Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: A modest proposal

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: A modest proposal Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: A modest proposal - 8/29/2017 4:51:45 AM   
cpdeyoung


Posts: 4552
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Carolina, USA
Status: offline
22 August 1935

The Union has moved much of the forces near Nashville to other locations. We want to lose very few troops in this spot.

Union aircraft proved far superior to Russian airframes and crews. At the cost of 1 T4M and 4 Goshawks we destroyed 9 TB3, 3 R5, 1 I15, 5 I16T5, and 1 MBR2.

The Union suspects that the USN will be able to make Russian troops miserable till some opposition at sea appears.

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 151
RE: A modest proposal - 8/30/2017 6:52:35 PM   
ironduke1955


Posts: 1974
Joined: 5/17/2006
From: UK
Status: offline
September 1935

The French have pulled back from Alstadt due to the Pounding from the British fleet stationed just of the coast. The French fleet suffered a terrible blow caught in a port they suffered horrendous losses to a carrier strike from the Royal Navy Air Arm and have been forced to pull back. The war is not going well and Britannia does indeed rule the waves.

< Message edited by ironduke1955 -- 8/30/2017 6:53:18 PM >

(in reply to cpdeyoung)
Post #: 152
RE: A modest proposal - 8/31/2017 9:51:49 PM   
cpdeyoung


Posts: 4552
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Carolina, USA
Status: offline
6th September 1935

Ouch!

Well things could be better for the home team. The size of the Royal and Germanic navies is impressive.

We will work on a solution.

(in reply to ironduke1955)
Post #: 153
RE: A modest proposal - 8/31/2017 9:53:44 PM   
cpdeyoung


Posts: 4552
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Carolina, USA
Status: offline
6th September 1935

Here is a look at the fleet :






Attachment (1)

(in reply to cpdeyoung)
Post #: 154
RE: A modest proposal - 9/1/2017 3:02:20 AM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline

The vast carnage strewn across two airfields was the first defeat of the Eastern Empire. The brutal losses spurred an all out ground assault, despite harsh winter conditions. Portions of Japan's city and a critical hilled fortress were taken at the cost many lives. But with overwhelming ground forces poised on the last strongholds of Union and Japanese forces, victory in Operation Snow-Blind is almost at hand.

(in reply to cpdeyoung)
Post #: 155
RE: A modest proposal - 9/3/2017 9:50:35 AM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
Some weirdness I can't explain... loaded Empire turn for Ed and the units of all nations were flashing and unable to be accessed. Rebooted the game and same issue. Reboot my comp and all 'seemed' well. Then I sea bombarded a Union port and Empire's Raw immediately dropped 5k. I don't think this is normal. Rebooted and same issue. Thought?

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 156
RE: A modest proposal - 9/3/2017 9:52:27 AM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
I'd post the images of before and after, but not sure how to upload the pics.

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 157
RE: A modest proposal - 9/3/2017 10:40:22 AM   
ernieschwitz

 

Posts: 2694
Joined: 9/15/2009
From: Denmark
Status: offline
I would think that something went wrong in the save game file. So that the person who played the turn before you, might need to re-upload, or replay.

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 158
RE: A modest proposal - 9/3/2017 10:58:06 AM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
Okay, thanks sir. Also, I'm a noob, so I'm not sure if this is an issue or a learning experience-- I couldn't run air attacks from carriers on muddy hexes... is that normal? Thanks again.

(in reply to ernieschwitz)
Post #: 159
RE: A modest proposal - 9/3/2017 1:58:27 PM   
ironduke1955


Posts: 1974
Joined: 5/17/2006
From: UK
Status: offline
My land based aircraft also can't take of during mud, I guess its meant to represent cloud cover as opposed to mud, Mud needs rain, rain needs clouds.

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 160
RE: A modest proposal - 9/3/2017 3:13:53 PM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
That's what I assumed... but wasn't sure thanks. I guess you'll have to redo that turn as the other stuff is wacky... sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

(in reply to ironduke1955)
Post #: 161
RE: A modest proposal - 9/5/2017 5:28:37 PM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
Hey, Tom FYI, you put the wrong turn (another game's turn) in this game's folder.

< Message edited by ArmouredLion -- 9/5/2017 7:19:28 PM >

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 162
RE: A modest proposal - 9/5/2017 7:18:39 PM   
ironduke1955


Posts: 1974
Joined: 5/17/2006
From: UK
Status: offline
OMG yep that was me, as my Grandma used to say to me "if brains were dynamite you'd be safe in a matches factory" everything is back to how it should be.

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 163
RE: A modest proposal - 9/5/2017 7:22:11 PM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
No problems, I do it quite often... also, just in case it was missed, when you get a chance redo your turn for this game... somehow the file is corrupt, as per bomber. Thanks brother. "If brains were dynamite you'd be safe in a matches factory". That's a good one.

