarios do you prefer?

Post by BradK82 »

I like medium. It is easier for me to keep track of the big picture while still allowing flexibility in turning a tactical situation.
Post Reply

Return to “Campaign Series: Middle East 1948-1985”