Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? Page: <<   < prev  228 229 [230] 231 232   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 5/30/2021 5:45:50 PM   
zclark

 

Posts: 210
Joined: 9/12/2015
Status: offline
Could be two separate missiles then. I read a Jane's article stating they were one in the same. Either way, it would be nice to have added.

https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/lockheed-martin-set-to-commence-jassm-agm-158b-2-lrip

(in reply to 14yellow14)
Post #: 6871
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 5/31/2021 6:36:12 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1406
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>Add new Adder loadout to SU-35s.</summary>
<detail>
Operational photos came to light for AAW escort. 4 R-77-1 Adder, 2 R-73. Perhaps the light configuration as the Alamo's time out?
</detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/GuyPlopsky/status/1399308061378969601/photo/1
</evidence>

(in reply to 14yellow14)
Post #: 6872
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/1/2021 6:30:49 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1406
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
<type>Add</type>
<summary>Add Omani NASAMS II</summary>
<detail>
Oman has purchased and received NASAMS with AN/MPQ-64F1 Sentinel Radar & the EO sensor vehicle. Pictures in first link. Copy #860. Update Sentinel to F, if in DB.
</detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/FarooqB90714421/status/1398914860239425536
https://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/oman-upgrading-its-air-defenses-07161/
https://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/page/trade_register.php
</evidence>

< Message edited by BDukes -- 6/1/2021 6:31:10 PM >

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 6873
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/1/2021 8:36:06 PM   
14yellow14

 

Posts: 89
Joined: 12/8/2019
Status: offline
<type>Add</type>
<summary>Rafale F4 in 2022</summary>

<detail>
The F4 standard will include upgrades of existing capabilities, like the Thales RBE2 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, the Spectra (Système de Protection et d’Évitement des Conduites de Tir du Rafale or, in English, Self-Protection Equipment Countering Threats to Rafale Aircraft) electronic warfare system, the OSF IRST, the Thales Talios targeting pod, the Reco NG reconnaissance pod and the communications suite. However, there will be also important new capabilities, like the Thales Scorpion Helmet Mounted Display (HMD), the MICA NG (Next-Generation) air-to-air missile and the new 1000 kg variant of the Safran AASM (Armement Air-Sol Modulaire) “Hammer” Precision-Guided Munition (PGM), the 1000 kg AASM, the new variant will see the AASM kit applied on the BLU109 penetrator warhead or the standard Mk-84, according to the mission’s needs.

The Rafale F4 standard will be fielded in two stages, in 2022 and 2024, in order to have the new capabilities operational as soon as they are certified.



</detail>

<evidence>
https://theaviationist.com/2021/06/01/rafale-f4-standard/
http://www.opex360.com/2021/05/21/premiere-campagne-dessais-en-vol-pour-le-rafale-porte-au-standard-f4/
</evidence>

< Message edited by 14yellow14 -- 6/1/2021 9:38:31 PM >

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 6874
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/1/2021 8:46:28 PM   
14yellow14

 

Posts: 89
Joined: 12/8/2019
Status: offline
<type>Add</type>
<summary>New German Eurofighter T4 Quadriga 2025</summary>

<detail>

New equipment to be integrated with the Quadriga jets will include an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar Captor-E Mk1, GBU-54 precision-guided bombs and (probably) Taurus KEPD cruise missile.

</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.flightglobal.com/defence/quadriga-award-launches-tranche-4-eurofighter-production-for-germany/141107.article
https://defbrief.com/2020/09/24/germany-buying-gbu-54-precision-guided-bombs-for-eurofighter-jets/
https://www.key.aero/article/germanys-eurofighter-plans
https://theaviationist.com/2020/11/06/germany-confirms-acquisition-of-38-new-tranche-4-eurofighter-combat-aircraft/
</evidence>

< Message edited by 14yellow14 -- 6/1/2021 9:18:19 PM >

(in reply to 14yellow14)
Post #: 6875
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/1/2021 10:00:24 PM   
aleavz

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 8/20/2019
From: Brazil
Status: offline
<type>Add</type>
<summary>Please add the brazilian Hermes-900.</summary>
<detail>
The brazilian airforce operates one Hermes-900 UAV for surveillance purposes.

Specs the same as Colombian one (cameras, FLIR etc, but no jammers).

