Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

1.07.01 Observations

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Empires in Arms the Napoleonic Wars of 1805 - 1815 >> 1.07.01 Observations Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
1.07.01 Observations - 12/1/2009 2:48:23 AM   
easterner

 

Posts: 179
Joined: 10/9/2004
Status: offline
FRANCE Soli-Hard

Still lapsing, still hiding in capital for Russ & Turk. They are at war with 100% of Russ in St. Pete's and 100% in Constans. Should be interesting. Rs lapsed vs. Sweden & Finns, Hid in St. Pete's of course.

Brits invaded Morocco, captured it, sent 1 corps over the Algerian border who now has no clue what to do. Should have stayed home and let Sp do this they are experts. All Brits are being sent to Morr. Not very helpful.

Au as usual lapsed itself into INSTABILITY.

Prus as usual had a clue but couldn't beat Fr. Did cordon a Nappy OF resulting in 1 Pr Corps beating 3 Fr.



< Message edited by easterner -- 12/1/2009 2:49:29 AM >
Post #: 1
RE: 1.07.01 Observations - 12/1/2009 12:57:00 PM   
Marshall Ellis


Posts: 5630
Joined: 10/2/2001
From: Dallas
Status: offline
I have noticed still some AI lapsing but I have gotten most of that out of the way in 1.08


_____________________________

Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games



(in reply to easterner)
Post #: 2
RE: 1.07.01 Observations - 12/2/2009 5:38:24 AM   
bresh

 

Posts: 936
Joined: 8/8/2005
Status: offline
Marshall, just a quick question.

How does the game react in the new battlefiles, if a battle happens, and one of the 2 players is not patched up ? Will it still accept battlefiles (hope not) ?

Regards
Bresh

(in reply to Marshall Ellis)
Post #: 3
RE: 1.07.01 Observations - 12/2/2009 1:12:40 PM   
Marshall Ellis


Posts: 5630
Joined: 10/2/2001
From: Dallas
Status: offline
Well, today yes. Would it be good to force a level set for PBEM games?



_____________________________

Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games



(in reply to bresh)
Post #: 4
RE: 1.07.01 Observations - 12/2/2009 2:35:18 PM   
bresh

 

Posts: 936
Joined: 8/8/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

Well, today yes. Would it be good to force a level set for PBEM games?




Yes, otherwise the changes to pbm security would not have much effect, if a player wished he could still trick the game by using 1.06, and now the player could claim that there was no rerolls, since 1.07.
How does 1.07 battlefile return to a player with 1.06, would it not expect to send the dice arrays along ?

I know i requested, if patch version could be included in turn files, atleast visible for host, so he could confirm all uppatched.
This was also to avoid creating new bugs ,resulted by playing different versions.
Think it was up around 1.02k-1.03.


Regards
Bresh

< Message edited by bresh -- 12/2/2009 2:38:06 PM >

(in reply to Marshall Ellis)
Post #: 5
RE: 1.07.01 Observations - 12/2/2009 8:06:22 PM   
Marshall Ellis


Posts: 5630
Joined: 10/2/2001
From: Dallas
Status: offline
I remember BUT have not added this yet!
I will add this as an issue in Mantis.

_____________________________

Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games



(in reply to bresh)
Post #: 6
RE: 1.07.01 Observations - 12/2/2009 8:18:44 PM   
bresh

 

Posts: 936
Joined: 8/8/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis

I remember BUT have not added this yet!
I will add this as an issue in Mantis.


With the addition of several arrays in battlefile in 1.07 compared to earlier, would the filesizes not be notable different ?
As i remember battlefiles use to be rather small.

Regards
Bresh

(in reply to Marshall Ellis)
Post #: 7
RE: 1.07.01 Observations - 12/2/2009 9:58:58 PM   
Marshall Ellis


Posts: 5630
Joined: 10/2/2001
From: Dallas
Status: offline
Correct! They will be a different size! I can look to see the diff!
This would absolutely create a backwards compatbility issue! An older version should/would puke on a newer battle file!
I will put a general message here and need to install this change into 1.08!



_____________________________

Thank you

Marshall Ellis
Outflank Strategy War Games



(in reply to bresh)
Post #: 8
RE: 1.07.01 Observations - 12/5/2009 1:31:32 PM   
Bearcat2

 

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline
Should I put the 107.01 patch on a clean install? Patched 107.01 Invaded/declared war on Hesse as France, 2 Hessian corps were formed in the province, 1 was my ally, the other a Hessian corp controlled by Russia[Russia controlled minor-not at war with], corruption of game files?

< Message edited by Termite2 -- 12/5/2009 1:34:27 PM >

(in reply to Marshall Ellis)
Post #: 9
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Empires in Arms the Napoleonic Wars of 1805 - 1815 >> 1.07.01 Observations Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.167