Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/23/2019 10:48:42 AM   
Daniele

 

Posts: 1661
Joined: 2/7/2015
Status: offline
1) First of all, thanks a lot for this great opportunity and for answering some questions about your upcoming game Command: Modern Operations. May I start asking to introduce you and the rest of the team briefly for the few that might not know the “Man behind the Work”?

I am Dimitris, co-founder and head of development at WarfareSims. Apart from leading the development team, the job entails a lot of other things - pretty much anything that is not explicitly assigned to someone else on the team falls by default on my shoulders (yes, that means I also have to take care of the pizzas). It can definitely be a wild horse to ride, but the satisfaction can make it worth it.

The rest of the team is distributed literally around the world. We have members and contributors from pretty much the entire NATO and ex-SEATO spectrum. This makes coordination more challenging but does afford us some significant advantages in coverage, responsiveness and diversity.



2) CMANO has been for several years the most accurate, complex and realistic military simulator around. We know that its full potential has been understood by many Armed Forces around the World, for training and scenario analysis. Having said that, may I ask why and when you decided to move to C:MO and how the development of this title could impact the partnership with the military?

The rallying cry for CMO (or CMANO2 if you will, as it really is “Command 2” in all but name) during its development all these years has been “a better game first, a better simulation second”. Understanding this mindset takes a bit of elaboration.

As you know, we have steadily supported CMANO v1.x for six years now, with a series of major free updates. These updates provided a ton of simulation, mechanics & AI improvement, as well as content; it has been pointed out to us repeatedly that the changes/additions we’ve freely provided to CMANO easily compare to new full-price releases by other companies. However, you wouldn’t know this by comparing a screenshot from Command v1.0 to one from the current public version. Almost all the changes are “under the hood”, so to speak. With this in mind, improving the user interface and gameplay experience became a primary pillar in CMANO2’s development.

At the same time, our market audience composition has shifted. When we initially launched Command, there was only one version, and in that single version we had to pour everything we had in our minds and wanted to share with the world, both from a “game” perspective and a “serious simulation” one. This resulted in a wonderful but slightly bipolar product that sometimes couldn’t decide if it wanted to be above all a mainstream-friendly game or a professional-oriented tool. The branching-off of a dedicated pro-oriented series has liberated us from this conundrum and allowed each path to evolve optimized for its dedicated audience. While the underlying simulation core and various data are similar (and often identical), Command-PE is now firmly a sim-first product loaded to the brim with tools for the professional user, while CMANO and now CMO/CMANO2 are first are foremost (serious) games.

Once this design focus is absorbed, several priorities naturally emerge: The game must be easier on the eyes than before. It must be more visually appealing, without losing its serious foundations. It must be easier to learn, both on the user interface and also on the basic mechanics of modern warfare. It must hold the player's hand more in the beginning. It must avoid flooding the player with information. It must make it easier for the player to find the one specific bit of information (amongst the sea of data) that he's actually looking for. It must let the player put together a basic dust-up without too much consideration for geopolitical realism and diplomatic realities. In short, while remaining a top-notch simulation, it must also become a better game.



3) C:MO appears to be a major step forward from CMANO. A rewritten map engine, new UI, new capabilities, etc. One of the striking new element seems the ability to integrate tools from professional software. I’m talking about mainly the TacView and new map layers. Could you tell us more about them?

he new map layers is one of the features we are particularly proud of, as it has been one of the most persistent requests for years now. In summary, the layers are:


- BMNGv2, an improved version of NASA’s public “Blue Marble NG” global map




- Relief-90, a high resolution overlay optimized to show terrain features





- Stamen Terrain / Roads / Labels: This global map combines terrain, roads & cities and placenames down to a very high detail level (you can literally zoom down to house level). This map is kindly provided by the fine folks at Stamen (http://maps.stamen.com), whom we heartily recommend for any map-related project.




- Terrain land-cover. This is a new layer type, necessary for displaying the different land cover type (urban, forest, desert, snow etc.) at any location on the planet. This is tightly related to the improvements we have added to land operations.




