Matrix Games Forums

A closer look at rockets in Space Program ManagerDeal of the Week - Pride of NationsA new update for Piercing Fortress EuropaNew screenshots for War in the West!Pike & Shot is now available!Server Maintenance Battle Academy 2 gets updated!Deal of the Week: Advanced Tactics Gold Ask Buzz Aldrin!Pike & Shot gets Release Date and Twitch Session!
Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Another Look At Weapons Balance

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds Series >> Another Look At Weapons Balance Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Another Look At Weapons Balance - 10/18/2014 3:26:52 AM   
llanite

 

Posts: 37
Joined: 10/23/2010
Status: offline
So I've played DW since the first edition, but I haven't really delved into modding until this release (mostly because babies and toddlers just suck up every minute of the day when I'm not at work… but it's getting better...)

I've read with great interest the various discussions of various weapons balancing issues, the thread on armor, and other discussions of the game's mechanics and I really appreciate the analysis from the DW community on this board - it's encouraged me to offer the following approach to visualizing and mapping weapons balance. My own goal was to understand the current system well enough to intelligently mod it. As people have noted, some weapon systems (like rail guns) have very limited utility, and there are only a few weapons (torpedoes, titan beams) that seem effective by the late game.

Methods:
To visualize all this, I've taken the trouble of assembling all the weapon systems, their improvements, and their respective tech levels into a single document. I then built a test case where I measured the damage of each system based on damage, rate of fire, and a test target case (100 shields, 50 armor, 100 hull points) and then calculated comparative damage models for all weapons and improvements at various ranges. To visually compare the results, I then normalized all the values and graphed the normalized results.

To understand what you're seeing, there are 2 normalized indices I use - a DE (Damage Efficiency Index) that is a normalized measure of the ability to kill the target case above at a particular range. 0 is the Mean of the entire population of weapons. Negative numbers fall below the Mean and are more efficient at killing the Test Target at that range.

I also use a second number - CE (Construction Efficiency) which measures how efficient a weapon system is at killing the Target Case at a particular range in terms of size and energy consumption. Again, 0 is the Mean of the population and negative numbers are more efficient in terms of space and energy.

I've accounted for all the weapon system's special abilities (bypassing armor, to-hit penalties, range fall off, etc.) in the model. The only thing I didn't do was wrap reactive armor effects into the equation. So, for example, a torpedo hitting the target case at range 200 will have to do 250 points of damage while accounting for the damage fall off at range 200. The DE is effectively how fast the torpedo will kill the target compared to all the other weapon systems. The CE is a measure of the energy it took to deliver that damage with the size of the weapon system modifying the answer. The same test for the graviton beam would only have to deliver 100 damage points since it bypasses shields and armor (but is penalized for its lower rate of fire and higher energy requirements).

So, here are all the weapon systems by Tech Level (X-Axis) mapped against their respective DE values (Y axis) at range 200:

[image]1.gif[/image]




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by llanite -- 10/18/2014 4:32:00 AM >
Post #: 1
RE: Another Look At Weapons Balance - 10/18/2014 3:34:20 AM   
llanite

 

Posts: 37
Joined: 10/23/2010
Status: offline
You can clearly see why people prefer certain weapon systems by the end game.

Here you can see the full nature of the development of all the weapon systems at range 99 (no distance penalty). X-Axis is CE, Y-Axis is DE, and as a convention I've reversed the scales - the upper right quadrant of the graph is the most efficient in terms of both damage and construction/energy. Systems above the DE Mean (horizontal black line on the graph) are more effective at damaging targets while systems to the right of the CE Mean (vertical black line) are more efficient at doing that damage in terms of size/energy:




Generally each weapon systems starts in the bottom left and progresses to the upper right with each tech level (labels made this graph unreadable).




