Sorry, but I reported this issue about one month ago and I am having difficulty finding the scenario to display this problem. That being said, it's possible that units that don't fire might not be firing because of the GROUP versus GROUP issue (uneven weapons/targets) that I reported in another thre...

Someone in another thread just reported this issue. I believe that the solution may be found in the testing that I conducted. It has to do with an uneven amount of weapons and targets. I am passing this along with the hopes that it cam be used to correct this issue.

Screenshot (12).png One last thing that again has to do with multiple targets. On this one, I have 4 planes attacking 4 ships. I've assigned two missiles from each plane at each of the 4 ships. That doesn't happen. Three of the 4 shoot at 3 of the ships. The fourth plane does not fire, and the four...

Last bit of info: I tried one plane firing at 1 target---worked perfectly. I tried two planes firing at 1 target---worked perfectly. I tried two planes firing at 2 targets---worked perfectly. I've reached the conclusion that if the weapons are evenly divisible for the number of targets, then it will...

This info may be some help. If I assign one play to attack one ship, then everything works perfectly. I believe that the issue may be the fact that there are multiple targets, and an uneven number of missiles to attack. In the scenario that I attached there are 6 targets listed and I have four plane...

Screenshot (11).png I don't believe that that will provide any more info, but this is the same scenario, played again, with similar results. In this scenario, I eliminated all of the other HARM-armed units, so this only deals with the Harppon-armed units. The same thing happened. The first group of...

Here is a strike mission. Other units have carried out their mission, now it's time for Flight Thunder 12 to carry out his. The plane group launches, as it should, and goes into its HOLDING pattern, as normal, before proceeding onto the target. But, it never does. It remains with the last Waypoint (...

btw, anyone have insight into the "called off" message on missions? Who called it off? And why? This is the first time I noticed that message. I've actually seen that quite often. I believe that it is always associated with the Mission Editor and Flight Path. Apparently, the Editor plots ...

UPDATE: I created a brand new scenario and everything seemed to work fine as far as the attack is concerned. There is one issue, however. I continue to get hundreds of messages about the weapon being "locked on" to the target. It repeats every few seconds. The same messages, over and over ...

I ran it using the updated db as well. In fact, I ran it using several different dbs. And, as I said, I ran Broken Arrow 300, which has been updated and uses the same platforms in this scenario, and it performs the exact same way. Previous versions played fine, but this version does not. Broken Arro...

Kushan1.zip Three groups of planes will take off. All three go to Engaged Offensive immediately, and go to 2k feet, as they proceed to the target. The first is armed with Delilah missiles. It flies to, and beyond the launch point without launching. If you change it to Opportunity, then it will fire...

I have mentioned this in two other threads, and I believe that it is associated with the other issues that were reported there, but just to make sure that it doesn't get lost, here is a reminder: Aircraft are sent on a air-to-ground missile attack. Shortly after launch, the planes are listed as Offe...

I believe that there is a similar problem with Air-to-Ground missiles as well. A group of planes approaches the release point on a DEDICATED STRIKE of a LAND TARGET, (the weapons are green) but the weapons are not launched. However, if you change the WRA to OPPORTUNITY FIRE, then the weapons are rel...

I don't believe that a save is necessary as this likely occurs in every scenario with this situation: A group of planes is headed toward an attack on a land target. The group is being escorted by a single OECM aircraft. If I go to the escort through WRA and set the ENCON to active radar and OECM for...

In general, always always on the same axis as your strike group, you are penalized a lot as soon as you move away from the axis.

Thank you for that info. That answers my question.

If my sole ECM escort is capable of jamming 10 radars, and the other side has 25 threatening radars, I still have something of a problem. I don't know how it actually works, but let's assume, for the sake of discussion, that this OECM plane can jam 10 radars. My question is: if a second unit were t...

This question is for any who may have played around with OECM aircraft and strikes: If I have two OECM aircraft available for my strike (it doesn't matter what kind) I'd like to know what is the best way to deploy the OECM aircraft to be the most efficient. I do realize that the OECM planes should b...

I'm not arguing with you. I posted because Dimitris made the statement that since the terrain modification was installed, reports have indicated that it has had the effect of slowing the game down. I don't know if on/off has anything to do with that as I don't use terrain, so mine is always off. Tha...

It is an option, but I wonder if it has any effect on system performance, even when turned off. If you go back to 1328.8 (or before) you will see a huge difference in how fast thing work now, whether the feature is turned off or not. It is my observation that even without the option turned on, the g...

I feel the opposite, The feature has merit, but at what cost? The game slows to a snail's pace, and games like that aren't fun to play. The game needs to 'move' or it's like watching paint dry. If this option is responsible for all if the performance issues, then there should be some consideration f...