Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: Raptorx7_slith
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? Page: <<   < prev  95 96 [97] 98 99   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 7/18/2016 2:48:13 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jun5896

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MQ-25_Stingray

New Carrier-Based Aerial-Refueling System (CBARS) UAV (2021?)

RAQ-25 was officially renamed as MQ-25


Make sure you're using the latest db although this mod might be in the current beta (so make sure you're suing that).

Should be under RAQ-25 Stingray UCAV along with the 20 other names its had. You'll also see an armed version.

This platform is highly experimental at this point.

M

_____________________________


(in reply to jun5896)
Post #: 2881
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 7/18/2016 6:59:17 AM   
JamitovHymem

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 7/4/2016
Status: offline
I don't really understand why the 346 and 346A APAR on 052C and 052D DDG are early 1990s tech, they should be a lot more advanced than that, especially the 346A



BTW, currently is there anyway to see whether or not a radar has special characteristics in game?(for example, AESA, PESA, etc)
This might be helpful sometimes when playing

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 2882
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 7/18/2016 7:30:43 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1893
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JamitovHymem

I don't really understand why the 346 and 346A APAR on 052C and 052D DDG are early 1990s tech, they should be a lot more advanced than that, especially the 346A

BTW, currently is there anyway to see whether or not a radar has special characteristics in game?(for example, AESA, PESA, etc)
This might be helpful sometimes when playing

They did characterized the APAR to be harder to jam after v1.10 update before.

As for the Chinese 052C/D's APARs, it is because they don't disclose their origins officially, and mostly believed it's came from Ukraine and guesstimates the development year as 90s. Yet the company denied when 052C comes out.

http://blog.sina.cn/dpool/blog/s/blog_3e6779230102uxwq.html

346A's radar for 052D has the detection range equal of the US's SPY-1, and slightly superior with APAR's jamming resistance in game, so I think it's fair to say China have the better radar. Until the Zumwalt and AB3 have their better upgrades.

< Message edited by Dysta -- 7/18/2016 10:34:22 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to JamitovHymem)
Post #: 2883
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 7/18/2016 9:28:25 AM   
SASR

 

Posts: 82
Joined: 3/1/2015
Status: offline
New class of replenishment oiler for the USN.

John Lewis-class, previously known as T-AO(X) and the replacement for the Henry J. Kasier-Class

T-AO 205 John Lewis -- United States (Navy), 2020

Some Info and specs are known right now but will get hammered out further as they get closer to construction. So far it looks very similar to the Kaiser class.

From: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/R43546.pdf
"The Navy wants to procure the first TAO-205 in FY2016 and the remaining 16 ships at a rate of
one per year during the period FY2018-FY2033. If this procurement schedule were implemented,
the Navy projects that the lead ship would enter service in FY2020 and that the remaining ships
would enter service at a rate of one per year during the period FY2021-FY2036."


From: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/R43546.pdf
"Although the design of the TAO-205 has not yet been determined in detail, the Navy anticipates
that the ship will have capabilities similar to those of the Kaiser-class ships, and that the TAO-205
will rely on existing technologies rather than new technologies. To guard against oil spills, TAO-
205s are to be double-hulled, like modern commercial oil tankers, with a space between the two
hulls to protect the inner hull against events that puncture the outer hull. (The final Kaiser-class
ships are double-hulled, but earlier ships in the class are single-hulled.)"


From: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/R43546.pdf
"The press report stated that the TAO-205 would have capabilities similar to the Kaiser-class ships,
but that compared to the Kaiser-class design, the TAO-205 will have increased space for dry
cargo, as well as a refueling capability for helicopters on its deck.8"


