Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

To Kill the Queen, 2022, (Submitted)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> To Kill the Queen, 2022, (Submitted) Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
To Kill the Queen, 2022, (Submitted) - 1/17/2021 12:44:13 AM   
BeirutDude


Posts: 2311
Joined: 4/27/2013
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Status: offline
To Kill the Queen, 2022
Al “Beirutdude” Sandrik
The Time Is: 15 April, 2022, 22:00 Zulu/06:00 Okinawa Time
First Island Chain/Ryukyu/Daito Islands
Playable as PRC/PLAN/PLAAF Only
24 Hours Duration


Background: Ten days ago, PLAN Marines landed on the Senkaku and Yaeyama Islands (The remotest part of Japan, and the last of the Ryukyu Islands near Taiwan). The rational was to deny the USN and JMSDF antisubmarine bases to interdict PLAN submarines from transiting into the Pacific through the First Island Chain. This was necessary as a prelude to isolating and invading the lost providence of Taiwan. The recently established Japanese garrison on Yonaguni Island put up a stubborn defense allowing time for USAF and JASDF squadrons from Okinawa to intervene. Subsequently, massive PLA Rocket Force barrages and persistent PLAAF airstrikes, with cratering munitions, have heavily damaged the three airbases on Okinawa leading to the withdrawal of the remaining U.S. and Japanese squadrons and isolation of the island from resupply.

U.S. Marines and Japanese Ground Self Defense Forces are digging in for combined PRC airborne and amphibious assault on the island. To stiffen the defense Carrier Strike Group - Five has been dispatched to provide air support to the defenders. Realizing the CSG would likely be fighting for its life, the ships were heavily armed with every available ABM SAM in the Pacific Fleet’s inventory.

The USS Ronald Reagan is the “High Value Unit” (HVU) and the “Queen” on the chessboard She is defended by an Inner Ring of Ticonderoga and Arleigh Burke Class Aegis missile CRUisers and DEStroyers (CRUDES) withing 15 nm. This includes a brand-new Australian destroyer. An outer ring of three (3) CRUDES is present 15 to 25 nm from the HVU to provide ASW and AAW support along the “Threat Axis” and a distant “Picket” of one JMSDF Aegis Destroyer and a Los Angles Class submarine provides distant support and some additional radar coverage.

Mission: As the Combined Forces Commanding Officer for the PLAN/AF/Rocket Forces in the East Fleet Area of Responsibility (AOR), you are tasked with destroying the USS Ronald Reagan. Your sole mission is to “Kill the Queen” to clear the way for the invasion of Okinawa.

Notes:
First, you must run the scenario for 15 seconds before you do anything else. Why? To give the scenario replay value all vessels teleport. To keep the Inner, outer and picket areas in their proper orientation and vessels in their assigned Operation Areas (OPAREAS) relative to the HVU/carrier it necessitated multiple teleport events. Trust me it works! After 15 seconds feel free to delete the highlighted Reference Points, they are not needed after that time.
Second, as of November, 2020 the combined PLAN/AF H-6 Inventory (of all variants) is estimated to be 231 aircraft, about 2/3s of them appear in this scenario (with a 20-30 percent maintenance downtime for each squadron). So, it may appear that there are a LOT of H-6s, well the PRC is building them like mad.
Next, you don’t get to play the U.S. side as I wanted to look at attacking an USN CSG with the three defensive zones, can you penetrate the carrier’s screen?
Finally, unlike many of my scenarios, you don’t get points for every unit destroyed. The world is at war and the two Titans of the Pacific are facing off, lots of people are going to die, whether the public likes it or not! In this case, you only get points for damaging and/or destroying the HVU/carrier. The more damage you inflict on the USS Reagan the more points you gain.

