Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to understand:

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to understand: Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/17/2021 2:10:15 AM   
juv95hrn

 

Posts: 236
Joined: 6/28/2005
Status: offline
When I transfer an air group into an existing AOG on map, from reserve, there is room on the air base. The air base is not set to zero supply level, there is plenty of fuel, ammo and supplies on the air base itself, there is a large depot in the same hex, why do I get "Failed to resupply air base, do you still want to transfer?". To me it feels like this should be an excellent air base to insert more planes into. What am missing? Too low air base supply level, for the amount of new air planes I try to base there?

This example is in Feodosia, on the Kerch, supplied by sea, but it happens afaik everywhere.

+confused+

< Message edited by juv95hrn -- 6/17/2021 2:13:03 AM >

(in reply to juv95hrn)
Post #: 751
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/17/2021 3:03:21 AM   
juv95hrn

 

Posts: 236
Joined: 6/28/2005
Status: offline
I need help to understand why my front lines on the Kerch are starving without supplies. HQs are next to them. The ports of Kerch and Feodosia have freight stored up in them. The rail line behind the front isn´t bombed. Its snowfall in January.

Yet a trickle of supplies are sent from a two Caucasus depots to one division, all but one freight each being lost on the way.

And to the majority of the front line hexes none is sent at all. The port depots have very few trucks in them, but I cant influence that except supply settings I believe. Could I send trucks there manually? I dont think so.

Feodosia is 4 hexes from the front, so no horse drawn transport, but if no supplies are sent out, this wouldnt matter I suppose.

I have a prio 4 depot on the rail line one hex behind the front, 3 from the port. It never receives any freight. A lack of moving stock on the peninsula to get anything here?

My only guess would be a somewhat too low supply priority on their HQs, but this doesnt really make sense either. They are some of the highest on the map.

Is it the frontline forts being built automatically sucking up all the supplies? This isnt the case anywhere else.

The AI isnt attacking, so it isnt combat depleting me. And its the delivery, and not the consumption that wont work.

Is it just that you simply cant supply an entire full Front, through the ports, even if they are stocked to the brim with freight?

Anyone dare to venture a guess?

< Message edited by juv95hrn -- 6/17/2021 3:10:49 AM >

(in reply to juv95hrn)
Post #: 752
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/17/2021 6:37:22 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10183
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: juv95hrn

When I transfer an air group into an existing AOG on map, from reserve, there is room on the air base. The air base is not set to zero supply level, there is plenty of fuel, ammo and supplies on the air base itself, there is a large depot in the same hex, why do I get "Failed to resupply air base, do you still want to transfer?". To me it feels like this should be an excellent air base to insert more planes into. What am missing? Too low air base supply level, for the amount of new air planes I try to base there?

This example is in Feodosia, on the Kerch, supplied by sea, but it happens afaik everywhere.

+confused+


it tests what is there, plus what it can send under the in-turn supply routines (ie what is usually used to replenish ammunition etc).

treat it as advice that maybe there might be a longer term problem there but most likely it'll resolve in the next logistics phase.

_____________________________


(in reply to juv95hrn)
Post #: 753
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/17/2021 6:51:51 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10183
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: juv95hrn

I need help to understand why my front lines on the Kerch are starving without supplies. HQs are next to them. The ports of Kerch and Feodosia have freight stored up in them. The rail line behind the front isn´t bombed. Its snowfall in January.

Yet a trickle of supplies are sent from a two Caucasus depots to one division, all but one freight each being lost on the way.

And to the majority of the front line hexes none is sent at all. The port depots have very few trucks in them, but I cant influence that except supply settings I believe. Could I send trucks there manually? I dont think so.

Feodosia is 4 hexes from the front, so no horse drawn transport, but if no supplies are sent out, this wouldnt matter I suppose.

I have a prio 4 depot on the rail line one hex behind the front, 3 from the port. It never receives any freight. A lack of moving stock on the peninsula to get anything here?

