Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

anlgzl
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:55 am

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by anlgzl »

Hi,

Is it possible to update the "aircraft store" of F-20 Tigershark. According the promotional videos that you can watch from the website below it can carry harpoon, amraam,lgb s and 30mm gun pod.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/8 ... eaking-bad

Thanks in advance
QuantumKitty
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2020 9:45 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by QuantumKitty »

Hi,
I was setting up a UK Carrier Group centered around R08 HMS Queen Elizabeth when I noticed that there was no option to add boats to the ship. According to my research the ship can carry up to 3x Passenger_transfer_boats.

Could the database entry for the Queen Elizabeth class be updated to reflect the boats that the class carries! (and of course add the boats to the database)

I would post links to the Wikipedia page and manufacturers specifications but this is my first post and am not allowed! A Google for the following should allow you to see boats and specifications:
ALN 139 ‘PTB Buccaneer - HMS Queen Elizabeth Carrier’
HMS Queen Elizabeth (R08)


Thanks in advance.
BDukes
Posts: 2578
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

Don't call it a comeback...
BDukes
Posts: 2578
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

Hello

GBU-53/B (SDB II) have name "Stormbreaker"

https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news ... per-hornet

Might push F-15E IOC currently in DB (2018) to 2020 as bomb have problems until nows.

https://www.defensenews.com/air/2020/06 ... witter.com
Don't call it a comeback...
BDukes
Posts: 2578
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BDukes »

Hi

Morrocco F-16V #4913 get Harpoon L Block II missile loadout

https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news ... g-missiles

Thank!
Don't call it a comeback...
Fox13
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2020 1:23 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Fox13 »

Hey guys. I have a lot of things to get fixed [:D]

First of all, the F-15SA in terms of sensors, it's no using the old AN/ALR-56C In fact it's using the Digital AN/ALR-56(v), a highly sensitive sensor with a Geo-location feature and, rapid detection with extended range. and digital jamming transmitter. I'm going to add BAE's file about the new RWR. Also further information about the system and DEWS in this video.
DEWS includes a digital RWR, digital jamming transmitter, ICS and an interference cancellation system.


it's can carry the SLAM-ER neither SDB, or CBU-105 and even GBU-54, and It's can carry more AAMs 16 missile and more combination of weapons thanks to adding Stations 1&9. also, I hope if you add the DB-110


The second thing is about PAC-2, PAC-3 and PAC-3MSE. All of them have the same target altitude 24000m. but PAC-3 has a more powerful duel-pulse motor to extend the range and altitude and off course more thrust.

and the same thing happened to KM-SAM. Its missile altitude 15000m but in fact, this altitude is for 40km range ballistic missile, and the maximum altitude is 20km. also, I have noticed that the radar has some issue with refreshing target data ( maybe because the radar is rotating? ) but the radar has a stopped mode. ( is it available and how to activate it ). and the missile using M/W seeker, not I Band as mentioned in the database.

Also, I noticed that the K30 Biho is only using 30mm twin guns, but the new version of k30 is using 4x missiles with 6km range


Finally, the Saudi F-15C/S APG-63/70 radars are limited by 30-+ degree, but in fact, the APG-63/70 radars have 60-+ degree.


Fox13
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2020 1:23 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Fox13 »

I was going to add some resources but sadly, I'm not allowed to post links and attachment rn.
User avatar
BeirutDude
Posts: 2790
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:44 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL, USA

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BeirutDude »

Most SRBM/IRBM reloads have an ROF of "1" (DF-21D/DF-26, etc)

Can I suggest a reload with a ROF of 1800 to 3600 to account for loading onto TEL and targeting? As it stands now if you give a TEL a reload in in its magazines it just fires it in the first salvo one second later.
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985

I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!
User avatar
BeirutDude
Posts: 2790
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:44 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL, USA

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by BeirutDude »

Most SRBM/IRBM reloads have an ROF of "1" (DF-21D/DF-26, etc)

Can I suggest a reload with a ROF of 1800 to 3600 to account for loading onto TEL and targeting? As it stands now if you give a TEL a reload in in its magazines it just fires it in the first salvo one second later.
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference. The Marines don't have that problem."
PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN, 1985

I was Navy, but Assigned TAD to the 24th MAU Hq in Beirut. By far the finest period of my service!
Rory Noonan
Posts: 2418
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:53 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by Rory Noonan »

Added requests up to this point.
Image
FTBSS
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 12:17 am

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by FTBSS »

Was just doing the Cargo tutorial and noted that the LCAC and LCM for that matter have a mass cargo capacity of .07tons the LCAC should be able to land M1 Abrams tanks that are on the mothership as well as the MLRS and howitzers however none of them load I believe because of the mass cargo value above I briefly looked at other landing craft and they all seem to have this issue.