Scoring 0 points = Disaster and 6,000 a Triumph

.INI and Delta Files are provided for deep rebuilds.
Al “BeirutDude” Sandrik (ex-Beachinnole)
Al.Sandrik@gmail.com


< Message edited by BeirutDude -- 3/5/2021 10:16:27 PM >


_____________________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985

I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!
Post #: 1
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 1/17/2021 7:16:17 PM   
BeirutDude


Posts: 2311
Joined: 4/27/2013
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Status: offline
"You sank my battleship!"

Well carrier!

Have made a few MINOR tweaks,
1. Turned off "Realistic Submarine Commutations."
2. Added a pop up message for sinking Reagan
3. Now ends the scenario when Reagan is sunk.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by BeirutDude -- 1/17/2021 7:23:26 PM >


_____________________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985

I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!

(in reply to BeirutDude)
Post #: 2
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 1/17/2021 10:50:36 PM   
magi

 

Posts: 1528
Joined: 2/1/2014
Status: offline
darn... this sounds like fun... but i wanna play the other side.....

(in reply to BeirutDude)
Post #: 3
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 1/18/2021 10:45:02 AM   
BeirutDude


Posts: 2311
Joined: 4/27/2013
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: magi

darn... this sounds like fun... but i wanna play the other side.....


Certainly possible but not as a scenario that goes both ways, but as one PRC and one separate Western scenario. The shear number of RPs necessary to get the AI to keep the pickets/AEW/CAP/ASW and inner/outer rings going would drive a player crazy if I checked the ignore mission if human. So yes it can be done just two separate scenarios. I will look at it.

_____________________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985

I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!

(in reply to magi)
Post #: 4
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 1/18/2021 11:02:23 AM   
BeirutDude


Posts: 2311
Joined: 4/27/2013
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Status: offline
If I did a second scenario on it, think I’d pull the CSG further NE and allow the player to move her into position. Victory would be remaining on station for 24 hours. So would start about 8 hours earlier to allow Americans to ready aircraft.

One thing is then I would have to add PRC fighters to the mix as the AI is not set to attack the PRC but a human might.

_____________________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985

I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!

(in reply to BeirutDude)
Post #: 5
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 1/18/2021 8:18:57 PM   
magi

 

Posts: 1528
Joined: 2/1/2014
Status: offline
sounds good to me.....

(in reply to BeirutDude)
Post #: 6
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 1/24/2021 11:10:00 PM   
BeirutDude


Posts: 2311
Joined: 4/27/2013
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Status: offline
Updated on 2-7-2021 see below for changes


quote:

ORIGINAL: magi

darn... this sounds like fun... but i wanna play the other side.....


"So let it be written, so let it be done!"

Changes to PRC only player version...
1. Added more airbases
2. Added some Fighter and multirole aircraft

New Scenario: Western Player version
1. All changes from the PRC above
2. Added variable weather
3. Scoring is adjusted to reflect different roles
4. Only missions necessary at the beginning of the scenario have been set up, otherwise it's your game.
5. I set up the CSG-5 "Group" but feel free to set it up however you please! Have fun.

< Message edited by BeirutDude -- 2/7/2021 1:38:58 PM >


_____________________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985

I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!

(in reply to magi)
Post #: 7
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 1/30/2021 10:46:22 PM   
BeirutDude


Posts: 2311
Joined: 4/27/2013
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Status: offline
Anyone have a look at this one? if so thoughts?

_____________________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985

I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!

(in reply to BeirutDude)
Post #: 8
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 1/31/2021 2:43:15 AM   
schweggy

 

Posts: 79
Joined: 2/3/2015
Status: offline
Quickly... not played through, but I got a hit with my Chinese satellites and pinned the location of the carrier. I was able to fire off all ASBM's and did 15% damage without launching a single aircraft. This in the first 10 minutes. After that it went downhill. Early version, will download and restart the current one tomorrow or sometime next week.

BTW the launch/re-entry phases of the ASBM just sucks the life out of the scenario. Not your issue specifically, but probably needs to be addressed in an update at some point.

