How is this combat result possible?

[sveint]

Nice job!

[PanzerMike]

Nice!

[BRedgie]

I noticed that in all 3 examples the defender was in either woods or forest. Any chance there is a wrong casualty multiplier for trees?

[BRedgie]

I didn't notice the 2nd page until after I posted my comment, so kindly disregard my earlier post.

[canuckgamer]

We are wondering if the fix for the "unusual" combat results will be released shortly? Our pbem game is currently in the winter of 39/40 and we will won't get in to the invasion of the Lowlands and France until it is fixed. Thanks.

[AlvaroSousa]

I'll put up a beta this weekend for the game exe.

[canuckgamer]

Is this coming out sometime this week? Will we be able to continue our PBEM after installing, or do we have start a new game?

[AlvaroSousa]

I will work on it tomorrow.

Had crap happen this weekend. I put it on my calander

[BRedgie]

Could it possibly be the retreat check where the unit doesn't retreat and should take addition losses but this calculation is somehow amplifying attacking losses instead to defending losses and also introduces a factor of 10 or something like that?

[AlvaroSousa]

No this was a formula error. It is fixed. I am looking over the forums for any issues I missed then putting up a Beta.

Due to the special project going on I will not be able to release a patch until the end of March.

[ncc1701e]

But sorry I don't think this issue is affecting the official patch 1.00.19. This is only in the 1.00.20 beta patch imo.