- Sentinel-2 Cloudless: This is the same map that is browsable here: https://s2maps.eu/ . This allows us to provide global satellite imagery to a very good level of detail (it’s detailed enough that you can make out features at airbases, ports etc.), and thus serves as an excellent “baseline” layer for scenario authors to place their objects on, as well as a more immersive environment for players.




Tacview integration is another hotly-requested item for years now. We have been in close contact with Frantz Raia (creator of Tacview) over the years and he has made several additions to the software, upon our request, which have been very useful both to us and to his own professional work (such as the real-time streaming feature). We worked hard together with Frantz on finding a way to make the commercial version of CMANO work well with Tacview (the requirements, priorities and constraints are different than the pro implementation of this feature, which has been available for a while now).

So what we came up with is an optional ability to stream part of the simulation information to Tacview. Basically the player can select a “3D view” menu option, and if Tacview is installed, a new window pops up which contains the 3D visualization (this requires Tacview Advanced edition in order to work). This window behaves similar to all other secondary windows in Command, so it can be resized, placed anywhere atop the main map window, or parked on another monitor. The player can jump from one unit to another, rotate and plan the camera etc., just like when normally using Tacview as a standalone app. As I said this is an optional feature and Command can run just fine without it.





4) Any other software you think could be added in the future?

There are a number of different programs we have investigated for possible integration. Some of them are pure visualizers (or “image generators”, to use the defence industry lingo) similar to Tacview, while others are full-fledged simulation and analysis suites. Most of them are really more relevant to the defence industry rather than the commercial wargaming sector (unless there is a hidden untapped market on e.g. radio-frequency spectrum analysis!), but we are certainly open to pointers.

One suggestion that seems to bubble up fairly consistently is possible integration with either F4-BMS or DCS World, with Command acting as the operational/strategic “command and control” layer for these primarily tactical simulations. We haven’t really run the numbers yet to determine whether this would be a worthwhile investment (this would obviously depend on the work required to get things up and running), but it could be something worth considering at some point in the future.



PART II QUESTIONS: FULL SPECTRUM OPERATIONS - Tune on Wednesday 25th to check the second part of the Interview!

5) Speaking of new terrain types, we noticed that the announcement references improvements in ground operations. We also saw some screenshots with high-res maps with roads and similar infrastructures. Can you elaborate on what’s in store for digital grunts in CMO?

6) Let’s talk a bit about the naval component. What do you think is the most innovative feature that will be added, or the most significant improvement from CMANO?

7) Could you tell us a little more about what do you mean exactly by “realistic submarine comms”?

8) Beside naval, Air warfare has always been the other major focus in CMANO. Will C:MO players see differences in managing squadrons, targets, aircraft behavior and missions in general?

9) In the public Feature list, there is a mention on “Aircraft crew G-tolerance”. Could you elaborate this point a bit more?


< Message edited by Daniele -- 9/23/2019 2:13:32 PM >
Post #: 1
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/23/2019 2:34:25 PM   
Primarchx


Posts: 2975
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline
Very cool. Loved the new map enhancements. Not sure if I'm interested in TacView at the level portrayed in Command, I'll have to see it in action.

(in reply to Daniele)
Post #: 2
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/24/2019 12:50:41 AM   
schweggy

 

Posts: 46
Joined: 2/3/2015
Status: offline
This is the crux:

These updates provided a ton of simulation, mechanics & AI improvement, as well as content; it has been pointed out to us repeatedly that the changes/additions we’ve freely provided to CMANO easily compare to new full-price releases by other companies.

(in reply to Primarchx)
Post #: 3
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/24/2019 1:02:13 AM   
Japo32

 

Posts: 11
Joined: 8/12/2017
Status: offline
Please!!! Study the way to connect Cmano to DCS or better with Falcon BMS!! (or both!!!) It is a dream that could come true. Specially in DCS as it doesn't have any dynamic campaign.

Thanks!

(and don't forget to try to make multiplayer mode in Cmano2)

(in reply to schweggy)
Post #: 4
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/24/2019 2:15:39 AM   
Rob322

 

Posts: 438
Joined: 8/16/2004
Status: offline
Wow! Where do I pre-order?

One question on terrain types, you mentioned snow. Is that something that's changeable by season? It melts in the summer!

