Matrix Games Forums

Pandora: Eclipse of Nashira Announced! Deal of the Week: Command Ops goes half price!New Fronts are opening up for Commander: The Great WarCharacters of World War 1Sign of for the Pike and Shot Beta!More Games are Coming to Steam! Return to the Moon on October 31st! Commander: The Great War iPad Wallpapers Generals of the Great WarDeal of the Week Panzer Corps
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Comparisons

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Modern] >> FlashPoint Germany >> Comparisons Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Comparisons - 1/26/2005 3:00:05 PM   
ETF


Posts: 1195
Joined: 9/16/2004
From: Hamilton Area, Canada
Status: offline
Anyone with Point of Attack 2? How would you compare the two products?
Post #: 1
RE: Comparisons - 1/26/2005 3:39:25 PM   
HercMighty


Posts: 399
Joined: 10/31/2003
From: Minnesota, USA
Status: offline
POA2 is a lot more in depth and a lot harder to play. Also you are left scratching your head more than you are understanding what is going on. Flashpoint gives you much more feedback and doesn't suffer from the FOW problems that POA2 does. I still have some hope from POA2 but it will most likely take POA3 to get it done, and for Scott to listen to some reason. His ideas are good but implementation for gamers is not there yet.

So in summary I have set POA2 aside in favor of this game.

(in reply to ETF)
Post #: 2
RE: Comparisons - 1/26/2005 4:26:53 PM   
JudgeDredd


Posts: 8474
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HercMighty

POA2 is a lot more in depth and a lot harder to play. Also you are left scratching your head more than you are understanding what is going on. Flashpoint gives you much more feedback and doesn't suffer from the FOW problems that POA2 does. I still have some hope from POA2 but it will most likely take POA3 to get it done, and for Scott to listen to some reason. His ideas are good but implementation for gamers is not there yet.

So in summary I have set POA2 aside in favor of this game.


POA2 is? And where from?

_____________________________

JudgeDredd
I AM the Law!

(in reply to HercMighty)
Post #: 3
RE: Comparisons - 1/26/2005 4:35:48 PM   
Black Cat

 

Posts: 615
Joined: 7/4/2002
Status: offline
POA2 is still broken, and attempts a much deeper & more complex level of simulation. As a long time supporter of HPS it`s sad for me to say IMHO the Game is still a Beta Version and really should be withdrawn from sale.

Tiller`s/HPS " Fuda Gap `85" is a Campaign Level Game, an is really another huge Panzer Campaign Game updated to modern times so it`s not really a good comparison to FG due to the scale.

The real comparison should be Tac Ops 4.0 which, even with the now very dated graphics is the Gold Standard for modern combat sims.

(in reply to HercMighty)
Post #: 4
RE: Comparisons - 1/26/2005 6:19:16 PM   
sabre100

 

Posts: 391
Joined: 5/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

POA2 is? And where from?


POA2 is Point of Attack 2 from HPS Sims (www.hpssims.com)

(in reply to Black Cat)
Post #: 5
RE: Comparisons - 1/26/2005 6:44:18 PM   
Chelco

 

Posts: 741
Joined: 8/6/2003
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Black Cat
The real comparison should be Tac Ops 4.0 which, even with the now very dated graphics is the Gold Standard for modern combat sims.


The only two things that turn me off from TacOps are the "always perfect morale" of the units and the scripted enemy AI.
But you are right, is the golden standard right now.

(in reply to Black Cat)
Post #: 6
RE: Comparisons - 1/26/2005 9:36:58 PM   
Hertston


Posts: 3465
Joined: 8/17/2002
From: Cornwall, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ETF

Anyone with Point of Attack 2? How would you compare the two products?



I wouldn't.

PoA2 is a flawed, but extraordinarily detailed simulation. Something that really needs a 3 gig processor while having graphics not a lot better than Tac-Ops would have to be. It is NOT a "game", and is barely playable as one. Many took up the challenge thinking they would enjoy that level of detail (I confess I was one) only to find they just couldn't play it, and that includes many well(ish) known community types you would generally consider "hardcore".

Flashpoint Germany is a very playable (and in my limited experience, entertaining) wargame, not a simulation. It's also one, like Tin Soldiers, that I would strongly recommend to newcomers to the genre.

A better comparison for FG would be the HPS "Modern Campaigns" Cold War games (larger scale, more complex in some ways, but actually simpler in others). A better comparison for PoA2 would be TacOps and Shrapnel/ProSim's Armoured Task Force (and Raging Tiger). ATF (I don't have Raging Tiger yet) is IMHO easily the most playable, while retaining the realism.

< Message edited by Hertston -- 1/26/2005 7:37:45 PM >

(in reply to ETF)
Post #: 7
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Modern] >> FlashPoint Germany >> Comparisons Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.074