Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

[Answered] ASuW A/C + Rdr vs Airtracks

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Tech Support >> [Answered] ASuW A/C + Rdr vs Airtracks Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
[Answered] ASuW A/C + Rdr vs Airtracks - 1/11/2021 3:03:13 PM   
Parel803

 

Posts: 553
Joined: 10/10/2019
From: Netherlands
Status: online
Searching for confirmation or just the fact that I'm doing something wrong.
Is it correct, in the game, that a Airborne SurfaceSearch radar like the AN/APS-143B on a Aurora and a AN/ZPY-4 on a FireScout is not seeing any A/C or missile tracks? Even if they would at low altitude. Hope someone can help me out.
With regards GJ

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Rory Noonan -- 1/13/2021 6:16:27 AM >
Post #: 1
RE: ASuW A/C + Rdr vs Airtracks - 1/11/2021 3:55:43 PM   
p1t1o

 

Posts: 271
Joined: 4/6/2015
Status: offline
That is correct.

Radars and other sensors in CMO have specific functions (eg: surface search, ground search, space search etc.) and can have one or several of them. Most dedicated surface-search radars cannot search for air targets. Some advanced AEW radars can - refer to specific sensor details in the DB.

This is broadly representative of reality, not all radars can do all jobs.

< Message edited by p1t1o -- 1/11/2021 3:59:50 PM >

(in reply to Parel803)
Post #: 2
RE: ASuW A/C + Rdr vs Airtracks - 1/11/2021 4:41:36 PM   
Parel803

 

Posts: 553
Joined: 10/10/2019
From: Netherlands
Status: online
Thx for the answer

(in reply to p1t1o)
Post #: 3
RE: ASuW A/C + Rdr vs Airtracks - 1/12/2021 4:20:56 AM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13231
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: online
That's actually a good point, most surface-search radars have some residual capability against low-altitude air targets.

_____________________________


(in reply to Parel803)
Post #: 4
RE: ASuW A/C + Rdr vs Airtracks - 1/13/2021 11:12:58 AM   
SeaQueen


Posts: 1439
Joined: 4/14/2007
From: Washington D.C.
Status: offline
Sometimes I think in computer games and models there's a tendency to think about things like, "this is a radar for detecting boats, therefore it detects only boats," when really it just means that it is pointed at the water, has software to show some preference for boat-like things, and hardware optimized to try to make boat-like things more visible. That doesn't mean it only picks up boats, though. It picks up radar reflections, and depending on how the radar is set up, it might pick up things that are not boats but none the less generate a radar reflection (chaff and other decoys are great examples!). Some of those things are just as useful to know about as boats. Then there's the human factor, which is whether the operator would be able to determine that a given radar target is not a boat, and is in fact some other boat-like-in-some-way thing that the radar optimized for finding boats just happened to pick up?

Radar... so much to nerd out on...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dimitris
That's actually a good point, most surface-search radars have some residual capability against low-altitude air targets.


(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 5
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Tech Support >> [Answered] ASuW A/C + Rdr vs Airtracks Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.475