Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Air War FUBAR in 1.12??

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/13/2020 12:28:15 AM   
chuckbbq

 

Posts: 40
Joined: 9/21/2012
Status: offline
Playing GC as the Axis for the first time in 1.12 and my Soviet opponent has been hammering my airbases every turn. on turn 9 I had enough. First thing I did was send my airbases back to the railhead, 3 to a hex, load them up with flak, transfer my fighters so they had 1% flown, cranked up intercept on the air doctrine all the way and turned off ground support. I open turn 10, check his airbase bombing attacks and, well, see below. Typical bombing, 58 fighters intercept and 165 pieces of flak participate, only for me to lose 10 Fighters and 4 Bombers and Soviet loses a whopping 5 Fighters. It seem like the only time I inflict substantial losses is when 100+ fighters participate. In fact, it's so bad, I lost around 100 fighters last turn, my fighter pool will be drained in no time. He bombs a quarter of the units on my line now, and takes insignificant losses. Am I missing something, or is the air war complete FUBAR in 1.12? This is extremely frustrating, and if this continues my fighter pool will be drained in no time. And it's summer 1941, I can't imagine what it'll be like in later years. Is anyone else experiencing the same thing? I don't remember it being this bad in previous versions.






Attachment (1)
Post #: 1
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/13/2020 12:57:50 AM   
Telemecus


Posts: 4678
Joined: 3/20/2016
Status: offline
There is an interception bug and you can see the details here https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4809464

Based on your description though your fighter fatigue should be sky high now making your fighters worthless - it is not until you have a rotation to have fresh fighters that they will actually do their job.

And finally your airbases are in fighter range of the enemy, even in range of I-15 fighters. The very minimum you should be doing now is keeping them out of Soviet fighter range. That is easy! You have much longer range fighters than the Soviets do and on your internal lines you can have staging bases to conduct air missions to extend range even further. Given the position you say you are in there is no way you should allow them to escort bombers to your airbases.

< Message edited by Telemecus -- 6/13/2020 1:49:28 AM >


_____________________________

Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT

(in reply to chuckbbq)
Post #: 2
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/13/2020 12:58:14 AM   
Telemecus


Posts: 4678
Joined: 3/20/2016
Status: offline
double post

_____________________________

Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT

(in reply to Telemecus)
Post #: 3
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/13/2020 1:49:54 AM   
chuckbbq

 

Posts: 40
Joined: 9/21/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Telemecus



Based on your description though your fighter fatigue should be sky high now making your fighters worthless - it is not until you have a rotation to have fresh fighters that they will actually do their job.




That's the surprising part, not at all! Almost all were under 20 fatigue. I keep a fresh rotation, it doesn't seem to help. The airbase from my screenshot is 12 hexes behind the lines, maybe 15 from a Russian airbase. How much further back do they need to be?






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by chuckbbq -- 6/13/2020 1:51:06 AM >

(in reply to Telemecus)
Post #: 4
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/13/2020 1:54:14 AM   
Telemecus


Posts: 4678
Joined: 3/20/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: chuckbbq
That's the surprising part, not at all! Almost all were under 20 fatigue. I keep a fresh rotation, it doesn't seem to help. The airbase from my screenshot is 12 hexes behind the lines, maybe 15 from a Russian airbase. How much further back do they need to be?



Ah OK on fatigue - is their morale still close to or above their base morale?

MiG3s from memory have a range of 19 hexes and is their longest range fighter so need to be out of range of that. On a later turn they have very long range P40B fighters which you do not have to worry about but hurricanes which you do and they have twenty something range - so keep outside of them when their turn to arrive is up.

_____________________________

Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT

(in reply to chuckbbq)
Post #: 5
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/13/2020 1:57:41 AM   
Telemecus


Posts: 4678
Joined: 3/20/2016
Status: offline
Just seen the screenshot. The morale is quite good although some like IIJG51 and IJG54 do need to be cycled through national reserve.

