From: West Yorkshire, England
What I was thinking about was how many games I've played where I thought...what else could they do with this to make it better? And drawn a blank. Then, having grabbed a patch or sequel, seen what can be done. As an example, I was thinking about the Thief series when I posted. Each time they bring a new one out, I'm blown away by the gameplay above all else. And each time, I'm convinced they can't improve upon it. The Shalebridge Cradle level in the last game has been talked about all over the Internet and justifiably so because it was so amazing to play. There are probably plenty more examples, but you get my drift
The thing is, I don't know enough about subs to say what's missing or what could be better. We have hundreds of WWII turn based games, all doing something similar, but different. Some are better than others for different people. SH is superb, yes. But, could it be better? I'm sure it could be beaten by someone with more imagination and knowledge than I. If this weren't the case, we'd have one or two games for every genre and all the devs would just pack up and go home because their work is done.
< Message edited by Jim_H -- 2/20/2009 10:26:30 PM >
2nd Lt. George Rice: Looks like you guys are going to be surrounded.
Richard Winters: We're paratroopers, Lieutenant, we're supposed to be surrounded.