(in reply to BeirutDude)
Post #: 9
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 2/7/2021 1:41:08 PM   
BeirutDude


Posts: 2311
Joined: 4/27/2013
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Status: offline
Updated 02-07-2021

Just updates the description's font color.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985

I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!

(in reply to schweggy)
Post #: 10
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 2/19/2021 6:24:38 PM   
Selchu

 

Posts: 90
Joined: 5/7/2017
Status: offline
I discovered yesterday that you had done a Western version to defend the carrier. Just finished it with a final score of 2000 (68.8% damage to the Reagan). I'll be honest I did struggle when during the first attack the Chinese managed to land a missile in the Reagan's hanger bay and wipe out the Hornet portion of the airwing. I also struggled at the start. I had most of my fighters getting reloaded after I had them launch ASuW strikes and then had to change them to AAW. All in all a tight scenario as always Beirut! Great fun.

SIDE: Western Allies
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
1x E-2D Advanced Hawkeye
35x F/A-18E Super Hornet
12x F/A-18F Super Hornet
5x MH-60R Seahawk
2x SH-60K Seahawk
2x Radar (AN/FPS-20A)
1x Radar (J/FPS-4)
2x Radar (J/FPS-5)
1x DD 151 Asagiri
1x DDG 173 Kongo
2x DDG 51 Arleigh Burke [Arleigh Burke Flight I]
1x DDG 81 Winston S. Churchill [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA]
1x DE 229 Abukuma


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
196x AN/SSQ-62E DICASS
176x AN/SSQ-53F DIFAR
8x RIM-7M Sea Sparrow
7x 76mm/62 Compact HE Burst [4 rnds]
9x 20mm/85 Mk15 Phalanx Blk 0 Burst [200 rnds]
8x Mk182 SRBOC Chaff [Seduction]
4x UGM-84L Harpoon II
2x Type 89 [G-12]
42x AIM-120D AMRAAM P3I.4
18x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
2x AN/ALE-55 FOTD
14x Generic Flare Salvo [3x Cartridges, Dual Spectral]
18x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk I
54x RIM-66M-1 SM-2MR Blk III
9x J/HQS-33B DICASS [AN/SSQ-62]
24x AGM-158C LRASM
18x AGM-84N Harpoon II+
6x AGM-88E AARGM
48x RIM-66M-5 SM-2MR Blk IIIB
102x RIM-162A ESSM
12x RIM-66M-2 SM-2MR Blk IIIA
2x AIM-9X Sidewinder
9x RIM-161E SM-3 NTW Blk IIA
18x RIM-161C SM-3 NTW Blk IB
39x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IA
36x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Dual I
2x 127mm/54 HE-CVT [HiFrag]
61x Mk214 Sea Gnat Chaff [Seduction]
44x Mk234 Nulka
13x Mk59 Mod 0 Floating Decoy
2x Mk50 Barracuda Mod 0 ALWT



SIDE: PRC
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
4x BZK-005 Sea Eagle UAV
5x H-6H Badger
1x H-6J Badger
49x H-6K Badger [God of War]
2x J-11BS Flanker C [Su-27UBK Copy]
4x J-16 Flying Shark [Su-30MKK Copy]
6x Su-30MKK Flanker G
2x Y-8CB Cub [GX1]
2x Z-20F
5x Z-9D Dauphin 2
1x DDG 136 Hangzhou [Pr.956E Sovremenny]
1x Type 052C Luyang II [170 Lanzhou]
2x Type 052D Luyang III [173 Changsha]
1x Type 055 Nanchang [101 Nanchang, Zheng He]
1x Type 041 Yuan


