Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: obvert (A) vs Lowpe (J)
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: obvert (A) vs Lowpe (J)
[font="Trebuchet MS"]Victory is won or lost in battle, but all military history shows that adequate logistic support is essential to the winning of battles.
Adm. Raymond Ames Spruance, USN[/font]
- Attachments
-
- PacificFleet.jpg (625.92 KiB) Viewed 1867 times
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
Lowpe and I have embarked on a new game. He'll take the Empire from Day 1 and be able to plan out everything he usually does in 43 from the start.
I'm looking forward to playing the Allies again after the Greyjoy game was interrupted, and now I'll hopefully get a chance to try to use some of the ideas that never got tested in that game. Maybe even a few new thoughts. [;)]
As this is a second game for us both, it may have a slow start and only run 4-7 turns/week. Lowpe is working on the first turn now, so there will be an update sometime this week. Fingers crossed he's not been reading too many Mr Kane AARs lately. [;)]
This will be a DBB Scen 28-C game. It is PDU-ON.
We decided to go with only a few HRs this time around.
[font="Times New Roman"]HRs[/font]
[font="Trebuchet MS"]Night bombing port/airfield:
50 planes/target for the entire war.
First turn:
No restrictions on port strikes for IJ
No new TFs for Allies but existing may move
No air groups changing location, but can change CAP settings
No crazy deep *TF moves (Mersing)
PP for borders:
Minus Thai and Burmese units [/font]
I'm looking forward to playing the Allies again after the Greyjoy game was interrupted, and now I'll hopefully get a chance to try to use some of the ideas that never got tested in that game. Maybe even a few new thoughts. [;)]
As this is a second game for us both, it may have a slow start and only run 4-7 turns/week. Lowpe is working on the first turn now, so there will be an update sometime this week. Fingers crossed he's not been reading too many Mr Kane AARs lately. [;)]
This will be a DBB Scen 28-C game. It is PDU-ON.
We decided to go with only a few HRs this time around.
[font="Times New Roman"]HRs[/font]
[font="Trebuchet MS"]Night bombing port/airfield:
50 planes/target for the entire war.
First turn:
No restrictions on port strikes for IJ
No new TFs for Allies but existing may move
No air groups changing location, but can change CAP settings
No crazy deep *TF moves (Mersing)
PP for borders:
Minus Thai and Burmese units [/font]
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
I like your HRs, simple yet important. Never thought of exempting Thai and Burmese troops from PPs, but it make sense.
- Cap Mandrake
- Posts: 20737
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
- Location: Southern California
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
Watch out! Lowpe-san know compression ratio on every Japn-mens engine and amperage on deicers.
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
I thought that the Burmese units being attached to the unrestricted Burma Command would not have to pay any PPs to move into India.
Anyway, good luck obvert.
Anyway, good luck obvert.
-
- Posts: 2818
- Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
Great, another interesting set of AARs to follow! Hopefully Lowpe would do his own part too.
Also, entrance requirement to this thread is successful ID of every ship class on that photo
Also, entrance requirement to this thread is successful ID of every ship class on that photo
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
ORIGINAL: BillBrown
I thought that the Burmese units being attached to the unrestricted Burma Command would not have to pay any PPs to move into India.
Anyway, good luck obvert.
The RTA Divisions are grey-restricted, and historically they participated in the invasion of Burma. A lot of people allow them.
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
A bad bet, that! [:D]ORIGINAL: obvert
Fingers crossed he's not been reading too many Mr Kane AARs lately. [;)]
We decided to go with only a few HRs this time around.
[font="Times New Roman"]HRs[/font]
[font="Trebuchet MS"]Night bombing port/airfield:
50 planes/target for the entire war.
First turn:
No restrictions on port strikes for IJ
No new TFs for Allies but existing may move
No air groups changing location, but can change CAP settings
No crazy deep *TF moves (Mersing)
PP for borders:
Minus Thai and Burmese units [/font]
What about US-Canada? [:D]
Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
Good luck to both of you. It will be interesting to see what Lowpe does now that he can decide what the Japanese will do in early 42, rather than taking over for a player who has already made those decisions.
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:51 pm
- Location: Millersburg, OH
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
Good luck to both of you. This one could be epic.
- CaptBeefheart
- Posts: 2513
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
- Location: Seoul, Korea
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
Looking forward to this. And yes, the Canada-US border is a relevant question.
Cheers,
CC
Cheers,
CC
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
ORIGINAL: witpqs
A bad bet, that! [:D]ORIGINAL: obvert
Fingers crossed he's not been reading too many Mr Kane AARs lately. [;)]
We decided to go with only a few HRs this time around.
[font="Times New Roman"]HRs[/font]
[font="Trebuchet MS"]Night bombing port/airfield:
50 planes/target for the entire war.
First turn:
No restrictions on port strikes for IJ
No new TFs for Allies but existing may move
No air groups changing location, but can change CAP settings
No crazy deep *TF moves (Mersing)
PP for borders:
Minus Thai and Burmese units [/font]
What about US-Canada? [:D]
Shhhhh! [:D]
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
Good luck, may your ships always find the bottom and your subs the surface.[;)]
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
Good luck, may your ships always find the bottom and your subs the surface.[;)]
Thanks Lowpe! Good luck to you too!
Always a kind word. [:D]
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
ORIGINAL: Aurorus
Good luck to both of you. It will be interesting to see what Lowpe does now that he can decide what the Japanese will do in early 42, rather than taking over for a player who has already made those decisions.
I'm going with paralyzed by indecision.
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
Obvert-
This will be fun to watch.
Best Regards,
-Terry
This will be fun to watch.
Best Regards,
-Terry
"No one throws me my own guns and tells me to run. No one."
-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven
-Bret (James Coburn); The Magnificent Seven
- MakeeLearn
- Posts: 4274
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:01 pm
RE: Beans, Bullets and Black Oil :: Lowpe (J) vs obvert (A)
ORIGINAL: obvert
[font="Times New Roman"]HRs[/font]
[font="Trebuchet MS"]Night bombing port/airfield:
50 planes/target for the entire war.
First turn:
No restrictions on port strikes for IJ
No new TFs for Allies but existing may move
No air groups changing location, but can change CAP settings
No crazy deep *TF moves (Mersing)
PP for borders:
Minus Thai and Burmese units [/font]
AH!!! HA!!!!
There is no ban on the use of shrubbery!!!
- Attachments
-
- WarshipBranches.jpg (31.16 KiB) Viewed 2053 times