WW2 Essay: Germany in Defeat

Gamers can also use this forum to chat about any game related subject, news, rumours etc.

Moderator: maddog986

Trigger1027
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2002 2:18 am

WW2 Essay: Germany in Defeat

Post by Trigger1027 »

I have to complete an essay on Germany in Defeat (WW2) and I need 3 reasons why that began to lose and lost and 3 events that contributed to their loss.
So far I have:
Reasons:
-Allied air support
Events:
-Operation Overlord
-Operation Market Garden
-Cherbourg
-Caen
-Liberation of Paris

Trigger1027
User avatar
Veldor
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 9:32 am
Location: King's Landing

Re: WW2 Essay: Germany in Defeat

Post by Veldor »

Originally posted by Trigger1027
I have to complete an essay on Germany in Defeat (WW2) and I need 3 reasons why that began to lose and lost and 3 events that contributed to their loss.
So far I have:
Reasons:
-Allied air support
Events:
-Operation Overlord
-Operation Market Garden
-Cherbourg
-Caen
-Liberation of Paris

Trigger1027


How bout something simpler but more abstract like "America entering the war?"

Wouldn't things have gone much differently had that been delayed another year or two (or three)??

Anyone think the war in europe could have been won without the Americans?
User avatar
Von Rom
Posts: 1631
Joined: Fri May 12, 2000 8:00 am

Re: WW2 Essay: Germany in Defeat

Post by Von Rom »

Originally posted by Trigger1027
I have to complete an essay on Germany in Defeat (WW2) and I need 3 reasons why that began to lose and lost and 3 events that contributed to their loss.
So far I have:
Reasons:
-Allied air support
Events:
-Operation Overlord
-Operation Market Garden
-Cherbourg
-Caen
-Liberation of Paris

Trigger1027


Below is a link to the BBC website that has an essay that should help you a great deal.

In addition:

1) Germany was never fully mobilized for total war until the beginning of 1943, when more people were conscripted, and Speer took over the armaments industries.

2) Too many resources went into too few "super weapons" (such as V-1s, King Tiger tanks, etc). Germany should have mass produced PzIVJs and StuGIVs/Hetzers like the Americans (Shermans) and Soviets (T-34s).

3) Unexpected "side shows" like the Balkans campaign which delayed Barbarossa.

4) The failure of the Germans to press Dunkirk and stop the Allies from evacuating over 300,000 troops.

5) Hitler's personal meddling in the conduct and strategic fighting on the Russian Front.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/war/wwtwo/ ... on_1.shtml
User avatar
Fred98
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Wollondilly, Sydney

Post by Fred98 »

My view is that the Sovites and the British could have done it on their own.

But the iron curtain would probably have been on the French border or even the English Channel.
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

Post by Raverdave »

The failure to take Moscow was a contributing factor, as well as the German army still relied on horse and carts for supplies !

Dunkirk as well as the battle of Britain.
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
VictorH
Posts: 247
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, U.S.

!!

Post by VictorH »

Oil! Germany didn't have access to the necessary Oil reserves to carry on a mechinized war. As stated above Germany didn't fully mobilize for war until 43 - 44, by that time it was too late, the numbers were against them. Germany's airforce was designed for a short range continental war. Another reason - Hitler! He was insane and stupid as were the entire German General Staff for putting up with his nonsense. Turning the Me-262 into a fighter bomber is an example of his meddling in matters better left for the military planners. Oh yea, don't forget all the resources Hitler comiitted to murdering 6 million + Jews and other "undesirables", definately the behaivor of an INSANE IDIOT.
Les_the_Sarge_9_1
Posts: 3943
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2000 10:00 am

Post by Les_the_Sarge_9_1 »

Malta and Barbarossa are two words that help.

Then racism is one, not liberating the Ukeranians cost them their lebensraum in the east eventually.
I LIKE that my life bothers them,
Why should I be the only one bothered by it eh.
Wallenstein
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Austria

Post by Wallenstein »

Most decisive military events:

Stalingrad - loss of the best equipped and trained forces in Russia

White Russia 1944 - destruction of Army Group Center with nearly 380.000 soliders due to Hitlers prohibition to retreat.

D-Day - no need to comment

As for reasons to defeat, let me add:

The failure to prevent a two/more front war.

No standard weapons - too many different types of tanks, planes, infantry weapons with different ammunitions, which lead to inefficiency especially later during the war.