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
12x YJ-82 [YJ-802Q]
34x HHQ-9
26x HQ-10 [FL-3000N]
48x HQ-9A
1x HQ-16A [SA-17 Semi-Copy]
6x 30mm China H/PJ-14 [Type 1130, 500 rnds]
21x 30mm China H/PJ-12 [Type 730, 240 rnds]
3x 100mm/55 H/PJ-87 HECVT
4x 130mm China H/PJ-38 HE
53x Generic Chaff Rocket
8x YJ-18 [3M54E Klub Copy]
2x YJ-18 [3M54E Klub Copy, Rocket Boosted Penetrator]
2x 30mm China H/PJ-17 [20 rnds]
13x Generic Flare Rocket [Single Spectral]
28x YJ-100 [CJ-10A Mod] ASCM
216x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
44x KD-63 [YJ-63]
40x YJ-91 [Kh-31P, ARM]
6x AS-17 Krypton C [Kh-31P, ARM]
86x Generic Flare Salvo [4x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
24x AS-18 Kazoo B [Kh-59MK]
2x Yu-10 [ADCAP MOD Copy]
12x DF-21D [ASBM, 600kg HE Conventional, CSS-5 Mod-4]
12x DF-21D [ASBM, 600kg HE Conventional, CSS-5 Mod-4] RV
4x CH-AS-X-13 [ASBM, Conventional]
3x CH-AS-X-13 RV [ASBM]
4x Generic Acoustic Decoy
12x DF-26D [ASBM, 600kg HE Conventional]
12x DF-26D [ASBM, 600kg HE Conventional] RV





< Message edited by Selchu -- 2/19/2021 6:25:23 PM >

(in reply to BeirutDude)
Post #: 11
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 2/20/2021 1:50:31 PM   
BeirutDude


Posts: 2311
Joined: 4/27/2013
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Status: offline
Glad you enjoyed it. To be honest, that is about the same as I did on my runs through it. Hard to keep the carrier from being hit, at least once.

_____________________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985

I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!

(in reply to Selchu)
Post #: 12
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 2/20/2021 1:52:43 PM   
BeirutDude


Posts: 2311
Joined: 4/27/2013
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Status: offline
quote:

All in all a tight scenario as always Beirut! Great fun.


Oh hey, no need to be formal, you can just call me, "The Dude!"




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985

I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!

(in reply to Selchu)
Post #: 13
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 2/20/2021 3:03:45 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1341
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: online
Just don't pee on his rug man!

Mike

(in reply to BeirutDude)
Post #: 14
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 2/20/2021 9:14:25 PM   
Selchu

 

Posts: 90
Joined: 5/7/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BeirutDude

Oh hey, no need to be formal, you can just call me, "The Dude!"






No Problem Dude






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Selchu -- 2/20/2021 9:17:12 PM >

(in reply to BeirutDude)
Post #: 15
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 2/20/2021 9:18:55 PM   
Selchu

 

Posts: 90
Joined: 5/7/2017
Status: offline
In unrelated news I'm replaying the scenario and approaching the 12 hour mark with no damage. Wonder can i make it through. I also if you don't mind might change it slightly for a bit of craic. I was thinking about putting an F-14D squadron in place of one of the F-18 squadrons. I'm curious how it might work out.

(in reply to Selchu)
Post #: 16
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 2/23/2021 12:48:07 PM   
BeirutDude


Posts: 2311
Joined: 4/27/2013
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Selchu

In unrelated news I'm replaying the scenario and approaching the 12 hour mark with no damage. Wonder can i make it through. I also if you don't mind might change it slightly for a bit of craic. I was thinking about putting an F-14D squadron in place of one of the F-18 squadrons. I'm curious how it might work out.


Have fun, if it works for you go ahead and submit it as an alternative to the original scenario.

_____________________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985

I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!

(in reply to Selchu)
Post #: 17
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 2/27/2021 5:19:24 PM   
nogravity

 

Posts: 37
Joined: 6/15/2012
Status: offline
Thanks for the mod. I played the PRC last night and managed to score 4 hits with ASBM in the first strike. As a result, the subsequent airstrike was carried out without much aerial opposition except a few Hornets launched before the ASBM strike. Majority of H-6 loss was due to its missiles need final approach guidance within the naval SAM umbrellas.

