Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Witness to World War 2.

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Witness to World War 2. Page: <<   < prev  125 126 127 128 [129]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/1/2019 10:42:00 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. Allied #9.

Western Allies. PTO. Ground Strike (1/3).




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3841
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/1/2019 10:42:27 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. Allied #9.

Western Allies. PTO. Ground Strike (2/3).




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3842
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/1/2019 10:42:49 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. Allied #9.

Western Allies. PTO. Ground Strike (3/3).




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3843
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/1/2019 10:43:39 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. Allied #9.

Western Allies. PTO. Land Combat (1/5). US Airborne Army Drop.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3844
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/1/2019 10:44:07 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. Allied #9.

Western Allies. PTO. Land Combat (2/5). Sapporo, Japan.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3845
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/1/2019 10:44:33 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. Allied #9.

Western Allies. PTO. Land Combat (3/5).




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3846
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/1/2019 10:44:56 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. Allied #9.

Western Allies. PTO. Land Combat (4/5).




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3847
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/1/2019 10:45:22 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. Allied #9.

Western Allies. PTO. Land Combat (5/5).




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3848
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/1/2019 10:45:50 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. Allied #9.

Western Allies. PTO. HQ Reorg.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3849
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/1/2019 10:46:27 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. Allied #9.

End of Turn Check.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3850
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/1/2019 10:48:04 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. Axis #11.

Weather. Fine across the map. Bad news for Japan. The good news is that there's 70% chance of the turn ending after Japan's impulse.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3851
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/2/2019 1:24:39 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. Axis #11.

Japan. End of Impulse.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3852
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/2/2019 1:25:19 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. Axis #11.

Japan. End of Turn. Japan catches a break, I guess ... turn ends without the allies seeing the benefit of the fine weather.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3853
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/2/2019 1:25:51 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. End of Turn.

Partisans.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3854
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/2/2019 1:26:15 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 38. Nov/Dec 1945. End of Turn.

Destroyed.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3855
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/2/2019 2:45:17 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
The War is Over. Senior Japanese government officials and military leaders have agreed to unconditional surrender with one condition (which really isn't unconditional). That condition is that Japan gets to keep her emperor. The allied powers agree to this condition in some weird way that still technically preserves Japan's unconditional surrender.

This is my stopping point. Below are the final victory totals. I want to thank everyone who's followed and/or commented on this game or my game play. I open this AAR to anyone who wishes to provide feedback, or comment on anything generally related.

I hope those of you that followed had 1/10th of the fun that I had playing the game and posting this AAR.

My reason for stopping is captured in https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4682172

The last allied impulse took me 2 hours and 45 minutes to play and I'd guess that a good 1 hour and 30 minutes of that time was waiting on MWiF. It got to the point that I dreaded picking up an HQ or any other unit that provoked MWiF to recalculate supply. It was taking somewhere between 3 to 5 minutes to pick and move these units. Even selecting an HQ for HQ support, in which case the HQ was already committed to the land combat, provoked a supply recalculation taking 2 to 3 minutes.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/2/2019 3:04:13 PM >


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3856
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/2/2019 1:55:08 PM   
cfinch

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 6/9/2016
Status: offline
10(?) years and still so many issues it seems, i wonder if the code traces every possible path vs stopping once any path is found. Seems odd that it takes longer once, more or less, every hex, port and supply source in europe is owned by the allies


and they are working on AI instead of the 2-map scenarios ;-(

i really would like the 2 mappers, as the whole enchilada is too much for me and the scenarios are "too little", goldielocks needs her 'just right' scenario ;-)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3857
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/2/2019 4:02:26 PM   
Cad908

 

Posts: 1317
Joined: 10/9/2009
Status: offline
What a tremendous accomplishment. I enjoyed following along with you on your journey, and with nearly 37,000 hits, many others did also.

Thank you.