Incompetent military leadership of Hitler.
Culiacan Mexico
Posts: 600
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Bad Windsheim Germany

Re: WW2 Essay: Germany in Defeat

Post by Culiacan Mexico »

Originally posted by Trigger1027
I have to complete an essay on Germany in Defeat (WW2) and I need 3 reasons why that began to lose and lost and 3 events that contributed to their loss.
The Oil War contributed to Germany's defeat.

Dr. Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht, former German finance minister: "Germany lost the war the day it started. Your bombers destroyed German production, and Allied production made the defeat of Germany certain."

Generaleutnant Adolf Galland, Chief of Fighters, GAF: "In my opinion, it was the Allied bombing of our oil industries that had the greatest effect on the German war potential. Even our supplies for training new airmen were severely curtailed--we had plenty of planes from the autumn of 1944 on, and there were enough pilots up to the end of that year, but lack of petrol didn't permit the expansion of proper training to the air force as a whole.

Thanks mdiehl
"If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains set lig
User avatar
SLAAKMAN
Posts: 2556
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 9:50 am
Contact:

Post by SLAAKMAN »

Here are three reasons why the Axis lost WW2; HITLER, MUSSOLINI, TOJO.
SLAAKATTAK
Germany's unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economy from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.
— Winston Churchill
Reiryc
Posts: 1081
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:00 am

Post by Reiryc »

reasons:

2 front war
depended fully on quick victories to win
lack of sufficient oil supplies

events:

defeat before moscow
kursk 43
d-day

These are all pretty simply explained and can be easily written about by finding sources, etc. Each event is a signicant event in which you saw the fortunes of germany change in a significant fashion and they also are pretty well documented with their effects.

Reiryc
Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

Post by Cap Mandrake »

How about this?

What if the Germans actually adhered to the Molotov-Ribentropp pact, settled for Western Poland, shelved the iditoic, unrealistic and shockingly evil idea of eliminating the Jews and Slavs? What if they simply DID NOT attack the Soviet Union and simply bought oil from the SU instead of trying to take it?

Now imagine the manpower and resources hemorrhaged on the Eastern Front diverted instead to thousands of Me-109's and FW's and tens of thousands of concrete bunkers on the Atlantic coast of France and the Lowlands staffed with elite troops. :eek:


Imagine Rommel in North Africa with 10 or 15 Pzr. Divisions instead of two converted Infantry Divisions :eek:
Image
User avatar
Fallschirmjager
Posts: 3555
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:46 am
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee

Post by Fallschirmjager »

I think Germany had to attack Russia

I Russia had been allowed until 43 or 44 to build up....then they would of attacked Germany.
Germany went in with the initiative and shattered a good portion of the Soviet army but fell just short.


I dont think there is any one reason Germany lost...there are hundreds of small ones that came together to prevent them from winning.
User avatar
jnier
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 10:00 am

Post by jnier »

Originally posted by Fallschirmjager
I think Germany had to attack Russia
I Russia had been allowed until 43 or 44 to build up....then they would of attacked Germany.

I hear people say this alot...but what is there any evidence that suggests this is the case?

The only reason a Soviet-German confronatation was inevitable was Hitler's obsession with "Lebenstraum." Barbarossa was never intended to pre-empt a Soviet attack and what's the evidence that the Soviets would have had any interest in attacking the world's most powerful military?
Les_the_Sarge_9_1
Posts: 3943
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2000 10:00 am

Post by Les_the_Sarge_9_1 »

If Germany had not attacked Russia, what I think would have happened, would be the world today would be part Communist, part Facist and part overworked America.

The Russians would eventually lock horns with Germany in the interests of global communism. It would then be about communism trying to destabilise German Facism and the facist ideal.

The US would likely be playing a big role, but with Germany big and bad and not about to go anywhere, it would be 3 major powers all hating each other and not being able to get rid of each other more or less.

We would not have Israel and the Arabs would just be arabs. The Japanese would be a wild card. I don't think they would fare well against Russian Communism though.

There is no reason to assume China would be communist though.

Japan might not have locked horns with the US, but the US would be plenty occupied keeping an eye on Germany and Russia.

Britain would likely be a small nobody alongside France both who likely would have lost their colonies thanks to world communism (which was a major obsession with Russia before Germany distracted them for 5 critical years).