From: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/R43546.pdf
"The T-AO(X) will only have a limited capability to defeat a submarine launched torpedo
attack and no capability to defeat a missile attack. When delivered, the TAO(X) will
have:
—[the] NIXIE Torpedo Countermeasure System [for decoying certain types of
torpedoes]
—[the] Advanced Degaussing System (Anti-Mine) [for reducing the ship’s magnetic
signature, so as to reduce the likelihood of attack by magnetically fused mines]
When required, the T-AO(X) will also have ability to embark Navy Expeditionary
Combat Command Expeditionary Security Teams (EST). The ESTs will embark with
several crew served weapons and are designed to provide limited self-defense against a
small boat attack.
The T-AO(X) will have Space, Weight, Power and Cooling (SWAP-C) margins for
future installations of the following systems:
—[the] Close In Weapon System (CIWS) or SeaRAM (Rolling Airframe Missile) [for
defense against missile attack]
—[the] Anti-Torpedo Torpedo Defense System (ATTDS) [for destroying torpedoes]
Even after the installation of a CIWS or ATTDS, if the T-AO(X) was to operate in
anything other than a benign environment, the ship will require both air and surface
escorts."



(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 2884
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 7/18/2016 11:19:10 AM   
JamitovHymem

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 7/4/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

quote:

ORIGINAL: JamitovHymem

I don't really understand why the 346 and 346A APAR on 052C and 052D DDG are early 1990s tech, they should be a lot more advanced than that, especially the 346A

BTW, currently is there anyway to see whether or not a radar has special characteristics in game?(for example, AESA, PESA, etc)
This might be helpful sometimes when playing

They did characterized the APAR to be harder to jam after v1.10 update before.

As for the Chinese 052C/D's APARs, it is because they don't disclose their origins officially, and mostly believed it's came from Ukraine and guesstimates the development year as 90s. Yet the company denied when 052C comes out.

346A's radar for 052D has the detection range is equal to SPY-1, and slightly superior with APAR's jamming resistance in game, so I think it's fair to say China have the better radar. Until the Zumwalt and AB3 have their better upgrades.



I think the blog already gave a pretty valid argument to deny the claim...

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 2885
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 7/18/2016 11:46:06 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
We just need data to make the change but keep in mind the generation doesn't actually mean it was built then but the design likely was.

If you look in the database viewer under Sensors/EW you can find type usually in the name on the right and the abilities on the left.



Mike




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to JamitovHymem)
Post #: 2886
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 7/18/2016 11:51:41 AM   
Dysta


Posts: 1893
Joined: 8/8/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JamitovHymem

I think the blog already gave a pretty valid argument to deny the claim...

Indeed, but not at the development years.

quote:

According to the Chinese official information released at various defense and electronics / radar exhibitions held in China, the Research Institute of Electronic Technology (more commonly known as the 14th Institute) at Nanjing is the developer of the system, and the radar is a direct successor to Type H/LJG-346 SAPARS (Shipborne Active Phased Array Radar System) that was completed in 1997, which was also completely indigenous and designed by the same institute.


For 346A still remain in 90s tech category, I think it's a simple improvement to gain extra miles of range based on the originals, while it's also using same bandwidth and operation method of APAR. Unless we have the claim to say 346A's development is latter than 90s and have significant differences, 90s is already realistically believable.

_____________________________


(in reply to JamitovHymem)
Post #: 2887
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 7/18/2016 12:07:30 PM   
JamitovHymem

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 7/4/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dysta

quote:

ORIGINAL: JamitovHymem

I think the blog already gave a pretty valid argument to deny the claim...

Indeed, but not at the development years.

quote:

According to the Chinese official information released at various defense and electronics / radar exhibitions held in China, the Research Institute of Electronic Technology (more commonly known as the 14th Institute) at Nanjing is the developer of the system, and the radar is a direct successor to Type H/LJG-346 SAPARS (Shipborne Active Phased Array Radar System) that was completed in 1997, which was also completely indigenous and designed by the same institute.


For 346A still remain in 90s tech category, I think it's a simple improvement to gain extra miles of range based on the originals, while it's also using same bandwidth and operation method of APAR. Unless we have the claim to say 346A's development is latter than 90s and have significant differences, 90s is already realistically believable.



Since the blog says the 346 was a direct successor to the Type H/LJG-346 SAPARS which was completed in 1997, it doesn't really make sense if the 346 is early 1990s.

But the 346A has liquid cooling and the 346 has air cooling. This should make some significant differences in the performance between them.

