Call for saves for air game testing

A complete overhaul and re-development of Gary Grigsby's War in the East, with a focus on improvements to historical accuracy, realism, user interface and AI.

Moderator: Joel Billings

User avatar
Joel Billings
Posts: 33050
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Contact:

Call for saves for air game testing

Post by Joel Billings »

We're asking for saves that we can use in looking at the question of auto-intercepts of enemy air phase raids. We're also looking for some where Air Superiority ADs are being used to interdict enemy air phase raids. Version 1.02.50 and .51 dramatically increased the chance of auto-intercepts of raids in the air phase, especially those that are not flying deep over enemy lines (deep raids were already being intercepted enough as there was usually a chance to detect the raids and intercept them before they reached their target). We're willing to adjust the chances to intercept, but we don't have the real world saves to use in a major effort to adjust how things work (or even to try to tweak it now). If you've got saves just prior to the air phase, where you're not seeing the results you would expect, please send the saves to 2by3@2by3games.com. Please tell us what bombing target we should be looking at, and any information on the raid or defenses that you think would be useful for us to know. Saves are the best way for us to see how any changes are working out. If you have particular air missions that you think are working out well, you can send those as well, that way we can see the impact of our changes on those missions as well. BTW, we've just added code to limit the number of bombers and fighters to any one mission to 200 of each, so please don't send raids with over 200 bombers or 200 fighters in them. There have been a few comments re the air game changes in .50 and .51, both here and in the tester forum, but the number of posts have been relatively few so we need to get more feedback as well. But saves are the main focus at this time. Thanks.
All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard
ShaggyHiK
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2021 12:38 pm

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by ShaggyHiK »

I don't play games against a bot, at the moment my participation is in a 4v4 game with the move coming to me ~once a week or two weeks.

Therefore, I can only give a new feedback if I find participation in a new party or an old one.
It will take some time.


Since I see your enthusiasm in this matter, then I must clarify for myself what time frame are you willing to endure?
User avatar
Joel Billings
Posts: 33050
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Contact:

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by Joel Billings »

At this point, we're waiting for saves and feedback, so it's hard to say what the time frame will be. If you have something from your current 4 player game, perhaps you can get in touch with the right person with the pre-save before the air phase and have them send it to us. Thanks.
All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard
User avatar
Erik Rutins
Posts: 39325
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by Erik Rutins »

Just renewing the call here.
Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC


Image

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.
ShaggyHiK
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2021 12:38 pm

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by ShaggyHiK »

Sent two save files to Joel in private messages in discord, 1 before the start of the air move. The second is right after the air phase.

The game works as I expect from it.

Bad weather does not allow the active use of aviation, flew 3 days out of 7. Losses are close to 10% of sorties.

The technical side of the issue, there is a lack of a button to send aircraft from the regiment to the pool.

There are regiments with 1-2-5 aircraft that cannot be replenished, but in reality the Soviet Air Force sent such regiments to the rear for staffing and training, and the aircraft were sent as replenishment to combat regiments.


In the game, they weigh dead weight. Reducing available aircraft.

Should such regiments be disbanded?

The same applies, for example, to the German reconnaissance air force, by the year 43, the decline in reconnaissance aircraft made it necessary to abandon the army reconnaissance aviation system and transfer more entire aircraft to the upper level of control. Still whole planes were sent as replenishment to the regiments that were preserved, and the beaten ones were withdrawn or disbanded.
jasonbroomer
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by jasonbroomer »

I only play server games. In my current game versus PyleDriver I can confirm that the VVS can still do stuff against someone who doesn't really know the air war proficiently (I hope that I am not demeaning PileDrvier in saying this). Note that the turns are being done swiftly.
Air losses.png
Air losses.png (504.68 KiB) Viewed 762 times
This is the losses update on turn 10 following the Soviet air phase.

Massed Soviet air attacks are still possible, despite limiting each mission to 200 bombers

Air Bombing.png
Air Bombing.png (1.38 MiB) Viewed 762 times

The obvious route to get around the limitation in bombers is run multiple missions per directive (auto i.e. x2 here), run multiple missions for the Air command on the same target (x2 in this instance) and/or use different air commands (Long Range and Bryansk air commands here).

This threatening panzer division got hit by 35 air raids and took 1200 casualties and lost 19 AFVs (taken from the losses report as this was the only ground attack), c.10-20% losses.

The LfW intercepted these on a regular basis throughout the week (13 times) but with only 16 planes (patrol at the correct altitude at least). I am sure he isn't using AS, I didn't over this area (doh!).

Elsewhere, there is air activity over Odessa and Kuressaare where unescorted Axis NP were intercepted by Soviet AS creating gradual attritional losses on the Axis bombers.
dgrimes
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 1:37 pm

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by dgrimes »

Just started Stalingrad to Berlin. Playing as Germans against the AI in version 1.02.52. The air war looks good with one exception: Very, very rarely (something like 1 out of every 1,000 bomber sorties) do bombers inflict any damage on enemy fighters. This has long been an issue, but it may have gotten worse in the latest version. In fact its very rare for bombers even shoot back.
dgrimes
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 1:37 pm

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by dgrimes »

Just started Stalingrad to Berlin. Playing as Germans against the AI in version 1.02.52. The air war looks good with one exception: Very, very rarely (something like 1 out of every 1,000 bomber sorties) do bombers inflict any damage on enemy fighters. This has long been an issue, but it may have gotten worse in the latest version. In fact its very rare for bombers even shoot back.
jasonbroomer
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by jasonbroomer »

jasonbroomer wrote: Wed Mar 08, 2023 10:45 am I only play server games. In my current game versus PyleDriver I can confirm that the VVS can still do stuff against someone who doesn't really know the air war proficiently (I hope that I am not demeaning PileDrvier in saying this). Note that the turns are being done swiftly.