(in reply to Daniele)
Post #: 5
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/24/2019 2:17:00 AM   
DrRansom

 

Posts: 164
Joined: 7/14/2013
Status: offline
Do you have any plans to improve the weather model? Namely: introduce local weather conditions and weather fronts?

(in reply to Rob322)
Post #: 6
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/24/2019 4:11:36 AM   
Dimitris


Posts: 11668
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: DrRansom

Do you have any plans to improve the weather model? Namely: introduce local weather conditions and weather fronts?


Yes, this is planned.

_____________________________


(in reply to DrRansom)
Post #: 7
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/24/2019 4:32:30 AM   
ProdigyofMilitaryPride

 

Posts: 77
Joined: 4/17/2015
Status: offline
Can there be targeting of aircraft parked/ships moored individually in airfields/naval facilities without having to rely on bomb explosions on the structures themselves?

_____________________________

"The courageous must protect freedom." - Dwight D. Eisenhower
"Anything built by human hands can be destroyed. This is no exception." - Kei "Edge" Nagase, Ace Combat 5: The Unsung War

(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 8
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/24/2019 4:48:22 AM   
Dimitris


Posts: 11668
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: ProdigyofMilitaryPride
Can there be targeting of aircraft parked/ships moored individually in airfields/naval facilities without having to rely on bomb explosions on the structures themselves?


You mean things like "Destroy specifically aircraft-476 parked on revetment-3, while leaving aircraft-475 and aircraft-477 [on the same revetment] intact"? No. You attack the air facility (preferably with a weapon optimized for it, e.g. a penetrator bomb on a HAS or a cluster bomb at an open revetment) and you hope the damage will be sufficient to destroy the aircraft.

If you need the fidelity you describe then you need another game/sim.

< Message edited by Dimitris -- 9/24/2019 4:52:58 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to ProdigyofMilitaryPride)
Post #: 9
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/24/2019 5:45:13 AM   
overkill01

 

Posts: 90
Joined: 12/31/2015
Status: offline
I am really impressed so far.
Glad it will be more mainstream-friendly, hoping that it won't sacrifice the realism for it though.

(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 10
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/24/2019 8:34:46 AM   
Andrea G


Posts: 305
Joined: 10/9/2017
From: Genoa, Italy
Status: offline
Are you planning to extend the cargo rules also to ground units?
I am thinking of Inf Sections that can load on IFV and so on.

_____________________________

"My name is Maurizio Cocciolone"
Italian pilot downed during Desert Storm
Start phrase of his interviw on the Iraqui TV

(in reply to overkill01)
Post #: 11
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/24/2019 8:54:12 AM   
Dimitris


Posts: 11668
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Andrea G
Are you planning to extend the cargo rules also to ground units?
I am thinking of Inf Sections that can load on IFV and so on.


Yes, but later.

_____________________________


(in reply to Andrea G)
Post #: 12
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/24/2019 12:52:36 PM   
Eggstor

 

Posts: 285
Joined: 1/24/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dimitris


quote:

ORIGINAL: DrRansom

Do you have any plans to improve the weather model? Namely: introduce local weather conditions and weather fronts?


Yes, this is planned.

Nice.

Tonight's forecast - Mostly cloudy early, giving way to Paveways late. Low of 52.
Tomorrow - Excessive heat and high wind warnings go into effect at noon. High of 10,000, winds variable gusting to 300 mph.

(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 13
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/24/2019 6:41:16 PM   
Airborne Rifles

 

Posts: 212
Joined: 2/17/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Eggstor


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dimitris


quote:

ORIGINAL: DrRansom

Do you have any plans to improve the weather model? Namely: introduce local weather conditions and weather fronts?


Yes, this is planned.

Nice.

Tonight's forecast - Mostly cloudy early, giving way to Paveways late. Low of 52.
Tomorrow - Excessive heat and high wind warnings go into effect at noon. High of 10,000, winds variable gusting to 300 mph.


Ha!


_____________________________

Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1733838503?ref_=pe_3052080_397514860
And our web site:
http://northernfury.us/

(in reply to Eggstor)
Post #: 14
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/24/2019 6:42:19 PM   
Airborne Rifles

 

Posts: 212
Joined: 2/17/2015
Status: offline
As a map guy and someone who's taught weather at the college level, I'm super excited about this interview!