I have not been able to figure out what the tall pod in the pictures is.
</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.fab.mil.br/noticias/mostra/19863/OPERACIONAL%20%E2%80%93%20Hermes%20900%20participa%20de%20treinamento%20em%20Campo%20Grande
https://www.fab.mil.br/noticias/mostra/18093/REAPARELHAMENTO%20%E2%80%93%20Hermes%20900%20refor%C3%A7a%20capacidade%20operacional%20da%20FAB%20no%20reconhecimento%20eletr%C3%B4nico
https://www.edrotacultural.com.br/fab-amplia-operacionalidade-do-hermes-900/
</evidence>



(in reply to 14yellow14)
Post #: 6876
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/2/2021 9:00:03 AM   
Sputnikod

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 6/2/2021
Status: offline
I think I have detected a mistake in the DB.

Because i am noob i cant attach pictures...

612 Badr of Saudi Arabia Navy:

In all pictures i found in internet have 2 Mk141 launchers with 4 Harpoons per mount.

But in DB have 2 launchers but only 2 missiles pero mount.






(in reply to aleavz)
Post #: 6877
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/2/2021 11:58:38 AM   
Blast33


Posts: 318
Joined: 12/31/2018
From: Above and beyond
Status: offline
Iranian navy #431 Kharg [Olwen Mod] - 1985 sunk yesterday after a fire.

https://twitter.com/AmirIGM/status/1400006584097443840
https://twitter.com/Pataramesh/status/1400043179018231811/photo/1





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Sputnikod)
Post #: 6878
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/2/2021 12:02:26 PM   
tylerblakebrandon

 

Posts: 108
Joined: 5/11/2020
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sputnikod

I think I have detected a mistake in the DB.

Because i am noob i cant attach pictures...

612 Badr of Saudi Arabia Navy:

In all pictures i found in internet have 2 Mk141 launchers with 4 Harpoons per mount.

But in DB have 2 launchers but only 2 missiles pero mount.










(in reply to Sputnikod)
Post #: 6879
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/2/2021 2:08:32 PM   
aleavz

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 8/20/2019
From: Brazil
Status: offline
<type>Add</type>
<summary>Please add the brazilian IAI-Heron.</summary>
<detail>
The brazilian airforce now operates two IAI-Herons, that were previously operated by the brazilian federal police. They seem to be each in a different configuration, and one of them seems to be equipped with a radar and some other remote sensing equipment besides the FLIR (lumps under the fuselage and on top of the nose), probably an ELINT suite. The radar is most likely the same as the one used in the australian Heron.

1x
Performance, sensors and etc. the same as the australian one + ELINT

1x
Performance, sensors and etc. the same as the 2006 israeli Heron (FLIR only)

</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1QeG5WFG74
https://forcaaerea.com.br/arp-heron-i-e-oficialmente-incorporado-ao-1o-7o-gav/
https://www.aereo.jor.br/2020/09/18/aviacao-de-patrulha-da-fab-incorpora-aeronaves-remotamente-pilotadas-iai-heron-i/
https://www.aereo.jor.br/2019/06/19/iai-assina-acordo-com-a-fab-para-operacao-do-uav-heron/
</evidence>


< Message edited by aleavz -- 6/2/2021 10:54:02 PM >

(in reply to tylerblakebrandon)
Post #: 6880
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/2/2021 2:25:30 PM   
aleavz

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 8/20/2019
From: Brazil
Status: offline
<type>Add</type>
<summary>Please add the brazilian Hermes-450 UAVs.</summary>
<detail>

The brazilian airforce operates at least two Hermes-450 UAVs. At least one of them is equipped with an under fuselage radar instead of the optical sensors. The radar is in all likelyhood a SELEX T-20, as this seems to be the only radar mentioned as being integrated into the Hermes 450.

Performance details the same as any other Hermes 450.

At least 1x
FLIR/EO suite

At least 1x
SELEX Gabbiano T-20 Radar. X-Band, 160NM range.