Also I notice you have replacements on for all fighter groups including the ones about to withdraw. That alone will mean you lose a couple more hundred fighters that way?

Overall then I would say you can recover quickly if you get your airbases out of escort range for now.

< Message edited by Telemecus -- 6/13/2020 2:00:17 AM >


_____________________________

Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT

(in reply to Telemecus)
Post #: 6
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/13/2020 3:03:49 AM   
chuckbbq

 

Posts: 40
Joined: 9/21/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Telemecus


Also I notice you have replacements on for all fighter groups including the ones about to withdraw. That alone will mean you lose a couple more hundred fighters that way?




I always thought that when an airgroup withdrew, that the physical planes returned to the pool, it was the unit itself capable of carrying the planes that withdrew. Have I had that wrong this entire time? Are the planes lost once it withdraws?

(in reply to Telemecus)
Post #: 7
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/13/2020 3:07:22 AM   
Telemecus


Posts: 4678
Joined: 3/20/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: chuckbbq
I always thought that when an airgroup withdrew, that the physical planes returned to the pool, it was the unit itself capable of carrying the planes that withdrew. Have I had that wrong this entire time? Are the planes lost once it withdraws?


I am afraid so - withdraw means you lose the lot. Watch out in your arrivals/withdraws schedule for when it says "disband" - in those cases you do keep the planes in the pool. But when it says withdraw, then not.

_____________________________

Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT

(in reply to chuckbbq)
Post #: 8
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/13/2020 3:47:05 AM   
caliss39

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 4/26/2020
Status: offline
Playing Barbarossa and ever time the Russians use their air power it does some damage to my units. Every time I use my air power it never does any damage to them(except for bombing airports. I even got all my planes on just one of Russias unit and no damage what so ever. What the story.

(in reply to chuckbbq)
Post #: 9
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/13/2020 8:35:24 PM   
Bozo_the_Clown


Posts: 850
Joined: 6/25/2013
From: Bozotown
Status: offline
quote:

Playing Barbarossa and ever time the Russians use their air power it does some damage to my units. Every time I use my air power it never does any damage to them(except for bombing airports. I even got all my planes on just one of Russias unit and no damage what so ever. What the story.


Sorry, but you are doing something wrong if you get these results.

(in reply to caliss39)
Post #: 10
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/13/2020 9:28:53 PM   
Telemecus


Posts: 4678
Joined: 3/20/2016
Status: offline
Why not post screenshots - we can work out what is going wrong for you?

_____________________________

Wargamers Discord https://discord.gg/U6DcDxT

(in reply to Bozo_the_Clown)
Post #: 11
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/18/2020 12:36:11 AM   
Disgruntled Veteran


Posts: 615
Joined: 2/19/2012
Status: offline
It's the same for me. I've lost over 1k planes to airfield bombing by T14. That's more planes lost on the ground than probably all my 12-14 WITE games combined. Its still only T14. I'm probably going to disband my airforce in this game for manpower. I really want to quit this one, but I'll stick it out.

The solution is not to move the luftwaffe 15+ hexes behind the line. That's retarded. Airpower is partially broken in 1.12. I could see the Red air force launching raids in high numbers and achieving results, but their losses should be much higher, especially in 41. Right now they are getting a 3 to 1 kill ratio minimum against a fresh luftwaffe.

This is stupid.

(in reply to Telemecus)
Post #: 12
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/18/2020 12:57:19 AM   
Bozo_the_Clown


Posts: 850
Joined: 6/25/2013
From: Bozotown
Status: offline
The next patch might fix this but why not have a house rule to disallow airfield bombings after turn 1. I find them unrealistic and boring/tedious anyway.

(in reply to Disgruntled Veteran)
Post #: 13
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/18/2020 1:00:44 AM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 3256
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Disgruntled Veteran

It's the same for me. I've lost over 1k planes to airfield bombing by T14. That's more planes lost on the ground than probably all my 12-14 WITE games combined. Its still only T14. I'm probably going to disband my airforce in this game for manpower. I really want to quit this one, but I'll stick it out.

