Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> Opponents Wanted >> Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)? - 5/5/2009 5:08:44 PM   
jjdenver

 

Posts: 1834
Joined: 11/2/2007
Status: offline
Title says it all. I'm interested in a multiplayer WWIII or 2-player Barbarossa.

_____________________________

Post #: 1
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/6/2009 9:25:34 PM   
RufusTFirefly

 

Posts: 1048
Joined: 8/29/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline
I would like to join WWIII. But dont have time for another Barbarossa1vs1.

(in reply to jjdenver)
Post #: 2
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/13/2009 7:21:09 PM   
jjdenver

 

Posts: 1834
Joined: 11/2/2007
Status: offline
Still LF opponent(s) for pretty much any multiplayer or 2 player scenario.

_____________________________


(in reply to RufusTFirefly)
Post #: 3
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/13/2009 7:38:41 PM   
Barthheart


Posts: 3165
Joined: 7/20/2004
From: Nepean, Ontario
Status: offline
We need a Japan player for Waw Ver k.... wanna join?

_____________________________

Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"

(in reply to jjdenver)
Post #: 4
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/15/2009 3:55:17 PM   
hatemf90

 

Posts: 305
Joined: 1/1/2009
Status: offline
Me and jjdenver are looking for a couple of players for a barbarossa game, any takers?

(in reply to Barthheart)
Post #: 5
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/18/2009 10:47:25 AM   
RufusTFirefly

 

Posts: 1048
Joined: 8/29/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline
Would prefer WWIII as I am already doing two games of Op Barbarossa, but in case you have closed search for WWIII-players I would like to join Barbarossa.

(in reply to hatemf90)
Post #: 6
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/18/2009 7:41:50 PM   
Jxai

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 5/5/2009
Status: offline
I'll play WWIII, I might be fodder though since I've only played against the AI.

(in reply to RufusTFirefly)
Post #: 7
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/18/2009 10:15:47 PM   
jjdenver

 

Posts: 1834
Joined: 11/2/2007
Status: offline
Pls PM me your email and post which side you'd prefer in WWIII and if we have enough we can play.

I'd prefer in order:
US
USSR
EU
PDRC

_____________________________


(in reply to jjdenver)
Post #: 8
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/19/2009 3:26:29 AM   
Jxai

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 5/5/2009
Status: offline
My prefs:
PDRC
NATO
USSR
US

(in reply to jjdenver)
Post #: 9
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/19/2009 1:36:29 PM   
hatemf90

 

Posts: 305
Joined: 1/1/2009
Status: offline
PDRC
USSR
NATO
USA

I hope Rufus is not looking for revenge :)

(in reply to Jxai)
Post #: 10
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/19/2009 6:02:10 PM   
RufusTFirefly

 

Posts: 1048
Joined: 8/29/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline
I will take any side that is opposite to hatemf90

Ok, serious now:
US or NATO would be fine.

So, jj, we try to send these bloody communists to hell?

Could start tomorrow (Wednesday) evening (GMT+1)

(in reply to hatemf90)
Post #: 11
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/19/2009 8:28:23 PM   
jjdenver

 

Posts: 1834
Joined: 11/2/2007
Status: offline
Based on the opinions given I think these sides should work out fine:

PDRC: hatemf90
USSR: jjdenver
NATO: Jxai
US: RufusTFirefly

This gives everyone one of their top 2 choices - so works out great. :)

NATO does their turn first so Jxai can you start the game up? I'll email to everyone so we have each other's email addresses.

_____________________________


(in reply to RufusTFirefly)
Post #: 12
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/19/2009 8:53:40 PM   
Jxai

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 5/5/2009
Status: offline
Sounds good, I'll start it as soon as I get the email.

JH

(in reply to jjdenver)
Post #: 13
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/19/2009 11:17:35 PM   
Jxai

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 5/5/2009
Status: offline
First turn sent to jjdenver, NATO is shocked by the sudden build up of Communist troops and hastily rushes troops to the European front. Deep recon flights suggest a buildup of armored assets around Berlin. Brussels is concerned and orders massive changes in production. Artillery obstinently refuses to fire... (is that a bug?)

(in reply to Jxai)
Post #: 14
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/19/2009 11:39:16 PM   
hatemf90

 

Posts: 305
Joined: 1/1/2009
Status: offline
No it just has a range of 1, so has to be right next to the target.

(in reply to Jxai)
Post #: 15
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/20/2009 12:11:44 AM   
Jxai

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 5/5/2009
Status: offline
Oh boy...I hope I didn't tip my hand too much. That is...the hand that I haven't played this scenario before. Heh.

(in reply to hatemf90)
Post #: 16
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/20/2009 7:23:08 PM   
RufusTFirefly

 

Posts: 1048
Joined: 8/29/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline
In this scenario you can build artillery (guns, rockets) with range = 1. And you can build long-range artillery (guns) with range = 2.

(in reply to Jxai)
Post #: 17
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 5/21/2009 1:44:18 AM   
hatemf90

 

Posts: 305
Joined: 1/1/2009
Status: offline
well, Rufus might have his revenge after all. Dont be surprised if you hear news of japan invading china

Turn sent to US

(in reply to RufusTFirefly)
Post #: 18
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 6/24/2009 7:05:26 PM   
RufusTFirefly

 

Posts: 1048
Joined: 8/29/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline
This game is dead or paused or ...?
In case it is dead I would like to start another one.

(in reply to hatemf90)
Post #: 19
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 7/19/2009 8:37:06 PM   
jjdenver

 

Posts: 1834
Joined: 11/2/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RufusTFirefly
This game is dead or paused or ...?
In case it is dead I would like to start another one.


I'm not sure what happened. Someone stopped sending the turn. I was making an AAR. The last screenshots I have are from Turn 5 so that must have been the last turn that I was sent.
Here is a pic of Turkey, Europe, and Scandinavia






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by jjdenver -- 7/19/2009 8:45:04 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to RufusTFirefly)
Post #: 20
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 7/19/2009 8:46:13 PM   
jjdenver

 

Posts: 1834
Joined: 11/2/2007
Status: offline
Norway was done and Soviets were moving on to Norway.





Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to jjdenver)
Post #: 21
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 7/19/2009 8:46:55 PM   
jjdenver

 

Posts: 1834
Joined: 11/2/2007
Status: offline
Turkey is conquered but Syria is threatened by Israel. Egypt hasn't been attacked yet. On Soviet front is advancing on Greece.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by jjdenver -- 7/19/2009 8:47:37 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to jjdenver)
Post #: 22
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-pla... - 7/19/2009 8:55:24 PM   
Grymme

 

Posts: 1821
Joined: 12/16/2007
Status: offline
Wow. Thats really impressive for round 5. Havent seen the soviets do that before in such short time. How did you take Turkey in 5 rounds?

_____________________________

My Advanced Tactics Mod page
http://atgscenarios.wordpress.com

30+ scenarios, maps and mods for AT and AT:G

(in reply to jjdenver)
Post #: 23
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> Opponents Wanted >> Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.133