</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1QeG5WFG74
https://www.leonardocompany.com/en/products/gabbiano-ts-ultra-light?f=/air/airborne-systems/airborne-radars
https://www.fab.mil.br/noticias/mostra/19817/OPERACIONAL%20-%20Hermes%20450%20%C3%A9%20empregado%20pela%20primeira%20vez%20em%20combate%20a%C3%A9reo%20simulado
https://www.brasilemdefesa.com/2013/05/rq-450-da-fab-hermes-450.html
https://www.fab.mil.br/noticias/mostra/26951/RIO%202016%20-%20Esquadr%C3%A3o%20H%C3%B3rus%20participa%20da%20vigil%C3%A2ncia%20a%C3%A9rea%20nos%20Jogos%20Ol%C3%ADmpicos
</evidence>





< Message edited by aleavz -- 6/2/2021 11:07:52 PM >

(in reply to aleavz)
Post #: 6881
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/2/2021 9:36:03 PM   
UncertainlyCertain

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 7/20/2020
Status: offline
<type>Add</type>
<summary>Please, consider adding the MQ-9B SeaGuardian</summary>
<detail>
A new version in the MQ-9 family. This particular one is offered as a maritime patrol UAV/UCAV.

Equipment carried:


- Lynx SAR (AN/APY-8)
- MTS-B EO/IR turret
- SeaVue XMC ISAR in an under fuselage pod or in alternative - Sea Spray 7500E maritime radar in an under fuselage pod
- Sage 750 ESM
- Potential to carry 2 to 4 sonobuoy dispenser pods for ASW, each pod is provisioned for 10 A-sized sonobuoys or 20 G-sized ones
- Increased endurance for up to 40h airborne time

Currently 2 airframes are leased by the Indian Navy, with plans to buy up to 30 such platforms. Other potential customers include the Japanese Coast Guard and the Hellenic Coast Guard.



</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/09/mq-9b-seaguardian-maritime-uav-which-missions-which-customers/
https://www.ga-asi.com/remotely-piloted-aircraft/mq-9b
https://www.ga-asi.com/ga-asi-integrates-sage-750-esm-onto-seaguardian
https://www.ga-asi.com/leonardo-seaspray-aesa-maritime-radar-to-be-integrated-on-ga-asi-seaguardian
https://www.ga-asi.com/ga-asi-completes-unmanned-aircraft-anti-submarine-warfare-demonstration-of-sonobuoy-dispensing-and-remote-processing
https://www.ga-asi.com/ga-asi-conducts-jcg-validation-flights-in-japan
https://www.ga-asi.com/ga-asi-concludes-successful-series-of-mq-9-demonstrations-in-greece
https://www.businessinsider.in/defense/news/india-plans-to-buy-30-mq-9-reaper-drones-for-3-billion-from-us-company-general-atomics/articleshow/81430469.cms
</evidence>

< Message edited by UncertainlyCertain -- 6/2/2021 9:44:53 PM >

(in reply to aleavz)
Post #: 6882
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/2/2021 10:50:02 PM   
TwarVG

 

Posts: 46
Joined: 3/26/2018
From: Britannia
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>Increase speed of SPEAR 3</summary>
<detail>The SPEAR 3 missile's (#3530) speed should be 600 knots instead of 400. The missile is reported as being high subsonic and it would match the speed of the EW variant SPEAR EW (#3690) in the database.</detail>
<evidence>https://missilethreat.csis.org/missile/spear-3/
https://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/spear-missile-system/
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/01/spear3-mini-cruise-missiles-to-provide-asuw-capability-to-british-f-35b/
</evidence>

(in reply to UncertainlyCertain)
Post #: 6883
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/2/2021 10:58:36 PM   
TwarVG

 

Posts: 46
Joined: 3/26/2018
From: Britannia
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>AIM-120D for UK F-35Bs</summary>
<detail>The first 2 British F-35B DB entries (#1095, #4947) should use AIM-120Ds instead of AIM-120C-5s. Approx 200 AIM-120Ds were purchased for the F-35 fleet to use as integration costs were low and it increases interchangeability with USMC F-35Bs when operating together. Until Meteor integration later on.</detail>
<evidence>
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-to-spend-650-million-on-200-aim-120d-amraam-missiles/
https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/united-kingdom-aim-120d-advanced-medium-range-air-air-missile-amraam
https://www.flightglobal.com/fixed-wing/uk-approved-to-buy-200-aim-120d-missiles/128799.article
</evidence>

(in reply to TwarVG)
Post #: 6884
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/2/2021 11:08:48 PM   
TwarVG

 