(in reply to Dysta)
Post #: 2888
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 7/20/2016 7:55:22 PM   
cdnice


Posts: 143
Joined: 5/7/2009
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline
Can the CH-146 Griffon be added to the database? I went looking but could not find it in the latest version.

http://www.rcaf-arc.forces.gc.ca/en/aircraft-current/ch-146.page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_CH-146_Griffon

Thank you for the consideration.

_____________________________



(in reply to JamitovHymem)
Post #: 2889
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 7/22/2016 10:19:42 AM   
Skjold

 

Posts: 240
Joined: 9/29/2015
Status: offline
I would like to request these Algerian additions to the DB please.

S-400 (Unknown version, presumably SA-21a?) #1668
16 TEL Launchers in total.
Delivery 2015-2016.

Buk-M2E (SA-17 Grizzly) #1913
48 launchers in total.
Delivery 2014-2015.

Pantsir-S1E (SA-22 Greyhound) #1935
38 vehicles in total.
Delivery 2010-2013.

Sources:
http://armstrade.org/files/obrazecglava4.pdf (Page 14-15) - Note: This is in Russian.

Add Raptor II capability to #3197 Su-24MK2
Delivery 2008.

Edit: Seems very similar to the existing H4-SOW (#3311 & #3312) entry with these differences.

Payload:600 kg HE warhead
Range:200 km (108 nm)


Sources:
http://armstrade.org/files/obrazecglava4.pdf (Page 16) - Note: This is in Russian.
http://www.deneldynamics.co.za/products/missiles/stand-off-weapons/raptor-ii - Mentions Su-24 Integration

< Message edited by Skjold -- 7/22/2016 10:45:32 AM >

(in reply to cdnice)
Post #: 2890
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 7/22/2016 2:05:50 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
Updated our worklist to this point. Thanks all!

Mike

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 7/22/2016 2:08:29 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Skjold)
Post #: 2891
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 7/22/2016 3:20:08 PM   
Pancor


Posts: 60
Joined: 6/18/2015
From: Indonesia
Status: offline
Hello

it looks like the weapon #2376 - FAB-4000M-46 GPB has the warhead for the FAB-5000M-46. while the #2377 - FAB-5000M-46 has the warhead for the FAB-4000M-46

could you fix it

thanks

Fixed Thanks

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 8/3/2016 2:37:53 AM >

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 2892
Vietnamese TT-400TP gunboat - 7/23/2016 5:57:04 AM   
jun5896

 

Posts: 202
Joined: 1/17/2015
Status: online
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TT-400TP_gunboat

This ship is missing on the database. It was commissioned in 2012 (4 ships).

(in reply to Pancor)
Post #: 2893
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 7/23/2016 1:06:56 PM   
Pancor


Posts: 60
Joined: 6/18/2015
From: Indonesia
Status: offline
Hello

it looks like the IRST system for the MiG-35 is the OLS-UEM not the OLS-35

OLS-UEM can detect & track air targets automatically. It consists of IR camera with matrix 320x256 and TV camera 640x480. Their cover is made from leuco sapphire. The mirror scan the air space of +/-90 degrees horizontally and -15/+60 deg vertically. Target can be detected from 45 km (rear hemispere) and 15km (front). Laser rangefinder work in two modes. Training (safe for eyes) and combat, in a range from 200 m up to 15 km. The station weigths 78 kg and is mounted in the same bay as the old OLS-29 was.


And the DECM is not the L-203 Gardenia but its the ELT/568(v)2

my preferences
http://www.deagel.com/Navigation-and-Targeting-Systems/OLS-UEM_a003104001.aspx
http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/air-force-aviation/capabilities-modern-infra-red-search-track-systems-ols-pirate-eots-8595/#post164156
+
Here's the Avionics for the MiG-35
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=1728.0
http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=20919&page=23

Thanks

< Message edited by Pancor -- 7/23/2016 1:19:14 PM >

(in reply to jun5896)
Post #: 2894
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/23/2016 8:27:53 PM   
msc

 

Posts: 105
Joined: 7/31/2013
From: Austria
Status: offline
Is it possible to add following units to db3000, since those were in service until the 1990ies:

M 2650 Ariadne 1961-1992 (see CWDB and my posting to CWDB-platform-request-thread)

M 1060 Schütze (Sweeper) 1959-1992 (see CWDB and my posting to CWDB-platform-request-thread)

