Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta7 (last update 12th july!)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: Allafterme, Kernel_Peace
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Shadow Empire >> Shadow Empire MATRIX VERSION Open Beta >> RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta7 (last update 12th july!) Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta7 (last update 12th july!) - 7/12/2020 11:13:34 AM   
Vic


Posts: 7350
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline 		I want to thank everybody that is participating with this open beta. The feedback is helping me to work faster (partly by allowing some room for making mistakes) and I am sure we'll have those Pull Points fully hammered out in a further two or three iterations.

< Message edited by Vic -- 7/12/2020 11:14:00 AM >

_____________________________

Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics

(in reply to ramnblam)
Post #: 361
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta7 (last update 12th july!) - 7/12/2020 11:56:20 AM   
demiare

 

Posts: 470
Joined: 6/20/2020
Status: offline 		Pull system fail to work correctly in case of several assets:
Image is here
To avoid wasting x2 LP into nowhere I forced to place a 40% traffic sign in branch (40% to all three sub-branches).
Something clearly wrong here - while 100% block now (beta7) allow pull system to pass it (thanks Vic!), but I don't sure I want it cost me twice as much LP...

P.S. Sorry for Gdrive link but I'm too lazy to figure what imagehosts are allowed here.

< Message edited by demiare -- 7/12/2020 11:58:34 AM >

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 362
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta7 (last update 12th july!) - 7/12/2020 5:24:05 PM   
Destragon

 

Posts: 475
Joined: 6/8/2020
Status: offline 		I can reproduce Demiare's issue. The junction on my city here is pulling 500 points to the south west, even though it only should be pulling 300.


(in reply to demiare)
Post #: 363
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta7 (last update 12th july!) - 7/12/2020 5:39:48 PM   
Smidlee

 

Posts: 62
Joined: 8/24/2014
Status: offline 		Try to delete the south road and instead connect the water directly to the nuclear resource. See if it only pulls 200.
Also try to 100% at the intersection at the end of the red mark instead of trying to block at the city.
I noticed Demiare also put the block in the city instead of the intersection. That way you don't have the pull coming from multi-directions.

< Message edited by Smidlee -- 7/12/2020 5:55:04 PM >

(in reply to Destragon)
Post #: 364
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta7 (last update 12th july!) - 7/12/2020 5:52:01 PM   
Destragon

 

Posts: 475
Joined: 6/8/2020
Status: offline 		I noticed another issue.
When you have multiple assets in a line and this line connects back to your main road as a loop, then the pull points for these assets will be oversupplied.
Here on the left I have 100 pull points coming from the capital, which would be enough to satisfy both of these assets. But then on the right, another 100 pull points are coming from the road. I assume this happens because the game hasn't marked the pull points of the second in line asset as "satisfied"?




quote:

ORIGINAL: Smidlee
Try to delete the south road and instead connect the water directly to the nuclear resource. See if it only pulls 200.

Well yeah, it works as intended like that, that's how I had it in my game beforehand. I built this split in the road just to see if I can reproduce the issue.

< Message edited by Destragon -- 7/12/2020 5:59:27 PM >

(in reply to Destragon)
Post #: 365
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta7 (last update 12th july!) - 7/12/2020 6:01:20 PM   
Smidlee

 

Posts: 62
Joined: 8/24/2014
Status: offline 		The intersection on the right should have "Travel signs for : Pull points checked since this setting is for each intersection. If you've got two intersection uncheck then it make sense both intersections will allow pull points. This is only useful in the case one route gets cut off by the enemy.

Have you tried to block the intersection where the resources split off instead of in the city above? There settings seem to work for each intersection independently.

< Message edited by Smidlee -- 7/12/2020 6:12:13 PM >

(in reply to Destragon)
Post #: 366
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta7 (last update 12th july!) - 7/12/2020 6:12:22 PM   
Destragon

 

Posts: 475
Joined: 6/8/2020
Status: offline 		Nah, I'm pretty sure this is just a bug. It only happens when you have multiple assets in a line.
See here, there's only 1 asset in the loop this time and now the junction on the right isn't sending any pull points southwards.


(in reply to Smidlee)
Post #: 367
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta7 (last update 12th july!) - 7/12/2020 8:59:19 PM   
Vic


Posts: 7350
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Destragon

I noticed another issue.
When you have multiple assets in a line and this line connects back to your main road as a loop, then the pull points for these assets will be oversupplied.
Here on the left I have 100 pull points coming from the capital, which would be enough to satisfy both of these assets. But then on the right, another 100 pull points are coming from the road. I assume this happens because the game hasn't marked the pull points of the second in line asset as "satisfied"?




quote:

ORIGINAL: Smidlee
Try to delete the south road and instead connect the water directly to the nuclear resource. See if it only pulls 200.