-Rob

(in reply to cfinch)
Post #: 3858
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/2/2019 4:14:32 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 17636
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cfinch

10(?) years and still so many issues it seems, i wonder if the code traces every possible path vs stopping once any path is found. Seems odd that it takes longer once, more or less, every hex, port and supply source in europe is owned by the allies


and they are working on AI instead of the 2-map scenarios ;-(

i really would like the 2 mappers, as the whole enchilada is too much for me and the scenarios are "too little", goldielocks needs her 'just right' scenario ;-)
A feature I'd like to have, which I know is a "Pie in the Sky" wish, is an off/on supply calculation switch that's easily accessible. With such a switch I'd turn it off for most of my movement (especially late game as in this situation). I would flip it back on occasionally during movement especially after moving my HQ's or moving/losing CP's/TRS in sea areas. Effectively, I would try to limit the supply (re)calculation to 3 to 4 times (i.e., 5 to 10-minutes total). Again, a Pie in the Sky feature that would really be nice to have and low one to play these types of games out to the bitter/fun end. With such a switch no more picking up an HQ unit, waiting 3 to 4-minutes, placing (i.e., moving, railing, or selecting for HQ support) the HQ unit and then waiting for 3 to 4-minutes more. To say the least that was maddening. This also happen when selecting and moving units in enemy territory not yet conquered (e.g., Turkey until recently, Japan).

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cad908

What a tremendous accomplishment. I enjoyed following along with you on your journey, and with nearly 37,000 hits, many others did also.

Thank you.

-Rob
Thank you.


< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/2/2019 4:17:28 PM >


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to cfinch)
Post #: 3859
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/2/2019 4:32:50 PM   
cfinch

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 6/9/2016
Status: offline
quote:

e types of games out to the bitter/fun end. With such a switch no more picking up an HQ unit, waiting 3 to 4-minutes, placing (i.e., moving, railing


congrats on finishing (more or less) as well, i should have added that first ;p

I forget if WiF allows chainning HQ from a port to a rail and then rail onwards but this situation would complicate matters

I also think they likely did not code supply status of "ports" such that a US unit traces to a port and then back to supply source vs <list of ports that can provide US Supply, UK, FR, ...> trace to one? youre in supply...) it would be faster as you would only recalculate all ports after a sea zone "change of state" and this eliminates a good deal of overseas checking
Overland checks may still be time consuming but i'm not sure why since there are no enemies to go around, is it because RU cann't trace via UK/US/FR spaces or some such?

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3860
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/7/2019 1:51:38 AM   
Elessar2


Posts: 101
Joined: 11/30/2016
Status: offline
No post-mortems?

I find how quickly the Eastern Front deteriorated for the Germans utterly fascinating.

(in reply to cfinch)
Post #: 3861
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/7/2019 5:12:32 PM   
lecrop


Posts: 286
Joined: 4/14/2009
Status: offline
Amazing AAR of an amazing wargame, thanks for sharing.

(in reply to Elessar2)
Post #: 3862
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/7/2019 5:49:21 PM   
Orm


Posts: 18295
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

Turn 36. Jul/Aug 1945. End of Turn.

Victory Totals.




If the game had ended after August '45, can we declare a winner?

_____________________________

Intend attacking at dawn high water.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 3863
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/8/2019 10:35:15 AM   
Centuur


Posts: 8239
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm


quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

Turn 36. Jul/Aug 1945. End of Turn.

Victory Totals.




If the game had ended after August '45, can we declare a winner?


These are the historical objectives:

Nat. China ~ 1,
Commonwealth ~ 21,
France ~ 5,
Germany ~ 1,
Italy ~ 0,
Japan ~ 9,
USA ~ 15,
USSR (incl. Communist China) ~ 15.

So the USSR is the winner of this game...


< Message edited by Centuur -- 9/8/2019 10:36:03 AM >


_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 3864
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/8/2019 11:48:00 AM   
TeaLeaf


Posts: 400
Joined: 11/5/2014
Status: offline
Just for my understanding of bidding, so please correct me if I'm wrong!
There can be no winner of this game since there hasn't been any bidding at start?

If the MP's historical totals are taken as their modified bids for this game, then scoring looks like:
1. Allied Player = 57 (total allied objectives) - 57 (total modified allied bids) = 0
2. Axis player = 9 (total axis objectives) - 10 (total modified axis bids) = -1.

So the Allied player would have won with his higher score (yes, 0 > -1 ).

If this game had had 6 players (again with historical modifier), then scoring would have been different, looking like:
1. CW 23-21 = 2.
2. Germany 2-1 = 1.
3. Italy 1-0 = 1.
4. USSR + Fr. (17+4) - (15+5) = -1.
5. USA + Nat. China (12+1)-(15+1) = -3.
6. Japan 6-9 = -3.

But ofc. the above scoring is moot in this game, since no1 actually placed a bid and we don't know how Ronnie would have bid against himself .

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 3865
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/8/2019 12:41:31 PM   
Orm


Posts: 18295
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Thank you.