M 1072 Lindau (Type 331 Hunter 1968-2000) (see CWDB and my posting to CWDB-platform-request-thread)

M 1072 Lindau Type HL 351 Troika Drone Control Vessel 1981-2000
(conversion from lindau-sweeper, with mine avoidance sonar DSQS 11A, reduced
mine-sweeping gear on board, Galileo OGR 7, ESM DR 855)

Seehund ROV (Troika Mine Contermeasure System) 1981-2000
for use with "Lindau Type 351"
equipment like #2140
(you can use #2140, I think there are no significant differences between versions
1982-2000 [control vessel Type 351] and after 2000 [control vessel type 352])


Please check equipment of following units:

#2140 Seehund ROV (Troika Plus Mine Countermeasures System)
wrong photo
no mechanical mcm gear, only magnetic&acoustic

#1507 P 6092 Zobel [Type 142A]
Radar was KH 14/9 instead of 3RM-20
ESM was DR 875 instead of NO/VR
(possibly chaff/flares on board)
40mm - total about 3100 rnds on board! (144 rnds immediately available on each turret)
40mm/L70 Type Bofors MEL DSTY 58 radar controlled or control by Galileo OGR7/2

(in reply to Temple)
Post #: 2895
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/24/2016 3:46:49 AM   
Mgellis


Posts: 2007
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline
Slowly but surely, I am working on a scenario involving Romania and Ukraine...

Please consider adding the following RQ-7 Shadow variant:

RQ-7 Shadow 600
Romania
Service dates: 1998-present

"AAI has also built a scaled-up Pioneer derivative known as the "Shadow 600". It also resembles a Pioneer, except that the outer panels of the wings are distinctively swept back, and it has a stronger Wankel engine, the UAV EL 801, with 52 hp (39 kW). A number of Shadow 600s are in service in several nations, including Romania." --Wikipedia

"AAI has delivered the six Shadow 600 unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) to Romania which were part of a $20-million order package. The Shadow 600s delivered to Romania were loaded with an Infametrics package that weigh around 17kg and contains a daylight color television camera and thermal imager. With a maximum load weight of 45-55kg, the UAV can carry two to three sensors simulataneously, such as the standard fit of a video recorder that permits the vehicle to be deployed beyond the line of sight from the ground control station (GCS). The Romanian Shadow 600s also includes a universal GCS that incorporates 226,000 source lines of software code."
http://www.readabstracts.com/Business-international/Romania-takes-delivery-of-Shadow-600s-US-Army-tries-again-with-brigage-level-UAV.html

"The AAI Shadow 400 and Shadow 600:

The RQ-7 200 is the only Shadow variant in service with the U.S. military. AAI Corporation (with limited success) also offered Shadow 400 and 600 variants. The Shadow 400 was proposed as a ship-based variant, with a hydraulic launcher and a net recovery system, designed to support naval operations. No production aircraft have been built and AAI is no longer offering this variant. The endurance of the Shadow 600 UAV is in the 12-14 hour range vs. 6 hours for the RQ-7A 200 variant and 9 hours for the RQ-7B 200. Other improvements include a more powerful 52 hp engine (the RQ-7 200 engine has 38 hp). A limited no. of Shadow 600 production aircraft were built and AAI is no longer offering this variant." -- http://www.bga-aeroweb.com/Defense/RQ-7-Shadow.html

Thanks for considering this one.



(in reply to msc)
Post #: 2896
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 7/25/2016 12:26:36 PM   
SASR

 

Posts: 82
Joined: 3/1/2015
Status: offline
AIM-9X Block II Range has been doubled over the Block 1

From: http://www.seapowermagazine.org/stories/20160516-missiles.html

quote:

The 9X Block II can do things its predecessors could hardly have imagined. For example, it is equipped with a 360-degree engagement capability and a data link, said Capt. Jim Stoneman, chief of the Navy’s Air-to-Air Missiles Program Office. That enables a pilot to fire the missile first and then aim it at a target.

“The pilot can shoot and then pass more information to the missile” via the data link to vector the missile to a target, Stoneman said during a briefing May 16 at the 2016 Sea-Air-Space Exposition. The missile’s 360-degree capability enables it to engage targets — even those behind the aircraft, he said.