The solution is not to move the luftwaffe 15+ hexes behind the line. That's retarded. Airpower is partially broken in 1.12. I could see the Red air force launching raids in high numbers and achieving results, but their losses should be much higher, especially in 41. Right now they are getting a 3 to 1 kill ratio minimum against a fresh luftwaffe.

This is stupid.


I feel sorry for you to suffer such a fate. I admire your tenacity but you and your opponent should know this is not right. To me the solution is not to play at all in 12.x at the moment or have an agreement to have no airbase bombing.

(in reply to Disgruntled Veteran)
Post #: 14
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/18/2020 1:01:35 AM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 3256
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bozo_the_Clown

The next patch might fix this but why not have a house rule to disallow airfield bombings after turn 1. I find them unrealistic and boring/tedious anyway.


Agreed.

(in reply to Bozo_the_Clown)
Post #: 15
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/18/2020 2:15:21 AM   
redrum68

 

Posts: 485
Joined: 11/26/2017
Status: offline
The key in v1.12 seems to be ensuring each of the hexes with airbases has say 2-3 fresh fighter air groups. These will intercept in large numbers when directly bombed and tear apart Soviet fighters/bombers. But you can not at all rely on those fighters intercepting in large numbers anything but their own hex in my experience.

< Message edited by redrum68 -- 6/18/2020 2:19:48 AM >

(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 16
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/22/2020 2:15:48 PM   
Bozo_the_Clown


Posts: 850
Joined: 6/25/2013
From: Bozotown
Status: offline
The air war in WitE is broken. I also find it incredibly tedious and boring. So why not agree to a house rule. HLYA suggested to only allow ground bombings in preparation for an actual attack. That might work but it would definitely be a huge advantage for the Axis in 41 because the Russians don't attack that much until blizzard. Maybe it would be better to establish a limit of 10 ground bombings per turn per side? Airbase bombing should be completely disallowed after turn 1.

The game is so much more fun without this.


(in reply to redrum68)
Post #: 17
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/22/2020 2:28:45 PM   
eskuche

 

Posts: 505
Joined: 3/27/2018
From: USA
Status: offline
I respect anyone's decision to make this a house rule but as someone who has invested time and effort into my little plane groups I would find it appalling :). Airbase bombing should never be an issue given both sides know how to play. Just pull back behind escort range.

I can support a ground bombing limit, however, as (and I will keep parroting this) Soviet unit-bombing can almost outstrip German replacements, as discussed elsewhere. I think 25 tac bombing missions is reasonable for the latter. LB bombing is meh generally except for the fatigue you can perpetrate on infantry regiments so should still be unlimited.

(in reply to Bozo_the_Clown)
Post #: 18
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/22/2020 5:58:39 PM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 3256
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bozo_the_Clown

The air war in WitE is broken. I also find it incredibly tedious and boring. So why not agree to a house rule. HLYA suggested to only allow ground bombings in preparation for an actual attack. That might work but it would definitely be a huge advantage for the Axis in 41 because the Russians don't attack that much until blizzard. Maybe it would be better to establish a limit of 10 ground bombings per turn per side? Airbase bombing should be completely disallowed after turn 1.

The game is so much more fun without this.




I 100% agree WitE air war is broken hence why I came out with possible house rules to compensate. I like the limit of 10 hexes a turn for ground bombing. That way the Airforce is used for ground support.

(in reply to Bozo_the_Clown)
Post #: 19
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/22/2020 6:23:57 PM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 3256
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: eskuche

I respect anyone's decision to make this a house rule but as someone who has invested time and effort into my little plane groups I would find it appalling :). Airbase bombing should never be an issue given both sides know how to play. Just pull back behind escort range.