My only guess would be a somewhat too low supply priority on their HQs, but this doesnt really make sense either. They are some of the highest on the map.

Is it the frontline forts being built automatically sucking up all the supplies? This isnt the case anywhere else.

The AI isnt attacking, so it isnt combat depleting me. And its the delivery, and not the consumption that wont work.

Is it just that you simply cant supply an entire full Front, through the ports, even if they are stocked to the brim with freight?

Anyone dare to venture a guess?


aye, I'd go for volume of demand > over what can feasibly be supplied.

worth bearing in mind what the unit supply priority actually means.

units under a level #1 HQ get first call on the supply network but can only get 50% of their total need, so if they have 50% they claim no new supply, at #2 this is 70%, at #3 90% and at #4 the default is 90% but there are a sequence of special rules that come into play.

So the claim sequence is #1 (cap 50%), 2 (cap 70%) etc. So in a low supply region, setting HQ priority >1 has a few problems but may help. The problem is that the local supply such as it is will have long been claimed so you get into the truck problem (ie your unit trucks spend so long looking for supply they forget to be available to move and fight) but it is an insurance policy against failed logistic checks (miss on round 1, they can go and look again on round 2).

Point here, is that simply raising unit supply priority is not the solution. In a problematic area get most of them to 1 or 2 maybe a single 3 (easier with the axis corps HQ).

You have several problems there. One is that rail cap can't cross sea hexes (even with a ferry) - this also affects Leningrad if that is cut off. So you quite likely lack any rail capacity in the Crimea if retaking it from the east till you regain Sevastopol.

I'd suggest take this to a thread in its own right, and add some images, you say the ports are full would help to unpick this if the above doesn't explain the situation.

_____________________________


(in reply to juv95hrn)
Post #: 754
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/18/2021 3:54:24 PM   
Rollerman

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 4/10/2021
Status: offline
Is it possible to automate the Hungarian and Romanian armed forces?

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 755
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/18/2021 4:08:18 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10183
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rollerman

Is it possible to automate the Hungarian and Romanian armed forces?


no, any on-map formations need to be handled manually. But there are only a few available Hungarians in 1941 (most are locked in place till about May 42)

_____________________________


(in reply to Rollerman)
Post #: 756
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/19/2021 1:54:45 AM   
juv95hrn

 

Posts: 236
Joined: 6/28/2005
Status: offline
It seems the formula for fatigue lowering is entirely under-the hood?

Which is better, using movement, and gaining some additional fatigue, to move away from being adjacent to an enemy unit (when the situation allows it), hoping to regain this loss in the next logistic phase.

Or to remain adjacent adjacent to the enemy, suffering additional fatigue and attrition, but not having to move in and out of a better refit position.

Yes, weather, terrain, etc. would influence this. But a hint at the formula would help you estimate.

I guess experience and careful note taking is required to gain insight.

Thanks!

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 757
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/19/2021 6:55:18 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10183
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
in the main being in a ZoC is a large drag on regaining combat readiness, so yes break contact if you can

_____________________________


(in reply to juv95hrn)
Post #: 758
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/19/2021 2:26:02 PM   
juv95hrn

 

Posts: 236
Joined: 6/28/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

in the main being in a ZoC is a large drag on regaining combat readiness, so yes break contact if you can



My little experience tell me that, unless the movement cost (and fatigue penalty for this), is all to prohibitive, yes this is indeed the better solution.

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 759
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/19/2021 2:28:03 PM   
juv95hrn

 

Posts: 236
Joined: 6/28/2005
Status: offline
I asked before about assigning construction units to Forts (that might cost AP if they happen to be attacked to a city/location).

But on Kerch, it costs AP to assign CUs to forts from Army HQs. This is usually no the case. Why?

Is it because Kerch is "isolated" by only ferry or Naval contact?

Or is it a bug?

Is there a workaround?

Thanks!

EDIT:

Nope, its now all of a sudden a cost of 1 AP all over. Its Turn 31. Does something change in 1942?