For games with no bidding I think that using the historical objectives is fair. And I do not mind using the objectives listed above for determining the winner. But somehow that list doesn't feel quite historical. Historically, Germany should be conquered in the May '45 turn so how can Germany control one objective?

_____________________________

Intend attacking at dawn high water.

(in reply to TeaLeaf)
Post #: 3866
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/8/2019 2:27:24 PM   
TeaLeaf


Posts: 400
Joined: 11/5/2014
Status: offline
Because Germany 'controls' Stockholm.

At the end of the game if an objective isn't controlled by a major power, its victory point goes to the MP with the closest capital.
But IDK if it's right to award this to a MP with a conquered capital...

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 3867
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/8/2019 4:07:20 PM   
composer99


Posts: 2779
Joined: 6/6/2005
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline
I would not use the historical objectives to determine the winner. MWiF certainly doesn't.

The RAW7 scenario booklet, in the Bidding subsection of 24.1.2, states:
quote:

Each player’s modified bid is calculated at game end, and equals their bid plus their currently controlled major power’s (which may change during the game - see 13.7.5) expected total. This table shows the expected totals of objectives for each major power at the end of Jul/Aug 1945:

Major Power 4-Map
China, Nat. 2
CW 19
France 1
Germany 10
Italy 0
Japan 5
USA 17
USSR & ComCh 13


(I have not included the expected objective totals for the 2-map campaigns.)

That is, the game does not expect the war to end with major powers occupying their historical objective totals. Not only should Germany not be conquered by July/August 1945, it should still be holding on to a respectable amount of territory outside the Reich.

In a six-player game, we get the following victory totals for this game. This assumes everyone's bid is 0.
Germany -8
Italy 1
Japan 1

CW 4
USA/NatCh -6 (-5, -1 more for aligning both Brazil & Mexico)
USSR/Fr/ComCh 7

Now, the rules for liberation state, "For the remainder of the game, the liberating major power controls the liberated major power for all purposes", which I take to mean includes counting its objectives. Since the USA liberated France, we would take the French objectives away from USSR and give them to USA, which changes their totals to -3 for USA &c. and 4 for USSR.

So either USSR wins, or USSR and CW tie.

_____________________________

~ Composer99

(in reply to TeaLeaf)
Post #: 3868
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/8/2019 7:13:35 PM   
TeaLeaf


Posts: 400
Joined: 11/5/2014
Status: offline
My personal preference:
A solitaire game doesn't have bidding, so for me the winner is very subject to feeling. Major Powers Without their capital certainly do not qualify in my book .

But if a MP must be chosen as winner, I think both the historical totals as modified bid and the campaign modifiers alone (assuming a bid for every MP) could be helpful. I could argue for both, but still subjective I think.

(in reply to composer99)
Post #: 3869
RE: Witness to World War 2. - 9/9/2019 3:30:56 AM   
composer99


Posts: 2779
Joined: 6/6/2005
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline
As a post-mortem, I'd be inclined to think the game turned out the way it did because of three factors:

(1) The Japanese lost badly because they waited too long to turn to the Pacific. Without looking back over 120 pages of AAR, I'm not quite sure if there was any specific turning point, but I definitely remember thinking they let that slide for far too long. In the end, Japan only had a positive objective count because the US and CW decided to invade Japan proper with a view to conquering it, instead of either going only for Tokyo or going for objectives (and Japan was only 1 objective over their expected amount at the end of the 4-map game, so a reasonable effort would likely have got the Allies two to four other objectives).

(2) The Germans did really well in the USSR, up until some time in 1943, because the USSR really flubbed its defence in 1941. Between the Commonwealth landing in Sardinia and Sicily in 1941, and the Germans building at least a respectable number of subs (again, if memory serves), Germany wasn't super-focused on fighting the USSR. Especially since they left the start of Barbarossa late - the start of July/August, I think? So the circumstances favoured the USSR, but they still managed to end up getting pushed back super deep into the USSR, Turkey aligned, and so on.

(3) Once the USSR was able to turn the corner in 1943 up in Siberia, the Germans waited far too long to begin withdrawing from Persia and the Caucasus, the end result being that their forces there got trapped and became the world's largest PoW camp. This more than anything else set the stage for the disaster that befell Germany.

_____________________________

~ Composer99

(in reply to TeaLeaf)
Post #: 3870
Page:   <<   < prev  125 126 127 128 [129]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Witness to World War 2. Page: <<   < prev  125 126 127 128 [129]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.182