I can support a ground bombing limit, however, as (and I will keep parroting this) Soviet unit-bombing can almost outstrip German replacements, as discussed elsewhere. I think 25 tac bombing missions is reasonable for the latter. LB bombing is meh generally except for the fatigue you can perpetrate on infantry regiments so should still be unlimited.


LB's can be very effective in the early years before your IL2's are a major force. Let me refine this down a little bit. HEAVY LB's (not PE's and SB's) can be very effective in the early years before your IL2's are a major force. So my questions are, "How do you have your LB's organized? How many per base? How many bases fly together? What targets are you attacking with the HLB's?"


(in reply to eskuche)
Post #: 20
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 6/22/2020 10:38:39 PM   
eskuche

 

Posts: 505
Joined: 3/27/2018
From: USA
Status: offline
Oh good, an exam!

Here are the facts: fast light LB's SB-2 and Pe-2 have 6 x 100 kg bombs, whereas the IL-4 and DB-3B have 10 x 100 kg. TB-3 have 250 kg. F/B's have 2 x 100 kg and are probably irrelevant unless you're farming up XP/morale for running missions on them. A few rare ones have 500 kg bombs, and all have some sorts of machine guns.

The knowledge that's been touted around is that heavy bombs with larger blast radius are better against dense terrain or forted units, whereas light bombs have lower radius, but you're hitting more units. This suggests that you should use IL-4/DB-3Bs against open targets. In practice, these level bombers regardless of miles flown tend to fall off in terms of bombing kills around 3-5 sorties in.

I have suspected that this was an issue with supply, which in 12.xx is drawn from the closest base and then, supposedly, from other depots on a per-need basis. It's also possible in this black box that it's better to spread out your 14 regiments over 14 (or 7) airbases, and they will draw supply separately and without overdrawing from one source. This is conjecture, but it is the only other factor that you could be alluding to in the past few messages (ruling out low fatigue, miles flown, enemy interception and escort, sortie range, AA pathing, morale/experience, guards status, rail need).

Edit: also empirically, the heavies do much better against airbases. Could be due to less AA turn-arounds due to their higher endurance.

I hope this is enough for at least a B+.

< Message edited by eskuche -- 6/22/2020 10:40:09 PM >

(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 21
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 7/11/2020 4:44:24 PM   
heliodorus04


Posts: 1624
Joined: 11/1/2008
From: Denver Colorado
Status: offline
Was there ever a version where the air war resembled anything close to eastern front historical data?
I remember that being a house rule upon release...

_____________________________

Spring 2018-Playing: Demyansk Shield: Frozen Fortress; Advanced Squad Leader,
Reading: Bonhoeffer
Rulebooks: ASL (always ASL), Holland'44, Demyansk Shield: Frozen Fortress

(in reply to eskuche)
Post #: 22
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 7/11/2020 5:07:00 PM   
Bozo_the_Clown


Posts: 850
Joined: 6/25/2013
From: Bozotown
Status: offline
quote:

Was there ever a version where the air war resembled anything close to eastern front historical data?


No

(in reply to heliodorus04)
Post #: 23
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 7/13/2020 11:19:38 PM   
thedoctorking


Posts: 1905
Joined: 4/29/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: redrum68

The key in v1.12 seems to be ensuring each of the hexes with airbases has say 2-3 fresh fighter air groups. These will intercept in large numbers when directly bombed and tear apart Soviet fighters/bombers. But you can not at all rely on those fighters intercepting in large numbers anything but their own hex in my experience.


I have been playing a game against El Lobo, and he has been quite effective in defending his air bases using the technique you outline here. Destroying the Luftwaffe on the ground is possible, but only if the Axis aren't defending themselves properly - keeping their bases at least 15 hexes behind the line, controlling fatigue, and keeping a couple of air units on base defense duty. I think you can have them set to range 80 and they will intercept in large numbers in adjacent hexes as well, at least that has been my experience with the Soviets when the Germans have tried bombing my air bases.

