Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

FITE 2

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> The Operational Art of War IV >> Mods and Scenarios >> FITE 2 Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
FITE 2 - 11/27/2017 6:46:03 PM   
philippe1968

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 11/27/2017
Status: offline
Hello,
Why "FITE2" is in a directory name "Custom Graphics" and not in "WWII East" ?
Scenario still in working ?
I'm not english reader and I don't understand this case.
Thank's
Post #: 1
RE: FITE 2 - 11/27/2017 6:49:26 PM   
cantona2


Posts: 3608
Joined: 5/21/2007
From: Gibraltar
Status: offline
yes scenario is working. you can find it in hypothetical scenarios driectory or just paste it into wwiieast folder


_____________________________

1966 was a great year for English Football...Eric was born


(in reply to philippe1968)
Post #: 2
RE: FITE 2 - 11/28/2017 1:42:52 AM   
jjdenver

 

Posts: 1715
Joined: 11/2/2007
Status: offline
How can you tell whether a scenario like this can be played vs the PO? The briefing is only about 10 lines long, doesn't mention PO or PBEM, and there is no documentation button to click on to read more about the scenario.

EDIT I found a .doc file on the filesystem for this scenario and read it to find that it is not for PO play.

< Message edited by jjdenver -- 11/28/2017 1:44:08 AM >

(in reply to philippe1968)
Post #: 3
RE: FITE 2 - 11/29/2017 5:44:34 PM   
Teufeldk

 

Posts: 58
Joined: 6/11/2014
Status: offline
Yeah, sorry about that.

We should probably have mentioned the .doc file in the briefing.

(in reply to jjdenver)
Post #: 4
RE: FITE 2 - 11/29/2017 6:31:14 PM   
philippe1968

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 11/27/2017
Status: offline
Thank you for these informations.

You said that there isn't PO play, but I see "strategics roads" of IA with objectives for each units.

(in reply to Teufeldk)
Post #: 5
RE: FITE 2 - 11/29/2017 8:49:34 PM   
Teufeldk

 

Posts: 58
Joined: 6/11/2014
Status: offline
Yes.

I think they were an early attempt to make it possible to play against the AI.

It means you can play the first few turns against the AI - to get a feeling for it. But not the whole game.

Regards
Kristian






< Message edited by Teufeldk -- 11/29/2017 8:51:46 PM >

(in reply to philippe1968)
Post #: 6
RE: FITE 2 - 11/29/2017 8:53:11 PM   
Teufeldk

 

Posts: 58
Joined: 6/11/2014
Status: offline
It is a huge game so it might be helpful to see how the first few turns play out against the AI before you try it against a human player.

(in reply to Teufeldk)
Post #: 7
RE: FITE 2 - 2/8/2018 11:24:21 PM   
Lobster


Posts: 1891
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: online
The bridges at Riga nearest the sea are broken. Even though they get blown up units can cross them at one MP at 184, 266. Makes it kind of pointless blowing the bridges. There have been a couple of other places like this but I didn't make note of the locations. Kind of wonder about the design decision to make major rivers into minor rivers at bridges. That one has me scratching my head.

_____________________________

http://www.operationbarbarossa.net/

"Getting back to reality...I'll only go as a tourist!"

(in reply to Teufeldk)
Post #: 8
RE: FITE 2 - 2/11/2018 4:29:26 PM   
Lobster


Posts: 1891
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: online
T.O. Trappenjagd. This should have a prerequisite. The Soviets need to be present on the Crimean Peninsula. If they were not there then this operation never would have existed.
T.O. Storfang. This should also have a prerequisite. The Soviets need to control Sevastopol. If the Sevastopol had fallen there would have been no need for this operation and it never would have existed.

These two T.O. should somehow be restricted to the narrow areas where they took place. Otherwise the German player can use them for anything. Very unhistorical since they were created only for the portion of the theater involving the Crimean Peninsula.