Also can the LCAC-100 ship to shore connector be added 73 ton mass capacity. 300 mile range
AndrewJ
Posts: 2449
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:47 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by AndrewJ »

Hello,

#1030 TMV-004 Caiman OECM Pod is listed as OECM in title, but is functionally DECM.

Image
IrvingMainway
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 8:16 am

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by IrvingMainway »

I don't have a lot to go on with this but its been mentioned that the F-117A was deployed to the middle east in 2017 to participate in OIR, possibly armed with the GBU-39 SDB.
https://theaviationgeekclub.com/one-of- ... zine-says/
qiaozx
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 11:32 am

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by qiaozx »

Hi,
I have one thing to report.
1, Based on the Sky Bow 3 missile manufacturer's description (The system is designed to engage different threats, including: aircrafts, cruise missiles, anti-radiation missiles, and short range tactical missiles.), I think the target altitude for the Sky Bow 3 missile is a mistake (from 30km ASL to 25km AGL ) .
And there is an upgrade program called "強弓專案", the purpose of this program is developing the Taiwan version of THAAD which could intercept targets above an altitude of 45 km, even to 70km.
User avatar
cdnice
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:17 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by cdnice »

ORIGINAL: Fox13

I was going to add some resources but sadly, I'm not allowed to post links and attachment rn.

Posting Resources for Fox13:


okay here is the stuff about the DEWS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqkTYP4yAr0&t=2s
https://www.baesystems.com/en-us/product/digital-electronic-warfare-system-dews
And you can find downloadable PDF File.


about the K30 Biho and its missiles, and M-SAM here is a lot of pictures can provide precise data about them

https://trishul5.rssing.com/chan-32517095/all_p1.html

and finally a resource about AN/ALR-56(v)
https://www.baesystems.com/en-us/download-en-us/20200428193032/1434554723415.pdf
Image
anlgzl
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:55 am

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by anlgzl »

KnightHawk75
Posts: 1850
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 7:24 pm

RE: 5 Sats with wrong broken orbits.

Post by KnightHawk75 »

The Orbits for the following seem wrong\broke, and result is an object that seems to circumnavigate the world every 1/2 second or otherwise jump\flash every second. Additionally TJS 4b doesn't exist as a sat it's a rocket booster in real life, suggest replacing it's entry with that tjs-5 not in DB v483 yet.
TJS 1
TJS 2
TJS 3
TJS 4a
TJS 4b
Gaofen 4

Applying the following manual TLE's corrects the issue(s), and puts them in their seemly correct geostationary orbits.
TJS - AKM while functional as is and Geo-stationary it's in the wrong place right now, nw of south america, the correct geo orbit TLE has been provided which puts it parked off Africa over the Indian ocean.

Code: Select all

 DataSatelliteOrbit Table.
 ID: 142
 componentnum\orbitindex: 1
 Missionid: 2015-046A
 MissionName: TJS-1
 Correct TLE:
 TJS-1
 1 40892U 15046A   20185.88519191 -.00000166  00000-0  10000-3 0  9995
 2 40892   0.0364 100.5982 0002059 282.2608  13.1221  1.00269422 17753
 
 ID: 142
 componentnum\orbitindex: 2
 Missionid: 2017-001A
 MissionName: TJS-2
 Correct TLE:
 TJS-2 
 1 41911U 17001A   20185.89766385 -.00000352  00000-0  00000-0 0  9994
 2 41911   0.1495  96.8346 0007102 285.0331 331.1710  1.00272226 12927
 

Code: Select all

 
 ID: 142
 componentnum\orbitindex: 3
 Missionid: 2018-110C
 MissionName: TJS-3 AKM
 Correct TLE:
 TJS-3 AKM
 1 43917U 18110C   20185.90180894  .00000048  00000-0  00000-0 0  9992
 2 43917   0.0638 254.3086 0002629 221.4548 190.3480  1.00267725  5556
 
 
 ID: 142
 componentnum\orbitindex: 4
 Missionid: 2018-110A
 MissionName: TJS-3
 Correct TLE:
 TJS-3
 1 43874U 18110A   20185.88435807 -.00000006  00000-0  00000-0 0  9993
 2 43874   0.1005 261.8248 0006024 267.8989 244.0085  1.00273055  5614
 

