Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

That dang Soviet speedbump line...

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> That dang Soviet speedbump line... Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 4:23:41 PM   
nedcorleone1


Posts: 162
Joined: 4/26/2011
Status: offline
I just hate how the Soviets get enough units, even if they are underpowered, to completely make a solid wall of troops that span the map vertically. Its making it very difficult to drive the Panzers forward to make any kind of encirclement. Sometimes I'll breech the line with my Panzers and infantry to setup a thrust for my next turn only to be met with a new wall of Soviet units.

/endrant
Post #: 1
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 5:04:38 PM   
Empire101


Posts: 1970
Joined: 5/20/2008
From: Coruscant
Status: offline
Yep, thats the pain in the neck alright...you just have to keep chomping at it

_____________________________

Our lives may be more boring than those who lived in apocalyptic times,
but being bored is greatly preferable to being prematurely dead because of some ideological fantasy.
- Michael Burleigh


(in reply to nedcorleone1)
Post #: 2
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 5:05:15 PM   
molchomor

 

Posts: 197
Joined: 12/28/2009
Status: offline
Sounds like a game against the Soviet AI ?

I posted screenshots awhile ago on my attack into a completely empty Caucaus only to be encircled by 100+ warped units the next turn (many corps sized, and very few empty shell units as most had CVs of 3+).

I believe the warping/teleporting abilities by the AI has been nerfed a bit since then (?), but the unlimited creation ability by the AI has not AFAIK, it still has more or less unlimited APs.

WHAT THIS MEANS: You will have to commit alot more of your panzers in a major offensive than against a human opponent. Often all of your mobile units in fact. This because the AI will never lack units to put up a wall in front of you.

(in reply to nedcorleone1)
Post #: 3
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 5:17:22 PM   
Empire101


Posts: 1970
Joined: 5/20/2008
From: Coruscant
Status: offline
Well I'm playing a human opponent, and it seems to be the same at the moment, riverline after riverline of troops.

_____________________________

Our lives may be more boring than those who lived in apocalyptic times,
but being bored is greatly preferable to being prematurely dead because of some ideological fantasy.
- Michael Burleigh


(in reply to molchomor)
Post #: 4
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 5:43:29 PM   
nedcorleone1


Posts: 162
Joined: 4/26/2011
Status: offline
It just irks me how the Soviets can have enough troops to put up what seems like an infinite line of troops. No matter how big of a bulge I create, he just fills them in indefinitely while I begin to run short on troops. And yes this is the AI I am talking about here. I can't seem to gain any momentum after Turn 4. Its turned into a slug fest as Empire101 stated (chomping at the line). I hate hate hate this type of strategy but I feel like my hands are tied by the sheer amount of units the SU gets. I try to make headway, a buildup for penetration and the beginnings of a piercing in the line only to be met with yet MORE troops. I want to pocket them not rout them. *sigh* My Panzers can't keep taking those kinds of losses... those poor guys.

(in reply to Empire101)
Post #: 5
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 7:54:58 PM   
lenin


Posts: 334
Joined: 1/19/2005
Status: offline
You are trying to exterminate a vast country of hundreds of millions of people. I'm sure a few of them will try to get in your way.....One thing the soviets were never short of was people...

_____________________________

"Imperialism is the eve of the proletarian social revolution"

(in reply to nedcorleone1)
Post #: 6
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 8:08:46 PM   
gradenko_2000_slith

 

Posts: 935
Joined: 12/27/2010
Status: offline
If the AI has infinite AP, then does that mean that a strategy of unit destruction will not work against it, since it'll always be able to create as many Rifle Corps as it desires?

(in reply to lenin)
Post #: 7
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 8:21:13 PM   
molchomor

 

Posts: 197
Joined: 12/28/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: gradenko_2000

If the AI has infinite AP, then does that mean that a strategy of unit destruction will not work against it, since it'll always be able to create as many Rifle Corps as it desires?



That is correct. Creating pockets and cap manpower centres seems the only way to (slowly) hurt the Soviet AI, atleast in the '42 campaign. If you take a look at the stockpiled resources the Ai has, he will not run out of anything anytime during the war even if you cap lots of resource, oil, fuel, armaments.