On some planes, such as the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter, pilots will be able to aim the missiles using sights built into their helmets.

Although the Sidewinder was developed as a short-range missile meant for close-in kills, the Block II’s range has been “about doubled,” Stoneman said, making it into a “beyond-visual-range” weapon.

(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 2897
Missing DB3000 Entry - 7/25/2016 10:49:13 PM   
stilesw


Posts: 1378
Joined: 6/26/2014
From: Hansville, WA, USA
Status: offline
DB entry 1023 - SAM Bty (Patriot [PAC-2GEM+]) - United States (Army), 2004, 6x Lnchr - states that it can be guided by AN/APQ-65. However I cannot find any AN/APQ-65 entry in the DB. The last entry is for AN/APQ-64. Am I missing something?
Running CMANO v1.11 SR2 Build 839.4 DB3000 Database Build 445. Also, the same is true
Running CMANO v1.11 Beta Build 843 DB3000 Database Build 445.

Thanks.
-Wayne Stiles

(in reply to SASR)
Post #: 2898
RE: Missing DB3000 Entry - 7/26/2016 1:20:58 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stilesw

DB entry 1023 - SAM Bty (Patriot [PAC-2GEM+]) - United States (Army), 2004, 6x Lnchr - states that it can be guided by AN/APQ-65. However I cannot find any AN/APQ-65 entry in the DB. The last entry is for AN/APQ-64. Am I missing something?
Running CMANO v1.11 SR2 Build 839.4 DB3000 Database Build 445. Also, the same is true
Running CMANO v1.11 Beta Build 843 DB3000 Database Build 445.

Thanks.
-Wayne Stiles

Wayne, the AN/MPQ-65 is already implemented in the Patriot battery so you don't have to add it separately. You can check this by looking at the mounts and sensors of the respective unit.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Supreme 2.0 -- 7/26/2016 1:23:33 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to stilesw)
Post #: 2899
North Korea ICBM and SAM - 7/26/2016 1:43:21 PM   
jun5896

 

Posts: 202
Joined: 1/17/2015
Status: online
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/dprk/kn-08.htm
http://38north.org/2016/03/chamjin032316/
http://www.janes.com/article/55190/north-korea-unveils-new-version-of-kn-08-icbm
https://www.nknews.org/2015/10/analysis-redesigned-kn-08-missile-unveiled-in-military-parade/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KN-08

KN-08 ICBM

http://www.janes.com/article/59282/north-korean-kn-06-test-confirms-similarity-to-chinese-and-russian-fourth-generation-sams
http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/news/2016/07/26/0200000000AEN20160726012000315.html
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2016/04/485_201736.html
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/dprk/kn-6.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KN-06
http://armyrecognition.com/april_2016_global_defense_security_news_industry/first_images_firing_tests_of_north_korea_kn-06_air_defense_missile_systems_10304161.html
http://world-defense.com/threads/northkorea-releases-images-of-new-kn-06-long-range-surface-to-air-missile-test.3794/

KN-06 SAM(S-300 copy, TEL - HQ-09?)


https://www.nknews.org/2013/11/north-korea-extends-range-of-kn01-anti-ship-missile-media/
http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2013/11/22/2013112200741.html

NK extends KN-01(ASM) range? (Korean source)


http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/dprk/missile.htm

more north korea missiles list


< Message edited by jun5896 -- 7/26/2016 1:55:22 PM >

(in reply to Vici Supreme)
Post #: 2900
RE: North Korea ICBM and SAM - 7/27/2016 2:56:41 PM   
Hongjian

 

Posts: 818
Joined: 1/2/2015
Status: offline
I have been playing "The Lost Province" scenario (very well crafted scenario, btw!) and found out that it is incredibly hard for the PLA Rocket Force to shut down any ROCAF/Taiwanese airbases with even huge amounts of DF-11A SRBM due to the lack of accuracy on the mainstay SRBMs, the DF-11A.
The DB gives a CEP of 600m for both the basic DF-11 of the 90s and the improved 2000s DF-11A, which results in them not being able to hit even a runway even if launched en-masse. What I found weird is that the DF-11A also has the same CEP of the basic DF-11 of 600m.
Wikipedia, citing MissileThread and Global Security, say that the DF-11A has improved Beidou/GPS guidance which raises its CEP to 20-30m.

