[1.12w] Low Priority: Protector in Low Mountain Forest

Moderator: Vic

Post Reply
User avatar
mroyer
Posts: 1190
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 12:27 pm

[1.12w] Low Priority: Protector in Low Mountain Forest

Post by mroyer »

Very minor issue I stumbled across.
Protector has no combat penalty for low mountain forest, but it does have a penalty for every other type of forest (no veg, grassy, high, high grassy). I suspect this is not as intended by design.
Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg (82.77 KiB) Viewed 154 times
-Mark R.
User avatar
Vic
Posts: 9292
Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 2:17 pm
Contact:

Re: [1.12w] Low Priority: Protector in Low Mountain Forest

Post by Vic »

Agreed it is inconsistent. Though it has no weapons :)
Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics
User avatar
BlueTemplar
Posts: 1064
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 12:07 pm

Re: [1.12w] Low Priority: Protector in Low Mountain Forest

Post by BlueTemplar »

Wait, don't / shouldn't the - also immobile - Automated MG's and Automated Turrets be in this Trooptype ?? (Better renamed to "Immobile" ??)
User avatar
Vic
Posts: 9292
Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 2:17 pm
Contact:

Re: [1.12w] Low Priority: Protector in Low Mountain Forest

Post by Vic »

Nope. Protector is only for shield generators.
Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics
GazBot
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2020 5:50 am

Re: [1.12w] Low Priority: Protector in Low Mountain Forest

Post by GazBot »

Also have this issue for aircraft defence bonus...in forests you get a good defensive buff against aircraft...but in mountain forests you get no buff.....
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”