Hard to say where Germany might be today, if racism had not caused all their scientific community to run away to the west.
I LIKE that my life bothers them,
Why should I be the only one bothered by it eh.
User avatar
Maliki
Posts: 403
Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2002 11:33 pm

Post by Maliki »

Les,it sounds like you should write an alternate history essay on the world divided by three ideologies.I've never heard the what ifs put the way you just did.Its interesting to contemplate to say the least.
"..if you want to make a baby cry, first you give it a lollipop. Then you take it away."
Les_the_Sarge_9_1
Posts: 3943
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2000 10:00 am

Post by Les_the_Sarge_9_1 »

Thanks for the vote of confidence:)

Part of every political opinion is dancing through the minefield of objectivity.

American media dominates a lot of perspective occasionally.
That and occasionally a person will forget that the second world war was in fact numerous wars all melded together.

It was WW2.
It was the Great Partiotic War.
It was a war of Facist ideology vs Western Democratic ideals.
It was a war waged for Asian Economic Unification (by force).

It featured numerous colonial territories seeing a chance for freedom/independence.
It featured numerous massive revolutionary scientific breakthroughs
It featured human genocide on a massive scale.

It eventually managed to involve almost every corner of the globe, and influence almost the entire human population of our planet.

In some ways, WW2 as it was known, is still being played out today.
Israel was born out of the Holocaust. Jews are still locked in a struggle to exist.
Korea freed from the Japanese because a pawn of east west friction. Today the forces of communism are still struggling against the western way of government.
There are other examples easily found.

So much of that war, was fought for incredibly poorly thought out justifications.
So many seemingly insignificant political decisions, or military decisions, had such an incredibly profound effect on the big picture.

Stalingrad was an epic battle to be sure. But it was the choice to confront Russia militarily that mattered.
The Battle of Britain was a major event, but might never have happened, if Germany has fortified the West wall first, then tackled Russia with a secure frontier.
The Battle of Midway was a major turning point, but might not have happened, if Japan had never hit Pearl Harbour.

Three big battles, all possibly avoided, merely by a politician making a simple choice.
I LIKE that my life bothers them,
Why should I be the only one bothered by it eh.
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

Post by Cap Mandrake »

Interesting Idea about 3 unaligned ideologies, but looking back on European history, 3 or more unaligned roughly equal powers is not a stable situation. There is an almost irresistable tendancy for 2 powers to align to get the leg-up on their rivals.


Does this thing have a spell-check BTW :D
Image
User avatar
BrubakerII
Posts: 339
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Adelaide Australia

Post by BrubakerII »

Originally posted by Les the Sarge 9-1
Hard to say where Germany might be today, if racism had not caused all their scientific community to run away to the west.


Hmm, this is a very interesting point and would make a great topic for a Discovery Channel documentary.

Perhaps the combined loss of some of the most interesting minds of the twentieth century is a topic never really explored? Extraordinary when you think about it and probably never seen before or since.

Brubaker
[8D] SSG Beta Tester [8D]
Les_the_Sarge_9_1
Posts: 3943
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2000 10:00 am

Post by Les_the_Sarge_9_1 »

One interesting thing about WW2 that doesn't get a lot of press (thanks to the material being really dry and non military in nature).

One of my obsessions is with science. I am as comfortable with theoretical physics, as I am with tank tactics.

Before the war actually got hot, the Nazis, thanks to their obsession with purging jewish science assisted in the ruination of their atomic efforts, by convincing the then scientific minds living in Germany, to seek safer nations to live in.

It was not all this group that made some of the big breaktroughs in the late 40's 50's and 60s of course. Some of the scientists grabbed as Germany collapsed at the end, were definitely influential thinkers.

But picture what might have happened, if some of the men that made the manhattan project hum, had remained in Germany. No these men would not always have worked tirelessly for the Nazi war machine. These men had grave misgivings working for the Allies as well. There were serious worries over fiddling with the atom prior to the first bomb testings.

But thanks to racism, many of the scientisfic community were elsewhere when Germany was seeking the bomb. And the men that were seeking it during the war, were seeking it along roads that were leading nowhere fast.

That is why, most that have studied physics, don't tend to give a lot of interest to notions of a German bomb project with racism intact. If the war had lasted 5 more years, there is no reason to assume the germans would have gotten the bomb.

They were not having a lot of problems perfecting jets and rockets though. But they would have had to settle for conventional munitions in them.

And the Russians, well I suppose they would have had to get them through spies like they in fact did on numerous occasions.
I LIKE that my life bothers them,
Why should I be the only one bothered by it eh.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”