I agree. All the "progression" we're going to see are things we've seen in other games. It's like playing catch up but it will still end up behind the times. The real progression this game needs is multiplayer. Joint missions, co-op, combined arms, team vs team.
If the game will only ever be 1v1, hopefully we see progression in the lobby system. Having a lobby hooked up to the forums GTC style is quintessentially 1993 internet.
This is probably the reason because most of the franchices are not continued at time. People asking more and more without evaluate really what they are getting.
Probably by this reason, Hexagon was right one day speaking at other forum about how they should have not named to this game Close Combat. If they had named it with other name and without any relation with the previous CC games, probably we would not read all these things negative, mostly thought out without evaluate what you will get here really as a very good thing.
Continuation in time with more DLC or games, complete modding capabilities, 100% new graphics at 3D without to forget the old CC view, more improves with the past of the time.
Come on guys, you are not realistic. I see all these things and I like what I see.
In the other way, you have been so long as me or even more, you knew about the game features when I discovered them or even before but some of you continue repeating them again and again as if they should change them, now when they are finising the game. It has not sense.
You start to do not be fun.;)
< Message edited by Nomada_Firefox -- 4/6/2017 8:45:04 PM >