Posts: 46
Joined: 3/26/2018
From: Britannia
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>UK F-35B loadout tweaks</summary>
<detail>A number of weapons are listed under aircraft stores for all UK F-35Bs (#1095, #4947, #4699) that haven't been acquired/won't be integrated. Please remove 25mm GAU-22/A, Brimstone 2, AIM-120C-5, CPU-123, GBU-24E/B, and Storm Shadow. None of these weapons are planned for integration and have just been carried over from the Typhoon FGR.4 loadouts.</detail>
<evidence>
https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2017-01-17/60456
http://www.janes.com/article/57304/storm-shadow-dropped-from-uk-s-f-35b-follow-on-integration-plan
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/currently-no-plans-to-purchase-gun-pods-for-f-35b-jets/
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-to-spend-650-million-on-200-aim-120d-amraam-missiles/
</evidence>

(in reply to TwarVG)
Post #: 6885
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/2/2021 11:14:23 PM   
TwarVG

 

Posts: 46
Joined: 3/26/2018
From: Britannia
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>SPEAR EW range reduction to 240nmi</summary>
<detail>SPEAR EW (#3690) is listed as having a 500nmi range in the DB which is way too much considering the normal variant , SPEAR 3, only has an 80nmi range. The 500nmi range is carried over from the MALD-J I think which is the closest western counterpart to SPEAR EW. The only reference I can find to range is that is approx 3 times that of the normal missile, so about 240nmi.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/spear-missile-system/ "SPEAR-EW has been reported as having three times the range of the normal version whilst retaining physical compatibility to ease of aircraft integration..."
</evidence>

(in reply to TwarVG)
Post #: 6886
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/2/2021 11:24:57 PM   
TwarVG

 

Posts: 46
Joined: 3/26/2018
From: Britannia
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>Protector UAV tweaks</summary>
<detail>Protector (#4724) should have its name changed to 'Protector RG.1' as per standard naming conventions in the RAF. All 3 weapons (Brimstone 2 Dual-Mode #3589, Brimstone Dual-Mode #2251, GBU-49/B Paveway II #2061) should be removed from its stores because none of them have been integrated. As a side note, Brimstone 2 Dual-Mode (#3589) should be removed from the DB because it's not an actual variant of Brimstone, it's an accidental amalgamation of 2 variants. Instead, Brimstone 2 (#3035) and Paveway IV (#519) should be added. Loadouts should be either 18 Brimstone 2, or 12 Brimstone 2 and 2 Paveway IV.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.flightglobal.com/military-uavs/uks-unmanned-protector-gains-brimstones-paveway-iv-for-ground-test/138854.article
https://www.flightglobal.com/military-uavs/uk-signs-100m-protector-test-and-evaluation-deal/134304.article
</evidence>

< Message edited by TwarVG -- 6/2/2021 11:26:58 PM >

(in reply to TwarVG)
Post #: 6887
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/3/2021 6:05:34 PM   
14yellow14

 

Posts: 89
Joined: 12/8/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TwarVG

<type>Update</type>
<summary>SPEAR EW range reduction to 240nmi</summary>
<detail>SPEAR EW (#3690) is listed as having a 500nmi range in the DB which is way too much considering the normal variant , SPEAR 3, only has an 80nmi range. The 500nmi range is carried over from the MALD-J I think which is the closest western counterpart to SPEAR EW. The only reference I can find to range is that is approx 3 times that of the normal missile, so about 240nmi.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/spear-missile-system/ "SPEAR-EW has been reported as having three times the range of the normal version whilst retaining physical compatibility to ease of aircraft integration..."
</evidence>


Additional info from MBDA says 420 km




;)


< Message edited by 14yellow14 -- 6/3/2021 6:10:50 PM >

(in reply to TwarVG)
Post #: 6888
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/3/2021 7:54:05 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 301
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline
<type>Amend</type>
<summary>#3035 - Brimstone 2 and #2251 - Brimstone Dual-Mode - Add LST sensor in addition to MMw radar</summary>
<detail>
#3035 - Brimstone 2
and
#2251 - Brimstone Dual-Mode -
ADD SENSOR
1x Laser Spot Tracker 15 nm LST, Laser Spot Tracker Surface Search, Ground Search (Fixed), Ground Search (Mobile), Heading Info

In addition to the current sensor and guidance:
Guidance Type: Inertial (INS) mid-course plus Active Radar Homing (ARH) terminal guidance
SENSORS
1x Active Radar Seeker 5 nm Weapon Seeker, Active Radar Early 2000s Technology, Surface Search, Ground Search (Fixed), Ground Search (Mobile), Range Information, Speed Information, Heading Info
Operating bands (search & track): M


Checking Brimstone DM and Brimstone 2 in the DB3k as a result of the prior requests and they are missing the crucial dual mode,

Brimstone 2 essentially is the evolved production variant of the Brimstone DMS (Dual Mode Seeker) research programme which was working toward creating the Brimstone 2, DMS was pushed into early use due to an urgent operational requirement for Afghanistan and the intervention in Libya.