Well yeah, it works as intended like that, that's how I had it in my game beforehand. I built this split in the road just to see if I can reproduce the issue.


It takes the fastest route so 1 asset pulled from the north and the other from the west


_____________________________

Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics

(in reply to Destragon)
Post #: 368
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta7 (last update 12th july!) - 7/12/2020 9:05:08 PM   
Vic


Posts: 7350
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Destragon

I can reproduce Demiare's issue. The junction on my city here is pulling 500 points to the south west, even though it only should be pulling 300.




Agreed. Will look into this for beta8. Thanks and if you d be so kind send that savefile to vic@vrdesigns.net


_____________________________

Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics

(in reply to Destragon)
Post #: 369
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta7 (last update 12th july!) - 7/12/2020 9:32:24 PM   
Destragon

 

Posts: 475
Joined: 6/8/2020
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Vic

It takes the fastest route so 1 asset pulled from the north and the other from the west

Oh yeah, I see. The rare metal mine is 4 steps away from the city with both the top route and the lower route.
Hm, I guess maybe it could be possible for the game to realise that supplying the one asset would also supply the other asset. I dunno.

But either way, it's really nice that we can finally restrict non-pull points from traveling down a road. Thanks.
Seeing that a mine that needs 100 logistics actually only draws 100 logistics is pretty cool.

quote:


Agreed. Will look into this for beta8. Thanks and if you d be so kind send that savefile to vic@vrdesigns.net

This is the same save file as from the "more pull logistics weirdness" email. You just need to build this road south of the capital.
Do you want the save again?

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 370
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta7 (last update 12th july!) - 7/15/2020 11:27:38 AM   
Vic


Posts: 7350
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline
quote:


This is the same save file as from the "more pull logistics weirdness" email. You just need to build this road south of the capital.
Do you want the save again?

Double checked it and it will be fixed for the next open beta.

_____________________________

Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics

(in reply to Destragon)
Post #: 371
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/15/2020 3:09:34 PM   
Vic


Posts: 7350
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline 		Posted v104-beta8

No new stuff, but quite a few bug fixes.

Whats left for v104 beta testing is further improving the Pull Points. Notably the remaining issue it that the algorithm can still be much better where it concerns finding the optimal route for the Pull trajectory, which is not always the shortest.

After that i'll move to official v105 patch.

best wishes,
Vic

_____________________________

Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 372
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/15/2020 7:42:56 PM   
Tchey


Posts: 70
Joined: 6/17/2020
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Vic

Posted v104-beta8

After that i'll move to official v105 patch.



Thanks for your hard work !

Do you have an idea if you’re going to keep updating the game at that pace for a long time before moving to something more "stable" ?
Or it all depend on bug reports ?

_____________________________

* Jeux1d100 ? Le blog Jeux1d100.net sur les jeux indécents et Linux, et la chaîne YouTube *

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 373
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/16/2020 12:47:03 AM   
Malevolence


Posts: 1779
Joined: 4/3/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Vic

Posted v104-beta8

No new stuff, but quite a few bug fixes.

Whats left for v104 beta testing is further improving the Pull Points. Notably the remaining issue it that the algorithm can still be much better where it concerns finding the optimal route for the Pull trajectory, which is not always the shortest.

After that i'll move to official v105 patch.

best wishes,
Vic


If your next drop is v105 via the normal matrix update, please add an minor separator or indicator in the v105 update notes for changes made between v104-beta8 and v105.

Why? Because if the release update is not a merge from beta, it can be onerous to identify only the added change notes that document fixes made between the beta and the released update.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Malevolence -- 7/16/2020 3:19:09 AM >

_____________________________

Nicht kleckern, sondern klotzen!

*Please remember all posts are made by a malevolent, autocratic despot whose rule is marked by unjust severity and arbitrary behavior. Your experiences may vary.

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 374
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/16/2020 10:09:42 AM   
Leslac

 

Posts: 38
Joined: 5/4/2020
Status: offline 		Latest beta (and 6-7 too I think), OHQ doesn't seem to influence combat outcomes. Only SHQ gives a percentage bonus. Or at least the OHQ bonus isn't visible.

Edit: Nevermind... It's when your OHQ is useless that their bonus don't appear.



On another note - I've received around 10 gravitic collectors from one recycling station. That's 5000 free energy production. Considering how important energy is, this is unbalanced to put it mildly. Compared to most of the other ancient artifacts, this is without a doubt the best.

I'd lower the chance of getting the gravitic collector substantially... Especially on hard or higher difficulties.

< Message edited by Leslac -- 7/16/2020 11:26:35 AM >

(in reply to Malevolence)
Post #: 375
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/16/2020 1:10:23 PM   
bvoid

 

Posts: 66
Joined: 5/16/2013
Status: offline 		Nevermind gravitic collector..... Cloning center is what's overpowered.