_____________________________

http://www.operationbarbarossa.net/

"Getting back to reality...I'll only go as a tourist!"

(in reply to Lobster)
Post #: 9
RE: FITE 2 - 2/12/2018 12:57:50 AM   
Lobster


Posts: 1891
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: online
The Romanians and Finns need to be deployed off the border. If they are deployed directly on the border it can cause them to engage the Soviets in a disengagement attack. This will release the Romanians or the Fins early even though the Soviet player never attacked. If you are playing against someone who does not understand the game mechanics or has not bothered to read the .doc file the game is ruined because they will move the Fins and/or Romanians early.

< Message edited by Lobster -- 2/12/2018 12:58:45 AM >


_____________________________

http://www.operationbarbarossa.net/

"Getting back to reality...I'll only go as a tourist!"

(in reply to Lobster)
Post #: 10
RE: FITE 2 - 2/16/2018 12:46:20 PM   
Teufeldk

 

Posts: 58
Joined: 6/11/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster

The bridges at Riga nearest the sea are broken. Even though they get blown up units can cross them at one MP at 184, 266. Makes it kind of pointless blowing the bridges. There have been a couple of other places like this but I didn't make note of the locations.


As far as I know, this has nothing to do with the scenario but with the game engine. Most units can cross destroyed bridges (but at a higher movement cost).

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster
Kind of wonder about the design decision to make major rivers into minor rivers at bridges. That one has me scratching my head.


I am unsure what you mean by making major rivers into minor rivers at bridges?



_____________________________

Regards
Kristian


(in reply to Lobster)
Post #: 11
RE: FITE 2 - 2/16/2018 12:53:56 PM   
Teufeldk

 

Posts: 58
Joined: 6/11/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster

T.O. Trappenjagd. This should have a prerequisite. The Soviets need to be present on the Crimean Peninsula. If they were not there then this operation never would have existed.
T.O. Storfang. This should also have a prerequisite. The Soviets need to control Sevastopol. If the Sevastopol had fallen there would have been no need for this operation and it never would have existed.

These two T.O. should somehow be restricted to the narrow areas where they took place. Otherwise the German player can use them for anything. Very unhistorical since they were created only for the portion of the theater involving the Crimean Peninsula.


Good point. But on the other hand, if Sevastopol had fallen, the Germans might have made an entirely new operation somewhere else. We keep it to not punish the Germans for being good or fast.

Your point about offensives being used where they were not meant to, is also a legit point. It is a feature of such a large scenario - it is not possible to create local offensives. At least we have not found a good way.

_____________________________

Regards
Kristian


(in reply to Lobster)
Post #: 12
RE: FITE 2 - 2/26/2018 1:23:38 AM   
Gandalf


Posts: 349
Joined: 12/15/2010
From: Jefferson City, MO
Status: offline
The subfolder for Fire in the East 2 in the \Graphics Override\... folder is named \FITE2\...

Shouldn't it be named the same as the scenario file name... i.e. \Fire in the East 2\... or will the scenario still find it as \FITE2\... ?

Incidentally, here's a screenshot of the area around Leningrad in FITE2 using the new Telu IV Map Mod located here: http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4442672




I expect this new map mod to explode in popularity quite quickly.

Regards

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Gandalf -- 2/26/2018 1:36:27 AM >


_____________________________

Member since January 2007 (as Gray_Lensman)

Wargaming since 1971 (1st game Avalon Hill's Stalingrad)

Computering since 1977 (TRS-80) (adhoc programming & game modding ever since)

(in reply to Teufeldk)
Post #: 13
RE: FITE 2 - 2/26/2018 2:35:54 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 36493
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Yep, my understanding is that the scenario name is what the of the folder in graphics override folder should be named. Also, the
EQP filename and the NQP filename.....they should all be the same.

_____________________________

Did you ever suddenly realize that you're dead and nobody is telling you?

