Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

CPP nice idea but...

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> CPP nice idea but... Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
CPP nice idea but... - 4/4/2021 9:12:00 AM   
AlessandroD


Posts: 381
Joined: 12/28/2014
From: Italy
Status: offline
...I don't like the halved rule, especially in the first attack.

I will try to explain it a little better, I really like this concept (CPP) and how it limits the combat effectivenes of a unit, also it works great decreasing the CV after every hex moved into.
Anyhow when you attack you lose half of your CPP but it doesn't matter if you are attacking a well defended position or a unit prone to surrender, and losing 20-40% of your nominal CV for attacking a weak garrison unit it seems a bit too much.
And it is even worse for a unit with high nominal CV like a panzer division.

Of course in the subsequent attacks you are losing much less but it should be the opposite, a tired unit attacking several times in a week should lose much more nominal CV that in your first attack.


What are you thoughts about CPP? What am I missing?

_____________________________

Post #: 1
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> CPP nice idea but... Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.137