Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably Historically

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably Historically Page: <<   < prev  57 58 [59] 60 61   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 12:38:26 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. Allied #3. Balkans. Southeast Poland.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1741
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 12:39:00 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. Allied #3. USSR. The Moscow Front.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1742
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 12:42:29 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. Axis #5. Weather.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1743
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 12:42:57 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. Allied #8. The Axis Naval Threat.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1744
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 12:43:19 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. Allied #8. The Turkish Front.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1745
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 12:43:52 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. Allied #8. USSR. The Moscow Front.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1746
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 12:44:15 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. Allied #8. USSR. The Polish Front.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1747
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 12:44:41 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. Axis #11. Weather.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1748
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 12:49:04 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. Axis #11. The Eastern Front.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1749
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 12:49:56 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
The turn comes to an end at the conclusion of the axis #11 impulse.

Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. Destroyed/Repair Pools.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1750
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 12:50:19 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. CP Losses.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1751
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 12:56:02 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. Surrender?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1752
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 12:59:26 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. Economic Reports.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1753
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:00:25 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. Authorized Production (1 Yr/6 turns). Axis.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1754
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:01:03 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 32. Nov/Dec 1944. Authorized Production (1 Yr/6 turns). Allies.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1755
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:02:15 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 33. Jan/Feb 1945. Trade.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1756
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:03:39 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 33. Jan/Feb 1945. Initiative.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1757
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:04:09 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 33. Jan/Feb 1945. Japan.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1758
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:04:35 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 33. Jan/Feb 1945. China, North.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1759
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:04:56 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 33. Jan/Feb 1945. China, South.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1760
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:05:32 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 33. Jan/Feb 1945. South China Sea and Surrounding Land Areas.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1761
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:05:55 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 33. Jan/Feb 1945. Siberia.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1762
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:06:26 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 33. Jan/Feb 1945. Turkey. Caucuses.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1763
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:07:11 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 33. Jan/Feb 1945. Central USSR.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1764
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:07:35 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 33. Jan/Feb 1945. Balkans. Poland.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1765
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:07:58 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 33. Jan/Feb 1945. Western Europe.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1766
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:08:25 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 33. Jan/Feb 1945. Italy. MTO.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1767
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 1:08:52 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
Turn 33. Jan/Feb 1945. Strategic Summary.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1768
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 11:24:26 AM   
Centuur


Posts: 7960
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline
What I don't get is this. Free France exists, but there don't seem to be Free French units anywhere in action on the frontlines.

That's a pity, because a small Free French air force (with ATR of course) or a couple of Free French naval transports can make a lot of difference. I'm missing the "dirty" tricks one can do with the Free French. Suppose they have 3 TRS. They pick a naval action and the CW/US take land actions. Than the Free French take on board the US and CW marines and drop them off at an enemy controlled beach. All in one impulse, without warning. And no offensive chit needed to do this in a supercombined...

Or simply put a Free French INF in Bordeaux with the partisan there.

Or use Free French ATR to drop US or CW PARA...

I love to have a small Free French force available to the Wallies in 1944-1945...

< Message edited by Centuur -- 7/24/2018 11:25:11 AM >


_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 1769
RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably ... - 7/24/2018 3:03:05 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 13747
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur

What I don't get is this. Free France exists, but there don't seem to be Free French units anywhere in action on the frontlines.

That's a pity, because a small Free French air force (with ATR of course) or a couple of Free French naval transports can make a lot of difference. I'm missing the "dirty" tricks one can do with the Free French. Suppose they have 3 TRS. They pick a naval action and the CW/US take land actions. Than the Free French take on board the US and CW marines and drop them off at an enemy controlled beach. All in one impulse, without warning. And no offensive chit needed to do this in a supercombined...

Or simply put a Free French INF in Bordeaux with the partisan there.

Or use Free French ATR to drop US or CW PARA...

I love to have a small Free French force available to the Wallies in 1944-1945...
Yes, you are 100% correct, I've not understood that subtly until too late. For example, building out the Free French infantry units and taking a land with Free France when the US takes a naval. I'm just not experienced with these tricks of the trade and tend to not to give them their due consideration. But, I will next time. Or, maybe start in this game though a bit late just to get the experience.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 1770
Page:   <<   < prev  57 58 [59] 60 61   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: An Attempt to use MWiF to Simulated WW2 Reasonably Historically Page: <<   < prev  57 58 [59] 60 61   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.188