Brimstone DMS had a dual SALH and MM wave radar sensor to permit use against a much wider set of targets and tighter rules of engagement for pinpoint targets.

Brimstone 2 evovled from this technology so there would be no need for a Brimstone 2 "Dual Mode" as Brimstone 2 has a dual mode seeker by default.

In its current DB3K entity the Brimstone DM and Brimstone 2 have just MM wave radar seeker, ideally it should emulate the JAGM entry #3529 which has both radar and a Laser spot tracker?

From the MBDA Brimstone* product brochure: https://www.mbda-systems.com/?action=force-download-attachment&attachment_id=18765

"The system can be operated in three modes, each providing
flexibility and proven high confidence in mission success:
Mode 1: Semi-Active Laser (SAL) guidance, to engage static
targets with limited or no radar cross section (RCS)
Mode 2: Both SAL and Millimetric Wave radar guidance for fast
moving targets in cluttered environments
Mode 3: Fire-and-forget simultaneous target engagement" (i.e radar only)

*interestingly it appears MBDA dont differentiate Brimstone 2 from the earlier version presumably because only Brimstone 2 is in production.

</detail>

<evidence>
http://www.mbda-systems.com/mbda/site/ref/scripts/EN_DUAL-MODE-BRIMSTONE_416.html
</evidence>

Brimstone 2 is an important weapon in the UK inventory which would benefit from the amendment,
and Brimstone Dual Mode (DMS) is most likely not still in service having been superseded by Brimstone 2.

I doubt whether MBDA/RAF/MoD would be supporting both types from a cost/logistics perspective?

#3589 - Brimstone 2 Dual-Mode is only used in two loadouts #27245 and #27246 for the:
#4724 - Protector MALE UCAV [MQ-9B] (United Kingdom - 2019) so relatively "easy" to remove and still maintain backward compatibility.



Thanks

K

< Message edited by KLAB -- 6/3/2021 8:47:35 PM >

(in reply to 14yellow14)
Post #: 6889
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/4/2021 2:03:43 PM   
aleavz

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 8/20/2019
From: Brazil
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>Update Super Tucano Endurance, add RWR, countermeasures and Missile Warning System </summary>
<detail>
Currently both A-29A and A-29B have the same 555kg fuel capacity of 550kg. While this is correct for the A-29B biplace version, the A-29A carries around 80 gallons of extra fuel.
Units affected: #1840, #4823, #4825.

Currently all Super Tucanos in game lack a countermeasure dispensing system, as well as RWR and MAWS. The aircraft possess all three of these systems.
According to Embraer the Super Tucano is equiped with two CMDs with 30 rounds each.
Units Affected: #4354, #1839, #1840, #2254, #3465, #3745, #4823, #4825.

The brazilian monoplace Super Tucano A #1840 is currently missing the A/A loadout present in the the A29-B (db #21791). I recently made a post regarding super tucano
loadouts but didn't realize this one was also missing. Loadout is 2x MAA-1 Piranha + 3x 330 Liter drop tank.
Units Affected: #1840

</detail>

<evidence>
https://defense.embraer.com/br/pt/super-tucano/
https://web.archive.org/web/20130408131154/http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA510401
https://www.flyingmag.com/news/super-tucano-appear-airventure/
</evidence>


(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 6890
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/8/2021 6:37:53 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1406
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>Add TTNT Datalink</summary>
<detail>Looks like legion pods can now be datalinked together and with IRST21 (Super Hornets)using at TTNT datalink. Additionally may want to look at how F-22's and F-15's are linked with Talon Hate pods.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/40980/legion-infrared-search-and-track-pods-can-now-carry-their-own-datalinks-for-more-lethal-targeting
</evidence>