http://missilethreat.com/missiles/df-11-11a-css-7/


Fixed Thanks

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 8/3/2016 2:38:18 AM >

(in reply to jun5896)
Post #: 2901
Update for South Korea FFX Batch-II - 7/28/2016 4:07:21 PM   
jun5896

 

Posts: 202
Joined: 1/17/2015
Status: online
Daegu-Class (ROKN FFX Batch-II), 2018

Displacement:
2,800 t, 3,600 t (full load)
Length: 122 m
Beam: 14.2 m
Draft: 4.15 m
Propulsion: CODOG, 2 shafts, 2 x MTU 12V 1163 TB83 diesel engine, 1 x Rolls Royce MT30 gas turbine engine
Speed: 30 knots (56 km/h; 35 mph) (max), 18 knots (33 km/h; 21 mph) (cruising)
Range: 8,100 km
Complement: 120
Sensors and processing systems: SPS-550K search radar, SPG-540K tracking radar, Hanhwa Thales EOTS
SQS-240K sonar, SQR-220K towed array sonar
Electronic warfare & decoys: LIG Nex1 SLQ-200(V)K Sonata electronic warfare suite, KDAGAIE Mk2 decoys, SLQ-261K TACM
Armament:
1 x 5 inch Mk-45 Mod 4 (127mm/L62) naval gun
1 x 20 mm Phalanx Block 1B CIWS
2 x 4 SSM-700K Hae Sung anti-ship Missiles or 4 Tactical Ship-to-Surface Missiles (tentatively named : Hae Sung II; Guided Missile ~ 200-250km : Korean news Source)
2 x 3 K745 LW Blue Shark torpedoes
1 x KVLS 16-cells quadpack with Haegung K-SAAM(It is similar VL MICA maybe 10 - 12nm It will replace RAM) 32 round in 8-cells and Red Shark K-ASROC 8 round in 8-cells. KVLS also integrate Hyunmoo-3 B/C and Tactical Ship-to-Surface Missile
Aircraft carried: Super Lynx or Wildcat (1 medium slot)



http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2016/june-2016-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/4067-dsme-launched-the-lead-daegu-class-ffx-ii-frigate-for-republic-of-korea-navy.html
http://www.janes.com/article/61012/dsme-launches-south-korea-s-first-ffx-ii-frigate


K-VLS


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_launching_system#References



LIG Nex1 Tactical Ship-to-Surface Missile (Guided Missile)

https://www.lignex1.com/eng/product/product01_02.jsp

Haegung K-SAAM

http://www.janes.com/article/55433/adex-2015-lig-nex1-says-k-saam-on-track-to-enter-rokn-service-by-2018

< Message edited by jun5896 -- 7/29/2016 12:08:11 AM >

(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 2902
RE: Update for South Korea FFX Batch-II - 7/29/2016 12:33:48 AM   
Rocksoldier

 

Posts: 274
Joined: 9/16/2015
Status: offline
I think there is a minor DB error in Aircraft #4416 (wrong name)
As far as i know the SF-260AM was replaced in 2005 with SF-260EA

http://www.aeromedia.it/sf260ami.html

Fixed Thanks!


< Message edited by mikmyk -- 8/4/2016 1:48:20 AM >

(in reply to jun5896)
Post #: 2903
RE: Update for South Korea FFX Batch-II - 8/2/2016 3:31:43 PM   
VIF2NE

 

Posts: 457
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
#973 - Big Bird C [64N6] -- SA-20

Radar has two active surfaces, ScanInterval = 6 seconds (one full turn 12 seconds).
This radar is similar to High Screen A [9S19 Imbir]. He scans the space in two dimensions, so the information is updated more quickly than for "ScanInterval"

http://www.russianarms.ru/forum/index.php?topic=11388.0


Fixed Thanks

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 8/3/2016 2:48:48 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Rocksoldier)
Post #: 2904
RE: Update for South Korea FFX Batch-II - 8/3/2016 2:22:57 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: VIF2NE

#973 - Big Bird C [64N6] -- SA-20

Radar has two active surfaces, ScanInterval = 6 seconds (one full turn 12 seconds).
This radar is similar to High Screen A [9S19 Imbir]. He scans the space in two dimensions, so the information is updated more quickly than for "ScanInterval"

http://www.russianarms.ru/forum/index.php?topic=11388.0


Fixed. Thanks!

