RE: Hello (Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion



Message


Zorch -> RE: Hello (5/1/2019 10:41:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zap

Look, Zakblood squashes spam threads. I just do spam quality control making sure spam has a certain level to be digestible for the whole Matrix community. If it isn't I step in with high quality responses to raise up the thread to another spam level.

+1
Who better to do quality control on spam than the Spam King?

Incidentally, 'Spam' is trademarked so we should be careful how we (ab)use the term, lest the lawyers of Hormel Corporation descend upon us like a hoard of zombies (cross thread metaphor alert).




Zap -> RE: Hello (5/1/2019 10:53:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zap

Look, Zakblood squashes spam threads. I just do spam quality control making sure spam has a certain level to be digestible for the whole Matrix community. If it isn't I step in with high quality responses to raise up the thread to another spam level.

+1
Who better to do quality control on spam than the Spam King?

Incidentally, 'Spam' is trademarked so we should be careful how we (ab)use the term, lest the lawyers of Hormel Corporation descend upon us like a hoard of zombies (cross thread metaphor alert).





Were okay, spam is not capitalized letter in my use of the word[:)]




Gilmer -> RE: Hello (5/1/2019 11:07:53 PM)

Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk!

Now they have to lock it. The conversation has turned political!!!




demyansk -> RE: Hello (5/1/2019 11:48:55 PM)

I was just curious about why someone would post like that. It seems to be a waste.




Zap -> RE: Hello (5/1/2019 11:58:01 PM)

Like who, the OP? Not sure why. I guess you can address the OP. But you might not get a response.




Chickenboy -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 4:22:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TaBull

Shame on the guys


We didn't sufficiently address this poster's well-stated issue. "Shame on the guys". I totally agree. Which guys were we talking about again? Zap, Zilch and Warspite1? Yeah. How could they? [:-]

ETA: TaBulls? TaBears? Ditka? Sausage?




Zap -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 6:55:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: TaBull

Shame on the guys


We didn't sufficiently address this poster's well-stated issue. "Shame on the guys". I totally agree. Which guys were we talking about again? Zap, Zilch and Warspite1? Yeah. How could they? [:-]

ETA: TaBulls? TaBears? Ditka? Sausage?



Brilliant deduction Chickenboy, for sure a Chicagoan = TaBull guy




Zap -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 6:56:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: KurtC

Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk!

Now they have to lock it. The conversation has turned political!!!





Shame on you KurtC for making this Political talk!! I like spam




warspite1 -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 7:14:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zap


quote:

ORIGINAL: KurtC

Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk!

Now they have to lock it. The conversation has turned political!!!





Shame on you KurtC for making this Political talk!! I like spam
warspite1

I agree with you Zap. However, while I know politics are verboten on this forum I can't simply stand aside in the face of such provocation from KurtC.

I have to say I thoroughly reject his one-sided, totally false and frankly anti-democratic opinion on this topic. IMHO its

Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!














rico21 -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 7:34:45 AM)

Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!
Sorry...[:(]
Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!
[:D]




Zap -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 7:36:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zap


quote:

ORIGINAL: KurtC

Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk!

Now they have to lock it. The conversation has turned political!!!





Shame on you KurtC for making this Political talk!! I like spam
warspite1

I agree with you Zap. However, while I know politics are verboten on this forum I can't simply stand aside in the face of such provocation from KurtC.

I have to say I thoroughly reject his one-sided, totally false and frankly anti-democratic opinion on this topic. IMHO its

Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!


[sm=00000958.gif] EEEeeKs, must save thread put it on track!
spam talk!spam talk! spam talk! spam talk!spam talk! spam talk! spam talk!spam talk! spam talk! spam talk!spam talk! spam talk! spam talk!spam talk! spam talk! spam talk!spam talk! spam talk! spam talk!spam talk! spam talk! spam talk!spam talk! spam talk! spam talk!spam talk! spam talk!