< Message edited by juv95hrn -- 6/19/2021 3:29:16 PM >

(in reply to juv95hrn)
Post #: 760
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/19/2021 3:06:47 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10183
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
there should be no cost, its a bug that will be fixed in the next patch. There is a partial work around set out in this thread - maybe a page or so back?

_____________________________


(in reply to juv95hrn)
Post #: 761
RE: Quick Questions Thread - 6/19/2021 3:27:02 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 45028
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
Why change the title of this thread????

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 762
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/20/2021 12:41:20 AM   
beamslam

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 11/13/2020
From: Vejle, Denmark
Status: offline
As I'm used to metric values like most Europeans, so it would make sense to have metric values instead of Imperial values. I can be a bit cumbersome all the time to "translate" the imperial values to metric figures. Like the speed of the planes and vehicles for example, those I know roughly in Kmh for the various types but the Mph values doesn't say me much until converted.
In the editor it is possible to change but it will not change in the game file. Is there a way to do this?

(in reply to Jajusha)
Post #: 763
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/20/2021 9:16:24 AM   
hei1

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 11/22/2019
From: Germany
Status: offline
+1

_____________________________

--- it's not a bug, it's a feature ---

(in reply to beamslam)
Post #: 764
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/20/2021 1:31:45 PM   
Starway


Posts: 15
Joined: 5/16/2021
From: Bielefeld, Germany
Status: offline
+1 for metric values

(in reply to hei1)
Post #: 765
Quick Questions Thread - 6/20/2021 2:41:45 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10183
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: beamslam

As I'm used to metric values like most Europeans, so it would make sense to have metric values instead of Imperial values. I can be a bit cumbersome all the time to "translate" the imperial values to metric figures. Like the speed of the planes and vehicles for example, those I know roughly in Kmh for the various types but the Mph values doesn't say me much until converted.
In the editor it is possible to change but it will not change in the game file. Is there a way to do this?


since this really isn't a question about game mechanics I'd suggest putting in a post into the 'feature suggestions' thread. More chance of it being noticed or the modding forum - depends really which bit of your question you want an answer to

_____________________________


(in reply to beamslam)
Post #: 766
RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to ... - 6/20/2021 2:52:12 PM   
juv95hrn

 

Posts: 236
Joined: 6/28/2005
Status: offline
Is the paradrop interface bugged?

How do I order and CONFIRM a new paradrop hex?

Each time I click the radio button of a corresponding para unit, it CHANGES drop hex destination shown, without me having chosen a new hex, like it has multiple targets allocated.

Also, after assignating a new drop hex for one unit, the next one will always show that same hex too, after clicking its radio button, even though its accual target hex is another one. If you reclick it, it will show the correct one.

If I right click a hex after picking a new target hex, it states "must be a friendly air base hex". But you cant choose staging base or

Bugged and overly complicated interface, or how do you handle this?

< Message edited by juv95hrn -- 6/20/2021 2:55:14 PM >

(in reply to Starway)
Post #: 767
RE: Quick Questions Thread - 6/20/2021 3:26:10 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10183
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juv95hrn

Is the paradrop interface bugged?

How do I order and CONFIRM a new paradrop hex?

Each time I click the radio button of a corresponding para unit, it CHANGES drop hex destination shown, without me having chosen a new hex, like it has multiple targets allocated.

Also, after assignating a new drop hex for one unit, the next one will always show that same hex too, after clicking its radio button, even though its accual target hex is another one. If you reclick it, it will show the correct one.

If I right click a hex after picking a new target hex, it states "must be a friendly air base hex". But you cant choose staging base or

Bugged and overly complicated interface, or how do you handle this?


not my experience, takes two clicks:

so open an old save, press F9 and select airborne.

it shows me all the airborne units I have that are potentially eligible to have a mission set - in this case a brigade in Budapest:



following the instructions I left click on the map on a potential target hex:



thats it, its set. The brigade will build preparation pts and be ready to carry out the drop in 2 turns.

press F1 or whatever and back to the map.

or select another brigade (if I had more than one showing) and redo those steps.