...

Elsewhere, there is air activity over Odessa and Kuressaare where unescorted Axis NP were intercepted by Soviet AS creating gradual attritional losses on the Axis bombers.
This incidentally is the '41 GC
User avatar
Erik Rutins
Posts: 39325
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by Erik Rutins »

jasonbroomer wrote: Wed Mar 08, 2023 2:11 pm
jasonbroomer wrote: Wed Mar 08, 2023 10:45 am I only play server games. In my current game versus PyleDriver I can confirm that the VVS can still do stuff against someone who doesn't really know the air war proficiently (I hope that I am not demeaning PileDrvier in saying this). Note that the turns are being done swiftly.

...

Elsewhere, there is air activity over Odessa and Kuressaare where unescorted Axis NP were intercepted by Soviet AS creating gradual attritional losses on the Axis bombers.
This incidentally is the '41 GC
I'll just add that if there's a particular server game anyone would like us to look at for air examples, just let us know and we can grab the latest save for the team's examination.
Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC


Image

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.
DarkHorse2
Posts: 871
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2022 12:08 pm

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by DarkHorse2 »

Still running into crazy level of intercepts of transport missions, well behind front lines.

See attached. Blue is route of transports, Red is the route of interceptors.

Additionally, I never see Ju52s firing a shot. If the 7.92mm MGs are not going to fire, I would rather just remove them to make more space for cargo.

WiTE2_T6_TransportIntercept.jpg
WiTE2_T6_TransportIntercept.jpg (502.72 KiB) Viewed 559 times

FYI - I turned off FOW to see where those Laggs were coming from...
Attachments
CombatMessages(Turn 006 7-27-1941 Ax)_AirTransportIntercept.txt
(5.05 KiB) Downloaded 1 time
DarkHorse2
Posts: 871
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2022 12:08 pm

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by DarkHorse2 »

More fun with VVS interceptions of Air Transport missions. :(

The RAF would be very envious. hmmm.... Soviet commander does look somewhat British....

WiTE2_T7_TransportIntercept.jpg
WiTE2_T7_TransportIntercept.jpg (394.7 KiB) Viewed 512 times
DarkHorse2
Posts: 871
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2022 12:08 pm

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by DarkHorse2 »

Air system still screwy as hell.

GC41, T7

Germany has approx 120 Bf-109F-2s based at Minsk. They have fuel, ammo, supplies. Have traveled 0% this turn.

Germans make deliberate attack, VVS responds by sending 120+ AC for defensive ground support.

Luftwaffe intercepts with 3 Bf-109s. :roll:

WiTE2_T7_DelibAttack.JPG
WiTE2_T7_DelibAttack.JPG (438.85 KiB) Viewed 501 times
Jango32
Posts: 790
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 4:43 pm

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by Jango32 »

Add the saves then.
DarkHorse2
Posts: 871
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2022 12:08 pm

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by DarkHorse2 »

Read the instructions.

Saves are not added here.
Jango32
Posts: 790
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 4:43 pm

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by Jango32 »

You're right, it was my mistake.
User avatar
Joel Billings
Posts: 33050
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Contact:

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by Joel Billings »

If you can come up with some pre-saves I'll take a look.
All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard
DarkHorse2
Posts: 871
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2022 12:08 pm

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by DarkHorse2 »

VVS is not intercepting German Airbase Attack missions.

I have conducted in the neighborhood of 50-100 Airbase Attacks (post turn 1) and the VVS has not intercepted once :!: :!:

Which is probably good, because Soviet AA has been devastating, when encountered. (can easily loose 80+ bombers or 9-10% of attacking bombers / turn).

If I was to attack with Ju52s, I am sure that would be a guaranteed interception. :lol:

WiTE2_T7_NoInterceptByVVS.jpg
WiTE2_T7_NoInterceptByVVS.jpg (86.29 KiB) Viewed 401 times
WiTE2_T7_AirbaseAttack_Night_1.6.png
WiTE2_T7_AirbaseAttack_Night_1.6.png (382.28 KiB) Viewed 401 times
WiTE2_T7_AirbaseAttack_3k_1.11.png
WiTE2_T7_AirbaseAttack_3k_1.11.png (560.62 KiB) Viewed 401 times
WiTE2_T7_AirbaseAttack_16k_1.13.png
WiTE2_T7_AirbaseAttack_16k_1.13.png (159.24 KiB) Viewed 401 times
Last edited by DarkHorse2 on Wed Mar 22, 2023 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DarkHorse2
Posts: 871
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2022 12:08 pm

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by DarkHorse2 »

More examples of VVS not intercepting....
WiTE2_T7_AirbaseAttack1.2.png
WiTE2_T7_AirbaseAttack1.2.png (160.52 KiB) Viewed 400 times
WiTE2_T7_AirbaseAttack1.3.png
WiTE2_T7_AirbaseAttack1.3.png (120.69 KiB) Viewed 400 times
WiTE2_T7_AirbaseAttack1.4.png
WiTE2_T7_AirbaseAttack1.4.png (365.79 KiB) Viewed 400 times
WiTE2_T7_AirbaseAttack_CR_1.8.png
WiTE2_T7_AirbaseAttack_CR_1.8.png (402.08 KiB) Viewed 395 times
User avatar
Joel Billings
Posts: 33050
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Contact:

Re: Call for saves for air game testing

Post by Joel Billings »

Do you have pre-saves? You should always save the game before the air phase. That way, if you see something off, you can send in the pre-save. As for air transport intercepts, how far behind the front line are your transports being intercepted?
All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2”