(in reply to gradenko_2000_slith)
Post #: 8
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/22/2011 8:43:39 PM   
Marquo


Posts: 1373
Joined: 9/26/2000
Status: offline
The trick is not to attack everywhere, but to have a plan to get to somewhere meaningful...like the VP cities...

(in reply to molchomor)
Post #: 9
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 12:29:53 AM   
Joel Billings


Posts: 27519
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: online
It doesn't have infinite AP, AFAIK, what it has is the ability to create a minimum number of units without paying APs for them if you are using a Logistics Help level of 110 or more for the Soviet AI. This is documented in the rules. Are you playing with 110 (challenging level) help?

_____________________________

All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard

(in reply to Marquo)
Post #: 10
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 12:36:53 AM   
nedcorleone1


Posts: 162
Joined: 4/26/2011
Status: offline
Joel thanks for popping in. I'm actually using a CUSTOM configuration with 100 across the board for GE and 90 across the board for SU. I'm not knocking the game at all really, though the whole 'teleporting' of units thing is a bit frustrating. I need to get to the point where I can play against a human opponent I suppose. Its hard to commit to something like that with school and work and such. I just can't seem to breakthrough the Soviet defenses. Granted I'm only on Turn 8 for a more serious game (played a stupid-easy campaign for learning the basics and it was a joke cutting through SU troops like butter ). I need to try procuring a bit more mass so to speak at a juncture and try another breakthrough, one that I can perhaps exploit a bit more. I just have a feeling a brand new wall of troops are going to stop me in my tracks again. Oh the frustration...!

(in reply to Joel Billings)
Post #: 11
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 1:24:45 AM   
Mark43

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 7/23/2011
Status: offline
I under stand your frustartion I have gotten as far as 3 hexes from Moscow and run out of steam due to the ever ready new line of SU. I have restarted my times and I have learned that if I try to encircle a group of units all they do is pull back, so I am trying to use this to my advantage. I have found that all I have to do is attempt to encircle a group of units and the SU retreats back to a new defensive line. I have taken Velikie Luki and Smolensk this way and I have actually encircled 9 infantry divisions in Kiev this way. I am having trouble getting to Leningrad due to the number of SU but I have not given up.

(in reply to nedcorleone1)
Post #: 12
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 1:25:12 AM   
Joel Billings


Posts: 27519
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: online
In the early turns you have to move fast. Also, remember to attack with infantry and use armor to penetrate and encircle. You have to be constantry breaking through and forcing the Soviets to pull back (and or actually surrounding units so you can finish them off when isolated). Don't forget to use HQ buildup in some cases to give your armor the MPs to execute some of the bigger breakthroughs. Have fun and good luck.

_____________________________

All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard

(in reply to nedcorleone1)
Post #: 13
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 9:21:27 AM   
molchomor

 

Posts: 197
Joined: 12/28/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joel Billings

It doesn't have infinite AP, AFAIK, what it has is the ability to create a minimum number of units without paying APs for them if you are using a Logistics Help level of 110 or more for the Soviet AI. This is documented in the rules. Are you playing with 110 (challenging level) help?


Nope, played with default settings. But I still am of the opinion that the AI has more or less unlimited APs.
If you look into the save I posted in the tech forum thread you'll see that during the 2.5 years of the '42 campaign, the Soviet AI lost 450 corps + alot of other units. It must also have a couple of hundred additional corps on the line as well, as the AI is still strong and healthy. Now, I'm unsure on the APs it would take to create such a mass of units, all I can say is that after crunching a big pocket with 70+ units, a few turns later the AI is up to its old strength again, so it for sure never has any lack of units to funnel its unlimited resources into. And it takes APs to create most of those units, right ?
With unlimited resources I mean everything except manpower seems unlimited, again if you open that save from my active tech thread and have a look at the Soviet arm, oil, fuel, resource pools you will see that, despite the Soviets having lost so many strategic centres, their resources are still basically unlimited which I would call a megabug.

(in reply to Joel Billings)
Post #: 14
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 12:50:51 PM   
Tarhunnas


Posts: 3152
Joined: 1/27/2011
From: Hex X37, Y15
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lenin

You are trying to exterminate a vast country of hundreds of millions of people. I'm sure a few of them will try to get in your way.....One thing the soviets were never short of was people...