Population is the most important resource and there is no other way to create it from scratch. 500 pop per month is crazy! This should be nerfed to 50/month I suggest. That would be 100 per turn.

Also: I _always_ seem to manage to get a cloning center early on. Watch out for the gold artifact site and immediately start scavenging it. Should produce less population AND be rarer AND possibly use a LOT of power.

< Message edited by bvoid -- 7/16/2020 1:12:41 PM >

(in reply to Leslac)
Post #: 376
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/16/2020 2:49:10 PM   
Culthrasa

 

Posts: 172
Joined: 4/16/2017
Status: offline 		Cloning centre is THE artifact to get yes.... The auto factory and grav collector are nice yes... but CC is the one :)
Also don't nerf plz! :)

(in reply to bvoid)
Post #: 377
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/16/2020 2:49:25 PM   
mek42

 

Posts: 72
Joined: 7/27/2007
From: Upstate (Central) NY
Status: offline 		If I made a copy of the game folder would I be able to have a production version and a beta version?

(in reply to bvoid)
Post #: 378
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/16/2020 3:00:55 PM   
CzarKasm

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 3/23/2011
Status: offline 		Cloning Center = Endless supply of Soylent Green

Food problems solved!

(in reply to mek42)
Post #: 379
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/16/2020 4:20:44 PM   
hapshott

 

Posts: 49
Joined: 6/4/2014
Status: offline 		Hello,

I get an error message that card 105.png is missing. This is with a clean install, patch 1.03 and then the beta8 patch. I also cannot find this card in the zip file (no card folder). Did I do something wrong?

best regards,

Hapshott

< Message edited by hapshott -- 7/16/2020 4:28:56 PM >

(in reply to CzarKasm)
Post #: 380
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/16/2020 4:40:30 PM   
Fizbun

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 6/25/2020
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hapshott

Hello,

I get an error message that card 105.png is missing. This is with a clean install, patch 1.03 and then the beta8 patch. I also cannot find this card in the zip file (no card folder). Did I do something wrong?

best regards,

Hapshott


Latest version is 1.04 not 1.03, maybe the problem is there my dude

(in reply to hapshott)
Post #: 381
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/16/2020 5:40:27 PM   
Malevolence


Posts: 1779
Joined: 4/3/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mek42

If I made a copy of the game folder would I be able to have a production version and a beta version?


Yes. Keep in mind, your savegames would be separated.

Ensure your separate shortcuts execute the correct runtime.


< Message edited by Malevolence -- 7/16/2020 5:41:41 PM >

_____________________________

Nicht kleckern, sondern klotzen!

*Please remember all posts are made by a malevolent, autocratic despot whose rule is marked by unjust severity and arbitrary behavior. Your experiences may vary.

(in reply to mek42)
Post #: 382
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/16/2020 11:19:49 PM   
hapshott

 

Posts: 49
Joined: 6/4/2014
Status: offline 		Thanks for pointing out that 1.04 Is the base patch. I completely missed the release of the 1.04 patch.

(in reply to Malevolence)
Post #: 383
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/16/2020 11:56:14 PM   
OldSarge


Posts: 452
Joined: 11/25/2010
From: Albuquerque, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Malevolence

quote:

ORIGINAL: mek42

If I made a copy of the game folder would I be able to have a production version and a beta version?


Yes. Keep in mind, your savegames would be separated.

Ensure your separate shortcuts execute the correct runtime.



You can also use the Generic Mod Enabler JSGME. There are several examples around the forum JSGME

Here is another post explaining how to set it up it by VPaulus on the Slitherine forums: JSGME Setup

< Message edited by OldSarge -- 7/17/2020 12:28:36 AM >

_____________________________

You and the rest, you forgot the first rule of the fanatic: When you become obsessed with the enemy, you become the enemy.
Jeffrey Sinclair, "Infection", Babylon 5

(in reply to Malevolence)
Post #: 384
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/17/2020 5:15:10 AM   
Foxador

 

Posts: 28
Joined: 7/5/2020
Status: offline 		You have a history option for the planet to have a very small size for colonization, is it possible to have one that does the opposite? One where it was heavily colonized so the population was like in the billions? That way you can have a map with a lot of ruins on it and I believer a slightly higher starting planet pop

(in reply to OldSarge)
Post #: 385
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/17/2020 11:46:59 PM   
Elver

 

Posts: 29
Joined: 6/25/2020
Status: offline
quote:

-No longer showing agricultural fields during Colonization Planet generation phase if Domed Farms are used


This takes care of the graphical oddity that was present when I reported this, but the other oddity remains: planets with even full-nutrition non-water-based alien plants will still create dome farms during colonization; you can even start with non-functional dome farms owing to a lack of water, but can build xenoag on the first turn which thrives w/o water. It's really weird and seems rather off for planets with no surface water but entirely viable e.g. sulfuric-acid-solvent plants to use dome farms to create Terran water-solvent crops they'll struggle to water.

