Norway.

Fury Games has now signed with Matrix Games, and we are working together on the next Strategic Command. Will use the Slitherine PBEM++ server for asynchronous multi-player.

Moderators: MOD_Strategic_Command_3, Fury Software

Post Reply
stormbringer3
Posts: 999
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: Staunton, Va.

Norway.

Post by stormbringer3 »

What are the pros and cons of not conquering Norway?
Thanks for any opinions.
User avatar
Platoonist
Posts: 2302
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 4:53 am
Location: Kila Hana

RE: Norway.

Post by Platoonist »

Pros:

US mobilization doesn't gets bumped up.

You save 180 MPPs which could be used for other things.

You don't have to defend the place.


Cons:

You pass up on a fast and relatively painless invasion of Norway. (except for that Oslo battery event)

You pass on gaining some free ground units to garrison the place.

The shorter and more secure route for the Norway convoy won't be an option. Makes it easier for the Allies to constantly raid it.

You won't gain some ports up north for your surface navy to lurk in and out of.

Losing a more secure route for U-Boats passing through the North Sea and into the Atlantic.

You still have to worry about the Allies invading it instead.


Summation: It's a bargain at 180 MPPS. Invade the place.
Image
stormbringer3
Posts: 999
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:58 pm
Location: Staunton, Va.

RE: Norway.

Post by stormbringer3 »

Thank you for the very detailed answer.
AshFall
Posts: 285
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 8:20 am

RE: Norway.

Post by AshFall »

What about the pros and cons of doing it via event or conquering it the traditional way? :)
Post Reply

Return to “Strategic Command WWII War in Europe”