< Message edited by loki100 -- 6/20/2021 3:27:28 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to juv95hrn)
Post #: 768
RE: Quick Questions Thread - 6/20/2021 6:46:38 PM   
beamslam

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 11/13/2020
From: Vejle, Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100


quote:

ORIGINAL: beamslam

As I'm used to metric values like most Europeans, so it would make sense to have metric values instead of Imperial values. I can be a bit cumbersome all the time to "translate" the imperial values to metric figures. Like the speed of the planes and vehicles for example, those I know roughly in Kmh for the various types but the Mph values doesn't say me much until converted.
In the editor it is possible to change but it will not change in the game file. Is there a way to do this?


since this really isn't a question about game mechanics I'd suggest putting in a post into the 'feature suggestions' thread. More chance of it being noticed or the modding forum - depends really which bit of your question you want an answer to



Right, I'll put it in the "feature suggestions"

< Message edited by beamslam -- 6/20/2021 6:49:37 PM >

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 769
RE: Quick Questions Thread - 6/20/2021 6:58:48 PM   
juv95hrn

 

Posts: 236
Joined: 6/28/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

quote:

ORIGINAL: juv95hrn

Is the paradrop interface bugged?

How do I order and CONFIRM a new paradrop hex?

Each time I click the radio button of a corresponding para unit, it CHANGES drop hex destination shown, without me having chosen a new hex, like it has multiple targets allocated.

Also, after assignating a new drop hex for one unit, the next one will always show that same hex too, after clicking its radio button, even though its accual target hex is another one. If you reclick it, it will show the correct one.

If I right click a hex after picking a new target hex, it states "must be a friendly air base hex". But you cant choose staging base or

Bugged and overly complicated interface, or how do you handle this?


not my experience, takes two clicks:

so open an old save, press F9 and select airborne.

it shows me all the airborne units I have that are potentially eligible to have a mission set - in this case a brigade in Budapest:



following the instructions I left click on the map on a potential target hex:



thats it, its set. The brigade will build preparation pts and be ready to carry out the drop in 2 turns.

press F1 or whatever and back to the map.

or select another brigade (if I had more than one showing) and redo those steps.



That is not the problem I describe.

I have changed drop hex, from one initial to an new one, after doing what you describe, which works fine for me to.

Now the unit will randomly show the new, or the old drop hex target.

When I have multiple para units on the same air base, with multiple targets, they take turns on showing new, old and random targets hex alternativs, depending on which order I click the radio buttons.

Even if I assign the correct new hex, and this registers, the next time I check, it will still point to the old location, the third time the correct one, without me not having done anything, but check the radio buttons to indicate which para unit is active.

So, yeah, the workaround might be to only use one para brigade per air base and never change the target hex.

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 770
RE: Quick Questions Thread - 6/20/2021 9:48:43 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10183
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: juv95hrn

...

That is not the problem I describe.

I have changed drop hex, from one initial to an new one, after doing what you describe, which works fine for me to.

Now the unit will randomly show the new, or the old drop hex target.

When I have multiple para units on the same air base, with multiple targets, they take turns on showing new, old and random targets hex alternativs, depending on which order I click the radio buttons.

Even if I assign the correct new hex, and this registers, the next time I check, it will still point to the old location, the third time the correct one, without me not having done anything, but check the radio buttons to indicate which para unit is active.

So, yeah, the workaround might be to only use one para brigade per air base and never change the target hex.


ok, went back over my saves for an instance where I can put two brigades on the same airbase, as below just swapped between them and selected a different target hex.





did nothing but open F9, select airborne, select one brigade left click on a target, select the other and left click on a different target hex.

Clearly you are doing/seeing something different but not sure why it doesn't work as above?

_____________________________


(in reply to juv95hrn)
Post #: 771
RE: Quick Questions Thread - 6/20/2021 10:03:43 PM   
juv95hrn

 

Posts: 236
Joined: 6/28/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100


quote:

ORIGINAL: juv95hrn

...