Mike


_____________________________


(in reply to VIF2NE)
Post #: 2905
RE: North Korea ICBM and SAM - 8/3/2016 2:31:20 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hongjian

I have been playing "The Lost Province" scenario (very well crafted scenario, btw!) and found out that it is incredibly hard for the PLA Rocket Force to shut down any ROCAF/Taiwanese airbases with even huge amounts of DF-11A SRBM due to the lack of accuracy on the mainstay SRBMs, the DF-11A.
The DB gives a CEP of 600m for both the basic DF-11 of the 90s and the improved 2000s DF-11A, which results in them not being able to hit even a runway even if launched en-masse. What I found weird is that the DF-11A also has the same CEP of the basic DF-11 of 600m.
Wikipedia, citing MissileThread and Global Security, say that the DF-11A has improved Beidou/GPS guidance which raises its CEP to 20-30m.

http://missilethreat.com/missiles/df-11-11a-css-7/


Reduced it to 50. Found similar sources but none that low

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Hongjian)
Post #: 2906
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 8/3/2016 2:48:06 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Skjold

I would like to request these Algerian additions to the DB please.

S-400 (Unknown version, presumably SA-21a?) #1668
16 TEL Launchers in total.
Delivery 2015-2016.

Buk-M2E (SA-17 Grizzly) #1913
48 launchers in total.
Delivery 2014-2015.

Pantsir-S1E (SA-22 Greyhound) #1935
38 vehicles in total.
Delivery 2010-2013.

Sources:
http://armstrade.org/files/obrazecglava4.pdf (Page 14-15) - Note: This is in Russian.

Add Raptor II capability to #3197 Su-24MK2
Delivery 2008.

Edit: Seems very similar to the existing H4-SOW (#3311 & #3312) entry with these differences.

Payload:600 kg HE warhead
Range:200 km (108 nm)


Sources:
http://armstrade.org/files/obrazecglava4.pdf (Page 16) - Note: This is in Russian.
http://www.deneldynamics.co.za/products/missiles/stand-off-weapons/raptor-ii - Mentions Su-24 Integration


I've searched but come up empty. Do you have any pictures of any of these SAM systems with algerian markings. I've only found one that is likely the S-300.

Thanks!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to Skjold)
Post #: 2907
Add Y-12 - 8/3/2016 5:45:03 PM   
benefant

 

Posts: 80
Joined: 6/5/2015
From: Austria
Status: offline
Please can you add the Y-12. ?


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harbin_Y-12

There are 3 Y-12's in the latest db for China, Kenya and Cambodia. Let me know if another nation is needed.


< Message edited by mikmyk -- 8/4/2016 1:45:06 AM >

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 2908
Add new russian tanker and transporter IL-76 possible? - 8/3/2016 5:55:59 PM   
benefant

 

Posts: 80
Joined: 6/5/2015
From: Austria
Status: offline

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilyushin_Il-96


Il-96400
Il-96400 TZ tanker

(in reply to benefant)
Post #: 2909
Eurofighter Loadout Austria - 8/3/2016 9:59:53 PM   
benefant

 

Posts: 80
Joined: 6/5/2015
From: Austria
Status: offline
#2083 and #3630
Eurofighter Austrian Airforce
They are not capable for AIM 120 AMRAAm
Only the IRIS-T

This was a political decision to special downgrade


So i think a light cap with 4 Iris and 3 drop tanks
And a heavy cap with 8 iris and 3 drop tanks


Please provide a source so we can make the change.

< Message edited by mikmyk -- 8/4/2016 1:46:26 AM >

(in reply to benefant)
Post #: 2910
Page:   <<   < prev  95 96 [97] 98 99   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? Page: <<   < prev  95 96 [97] 98 99   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.211