Code: Select all

 
 ID: 142
 componentnum\orbitindex: 5
 Missionid: "	2019-070A" (remove leading spaces)
 MissionName: TJS-4B (this should read TJS-4, there is no B... 2019-070B is a rocket booster)
 Correct TLE:
 TJS-4
 1 44637U 19070A   20185.90319779 -.00000178  00000-0  00000-0 0  9999
 2 44637   0.0719 105.9927 0002282 332.9481 252.0196  1.00270723  2762
 
 
 ID: 142
 componentnum\orbitindex: 6
 Missionid: 2019-070B (2019-070B is rocket booster so this really should not exist best solution.. change to TJS-5 aka 2020-002A)
 MissionName: TJS-4B ( Change to TJS-5 )
 Correct TLE:
 TJS-5
 1 44978U 20002A   20185.97180131  .00000034  00000-0  00000+0 0  9998
 2 44978   0.6107 281.6521 0002044 227.0508 302.0602  1.00270158  1904
 

Code: Select all

 
 ID: 128
 componentnum\orbitindex: 6
 Missionid: 2015-083A 
 MissionName: Gaofen 4
 Correct TLE:
 GAOFEN 4
 1 41194U 15083A   20185.23478118 -.00000342  00000-0  00000+0 0  9995
 2 41194   0.0273  86.6413 0003982  80.6577 304.6012  1.00268641 16681
 
public TLE's obtained from celestrak http://celestrak.com/satcat/search.php
applied ingame during testing using unit:updateorbit() along with the properly formatted and escaped TLE.

edit 5/12/21: updated to use code tags to keep the proper white space in tle's for copy and pasting from web.


KnightHawk75
Posts: 1850
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 7:24 pm

RE: LUCH\Olymp-K sat incorrect location

Post by KnightHawk75 »

Sat location update is needed on two more.

ID: 146
componentnum\orbitindex: 1
Missionid: 2014-058A
MissionName: Olymp-K (This should probably read LUCH (OLYMP) but whatever)
Correct TLE:
LUCH (OLYMP)
1 40258U 14058A 20185.73672064 -.00000020 00000-0 00000-0 0 9991
2 40258 0.0256 34.1425 0001060 92.1055 60.0976 1.00272426 21131

Presently in geo off the pacific side of S.America, Corrected location is Atlantic off the coast of central Africa.
ref: https://www.n2yo.com/satellite/?s=40258


ID: 28
componentnum\orbitindex: 1
Missionid: 38101 (norad# is used, most others use intl id, if wanted: 2012-012A)
MissionName: COSMOS 2479
Correct TLE:
COSMOS 2479
1 38101U 12012A 20185.76257670 -.00000263 +00000-0 +00000-0 0 9997
2 38101 003.8848 071.9271 0006502 276.0792 130.7534 01.00383801030278

Currently it's in geo over the south china sea area, this updates it to correct location, northern part of South America.
ref: https://www.n2yo.com/satellite/?s=38101

edit: added refs

BDukes
Posts: 2578
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:59 pm

RE: LUCH\Olymp-K sat incorrect location

Post by BDukes »

Hellos

Please add Mexican Navy Amphibs when have times.

L 402 Manzanillo (ex US LST 602-Chelan County Class) IOC 1972-Current
Chelan County class in db as #1614 or #1242 so can copy

https://twitter.com/MikiAV8BHarrier/sta ... 49/photo/2

Just looking it looks like South Korea (already in dbs), Thailand (already in dbs) Indonesia (LST-511 Teluk Bone 1970-2019 x4), Vietnam, Taiwan (LST-223 Chung Fu 1958-1997), Turkey (A-580 SANLAKTAR 1972 x2) and Phillipines (BRP Sierra Madre 1975-1999-Now a beached base, 2 now beached hulks-bases) use these ships too.

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military ... 2-unit.htm

BAL01 Montes Azules (2011-present, x2)
https://twitter.com/MikiAV8BHarrier/sta ... 49/photo/3

Stats:
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_Monte ... s_(BAL-01)




Don't call it a comeback...
User avatar
KLAB
Posts: 463
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:24 pm

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Post by KLAB »

F-15C Eagle - 2018, AN/APG-70
Haven't checked F16 but the above entry has the -ARS-34 Legion Pod from DB477 onward?
Are you sure it's not already available?
K
Locked

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”