(in reply to aleavz)
Post #: 6891
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/8/2021 6:52:26 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1406
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>Add JAGM, Hellfire K1 and R loadout to UK Apache's from 2023</summary>
<detail>UK Apache JAGMS ordered and will be Hellfire K1 and R capabile. Add loadouts to #4842 and any follow-on to #2044. No idea if it actually replaces Brimstone</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/uk-selects-jagm-for-apache
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-confirms-jagm-missile-for-ah-64e-apache-fleet/
</evidence>

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 6892
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/8/2021 7:11:10 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1406
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Add new KCR-60M #2682 with A220 Deck Guns. 629 Tombak [KCR-60M] Indonesia 2021</summary>
<detail>Indonesia purchased A220 deck guns for KCR-60M Units. Replaces Bofors. Units 629 Tombak and 630 Halasan. You can find the same deck gun on #2890 (Bykov). Generic directors like Bykov will be fine until they're known.Second link shows the 220 mount.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/indonesia-acquires-a-220m-naval-guns-for-kcr-60m-attack-craft
https://www.indomiliter.com/kri-tombak-629-telah-dipasangi-meriam-a-220m-57mm-buatan-rusia/
</evidence>

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 6893
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/8/2021 8:13:06 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1406
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>Izumo's receing RAM Block II missiles (2021)</summary>
<detail>Japan upgraded RAM systems to RAM Block II. Izumo class #2442 is the first.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/japan-ram-block-2-tactical-missiles
https://www.reddit.com/r/MilitaryPorn/comments/nuytbz/a_raytheon_ram_block_2_sam_system_launching_a/
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/09/us-oks-japan-requests-for-additional-ram-block-2-tactical-missiles/
https://www.defenseworld.net/news/29243/Raytheon_to_Manufacture_RAM_Block_2_Missiles_for_Japan__Turkey__U_A_E_
</evidence>

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 6894
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/8/2021 9:53:20 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1406
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
<type>Add</type>
<summary>Chinese Type 54 Jiangkai MLU #1682 2021</summary>
<detail>Only a class of 2 shops but #1682 Type 54 Jiangkai I [525 Manshan] completed MLU in 2021. Replace HQ-7 with 24 round HQ-10. ESM and ECM updated to 726 which seems to be standard ECM for most Chinese Combatants now. New decoy launchers 8x3 (current fit probably ok). CIWS is PJ-13 which is a copy of AK-630M (look at Type 022) very small CIWS not beefy. PJ-13 is the Chinese designation. Likely has the VDS (same as other 054/056). First one seems completed, Manshan. </detail>
<evidence>
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/t/type-054-a-ffg-thread-ii.4149/page-499
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/t/type-054-a-ffg-thread-ii.4149/page-502
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/t/type-054-a-ffg-thread-ii.4149/page-501
https://twitter.com/stoa1984/status/1401920382098104326/photo/1
</evidence>

< Message edited by BDukes -- 6/8/2021 10:36:48 PM >

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 6895
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/8/2021 10:04:07 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 301
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline
This reminds me that as per a prior request the #2890 (Bykov) Vasily Bykov shouldn't have 57mm A-220 as in reality it has a 76mm AK-176MA forward AND the containerised Club launchers are very much a "can be fitted" but aren't in reality option.
There's no evidence of the Gibka SAM SA-N-24 or similar mounted launcher either in any images of the real ships so far despite a lot of articles saying they're meant to have it.
From TV documentaries the stern area is used for an Pr.02800 10m fast assault craft and dimensionally it's a case of either the fast boat or SSM containers, but not both.

The current Db3k Bykov could be branded hypothetical "future war footing" as it's incarnation in the DB doesn't accurately represent the real vessels which have a primarily constabulary role in peacetime but I think it's been included in one of the LIVE (King of the Border?) scenarios making it less easy to amend without skewing the scenario.

A bit like USCG cutters with provision for Harpoon capability the Bykov's would only get heavily armed in the event of a well signalled escalation in hostilities.