_____________________________

Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1733838503?ref_=pe_3052080_397514860
And our web site:
http://northernfury.us/

(in reply to Airborne Rifles)
Post #: 15
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/24/2019 10:08:01 PM   
Gunner98

 

Posts: 4235
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: The Great White North!
Status: offline
quote:

Nice. Tonight's forecast - Mostly cloudy early, giving way to Paveways late. Low of 52. Tomorrow - Excessive heat and high wind warnings go into effect at noon. High of 10,000, winds variable gusting to 300 mph.


I wouldn't sweet those thundershowers folks. Radar has also picked up a swarm of ICBMs coming in over the pole...

Looking forward to this. Nice maps, especially the SATVIEW for scenario building

Not sure about the Tacview bit, glad it's optional - too much attention grabbing detail may make players lose the big picture. Nice for ultra tactical but anything over a few aircraft and I think I'll leave it alone.





_____________________________

Check out our novel, Northern Fury: H-Hour!: http://northernfury.us/
And our blog: http://northernfury.us/blog/post2/
Twitter: @NorthernFury94 or Facebook https://www.facebook.com/northernfury/

(in reply to Eggstor)
Post #: 16
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/25/2019 1:24:16 AM   
DrRansom

 

Posts: 164
Joined: 7/14/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dimitris


quote:

ORIGINAL: DrRansom

Do you have any plans to improve the weather model? Namely: introduce local weather conditions and weather fronts?


Yes, this is planned.



Awesome! I'm looking forward to that.

It could lead to a crazy scenario - if the localized effects of atom explosions can be modeled, we could get real time nuclear winter...

(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 17
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/25/2019 3:58:40 AM   
magi

 

Posts: 1367
Joined: 2/1/2014
Status: offline
I am so excited I just can’t wait ......

(in reply to DrRansom)
Post #: 18
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/25/2019 6:45:38 AM   
lecrop


Posts: 331
Joined: 4/14/2009
From: St.Pierre-la-Rivičre
Status: online
Very impressive

(in reply to magi)
Post #: 19
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/25/2019 7:07:06 AM   
Andrea G


Posts: 305
Joined: 10/9/2017
From: Genoa, Italy
Status: offline
Will there be the possibility to load ammo as cargo to transfer from base to base without using LUA?

_____________________________

"My name is Maurizio Cocciolone"
Italian pilot downed during Desert Storm
Start phrase of his interviw on the Iraqui TV

(in reply to lecrop)
Post #: 20
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/25/2019 7:33:21 AM   
Dimitris


Posts: 11668
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Andrea G
Will there be the possibility to load ammo as cargo to transfer from base to base without using LUA?


This is something we're working on for the future.

_____________________________


(in reply to Andrea G)
Post #: 21
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/28/2019 9:26:18 AM   
Darkwing

 

Posts: 97
Joined: 6/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

One suggestion that seems to bubble up fairly consistently is possible integration with either F4-BMS or DCS World, with Command acting as the operational/strategic “command and control” layer for these primarily tactical simulations. We haven’t really run the numbers yet to determine whether this would be a worthwhile investment (this would obviously depend on the work required to get things up and running), but it could be something worth considering at some point in the future.


This was the first thing I thought of, and holy CRAP would that be awesome!

(in reply to Daniele)
Post #: 22
RE: Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools - 9/28/2019 6:58:13 PM   
guanotwozero

 

Posts: 397
Joined: 12/27/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniele
...
Most of them are really more relevant to the defence industry rather than the commercial wargaming sector (unless there is a hidden untapped market on e.g. radio-frequency spectrum analysis!), but we are certainly open to pointers.
...

I bet there's more than a few people here who enjoyed Dangerous Waters with its sonar waterfall displays and pattern/profile matching, so there may well be a market for a game with the RF equivalent. Not sure it would be directly relevant to CMO, though, as it's "below the paygrade" as mentioned in the other thread.

(in reply to Daniele)
Post #: 23
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Dev Interview Part I - Old and New Tools Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.154