Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Adjusting Artillery

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: Taxman66, Robotron
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Strategic Command Series >> Strategic Command: World War I >> Adjusting Artillery Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Adjusting Artillery - 10/12/2020 7:48:50 PM   
dwesolick


Posts: 546
Joined: 6/24/2002
From: Colorado
Status: offline
Been tinkering around with the editor and wanted to tone down the artillery a bit, possibly by reducing shells from a max of 10 to, say, 5.
I can't seem to find where to do this in the editor. I see attack values, etc. in campaign menu, but can't find where to adjust shells. Can anyone help?

thanks!


_____________________________

"The Navy has a moth-eaten tradition that the captain who loses his ship is disgraced. What do they have all those ships for, if not to hurl them at the enemy?" --Douglas MacArthur
Post #: 1
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 10/13/2020 9:22:01 AM   
BillRunacre

 

Posts: 3853
Joined: 7/22/2013
Status: offline
With the campaign open in the Editor you'll need to go to:

Campaign -> Edit Country Data -> Edit Combat Target Data

Then select the relevant artillery unit type, and one of the boxes in the top right is for its maximum shells.

You'll want to use the Apply Data function in the bottom right to apply this to all other countries too.

_____________________________

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FurySoftware

We're also on Facebook! https://www.facebook.com/FurySoftware/

(in reply to dwesolick)
Post #: 2
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 10/13/2020 1:23:56 PM   
dwesolick


Posts: 546
Joined: 6/24/2002
From: Colorado
Status: offline
Got it done. Thank you Bill!

_____________________________

"The Navy has a moth-eaten tradition that the captain who loses his ship is disgraced. What do they have all those ships for, if not to hurl them at the enemy?" --Douglas MacArthur

(in reply to BillRunacre)
Post #: 3
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 10/16/2020 1:48:55 AM   
Chernobyl

 

Posts: 104
Joined: 8/27/2012
Status: offline
I agree in general with toning down upgraded regular artillery corps. They are insane. I understand artillery was king in WWI but it's too powerful right now :)

(in reply to dwesolick)
Post #: 4
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 10/16/2020 6:12:33 PM   
dwesolick


Posts: 546
Joined: 6/24/2002
From: Colorado
Status: offline
Yep. I toned it down to max 5 shells and it seems to be much more realistic. I'm playing against the Central Powers AI and the German artillery still packs a decent punch, but not a knockout blow all by itself. Feels about right compared to the previous game I played (against Allied AI).

I also made the turns simultaneous to extend gameplay (while toning down MPPs so they aren't doubled) and that is working great so far. Game feels a lot more cerebral and less rushed than before.

_____________________________

"The Navy has a moth-eaten tradition that the captain who loses his ship is disgraced. What do they have all those ships for, if not to hurl them at the enemy?" --Douglas MacArthur

(in reply to Chernobyl)
Post #: 5
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 10/16/2020 7:13:51 PM   
mdsmall

 

Posts: 164
Joined: 4/28/2020
From: Vancouver, BC
Status: online
Hi - can you describe a bit more how the simultaneous turns work? Is unit movement simultaneous for both sides? How does this change combats? This would be worth describing in a separate thread.

(in reply to dwesolick)
Post #: 6
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 10/16/2020 9:21:24 PM   
dwesolick


Posts: 546
Joined: 6/24/2002
From: Colorado
Status: offline
Haven't noticed any dramatic difference in game play so far. It's still I go/You go except that we now each get to go for each turn. It makes the game play out in a more sedate fashion rather than the hell for leather, "Oh my God, it's 1916 already!?" fashion. In a nutshell, all I've really done is add a lot more turns to the game.

The AI is giving me a very good game so far (I'm currently in Feb 1915) and since I scaled back MPP production to fit the greater number of turns, technical progress feels about right for both sides so far. All in all I'm very happy with the game so far and I think I'll do the same thing with the SC WWII Europe game when I get around to playing it.

_____________________________

"The Navy has a moth-eaten tradition that the captain who loses his ship is disgraced. What do they have all those ships for, if not to hurl them at the enemy?" --Douglas MacArthur

(in reply to mdsmall)
Post #: 7
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 10/17/2020 8:03:44 AM   
Willard


Posts: 124
Joined: 2/7/2004
From: Up the Nung river past Do Lung bridge...
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dwesolick

Haven't noticed any dramatic difference in game play so far. It's still I go/You go except that we now each get to go for each turn. It makes the game play out in a more sedate fashion rather than the hell for leather, "Oh my God, it's 1916 already!?" fashion. In a nutshell, all I've really done is add a lot more turns to the game.