For evidence watch the following TV documentary (possibly on mute).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljjQwbaXWx0

Thanks.
K


quote:

ORIGINAL: BDukes

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Add new KCR-60M #2682 with A220 Deck Guns. 629 Tombak [KCR-60M] Indonesia 2021</summary>
<detail>Indonesia purchased A220 deck guns for KCR-60M Units. Replaces Bofors. Units 629 Tombak and 630 Halasan. You can find the same deck gun on #2890 (Bykov). Generic directors like Bykov will be fine until they're known.Second link shows the 220 mount.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/indonesia-acquires-a-220m-naval-guns-for-kcr-60m-attack-craft
https://www.indomiliter.com/kri-tombak-629-telah-dipasangi-meriam-a-220m-57mm-buatan-rusia/
</evidence>



< Message edited by KLAB -- 6/8/2021 10:13:48 PM >

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 6896
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/8/2021 10:15:14 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1406
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>Type 056 Updates. ESM-ECM, Satcom and PJ-13 gun downgrade</summary>
<detail>Add ESM-ECM. 326 set common on Chinese surface combatants Believe it or not some 056 didn't receive PJ-13 guns but standard 12.7mm instead (cost?). Sat com updates as well but didn't matter for CMO yet. Graphic on link 2 will drive you bonkers but each variant may not be CMO relevant. </detail>
<evidence>
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/t/type-056-class-opv-corvette.5339/page-338
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/t/type-056-class-opv-corvette.5339/page-345
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/t/type-056-class-opv-corvette.5339/page-350
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/t/type-056-class-opv-corvette.5339/page-348
</evidence>

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 6897
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/8/2021 10:32:37 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1406
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KLAB

This reminds me that as per a prior request the #2890 (Bykov) Vasily Bykov shouldn't have 57mm A-220 as in reality it has a 76mm AK-176MA forward AND the containerised Club launchers are very much a "can be fitted" but aren't in reality option.
There's no evidence of the Gibka SAM SA-N-24 or similar mounted launcher either in any images of the real ships so far despite a lot of articles saying they're meant to have it.
From TV documentaries the stern area is used for an Pr.02800 10m fast assault craft and dimensionally it's a case of either the fast boat or SSM containers, but not both.

The current Db3k Bykov could be branded hypothetical "future war footing" as it's incarnation in the DB doesn't accurately represent the real vessels which have a primarily constabulary role in peacetime but I think it's been included in one of the LIVE (King of the Border?) scenarios making it less easy to amend without skewing the scenario.

A bit like USCG cutters with provision for Harpoon capability the Bykov's would only get heavily armed in the event of a well signalled escalation in hostilities.

For evidence watch the following TV documentary (possibly on mute).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljjQwbaXWx0

Thanks.
K


quote:

ORIGINAL: BDukes

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Add new KCR-60M #2682 with A220 Deck Guns. 629 Tombak [KCR-60M] Indonesia 2021</summary>
<detail>Indonesia purchased A220 deck guns for KCR-60M Units. Replaces Bofors. Units 629 Tombak and 630 Halasan. You can find the same deck gun on #2890 (Bykov). Generic directors like Bykov will be fine until they're known.Second link shows the 220 mount.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/indonesia-acquires-a-220m-naval-guns-for-kcr-60m-attack-craft
https://www.indomiliter.com/kri-tombak-629-telah-dipasangi-meriam-a-220m-57mm-buatan-rusia/
</evidence>




They are nice-looking ships for sure. I'm pretty sure I recognize your username from SPMBT or some other game as well so I know you know your stuff!

My take is updates are significantly behind but also know the beta versions could be ahead. So I just try and add stuff the way they like it with links and have faith they'll get there someday. Lot of stuff you can manually change but it does add a new layer or work to scenario development (checking over units). it is what it is.

Mike

(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 6898
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/10/2021 9:30:24 AM   
Lnestig

 

Posts: 49
Joined: 12/20/2012
Status: offline
Could you add the new SAAB RB 15 Mk4 "Gungnir" anti ship missile?

https://www.saab.com/products/the-rbs15-family
https://www.naval-technology.com/projects/rbs-15-gungnir-next-generation-anti-ship-missile/
https://www.saab.com/sv/newsroom/press-releases/2017/saab-far-bestallning-pa-nasta-generations-sjomalsrobot




(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 6899
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 6/10/2021 9:34:37 AM   
Lnestig

 

Posts: 49
Joined: 12/20/2012
Status: offline
Could you add the new SAAB A26 submarine, in the Swedish Navy Blekinge-class?

https://www.saab.com/products/naval/submarines
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/10/saabs-a26-submarine-program-transitioning-from-design-to-production/
https://www.naval-technology.com/projects/kockums-a26-submarine/


(in reply to Lnestig)
Post #: 6900
Page:   <<   < prev  228 229 [230] 231 232   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? Page: <<   < prev  228 229 [230] 231 232   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.367