This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

Post Reply
E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by E »

PCK
WAW
BFD
TOAW
COC
CIA
FBI
IRS
PZC
CWE
BS
TGIF
FM


...IMHO

"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
GaryChildress
Posts: 6763
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by GaryChildress »

This is a good point. It's hard for me to keep up with all the acronyms especially when people are referring to non-Matrix games with them.
User avatar
Greybriar
Posts: 1158
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:54 am

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by Greybriar »

ORIGINAL: E

This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Agreed!

But an alternative would be to mention the complete title of the game in the thread's title or in the first post in the thread.
This war is not about slavery. --Robert E. Lee
GaryChildress
Posts: 6763
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by GaryChildress »

ORIGINAL: Greybriar

ORIGINAL: E

This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Agreed!

But an alternative would be to mention the complete title of the game in the thread's title or in the first post in the thread.

Trouble is with the "tell me some good games to play" threads. After the first post you get about a thousand acronyms in alphabet salad. [:D]
E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by E »

ORIGINAL: Greybriar

ORIGINAL: E

This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Agreed!

But an alternative would be to mention the complete title of the game in the thread's title or in the first post in the thread.

Yeah, that's going to happen. *grin*
"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
Arsan
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 6:08 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by Arsan »

ORIGINAL: E

ORIGINAL: Greybriar

ORIGINAL: E

This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Agreed!

But an alternative would be to mention the complete title of the game in the thread's title or in the first post in the thread.

Yeah, that's going to happen. *grin*

You could start by giving example: what FAQ stands for?? [&:]
.
.
.
(just joking [;)][:D])
E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by E »

ORIGINAL: Arsan

You could start by giving example: what FAQ stands for??

That's exactly the problem! I don't know what it means!
"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
oldspec4
Posts: 748
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:34 pm

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by oldspec4 »

I know what BS means [:D] But I agree that, unless you're a regular on this forum, the acronyms are generally a puzzle to most.
E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by E »

ORIGINAL: oldspec4

I know what BS means [:D]

Battleship! *grin*
"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
User avatar
spellir74
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:30 am

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by spellir74 »

Panzer Command.

"PzC"

"PzC:K"

[kharkov]

"PzC:OWS" or just OWS.



===
What is FM?
test

Image
User avatar
spellir74
Posts: 2065
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:30 am

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by spellir74 »

The list defined could be in a FAQ.
test

Image
E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by E »

ORIGINAL: spellir74

What is FM?

F*ck*ng Magic. Ahem, Erm, I mean Frequency Modulation.
"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
IronDuke_slith
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by IronDuke_slith »

ORIGINAL: E

PCK
WAW
BFD
TOAW
COC
CIA
FBI
IRS
PZC
CWE
BS
TGIF
FM


...IMHO



WTF... [;)]
User avatar
Hertston
Posts: 3317
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2002 3:45 pm
Location: Cornwall, UK

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by Hertston »

This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

You can't do that ! [X(]   It's just so much fun making them up and watching people pretend they know what you are talking about... [:D]
User avatar
06 Maestro
Posts: 3989
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 10:50 pm
Location: Nevada, USA

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by 06 Maestro »

Yea, you might have a point, but on the other hand-[>:] D I L L I G A F [:'(]

It could be useful, but care should be takena s to what is defined.
Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.

Thomas Jefferson

E
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:14 am

RE: This forum needs a dedicated Acronym FAQ

Post by E »

ORIGINAL: 06 Maestro

It could be useful, but care should be takena s to what is defined.

In context of a matrix games forum, the games being acronymmed* would suffice. The problem as I see it is that the only one's who really know and use a specific game acronym are those who own/play/or are/were specifically interested in a game. So you get a thread like "which game should I buy" which is then filled with acronyms used by owners/players but meant for obviously non-owners/non-players consumption. I think it'd be Matrix best interest to help newbies to understand which game is being talked about in each of those acronyms. Now if you're in a specific forum, you can guess what the main acronym means, but not necessarily in the general forum. For instance if someone said "AT attack strengths are too high," ...did they say attack strength are too high in Advanced Tactics? Or did they say Anti-Tank attack strengths are too high in the Operational Art of War? Or in wargames in general? Granted the example given is probably poor as there would hopefully (but not necessarily), be a better context).

* - (tm) (Patent Pending)
"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”