The AI is giving me a very good game so far (I'm currently in Feb 1915) and since I scaled back MPP production to fit the greater number of turns, technical progress feels about right for both sides so far. All in all I'm very happy with the game so far and I think I'll do the same thing with the SC WWII Europe game when I get around to playing it.


Is changing the turns & halving the MPPs require a mod or is this a setting? Sorry, new to this game so unsure on this aspect.

(in reply to dwesolick)
Post #: 8
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 10/18/2020 1:45:39 PM   
dwesolick


Posts: 546
Joined: 6/24/2002
From: Colorado
Status: offline
No mod required. I did it myself in the editor and it is pretty easy to do.

_____________________________

"The Navy has a moth-eaten tradition that the captain who loses his ship is disgraced. What do they have all those ships for, if not to hurl them at the enemy?" --Douglas MacArthur

(in reply to Willard)
Post #: 9
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 11/21/2020 9:48:27 AM   
stockwellpete

 

Posts: 156
Joined: 12/20/2012
Status: offline
Yes, I agree about artillery being a bit too powerful, particularly from 1916 onwards. I only play against the AI, in my latest game as the Central Powers at Veteran level and I am just getting blasted to death on the Western Front. The AI seems to be very good at getting 2 artillery pieces to fire at a unit and sometimes will completely destroy it without having to send infantry in. Of course, artillery should be very destructive, but would it be able to completely wipe out corps like this? Restricting the number of shells seems like one good way of adjusting things, whether there are any others I am not sure - a ceiling on the number of strength points any individual unit can lose in the same turn due to artillery fire perhaps? Maybe the loss of 5 points should be the maximum?

I do realise part of the problem is with my own weakness at the game at the moment. I do need to think about defending in depth on the Western Front and having a second line of trenches to mitigate the loss of the first line and prevent breakthroughs turning into a rout. So I probably need to buy a few more corps and be more selective about my research. Maybe I have not got the balance quite right yet. Really fascinating game though. Lockdown? What lockdown?

(in reply to dwesolick)
Post #: 10
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 11/21/2020 9:51:47 AM   
stockwellpete

 

Posts: 156
Joined: 12/20/2012
Status: offline
Cutting down from 10 to 5 sounds like quite a lot. I am interested in trying a change, but maybe I will reduce it to 8 at first and see how that works.

(in reply to dwesolick)
Post #: 11
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 11/21/2020 1:12:19 PM   
Taxman66


Posts: 1520
Joined: 3/19/2008
From: Columbia, MD. USA
Status: online
I think the best fix is to reduce the # of Tech investment chits for Arty to 1. This will slow down the arrival of the killer artillery and allow for Inf Weapons tech (which does provide some defense to Art) to keep pace.

_____________________________

"Part of the $10 million I spent on gambling, part on booze and part on women. The rest I spent foolishly." - George Raft

(in reply to stockwellpete)
Post #: 12
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 11/21/2020 6:12:00 PM   
stockwellpete

 

Posts: 156
Joined: 12/20/2012
Status: offline
Yes, that sounds like a good idea too. Is it simple to adjust in the Editor, do you know?

(in reply to Taxman66)
Post #: 13
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 11/21/2020 7:02:04 PM   
Taxman66


Posts: 1520
Joined: 3/19/2008
From: Columbia, MD. USA
Status: online
I would let the US keep the ability to invest multiple chits so as to catch up.

_____________________________

"Part of the $10 million I spent on gambling, part on booze and part on women. The rest I spent foolishly." - George Raft

(in reply to stockwellpete)
Post #: 14
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 11/21/2020 7:34:54 PM   
Chernobyl

 

Posts: 104
Joined: 8/27/2012
Status: offline
I would be happy for there to be some official change. Either reduce ammo or reduce the chance of de-entrenching from 100% to like 50%. It's supposed to be tough to break thru trenches even in 1918. Right now we have artillery obliterating any level of entrenchment easily starting in mid 1915. I just took Verdun against a human opponent with almost no casualties in July 1915 and there was honestly nothing he could have done to stop it.