SIDE: Western Allies
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
2x C-2A(R) Greyhound
1x CG 54 Antietam [Ticonderoga Baseline 3, VLS]
1x CG 62 Chancellorsville [Ticonderoga Baseline 4, VLS]
1x CVN 76 Ronald Reagan [Nimitz Class]
1x DDG 39 Hobart
3x DDG 51 Arleigh Burke [Arleigh Burke Flight I]
1x DDG 81 Winston S. Churchill [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA]
1x DDG 85 McCampbell [Arleigh Burke Flight IIA]
1x DE 229 Abukuma
4x E-2D Advanced Hawkeye
4x EA-18G Growler
33x F/A-18E Super Hornet
12x F/A-18F Super Hornet
17x MH-60R Seahawk
1x MH-60R Seahawk
8x MH-60S Knighthawk
1x P-1
2x P-8A Poseidon
1x Radar (AN/FPS-20A)
1x Radar (J/FPS-4)
2x Radar (J/FPS-5)


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
23x 127mm/54 HE-CVT [HiFrag]
3x 127mm/62 HE-CVT [HiFrag]
48x 20mm/100 Mk15 Phalanx Blk 1B Burst [300 rnds]
2x 20mm/85 Mk15 Phalanx Blk 0 Burst [200 rnds]
2x 25mm/75 Typhoon-G Burst [10 rnds]
3x 76mm/62 Compact HE Burst [4 rnds]
8x AIM-120D AMRAAM P3I.4
1x AN/ALE-55 FOTD
11x AN/SSQ-53F DIFAR
6x AN/SSQ-62E DICASS
2x AN/SSQ-77B VLAD
2x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
23x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
25x J/HQS-12 DIFAR
13x J/HQS-33B DICASS [AN/SSQ-62]
2x Mk182 SRBOC Chaff [Seduction]
12x Mk214 Sea Gnat Chaff [Seduction]
8x Mk234 Nulka
70x Mk245 GIANT Flare
4x Mk59 Mod 0 Floating Decoy
4x PIRATE Flare
11x RIM-161C SM-3 NTW Blk IB
29x RIM-161E SM-3 NTW Blk IIA
300x RIM-162A ESSM
18x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk I
4x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk IA
2x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Dual I
40x RIM-66M-1 SM-2MR Blk III
104x RIM-66M-2 SM-2MR Blk IIIA
116x RIM-66M-5 SM-2MR Blk IIIB



SIDE: PRC
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
9x H-6H Badger
13x H-6K Badger [God of War]
1x J-16 Flying Shark [Su-30MKK Copy]
1x J-20B Mighty Dragon


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
6x AS-17 Krypton C [Kh-31P, ARM]
12x AS-18 Kazoo B [Kh-59MK]
1x CH-AS-X-13 [ASBM, Conventional]
1x CH-AS-X-13 RV [ASBM]
12x DF-21D [ASBM, 600kg HE Conventional, CSS-5 Mod-4]
12x DF-21D [ASBM, 600kg HE Conventional, CSS-5 Mod-4] RV
12x DF-26D [ASBM, 600kg HE Conventional]
12x DF-26D [ASBM, 600kg HE Conventional] RV
97x Generic Chaff Salvo [4x Cartridges]
52x Generic Flare Salvo [4x Cartridges, Single Spectral]
356x KD-63 [YJ-63]
4x PL-12
25x PL-15
88x YJ-100 [CJ-10A Mod] ASCM
4x YJ-91 [Kh-31P, ARM]


(in reply to BeirutDude)
Post #: 18
RE: Scenario for PT: "To Kill the Queen, 2022" - 2/28/2021 1:55:59 PM   
BeirutDude


Posts: 2311
Joined: 4/27/2013
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Status: offline
Hmmmm, would have hoped the RIM-161c Sm-3s were better than that. Might have been a bad teleport where the ASBM Shooters had a bad angle/DLZ or bad luck?

_____________________________

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985

I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!

(in reply to nogravity)
Post #: 19
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> To Kill the Queen, 2022, (Submitted) Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.402