That is not the problem I describe.

I have changed drop hex, from one initial to an new one, after doing what you describe, which works fine for me to.

Now the unit will randomly show the new, or the old drop hex target.

When I have multiple para units on the same air base, with multiple targets, they take turns on showing new, old and random targets hex alternativs, depending on which order I click the radio buttons.

Even if I assign the correct new hex, and this registers, the next time I check, it will still point to the old location, the third time the correct one, without me not having done anything, but check the radio buttons to indicate which para unit is active.

So, yeah, the workaround might be to only use one para brigade per air base and never change the target hex.


ok, went back over my saves for an instance where I can put two brigades on the same airbase, as below just swapped between them and selected a different target hex.





did nothing but open F9, select airborne, select one brigade left click on a target, select the other and left click on a different target hex.

Clearly you are doing/seeing something different but not sure why it doesn't work as above?


Thanks for your input and efforts.

What you describe is what I experience too, so far.

- It would be great if you exit, then go back into the paradrop menu again, then check if the paras keep their new destination hex, you set the first time in the menu.

- Then select the paraunits a couple of times, with the radiobuttons, and check if the allocated target hex remains the same, or shows different ones, like for me.

Again, I can assign a target hex, I can change it to a new one, like you comfirm here.

The issue is that when re-checking if the changes "stick", the para target hexes differ from one time to another, as I select the para units. Like the order didnt stick, or that system shows the old or new hex intermittently or randomly. Or like you actually have 2 hexes selected, the new and the old, and the system shows them both each other time you select the unit.

Also as I described above, after giving one para unit a new destination hex, the next para unit I select, will have that exact same hex selected to in the map arrow interface (although in actuality it has another hex, previously pointed to and assigned with the coordinates). So I click around a bit more, selecting units, and the next time it will show the correct targets hex.

I suspect here there is a minor bug, and the system remains indicating the same target location hex, after you select a new para unit in the same hex, although this is just showing the wrong target hex, but in effect, the unit really has the correct, other target. So its just a visual glitch.

Its hard to describe more precise like this. A screen shot wouldnt help, since you have to select different para units on the same air base multiple times, for the glithch to appear.

Its this or I am doing something wrong, but I am follwing your exact steps above, its just that I have re-assigned a new hex from the original one, and not just chosen an inital drop hex. That works just fine.

Hope this explains the problem better.

Thanks!

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 772
RE: Quick Questions Thread - 6/20/2021 10:14:54 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10183
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
I've gone back to that and simply re-ordered, opened and closed (via F1) the tab and can't generate anything unusual. The only issue is it does re-open with whichever brigade you last allocated showing it may look like they both have the same targets.

So there is an apparent delay/hook to the other target but I think its not actually what is happening.

I've attached a wetransfer link to a video of the command sequence I am following and the respective target display.

Just click on the link and download:

https://we.tl/t-UnMJTdJSfD

I'm using a test beta build (hence the info at the screen top) but that really shouldn't be influencing this routine

_____________________________


(in reply to juv95hrn)
Post #: 773
RE: Quick Questions Thread - 6/20/2021 11:06:04 PM   
juv95hrn

 

Posts: 236
Joined: 6/28/2005
Status: offline
24.3 states that a ground unit has a transport cost. In actuality this consists of two numbers fx. "1000/2000". What do these mean specifically?

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 774
RE: Quick Questions Thread - 6/20/2021 11:15:50 PM   
juv95hrn

 

Posts: 236
Joined: 6/28/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

I've gone back to that and simply re-ordered, opened and closed (via F1) the tab and can't generate anything unusual. The only issue is it does re-open with whichever brigade you last allocated showing it may look like they both have the same targets.

So there is an apparent delay/hook to the other target but I think its not actually what is happening.

I've attached a wetransfer link to a video of the command sequence I am following and the respective target display.