This previously was an extremely rare niche case, but is now fairly common when selecting the Alien Life history and a hostile planet class (e.g., Cerebus).

[Edit: these planets still list Domed Farms as the recommended type of agriculture as well]

< Message edited by Elver -- 7/17/2020 11:55:04 PM >

(in reply to Foxador)
Post #: 386
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/18/2020 5:34:11 PM   
jwarrenw13

 

Posts: 1577
Joined: 8/12/2000
From: Monroe, LA, USA
Status: offline 		Question. Will there be a basic primer on how the new logistics system works when it goes final? I finally broke down and started playing a game with the betas. I don't fully know what is going on because I honestly play without getting too deep into all the numbers behind the log system. I try to use mainly the bottleneck overlay and then after any adjustments the preview points overlay to manage logistics, mainly just by eyeballing those overlays and the supply status of units instead of counting lug nuts on trucks. I've found that the new system seems for me at least to be easier to use with less management than the 1.04 sytem, but it is still complex and requires management. In other words, pretty good. In playing a full game through turn 86 now I've found I'm making more use of building more truck stops and less use of roadblocks to keep things moving, and I have a widespread log network in this game much more complicated than in the two full games I played before trying the beta. In those games I usually had just one operation going at a time. In this game I have one major operation going but four minor operations going at the same time on a Medusa planet fighting alien life forms as well as minor and major powers. In my previous two games I was on a Siwa planet. I'm able to keep all these operations going, though I am having to actively manage to keep supply going to my units. And I enjoy actively managing, but I don't want to go too deep into counting lug nuts. But I still don't fully grasp the changes with the beta supply system and am wondering if someone has written or is going to write a new supply system for dummies tutorial for people like me to are not going to go deep into the numbers and count lug nuts. To the lug nut counters, thanks for all the hard work.

(in reply to Elver)
Post #: 387
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/19/2020 9:25:50 AM   
Vic


Posts: 7350
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Elver

quote:

-No longer showing agricultural fields during Colonization Planet generation phase if Domed Farms are used


This takes care of the graphical oddity that was present when I reported this, but the other oddity remains: planets with even full-nutrition non-water-based alien plants will still create dome farms during colonization; you can even start with non-functional dome farms owing to a lack of water, but can build xenoag on the first turn which thrives w/o water. It's really weird and seems rather off for planets with no surface water but entirely viable e.g. sulfuric-acid-solvent plants to use dome farms to create Terran water-solvent crops they'll struggle to water.

This previously was an extremely rare niche case, but is now fairly common when selecting the Alien Life history and a hostile planet class (e.g., Cerebus).

[Edit: these planets still list Domed Farms as the recommended type of agriculture as well]


Could be a biohazard level issue?

best wishes,
Vic


_____________________________

Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics

(in reply to Elver)
Post #: 388
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta8 (last update 15th july!) - 7/19/2020 9:40:07 AM   
Vic


Posts: 7350
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Vic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Elver

quote:

-No longer showing agricultural fields during Colonization Planet generation phase if Domed Farms are used


This takes care of the graphical oddity that was present when I reported this, but the other oddity remains: planets with even full-nutrition non-water-based alien plants will still create dome farms during colonization; you can even start with non-functional dome farms owing to a lack of water, but can build xenoag on the first turn which thrives w/o water. It's really weird and seems rather off for planets with no surface water but entirely viable e.g. sulfuric-acid-solvent plants to use dome farms to create Terran water-solvent crops they'll struggle to water.

This previously was an extremely rare niche case, but is now fairly common when selecting the Alien Life history and a hostile planet class (e.g., Cerebus).

[Edit: these planets still list Domed Farms as the recommended type of agriculture as well]


Could be a biohazard level issue?

I might have to review the rules here.

As it makes sense you could do agriculture with a biohazard suit on.

best wishes,
Vic






_____________________________

Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 389
RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta9 (last update 19th july!) - 7/19/2020 9:44:44 AM   
Vic


Posts: 7350
Joined: 5/17/2004
Status: offline 		And beta9 has been posted!

There still might be some glitches left in the Pull logistics system, please do give it a spin, ideally with a new game, but I am quite happy now as to the design.

Also added Agricultural Crops details report :)

and some bug fixes.

Thanks for all the feedback, it helps so much to make SE a better more solid game!

Best wishes,
Vic



_____________________________

Visit www.vrdesigns.net for the latest news, polls, screenshots and blogs on Shadow Empire, Decisive Campaigns and Advanced Tactics

(in reply to Vic)
Post #: 390
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Shadow Empire >> Shadow Empire MATRIX VERSION Open Beta >> RE: Open Beta Patch v1.04-beta7 (last update 12th july!) Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.185