From: Brooklyn, NY
A good piece of data to add would be, what are the personnel capacity and mass capacity parameters?
So, we don't record a reference for every piece of data in the database. It could very well be wrong, but it could also be the result of a long discussion that I wasn't privy to. The provenance of the data actually doesn't matter, it's whether it matches the real world capability.
The value of the data is not in the numbers; it's in the expertise of the guys (notice plural, it's a team effort where we source multiple references and come to a consensus if something is not able to be demonstrated empirically) who maintain that data.
On the other side of the curtain, all people see are numbers and we honestly do such a good job with the rest of it that the weird stuff stands out and catches people off guard.
So I want to fix this issue, like any other DB issue, but the place to show us the problem and get it solved is the DB thread with empirical evidence. The tech support subforum is more a place for open discussion.
No need to re-post or anything like that, I'll get our research team to look into it. Unless it's holding back any real capability we can't prioritize it, but it will get looked at