Yes, but one should not assume that Soviet population is inexhaustible. The Soviet Union had a population of about 200 million in 1940, compared to Germany 80 million. That is only 2.5 times as much. Germany of course fought on many fronts, the Soviet union only on one, but OTOH there were the Axis minor allies. All I want to say is that the difference is not infinite.

(in reply to lenin)
Post #: 15
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 1:27:18 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
I can´t remember from the top of my head but I think Glantz wrote that the Soviets also suffred from a quite severe manpower shortage from 43-44 and onwards? Might have been in "when titans clashed"? Whover it was that wrote it pointed it out on several occations. Also claiming this more or less forced the Soviet to rely even more on Mech and Tank forces later in the war.

So if the german player causes historical or bigger soviet losses it should cause a manpower problem for the Soviets aswell.

(in reply to Tarhunnas)
Post #: 16
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 5:52:57 PM   
JAS Gripen


Posts: 15
Joined: 2/21/2011
Status: offline
Soviets had women also in arms, not to mention a zillion support jobs that aryan women were not allowed into.


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 17
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/23/2011 8:33:18 PM   
Jakerson

 

Posts: 565
Joined: 8/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tarhunnas
Yes, but one should not assume that Soviet population is inexhaustible. The Soviet Union had a population of about 200 million in 1940, compared to Germany 80 million. That is only 2.5 times as much. Germany of course fought on many fronts, the Soviet union only on one, but OTOH there were the Axis minor allies. All I want to say is that the difference is not infinite.


Soviet Union also used Women’s as Soldiers, Fighter Pilots and Snipers in large numbers. While Nazi Germany had strategy that women’s place is home only and used men only.

So Soviet Union had 5 times more Soldiers when you count womens too. Some of the best snipers and fighter pilots in Soviet army where womens.

Nazi Germany had 5-6 Million men they could use as Soldiers while Soviet union could have easily bring 25-35 million men and womens to arms.



< Message edited by Jakerson -- 7/23/2011 8:34:53 PM >

(in reply to Tarhunnas)
Post #: 18
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 2:31:50 AM   
Aurelian

 

Posts: 4016
Joined: 2/26/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mr_flappypants

It just irks me how the Soviets can have enough troops to put up what seems like an infinite line of troops. No matter how big of a bulge I create, he just fills them in indefinitely while I begin to run short on troops. And yes this is the AI I am talking about here. I can't seem to gain any momentum after Turn 4. Its turned into a slug fest as Empire101 stated (chomping at the line). I hate hate hate this type of strategy but I feel like my hands are tied by the sheer amount of units the SU gets. I try to make headway, a buildup for penetration and the beginnings of a piercing in the line only to be met with yet MORE troops. I want to pocket them not rout them. *sigh* My Panzers can't keep taking those kinds of losses... those poor guys.


No matter how many men [the Russians] lost, there seemed always to be fresh reserves. No matter how many tanks were destroyed in battle,
the next morning brought waves of tanks from a seemingly inexhaustable supply. No matter how fiercely the Luftwaffe fought in the air, the
day following brought waves of new Russian fighters and ground-attack planes. No matter how many supplies were destroyed, how much
artillery was wiped out or captured-there was always more.
Martin Caidin, Te Tigers Are Burning, pg. 225

(in reply to nedcorleone1)
Post #: 19
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 3:47:15 AM   
nedcorleone1


Posts: 162
Joined: 4/26/2011
Status: offline
Oh absolutely I agree and I'm familiar with my history on this aspect of the war. However, I'm sure the SU was not able to teleport these troops into a solid line as fast as the game seems to allow. I understand that each turn represents a considerable amount of time but it just seems unrealistic that the 'solid line' formation would occur indefinitely. Because of this it really causes the exciting momentum of the game to turn in to a slow crawl as any dynamic and fluidity on the battlefield is stifled. In the end it just boils down to the fact that I need to play a human opponent to get this type of game. I'm not knocking the game at all really and I've enjoyed it immensely thus far. I just need to get those Panzers rolling again but after Turn 6 or so that opportunity just doesn't seem to make itself known.

(in reply to Aurelian)
Post #: 20
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 3:56:19 AM   
sveint


Posts: 1683
Joined: 1/19/2001
Status: offline
How many more threads do we need complaining about the Soviets?

Play the Soviets against Germany then.

(in reply to nedcorleone1)
Post #: 21
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 4:09:15 AM   
nedcorleone1


Posts: 162
Joined: 4/26/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sveint

How many more threads do we need complaining about the Soviets?

