From: London, UK
Thank you Marshall. I will check back in a couple of months.
My intention was/is to keep this conversation moving so we can keep this topic heading toward the front burner.
I am not, however, in the habit of accepting counterfactual jabs. You insinuated that my request for information was insipid with your "What do you think?"
Back on August 18th Marshall said that dominant powers would be " A little problematic" It is now November 10th.
I do not think that this time lag is unreasonable between inquiries. What do you think?
No where that I can see did I see Marshall write "complicated" or Difficult" in reference to Domiant powers which you directly averred that he did, in the context of insinuating that I was hasty or stupid. Morever, it is near two months since there was a word on this subject. Last time I checked we are now on official version 1.04.7. Enquiring about inclusions in 1.06 or thenabouts is not unreasonable.
I would implore you to remain civil.
ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis
This might be a little problematic at first since the requirements are different for each MP and even then there are many things I would rather add first (Editor, tutorial, EiA classic scenario, IP play, etc.) so this is on the back burner for now BUT I would consider it at a later date.
With words like "problematic" "difficult" "complicated" being used to describe this, 1.06 being the next one out and a host of other more immediate bug fixes needed for the current versions as listed in other threads, what do you think? And that quote was on dominant powers.