Updated DB image & description packs are available!

[Dimitris]

One small error in the image linking: https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 6#p5065966

[Dimitris]

One more: https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 0&t=391349

[kgambit]

Corrections for #4229 and #1136 will be in the next update. Thanks for catching those.

[Dimitris]

Some of the images in the DB3K pack have been identified as being corrupt: https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 9#p5066989

It is relatively easy to pick them out in file explorer, by using thumbnail view: https://i.imgur.com/76qz7NZ.png (They stand out because they show their file icon instead of their image thumbnail)

Is it possible to filter these out in the next pack release? Thanks in advance!

[CV60]

Some of the images in the DB3K pack have been identified as being corrupt: https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 9#p5066989

It is relatively easy to pick them out in file explorer, by using thumbnail view: https://i.imgur.com/76qz7NZ.png (They stand out because they show their file icon instead of their image thumbnail)

Is it possible to filter these out in the next pack release? Thanks in advance!

We can filter them out for the next release (tentatively 30 April 2023)

[tylerblakebrandon]

Some items related to CWDB v498 additions.

[tylerblakebrandon]

Some items related to DB3K v498 additions.

[Parel803]

Good evening,
Tried a bit on the sensor side:

[1nutworld]

Just wanted to make a note that when goofing around with various units in the V1.05 1307 update, I noticed that the weapon description of weapon #802 CBU-97 the image is correct, but the weapon description is of the Raytheon MIM-23 Hawk, I believe #1823.

It's not a big deal, but I just thought I'd point out the error so it can be addressed at some later date.

Scott

[thewood1]

There used to be an instruction to delete all images and descriptions before applying the community images and descriptions. Otherwise, old inaccurate descriptions hang around lie this.

[CV60]

Just wanted to make a note that when goofing around with various units in the V1.05 1307 update, I noticed that the weapon description of weapon #802 CBU-97 the image is correct, but the weapon description is of the Raytheon MIM-23 Hawk, I believe #1823.

It's not a big deal, but I just thought I'd point out the error so it can be addressed at some later date.

Scott

Thanks. As thewood1 notes, it is important to delete all images and descriptions before applying the latest community image and description package, as otherwise inaccurate files continue to hang around. I personally recommend Nuking them from orbit, as its the only way to be sure However, in this case, you are correct. Weapon_802 is one of the periodic Hawk SAM images/description files that manage to infiltrate into the database. It has been eliminated with extreme prejudice from the master file.....

[Schr75]

Hi CV60

The description and picture of the DB3000 v498a entry:

#699 SA-N-20a Gargoyle [48N6]

is referring to the "infamous" MIM-23 Hawk description

This is from a virgin install with the latest description and image files installed.

Søren

[Parel803]

Some images on the Sensor: APAR (2009)
best regards GJ

[Parel803]

Some on the SMART-S
best regards GJ

[Parel803]

Some images on Scout Radar
Best regards GJ

[Schr75]

Hi

The picture for the Pershing 2 SSM shows a hypothetical single stage Pershing 1B.
This is DB3K entry # 1537.

Søren

[artao5]

So ... This is on top of what's included by default?

[Parel803]

Good evening,

Some on weapons. More images than photos.

best regards GJ

[Parel803]

Good afternoon,
Some Sensor Tall Rack radars. Other need more sort out.
best regards GJ

[Parel803]

added more tall rack.

The facility consists of these three RADARS and a command post, they divided in the DB also in three facilities. The small image of facility 1848 is the command post. Not sure when the comman post images go to?

best regards