Optional Rules Negotiations.
1. I have never used the construction engineer optional. In the board game it was too difficult to keep track of all the factories and ports. That is easier on the computer, but I'm not sure how it will impact the actual usage of engineers in the game.
Agree not to use.
2. I've tried the unlimited breakdown in my current game. It works ok since the corp broken down are removed from the game until reformed. I am ok either way here.
Why not, I'll give it a try
3. I like defensive shore bombardment in general (as the axis I probably should not say that), but it is not a must have.
OK.
4. I have always found limited overseas supply helps to make the Pacific war a bit more active. Without it, it always seems to fall back to a waiting game, with both sides keeping their main fleets in port until the other makes a move.
I've never used this rule and not sure what to do. But, if you or someone else can fill me in on how this rule changes play and what I need to do to make sure I keep my troops in supply then sure, why not.
5. I have liked emergency HQ supply, though I have seldom used it in an actual game.
Again, I've never used this rule and not sure what it does but if someone can educate me on it I'll play with it.
6. I have liked night missions, but again I have seldom actually used in a game.
OK
7. I do not like Chinese attack weakness. The Nationalist are already weak and this just ensures they never attack (again, I am arguing the wrong way as the axis player
).
I need all the help I can get, so sure I'll play with it.
8. Relative to Japan and Russia, I am fine with us playing with the compulsory peace optional. As far as starting with a peace pac, I believe in game we can come up with deal. What does RU wants to offer the Japanese for this deal?
Comrade Stalin offers Prime Minister Hideki Tojo a 1-year, 6-turn (Sep/Oct '39 - Jul/Aug '40) non-aggression pact where neither the Soviet Union or Japan will attack each other to either be renegotiated or not after said year.