Play the Soviets against Germany then.



Hey thanks for the valuable and relevant reply. I first started playing this game as the Soviets and definitely could not recreate what the AI is doing... not even close. Also, would you rather me 'complain' about something else? Last I saw this forum has these links that you can CHOOSE to click on. You have all the freedom in the world to just skip over this thread. Apparently you chose to invest the effort in not only reading this thread but also clicking on the 'Reply' button and wasting your keystrokes. Interesting. Peace be with you and perhaps I'll see you in another thread, one more of your liking.

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 22
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 4:17:31 AM   
Panama


Posts: 1362
Joined: 10/30/2009
Status: offline
The Germans wargamed the invasion of the Sovier Union several times. Even when they stacked the deck in their favor they failed to achieve their objectives which were Leiningrad, Ukaine and Moscow, in that order. The distances and logistics were just impossible to overcome. They would always end up in front of Moscow with no reserves, exhausted and over extended. Why the heck they went ahead with it was crazy. Of course Hitler was a genius so he knew better.

Anyway, you will most probably do better than they did speed bumps or no speed bumps.

_____________________________


(in reply to nedcorleone1)
Post #: 23
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 4:22:40 AM   
sveint


Posts: 1683
Joined: 1/19/2001
Status: offline
I meant no insult. But every other thread complains about the Soviets.

I do suggest you start a game as the Soviets and you'll get a much better feel for their capabilities. 1941 right now is quite balanced (historical), except perhaps for the fall of Leningrad (advantage Axis).

(in reply to Panama)
Post #: 24
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 4:23:58 AM   
nedcorleone1


Posts: 162
Joined: 4/26/2011
Status: offline
Yeah, the Germans likely knew they couldn't win logistically but they really hoped for winning that diplomatic war and forcing a premature surrender from the Soviets. Boy did they underestimate the will of the Soviet people. Same thing with England right? I mean Hitler wanted to bomb them into submission and draw out a surrender that way since Sealion was cancelled. Winston Churchill was like a rock in a time of disarray. The will of the people caused Hitler to run out of gas.

(in reply to Panama)
Post #: 25
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 6:32:46 AM   
Wild


Posts: 316
Joined: 12/10/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sveint

I meant no insult. But every other thread complains about the Soviets.

I do suggest you start a game as the Soviets and you'll get a much better feel for their capabilities. 1941 right now is quite balanced (historical), except perhaps for the fall of Leningrad (advantage Axis).



Every other thread complains about the Soviets because as of this moment in time they are overpowered (more so in '42). It is therefore important to have these types of threads to bring up all these issues so the balance can be gotten right.

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 26
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 10:07:24 AM   
Monter_Trismegistos

 

Posts: 1359
Joined: 2/1/2005
From: Gdansk
Status: offline
So why people capture Leningrad (which historically was impossible), if Soviets are overpowered?

_____________________________

Nec Temere Nec Timide
Bez strachu ale z rozwagą

(in reply to Wild)
Post #: 27
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 2:24:12 PM   
Wild


Posts: 316
Joined: 12/10/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Monter_Trismegistos

So why people capture Leningrad (which historically was impossible), if Soviets are overpowered?



In real life the capture of Lenningrad was a near run thing, and should be quite possible if players choose to prioritize it by sending more forces than historical to capture it. Which is what most players do.

You don't have much of an argument there i'm afraid.

(in reply to Monter_Trismegistos)
Post #: 28
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 7:23:43 PM   
Scook_99

 

Posts: 301
Joined: 6/20/2007
Status: offline
You can capture both Leningrad and Moscow in 1941 as Germany and you will still have a really rough time from 1942 on.

(in reply to Wild)
Post #: 29
RE: That dang Soviet speedbump line... - 7/24/2011 7:39:17 PM   
Ketza


Posts: 2227
Joined: 1/14/2007
From: Columbia, Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sveint

I meant no insult. But every other thread complains about the Soviets.

I do suggest you start a game as the Soviets and you'll get a much better feel for their capabilities. 1941 right now is quite balanced (historical), except perhaps for the fall of Leningrad (advantage Axis).


After playing several games as the Soviets I came to the conclusion Axis players are nuts.

Me being one of them

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> That dang Soviet speedbump line... Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.156