(in reply to Gandalf)
Post #: 14
RE: FITE 2 - 2/26/2018 3:01:35 PM   
Lobster


Posts: 1891
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Teufeldk


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster

The bridges at Riga nearest the sea are broken. Even though they get blown up units can cross them at one MP at 184, 266. Makes it kind of pointless blowing the bridges. There have been a couple of other places like this but I didn't make note of the locations.


As far as I know, this has nothing to do with the scenario but with the game engine. Most units can cross destroyed bridges (but at a higher movement cost).


This is a tank unit crossing a 'super' river where the bridge is destroyed. It has no engineers at all. This should not be possible. What's more it does it at only one movement point. There were a couple of other places like this but do not recall where. Sorry.









Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lobster -- 2/26/2018 3:12:08 PM >


_____________________________

http://www.operationbarbarossa.net/

"Getting back to reality...I'll only go as a tourist!"

(in reply to Teufeldk)
Post #: 15
RE: FITE 2 - 2/26/2018 3:11:14 PM   
Lobster


Posts: 1891
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: Teufeldk


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster
Kind of wonder about the design decision to make major rivers into minor rivers at bridges. That one has me scratching my head.


I am unsure what you mean by making major rivers into minor rivers at bridges?




There are many points where a super river becomes a minor river at a bridge and then becomes a super river again making it more difficult to defend.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

http://www.operationbarbarossa.net/

"Getting back to reality...I'll only go as a tourist!"

(in reply to Teufeldk)
Post #: 16
RE: FITE 2 - 2/26/2018 4:15:37 PM   
Curtis Lemay


Posts: 10849
Joined: 9/17/2004
From: Houston, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster

This is a tank unit crossing a 'super' river where the bridge is destroyed. It has no engineers at all. This should not be possible. What's more it does it at only one movement point. There were a couple of other places like this but do not recall where. Sorry.




It's the anchorage tile that does it.

_____________________________

My TOAW web site:

Bob Cross's TOAW Site

(in reply to Lobster)
Post #: 17
RE: FITE 2 - 2/26/2018 5:03:28 PM   
Lobster


Posts: 1891
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

It's the anchorage tile that does it.



Ah. I don't suppose there's an easy way to make the river act like a river while there is an anchorage located there?

_____________________________

http://www.operationbarbarossa.net/

"Getting back to reality...I'll only go as a tourist!"

(in reply to Curtis Lemay)
Post #: 18
RE: FITE 2 - 2/26/2018 7:13:27 PM   
Teufeldk

 

Posts: 58
Joined: 6/11/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster

This is a tank unit crossing a 'super' river where the bridge is destroyed. It has no engineers at all. This should not be possible. What's more it does it at only one movement point. There were a couple of other places like this but do not recall where. Sorry.




It's the anchorage tile that does it.


Thank you for your reply.

I was not aware of that. It might be reason to move or delete some of the anchorage in a later version.

(in reply to Curtis Lemay)
Post #: 19
RE: FITE 2 - 2/26/2018 7:19:36 PM   
Teufeldk

 

Posts: 58
Joined: 6/11/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster


quote:

ORIGINAL: Teufeldk


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster
Kind of wonder about the design decision to make major rivers into minor rivers at bridges. That one has me scratching my head.


I am unsure what you mean by making major rivers into minor rivers at bridges?




There are many points where a super river becomes a minor river at a bridge and then becomes a super river again making it more difficult to defend.







Maybe it is because they build the bridge at the place where the river was the most narrow?

I did not draw the map, so I don't really know, to be honest, but I think it is fairly high quality. And I can assure you that is not made on purpose to make it hard to defend. But if you find places that you think are just wrong according to the geography in the 1940's please let us know, and we will look into it.