Zap -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 7:42:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rico21

Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!
Sorry...[:(]
Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!
[:D]




Why did you have to do that! You will really get this closed up




Aurelian -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 9:04:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zap


quote:

ORIGINAL: rico21

Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!
Sorry...[:(]
Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!
[:D]




Why did you have to do that! You will really get this closed up


The thread direction has been trumped by another.........




Lobster -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 12:37:32 PM)

It's amazing how much verbage is created by a simple hello. I said hello to my wife decades ago and an unbelievable amount has been spilled. Mostly by her but that's her job. [;)]




ringoblood -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 12:51:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster

It's amazing how much verbage is created by a simple hello. I said hello to my wife decades ago and an unbelievable amount has been spilled. Mostly by her but that's her job. [;)]

I wonder Lobster if she still even sleeps with you after that post, [:D]




Lobster -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 12:56:08 PM)

I'm safe. She never reads this forum. [sm=00000289.gif]




rico21 -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 1:21:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zap


quote:

ORIGINAL: rico21

Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!Trump Poutine!
Sorry...[:(]
Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!Poutine Trump!
[:D]




Why did you have to do that! You will really get this closed up

I never answer to a political question




Orm -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 2:48:35 PM)

Now I am hungry.




Chickenboy -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 3:18:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zap


quote:

ORIGINAL: KurtC

Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk! Political talk!

Now they have to lock it. The conversation has turned political!!!





Shame on you KurtC for making this Political talk!! I like spam
warspite1

I agree with you Zap. However, while I know politics are verboten on this forum I can't simply stand aside in the face of such provocation from KurtC.

I have to say I thoroughly reject his one-sided, totally false and frankly anti-democratic opinion on this topic. IMHO its

Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!Talk Political!



+1




Chickenboy -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 3:25:25 PM)

This is a public service announcement and a primer for first class spambottery. How do I maximize my spam whilest minimizing my effort you may ask?

[pause while readers ask themselves this question]

Well, I'll tell you:

1. Let others do your work for you. Witness my "+1" commentary in post 79. When someone bothers typing in and cut/paste/copying in all the text, just put a "+1" on your reply. You get to 'say' the same thing as others, but with no additional effort. In this example, after Warspite1 put forward his erudite and sophisticated argument, I merely +1'ed it. Same post count for much less effort.

2. When you're explaining your +1'ing of a conversation, don't do it in the same post as the +1 post. Do it in another. Witness this very post (80) in this thread. Sure, I could have even broken THIS post down into four or five subcomponents, but c'mon-that would be over the top lazy. I'm talking Lecivius-level lazy. That's frowned upon.

3. All good lists have three main salient points. I can't think of one here, but will enumerate it nonetheless. You can bet that if I think of one in short order, it will be posted under separate cover. See rule number 2.

I hope that clears up some things and that you n00bs have found this instructive in your journey to apprentice spambots.




warspite1 -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 3:44:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

This is a public service announcement and a primer for first class spambottery. How do I maximize my spam whilest minimizing my effort you may ask?

[pause while readers ask themselves this question]

Well, I'll tell you:

1. Let others do your work for you. Witness my "+1" commentary in post 79. When someone bothers typing in and cut/paste/copying in all the text, just put a "+1" on your reply. You get to 'say' the same thing as others, but with no additional effort. In this example, after Warspite1 put forward his erudite and sophisticated argument, I merely +1'ed it. Same post count for much less effort.

2. When you're explaining your +1'ing of a conversation, don't do it in the same post as the +1 post. Do it in another. Witness this very post (80) in this thread. Sure, I could have even broken THIS post down into four or five subcomponents, but c'mon-that would be over the top lazy. I'm talking Lecivius-level lazy. That's frowned upon.

3. All good lists have three main salient points. I can't think of one here, but will enumerate it nonetheless. You can bet that if I think of one in short order, it will be posted under separate cover. See rule number 2.

I hope that clears up some things and that you n00bs have found this instructive in your journey to apprentice spambots.
warspite1

+1




warspite1 -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 3:47:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

This is a public service announcement and a primer for first class spambottery. How do I maximize my spam whilest minimizing my effort you may ask?