Just click on the link and download:

https://we.tl/t-UnMJTdJSfD

I'm using a test beta build (hence the info at the screen top) but that really shouldn't be influencing this routine


Yes, I think the video describes exactly what is confusing me. The delay in wrongly showing the other para units target, instead of its own, correct one, the first time you select it (but not if you re-select among them again). I agree its a glitch, and probably not WAD, and if the targets actually registers correctly with the system, in contrast to what it is showing graphically, I think I can understand it anyway.

But I also have 3 para units on one air base, and when clicking around selecting them, the shift among different targets seemingly randomly (ie. not only the previously selected target hex, or the previously selected para units target hex, but each others current and previous target hexes, making it impossible to discern (at least by the on-map graphics) which is their actual target hex. I guess one has to go with the map coordinates given instead for now.

Thanks for your input. I will check next turn if the lastly given target hex has "stuck" for each para unit, or if they still give the wrong target then. I suspect it does, because I started to briefly look into this last turn, but dismissed it as me simply not understanding the interface.

Although nothing major I think this must be classified as a minor visual and interface bug?

EDIT:

I found a small work-around. By clicking/selecting the same para unit twice in a row, you convince the system to show the correct target hex.

The Soviet para-forces are utterly confused at this stage, and their preparations have suffered greatly. But finally I believe some units have their correct targets set. We will see what the system shows next week.

EDIT 2:

The whole thing is actually quite intuitive when you realize, and get used to that you actually have to click each para unit TWICE, to show that units actual target hex.

< Message edited by juv95hrn -- 6/21/2021 2:00:38 AM >

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 775
RE: Quick Questions Thread - 6/21/2021 3:22:24 AM   
juv95hrn

 

Posts: 236
Joined: 6/28/2005
Status: offline
How does 124 vehicle factories in the factory navigation table (with no damage) translate to 61 active and available factories producing 610 vehicles in the logistic phase report? Some production coefficient for the year?

(in reply to juv95hrn)
Post #: 776
RE: Quick Questions Thread - 6/23/2021 1:11:24 AM   
56ajax


Posts: 1926
Joined: 12/3/2007
From: Carnegie, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: juv95hrn

How does 124 vehicle factories in the factory navigation table (with no damage) translate to 61 active and available factories producing 610 vehicles in the logistic phase report? Some production coefficient for the year?

For the Soviets, from 1942 onwards there is a multiplier of 0.55. (germans 0.7)

Maths dont quite add up so I suspect each factory has the multiplier applied individually as opposed to the sum of the factories x the multiplier. (or there is hidden damage/delay)

_____________________________

Molotov : This we did not deserve.

Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.

C'est la guerre aérienne

(in reply to juv95hrn)
Post #: 777
RE: Quick Questions Thread - 6/23/2021 1:16:35 AM   
56ajax


Posts: 1926
Joined: 12/3/2007
From: Carnegie, Australia
Status: offline
Quick question on unit supply and trucks and rail.

Units are supplied from depots using vehicles and not rail. Is this correct?

_____________________________

Molotov : This we did not deserve.

Foch : This is not peace. This is a 20 year armistice.

C'est la guerre aérienne

(in reply to 56ajax)
Post #: 778
RE: Quick Questions Thread - 6/23/2021 2:41:23 AM   
carlkay58

 

Posts: 8381
Joined: 7/25/2010
Status: offline
Correct

(in reply to 56ajax)
Post #: 779
RE: Quick Questions Thread - 6/24/2021 5:37:27 AM   
Hardradi


Posts: 342
Joined: 2/9/2011
Status: online
It seems like there is a difference between conquering a port versus conquering a land locked city. Eg, if you conquer Riga and Minsk on turn 1, with Riga you can allocate construction units and AA units on Turn 1 but with Minsk you cannot assign either on Turn 1. I think the option appears in Turn 2 for Minsk. The difference seems to apply for all coastal versus land locked cities.

If you build a depot in Minsk on Turn 1, there is still no option to assign const/AA units.

Is there a reason for this difference?

(in reply to carlkay58)
Post #: 780
Page:   <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> RE: Truck Summary in logistics Phase Report is hard to understand: Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.438