Did I list a source?
Your responce implies you didnt read my post.
It CLEARLY lables the ENTIRE post as
MY OPINION. As such it is no more than that,
and no defence is needed since I am NOT
defending my thesis with YOU in the audience.
I got my degree (in history) in 1972 and do NOT feel the need to go thru it again.
If you are saying that it is unsupported and that you disagree, that is fine. Do THAT.
But then be prepared to see ANY assertion I dont like, that is equally unsupported dismissed with this post as reference.
The one thing I have learned about arguing
history is that no amount of reference will
convince anyone who doesnt wish to recognize it. It is like asking if Churchill used the
Canadians at Dieppe because he knew they
would be hammered, and didnt want 'English'
troops to suffer. It is like asking if Ney
had not been commanding the right wing at
Waterloo and instead Davout, would Napoleon
Such questions invite debate, generating heat, and very little light.
If you are saying (apparently) that Yamamoto
was NOT aware that his code was broken,
I have no intention of running down Book X
just so that you can counter w Book Y.
The evidence is there for anyone w serious intrest. The man is dead and ONLY he knows why he did whatever.
“It is clear that the individual who persecutes a man, his brother, because he is not of the same opinion, is a monster.”
'For those with faith, no proof is needed. For those without faith, no proof is enough'