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by llanite -- 10/18/2014 4:41:13 AM >

(in reply to llanite)
Post #: 2
RE: Another Look At Weapons Balance - 10/18/2014 3:39:11 AM   
llanite

 

Posts: 37
Joined: 10/23/2010
Status: offline
Here's the same graph at Range 400:








Attachment (1)

< Message edited by llanite -- 10/18/2014 4:43:09 AM >

(in reply to llanite)
Post #: 3
RE: Another Look At Weapons Balance - 10/18/2014 3:43:38 AM   
llanite

 

Posts: 37
Joined: 10/23/2010
Status: offline
And at Range 600:




Observations and Conclusions about the DW Weapon System:
The second graph explains a lot of things: first, you can see that rail guns (Orange) have a very different progression from all other systems. They start out very CE efficient and at the top in terms of DE. But they have a very flat progression and by mid-game fall out of favor - as their tech levels increase, they become more efficient in terms of size/energy, but never become better at causing damage to a target. Grav weapons are the most efficient at causing damage, but by late game can't compete against torpedoes and beams. Missiles are a bit hopeless - even at long range, by the time you develop Assault Missiles, Torpedoes already do a better job.

From my own perspective, this also illustrates why every game plays out the same by the late game. At the beginning of the game there are very real choices to make about different weapon systems because they are wildly divergent in terms of damage vs. construction trade-offs. But by mid-game, and certainly in the late game, all these different technologies converge toward a single point and there's only a couple of systems that make sense.

I hope this makes sense to people - and for the modders out there in particular, if you're designing a total conversion or a rebalancing of the weapon systems, it would be very interesting to see what might come of a set of weapon systems that stay divergent through the end game, with no clear winners in the tech race. This could give each race a lot of uniqueness and make the in-game ship combat more exciting as you have to redevelop your fleets to address different technological threats.

If anyone is interested I can also provide the underlying excel file I used for this - it combines elements from the Component.txt file, the Projects.txt file, and adds meta-data like the Tech level and Weapon Damage Type (phase, grav, etc) to each weapon system so that all of that data is available in one place.

Best Regards
Llanite



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by llanite -- 10/18/2014 4:45:00 AM >

(in reply to llanite)
Post #: 4
RE: Another Look At Weapons Balance - 10/18/2014 11:03:02 PM   
rxnnxs

 

Posts: 16
Joined: 6/1/2013
Status: offline
thank you for this work you didi a really time consuming and useful job!
i wish that those findings will influence the mods and the original game as well.
this work needs more attention and i hope it will get some more while i am typing :-)

(in reply to llanite)
Post #: 5
RE: Another Look At Weapons Balance - 10/19/2014 2:26:31 PM   
llanite

 

Posts: 37
Joined: 10/23/2010
Status: offline
Thanks rxnnxs! I'll admit I did this mostly for myself as I dug in to what it would take to mod DW. I'll have some posts later this week about using all this as a tool to quickly design weapon systems for a total conversion. Hopefully people will see the advantages of an analytical approach with a real example.

(in reply to rxnnxs)
Post #: 6
RE: Another Look At Weapons Balance - 10/19/2014 9:40:10 PM   
hewwo

 

Posts: 258
Joined: 4/22/2010
Status: offline
cool work :) I wonder how the weapon balance in the AI mod looks like in a graph like this.

(in reply to llanite)
Post #: 7
RE: Another Look At Weapons Balance - 10/20/2014 3:28:40 AM   
CyclopsSlayer


Posts: 481
Joined: 2/11/2012
Status: offline
I agree 100% with these conclusions.
For a long time now it has been apparent to me that the only two efficient systems, and the only two I develop, are Energy Torpedoes and Fighters. The best mix I could find of Stand-Off and local superiority combat ability.
Alongside the Warp blockers to tackle fleeing targets.

Believe me, an attacker trying to strike one of my forward Bases/ Mega Carriers will seldom actually get into gun range when faced with 40 Hanger loads of Fighters especially since Fighters once activated stay active in local space and engage FAR FAR beyond standard weapon engagement ranges.

(in reply to hewwo)
Post #: 8
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds Series >> Another Look At Weapons Balance Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.078