[pause while readers ask themselves this question]

Well, I'll tell you:

1. Let others do your work for you. Witness my "+1" commentary in post 79. When someone bothers typing in and cut/paste/copying in all the text, just put a "+1" on your reply. You get to 'say' the same thing as others, but with no additional effort. In this example, after Warspite1 put forward his erudite and sophisticated argument, I merely +1'ed it. Same post count for much less effort.

2. When you're explaining your +1'ing of a conversation, don't do it in the same post as the +1 post. Do it in another. Witness this very post (80) in this thread. Sure, I could have even broken THIS post down into four or five subcomponents, but c'mon-that would be over the top lazy. I'm talking Lecivius-level lazy. That's frowned upon.

3. All good lists have three main salient points. I can't think of one here, but will enumerate it nonetheless. You can bet that if I think of one in short order, it will be posted under separate cover. See rule number 2.

I hope that clears up some things and that you n00bs have found this instructive in your journey to apprentice spambots.
warspite1

+1

warspite1

In fact, allow me to elucidate. I second this fine piece of writing, the way you've grasped the problem, and formulated your response, with well reasoned commentary - and not being suckered in to mere Hyperbole, thus avoiding the risk of creating a polemical. Superb.




Chickenboy -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 3:57:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

This is a public service announcement and a primer for first class spambottery. How do I maximize my spam whilest minimizing my effort you may ask?

[pause while readers ask themselves this question]

Well, I'll tell you:

1. Let others do your work for you. Witness my "+1" commentary in post 79. When someone bothers typing in and cut/paste/copying in all the text, just put a "+1" on your reply. You get to 'say' the same thing as others, but with no additional effort. In this example, after Warspite1 put forward his erudite and sophisticated argument, I merely +1'ed it. Same post count for much less effort.

2. When you're explaining your +1'ing of a conversation, don't do it in the same post as the +1 post. Do it in another. Witness this very post (80) in this thread. Sure, I could have even broken THIS post down into four or five subcomponents, but c'mon-that would be over the top lazy. I'm talking Lecivius-level lazy. That's frowned upon.

3. All good lists have three main salient points. I can't think of one here, but will enumerate it nonetheless. You can bet that if I think of one in short order, it will be posted under separate cover. See rule number 2.

I hope that clears up some things and that you n00bs have found this instructive in your journey to apprentice spambots.
warspite1

+1

warspite1

In fact, allow me to elucidate. I second this fine piece of writing, the way you've grasped the problem, and formulated your response, with well reasoned commentary - and not being suckered in to mere Hyperbole, thus avoiding the risk of creating a polemical. Superb.


+1

[:'(]




Lecivius -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 4:54:25 PM)

.

[image]local://upfiles/26061/7BA5C52EFF094DD3B3D218592E9EE6B6.gif[/image]




Zap -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 5:00:17 PM)

Simply, quality spam, is my rule of thumb, i post, and everything is so much better.




Orm -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 5:08:10 PM)

No, Chickenboy, I am not quite sure that I understand your three points. Here is why.

1) What is spambottery?
2) What is the meaning of "+1"?
3) I am still hungry.




Zap -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 5:18:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

No, Chickenboy, I am not quite sure that I understand your three points. Here is why.

1) What is spambottery?
2) What is the meaning of "+1"?
3) I am still hungry.





Chickenboy did not explain the "quote" stacking a most elevated form of spamming




Lecivius -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 5:32:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zap


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

No, Chickenboy, I am not quite sure that I understand your three points. Here is why.

1) What is spambottery?
2) What is the meaning of "+1"?
3) I am still hungry.





Chickenboy did not explain the "quote" stacking a most elevated form of spamming


Oh Gawds, you just invited it.




Zorch -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 5:45:48 PM)

This thread has just passed the Turing Test.




Chickenboy -> RE: Hello (5/2/2019 6:42:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zap


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

No, Chickenboy, I am not quite sure that I understand your three points. Here is why.

1) What is spambottery?
2) What is the meaning of "+1"?
3) I am still hungry.





Chickenboy did not explain the "quote" stacking a most elevated form of spamming


+1




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
4.882813E-02