_____________________________

Regards
Kristian


(in reply to Lobster)
Post #: 20
RE: FITE 2 - 2/27/2018 12:19:35 AM   
Lobster


Posts: 1891
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: Teufeldk


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster


quote:

ORIGINAL: Teufeldk


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster
Kind of wonder about the design decision to make major rivers into minor rivers at bridges. That one has me scratching my head.


I am unsure what you mean by making major rivers into minor rivers at bridges?




There are many points where a super river becomes a minor river at a bridge and then becomes a super river again making it more difficult to defend.







Maybe it is because they build the bridge at the place where the river was the most narrow?

I did not draw the map, so I don't really know, to be honest, but I think it is fairly high quality. And I can assure you that is not made on purpose to make it hard to defend. But if you find places that you think are just wrong according to the geography in the 1940's please let us know, and we will look into it.



I do have German Army and RKKA topo maps of the Soviet Union from pre WW2 to the present in many different scales. But I'm not going to criticize Rick's map interpretations. I was just wondering why some major rivers have minor river hexes at bridges is all. Cheers.

_____________________________

http://www.operationbarbarossa.net/

"Getting back to reality...I'll only go as a tourist!"

(in reply to Teufeldk)
Post #: 21
RE: FITE 2 - 2/27/2018 12:47:40 AM   
TPOO

 

Posts: 180
Joined: 11/15/2007
From: Garden Grove, CA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster


quote:

ORIGINAL: Teufeldk


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster


quote:

ORIGINAL: Teufeldk


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lobster
Kind of wonder about the design decision to make major rivers into minor rivers at bridges. That one has me scratching my head.


I am unsure what you mean by making major rivers into minor rivers at bridges?




There are many points where a super river becomes a minor river at a bridge and then becomes a super river again making it more difficult to defend.







Maybe it is because they build the bridge at the place where the river was the most narrow?

I did not draw the map, so I don't really know, to be honest, but I think it is fairly high quality. And I can assure you that is not made on purpose to make it hard to defend. But if you find places that you think are just wrong according to the geography in the 1940's please let us know, and we will look into it.



I do have German Army and RKKA topo maps of the Soviet Union from pre WW2 to the present in many different scales. But I'm not going to criticize Rick's map interpretations. I was just wondering why some major rivers have minor river hexes at bridges is all. Cheers.


You might have to check with Soren to see if he changed some of these Super River hexes to Minor River hexes that had rail road bridges as I did not make the map with them that way. I think at one time there was a reason that he wanted it that way but that was so long ago I do not remember. There are only a couple of hexes on the map where I purposely put a minor river hex on a super river for the reason it was much narrower in that spot but neither of them are road or railroad crossings. If there is a consensus on which way to go on these hexes I can fix them and Soren or Kristian can upload a corrected scenario in case there is a new patch coming soon. Thank you.

(in reply to Lobster)
Post #: 22
RE: FITE 2 - 2/27/2018 6:35:25 AM   
cantona2


Posts: 3608
Joined: 5/21/2007
From: Gibraltar
Status: offline
In those cases you need to carefully look at the terrain and defend accordingly, maybe its a ford or a narrower part of the river. Make those strong points in the line, entrench your units deep, support with massed artillery and stop the Fascist invader

_____________________________

1966 was a great year for English Football...Eric was born


(in reply to TPOO)
Post #: 23
RE: FITE 2 - 2/27/2018 12:01:23 PM   
Lobster


Posts: 1891
Joined: 8/8/2013
From: Third rock from the Sun.
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: cantona2

In those cases you need to carefully look at the terrain and defend accordingly, maybe its a ford or a narrower part of the river. Make those strong points in the line, entrench your units deep, support with massed artillery and stop the Fascist invader


Well, that door swings both ways so it could be the Fascist defending against the Patriotic Hordes.

_____________________________

http://www.operationbarbarossa.net/

"Getting back to reality...I'll only go as a tourist!"

(in reply to cantona2)
Post #: 24
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> The Operational Art of War IV >> Mods and Scenarios >> FITE 2 Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.225