I think there is no call to limit bombing missions to only hexes that are to be attacked on the ground or eliminate airbase bombing. My experience in campaign games played under 1.12 so far has been that the Axis can maintain air parity at least through 1943.

It seems really silly to restrict ground attack to 10 hexes a turn. As the Soviets in 1942 and thereafter, I am attacking far more than 10 hexes every turn, so that wouldn't even allow for bombing all the hexes where I have ground attacks. And besides, when the Soviet air force has 600 air squadrons, ten attacks a turn wouldn't even allow for those guys to fly even once a month. I think Uncle Joe would object to spending the people's money on all those airplanes if they aren't ever going to fly

< Message edited by thedoctorking -- 7/13/2020 11:30:15 PM >

(in reply to redrum68)
Post #: 24
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 7/14/2020 9:01:13 PM   
redrum68

 

Posts: 485
Joined: 11/26/2017
Status: offline
@thedoctorking - Yeah, that's I think the best option for the Axis right now. That being said, I think its pretty unbalanced as the Axis have to really limit their air usage and make sure to stay out of soviet bombing escort range or with enough fresh fighters to defend which I think later in the game makes sense but shouldn't be how things are in 1941.

Generally, I think the air war should be shifted to fewer, more impactful missions (no hard limits though) so that each plane can fly less missions per turn but have larger results. This helps limit the sheer numbers of clicks/missions and makes the players think more about where to bomb/defend/etc not just bomb every enemy unit. But at a minimum the escort bug really needs to be fixed and I think AA needs to be looked at as it doesn't appear to have much impact currently on reducing casualties or shooting down planes.

(in reply to thedoctorking)
Post #: 25
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 7/15/2020 10:09:24 PM   
thedoctorking


Posts: 1905
Joined: 4/29/2017
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: redrum68

@thedoctorking - Yeah, that's I think the best option for the Axis right now. That being said, I think its pretty unbalanced as the Axis have to really limit their air usage and make sure to stay out of soviet bombing escort range or with enough fresh fighters to defend which I think later in the game makes sense but shouldn't be how things are in 1941.

Generally, I think the air war should be shifted to fewer, more impactful missions (no hard limits though) so that each plane can fly less missions per turn but have larger results. This helps limit the sheer numbers of clicks/missions and makes the players think more about where to bomb/defend/etc not just bomb every enemy unit. But at a minimum the escort bug really needs to be fixed and I think AA needs to be looked at as it doesn't appear to have much impact currently on reducing casualties or shooting down planes.

If you've played WitW, you can see that the way the engine treats air war has changed a lot since this game came out. From discussion on the WitE2 board in this forum, you can see that WitE2 will have a system more like WitW.

That said, for this version I don't think the Soviet air force is ahistorically strong in 1941. VVS had many aircraft in reserve and rapidly restored its losses from the first weeks of the war. By fall, they were contesting control of the air over the battlefield, although still suffering heavy losses.

Here's a nice Wikipedia article about the air war in 1941.

(in reply to redrum68)
Post #: 26
RE: Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? - 7/26/2020 3:14:16 PM   
heliodorus04


Posts: 1624
Joined: 11/1/2008
From: Denver Colorado
Status: offline
War in the West is an air attrition simulator over the top of a fuel/supply-railroad simulator disguising itself as a wargame. Ground warfare is inconsequential in the WitW simulator. It's reached the point where I have much more fun playing MMP's Operational Combat Series via Vassal than the madness 2by3 pimps out in all its "black-box" glory...

WitE is still fun (after all these years) because it hasn't devolved into the air/supply simulator that WitW is.

_____________________________

Spring 2018-Playing: Demyansk Shield: Frozen Fortress; Advanced Squad Leader,
Reading: Bonhoeffer
Rulebooks: ASL (always ASL), Holland'44, Demyansk Shield: Frozen Fortress

(in reply to thedoctorking)
Post #: 27
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Air War FUBAR in 1.12?? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.164