(in reply to ironduke1955)
Post #: 164
RE: A modest proposal - 9/9/2017 4:42:49 PM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
Shall I add this game to my list of defunct games?

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 165
RE: A modest proposal - 9/13/2017 12:56:39 AM   
Bombur

 

Posts: 3385
Joined: 7/2/2004
Status: offline
It depends on you, it´s your turn, right?

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 166
RE: A modest proposal - 9/13/2017 2:58:00 AM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
See above couple of messages.. I left two messages that the French turn file was corrupt, as per ernie's diagnosis. Tom needs to redo his turn as I was expending 5k raw to bombard his shores.

< Message edited by ArmouredLion -- 9/13/2017 2:59:20 AM >

(in reply to Bombur)
Post #: 167
RE: A modest proposal - 9/13/2017 6:55:32 AM   
ironduke1955


Posts: 1974
Joined: 5/17/2006
From: UK
Status: offline
I checked my PM's no messages received I will replay turn 49 I do need a good kick up the pants to replay a turn.

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 168
RE: A modest proposal - 9/13/2017 7:03:36 AM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
Hahaha, no worries and sorry for the replay... maybe just reload the one you did again and see if it fixes it? I put the replay request above... no worries. Given that we are starting the other 38 game, and Cp and Lao aren't playing... should we continue? I'm fine leaving it on the side for bit, dropping it altogether, or continuing.

(in reply to ironduke1955)
Post #: 169
RE: A modest proposal - 9/13/2017 6:59:05 PM   
cpdeyoung


Posts: 4552
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Carolina, USA
Status: offline
I am still in this game I think. I placed a Turn 49 in the folder for Bombur, and he seems to have played it.

Chuck

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 170
RE: A modest proposal - 9/13/2017 7:07:39 PM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
Oohh, okay for some reason I thought you weren't... too much football didn't do well for my brain. Then let the battle continue.

(in reply to cpdeyoung)
Post #: 171
RE: A modest proposal - 9/14/2017 9:52:55 AM   
ironduke1955


Posts: 1974
Joined: 5/17/2006
From: UK
Status: offline
Ok replayed turn 49 may you have better better fortune with it.

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 172
RE: A modest proposal - 9/14/2017 11:20:16 AM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
Okay, going to load it up now thanks...

(in reply to ironduke1955)
Post #: 173
RE: A modest proposal - 9/14/2017 11:39:06 AM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
Same results...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ironduke1955)
Post #: 174
RE: A modest proposal - 9/14/2017 11:40:06 AM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
After sea bombardment... How should I proceed?




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ArmouredLion -- 9/14/2017 11:41:46 AM >

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 175
RE: A modest proposal - 9/14/2017 12:32:54 PM   
ironduke1955


Posts: 1974
Joined: 5/17/2006
From: UK
Status: offline
Well that is a huge fleet I would say that they would use 4K/5K of oil for naval bombardment there may be a resource issue where Raw is being removed instead of Oil.

Though I do note a reduction in oil. of 1204 oil that is still low for a fleet of that size.

And yes there is a reduction of oil for naval bombardment as much as for naval movement not sure why even ships that fire their guns in port expend oil ?



< Message edited by ironduke1955 -- 9/14/2017 12:46:43 PM >

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 176
RE: A modest proposal - 9/14/2017 12:45:26 PM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
Sounds about right... but raw is harder to come by, and how long will it persist? I can't sustain that kind of draw.

Weird... yeah I lose oil as well... what to do, what to do?

< Message edited by ArmouredLion -- 9/14/2017 12:46:16 PM >

(in reply to ironduke1955)
Post #: 177
RE: A modest proposal - 9/14/2017 12:48:48 PM   
ironduke1955


Posts: 1974
Joined: 5/17/2006
From: UK
Status: offline
Sounds fatal if you can't produce units its game over. I would try scuppering your entire fleet and see if that reduces RAW expenditure no only joking.

< Message edited by ironduke1955 -- 9/14/2017 12:49:38 PM >

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 178
RE: A modest proposal - 9/14/2017 12:50:18 PM   
ernieschwitz

 

Posts: 2694
Joined: 9/15/2009
From: Denmark
Status: offline
There are basically three things I can think of that may explain this.

1). Bombur has decided that some ships use coal, and thus use RAW instead of OIL.

2). Bombur has made a mistake in assigning what a certain kind(s) of SFT uses, and they use RAW instead of OIL.

3). There is a bug in the game, introduced by one of Vics recent patches.

(in reply to ArmouredLion)
Post #: 179
RE: A modest proposal - 9/14/2017 12:54:00 PM   
ArmouredLion

 

Posts: 292
Joined: 9/18/2015
Status: offline
Nice... tricky vet and his mind tricks.

(in reply to ironduke1955)
Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: A modest proposal Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.133