< Message edited by Chernobyl -- 11/21/2020 7:37:36 PM >

(in reply to Taxman66)
Post #: 15
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 11/21/2020 7:53:58 PM   
Ktonos

 

Posts: 269
Joined: 3/16/2018
Status: offline
Maybe have the 50% chance to de-entrench apply only against fort cities? Always assumed that heavy barrages that deentrench and obliterate regular positions represent gas attacks, and with this assumption it seems logical. But fort cities yes, should be tougher

(in reply to Chernobyl)
Post #: 16
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 11/22/2020 1:42:37 AM   
ThisEndUp

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 6/24/2020
Status: offline
An alternative would be to set a minimum entrenchment level, such that artillery can never fully de-entrench a unit. This minimum would be dependent on tech and terrain of course. It always struck me as odd that you can completely de-entrench a unit in the mountains or in a city - it's not as if you can level the entire area.

(in reply to Ktonos)
Post #: 17
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 11/22/2020 2:17:21 PM   
FOARP

 

Posts: 522
Joined: 12/24/2012
Status: offline
For my mod I've reduced artillery to 6 shells, and also introduced a 3-shell heavy artillery unit with one more hex of range (heavy artillery is right there in the base code).

_____________________________

American Front: a Work-in-progress CSA v USA Turtledove mod for SC:WW1 can be seen here.

(in reply to ThisEndUp)
Post #: 18
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 11/23/2020 12:58:39 PM   
Chernobyl

 

Posts: 104
Joined: 8/27/2012
Status: offline
Other thoughts on artillery:

The main thing it does is de-entrench with 100% chance one level per ammo, once you upgrade at least once.

But more than that, it doesn't even need to be at high readiness. For example, an upgraded artillery which is understrength and not under command of a friendly HQ will still de-entrench 100% of the time. No spare MPP to reinforce your understrength artillery? No problem cause they don't even need to be at full strength!

I believe it is less likely to deal strength damage if it has low readiness, but this often doesn't matter. You can easily rail your artillery around the map and not need a HQ for it to completely de-entrench an enemy unit, leaving it as good as dead. This makes it extremely easy to concentrate artillery against one enemy nation like France of Russia, in order to trigger an early snowball effect (high losses for one nation lead to low national morale and friendly HQ experience gain which leads to even higher losses which are too difficult to replace with the budget of one nation alone).

It seems clear to me that artillery's performance ought to depend largely on its readiness, just like all other units in the game.

I think it's tough to get artillery right, and I don't want to nerf it too hard. German artillery smashed Russian units in Poland in 1915, but even greater concentrations of artillery failed to annihilate German units in 1916. It should be powerful but still have difficulty completely breaking through extensive trench lines. Artillery should actually be LESS devastating against heavily-entrenched enemy units. Ideally it should also lose steam the more it fires during a single turn, to simulate loss of accuracy due to barrels wearing out.

A humble proposal:

Arty De-entrenchment chance by upgrade level:
Level 0: 0%
Level 1: (0.5 - (0.05 * # of times fired this turn)) * readiness %
level 2: (0.65 - (0.05 * # of times fired this turn)) * readiness %

In other words, assuming 100% readiness, level 1 artillery would have a maximum of 50% chance to de-entrench every time it fires, lowering down to a minimum of 5% after firing 9 times. This would yield an expected 2.0 de-entrenchments if it fires 5 times, but only 2.8 if it fires all 10 shells at once.

This would also have interesting strategy effects regarding artillery placement and concentration and shell conservation which I won't go into here. But I will mention that it would also lead to more sporadic artillery fire (checking to see if you get the de-entrenchment you want, calling of an attack if you get unlucky). In a way that might be more "realistic" with units coming under moderate artillery bombardment often rather than artillery only showing its face during massive assaults.

I'm not sure it's the ideal solution. Concentrating multiple batteries together might still be too strong. But I wanted to put my idea out there.

(in reply to FOARP)
Post #: 19
RE: Adjusting Artillery - 11/23/2020 4:26:24 PM   
stockwellpete

 

Posts: 156
Joined: 12/20/2012
Status: offline
Just to mention another indicator that artillery is probably too powerful at the moment is the use of "tunnel warfare" and mining in WW1. Obviously this is not represented in the game right now (and it is hard to see how it could be), but it does illustrate there were definite limits to the impact of artillery bombardments in certain situations (including mountainous regions).

(in reply to Chernobyl)
Post #: 20
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Strategic Command Series >> Strategic Command: World War I >> Adjusting Artillery Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.156