Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Between the Storms

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: Between the Storms Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Between the Storms - 7/7/2014 2:15:20 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Understand completely. Still...starting with a pair of SS that have working TTs will be a nice Allied addition.

Will need a tender...


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 181
RE: Between the Storms - 7/7/2014 2:23:12 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41452
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
HMAS Albatross was my choice. Originally a seaplane tender, she was traded to the RN to pay for HMAS Hobart. If we assume that Australia's economic situation is better, and that the RAN wants to play with subs, why not convert her from an AV to an AS? She's about the same age as the subs she'll be servicing.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 182
RE: Between the Storms - 7/7/2014 10:31:13 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41452
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Here's the data I'll be using myself:





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 183
RE: Between the Storms - 7/8/2014 12:12:17 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
We'll add all this to the Aussie OOB for Between the Storms and, perhaps, RA 7.0. Really like the ideas a bunch...

Juan just sent me his second draft on off-map bases and aircraft purchasing. Looks quite promising. This was our email exchange:

Hi John,

Here's a second draft of airgroups. This ones includes a few changes to the US groups along with the British ones. I remain rather uncertain as to what an acceptable price for these is, as that is probably the main factor in their usefulness.

Regarding the actual bases themselves - would you like me to get those done and send them to you, or perhaps in light of the airgroups still being WIP I should hold off on that, and you can get on with the rest of it while this stuff is worked out, and then I can put this all in at once afterwards?

Regards,
Juan





Juan,

I am all for using the Treaty Mod as an ‘experiment’ with this. Could we go with what you have and let a few games begin (Adm Nelson and I are going to play one) to get feedback. This way we can do a quick deployment of the new Mod and then get commentary...

It will take us a month—probably—to get RA 7.0 and Between the Storms ready to go. You could spend that month refining and working as we get the new Mods finished.

What do you think?

John

PS Just printed your spreadsheet and will give it a good look over.








_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 184
RE: Between the Storms - 7/8/2014 1:33:46 AM   
ny59giants_MatrixForum


Posts: 9678
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: online
I would think the cost of buying out these air groups would have to be close to 15 days worth of PPs. More for 2e and 4e bombers. Since a regiment/brigade is around 600 points, shouldn't a fighter squadron cost around the same??

_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 185
RE: Between the Storms - 7/8/2014 1:48:55 AM   
DOCUP


Posts: 3030
Joined: 7/7/2010
Status: offline
I like the idea of a small French presence at the beginning, and it gets bigger over time.  600 points for 25 fighters seems high to me, B29s yes 600 or more points.  It does need to cost though.

(in reply to ny59giants_MatrixForum)
Post #: 186
RE: Between the Storms - 7/8/2014 2:56:09 AM   
JuanG


Posts: 900
Joined: 12/28/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

I would think the cost of buying out these air groups would have to be close to 15 days worth of PPs. More for 2e and 4e bombers. Since a regiment/brigade is around 600 points, shouldn't a fighter squadron cost around the same??


I've really struggled with this aspect to be honest.

On one hand, theyre only airframes, not actual airgroups/pilots. On the other hand, I do not think they should be a 'given' by any means, and should definately incur a cost.

Another factor is the most I can make each 'group' (ie. packet of aircraft) cost is 255PP (ie 5 days worth give or take).

Currently I'm working with fighters being in the 7-10PP range per airframe, with airframes in groups of 16-30 depending on when and where. This puts the price of most of those groups in the 120-250 range.

Medium bombers are a little more expensive, heavies (especially pre-44) notably so, with group sizes of 6-12 for the latter. Specialist craft like recon and patrol aircraft also come in smaller groups, though their prices are less than those for heavies.

I've also tried to account for overall availability of an airframe in how much it costs - extra B-17s in '42 are rare and expensive, as are P-38s and other craft with limited availability at the time (in the Pacific - many of these were prioritized to Europe).

Likewise, as the war goes on groups become cheaper, even for aircraft of better performance (A 16 aircraft P-40E unit in early '42 costs 140PP, or 8.75 per airframe, while a 24 aircraft P-40N1 unit costs 200PP, or 8.33 per airframe). As airgroups are not removed from these offmap bases, their has the effect of firstly building up a pool to draw upon if needed given the resources, and also of making later war groups offer more for the same cost, conveniently representing the better position the allies enjoyed as the war progressed in terms of equipment numbers.

As it stands there are;
130 groups for the USAAF, representing 2304 airframes, for a total cost of 24890PPs (498 days worth). The bulk of these arrive in between late '42 and early '44.
70 groups for the USN/MC, representing 1224 airframes, for a total cost of 11930PPs (239 days worth). Their arrival dates are similar to the USAAF groups.
50 groups for the RAF/FAA/IAF, representing 894 airframes, for a total cost of 8740PPs (175 days worth). A notable portion of these arrives mid-late '42, with the rest spread though the later years.
I have yet to finish the Commonwealth or Minors, but I expect these to be something like 35 groups and ~600 airframes and 15 groups and ~200 airframes respectively.

As I've said to John, this is really a shot in the dark, and I reckon a lot will depend on the allied player actually playing and the situation at hand - in some games an extra 20 F4F-4's in mid-42 may seem like a waste compared to other options, whereas in another it could be a bargain. The best way to find out is to actually try it.

< Message edited by JuanG -- 7/8/2014 3:56:54 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to ny59giants_MatrixForum)
Post #: 187
RE: Between the Storms - 7/8/2014 10:26:05 AM   
ny59giants_MatrixForum


Posts: 9678
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: online
I know one thing an Allied player like me will be doing is buy out these obsolete airframes to free up the P-38Es that start the game. Having a couple of P-38 groups will be worth the price.

_____________________________


(in reply to JuanG)
Post #: 188
RE: Between the Storms - 7/8/2014 1:51:24 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
I have told Juan to roll forward with this. In many ways we are incorporating bunches of new stuff within these three Mods: DB-C, Stacking Limits, JWE's new Aussie/NZ/Phil OOB, Off-Map Bases with Airframe buyout, and the Mods themselves. These should be pretty exciting to work with and I look forward to getting them rolling. All the work done by John and Juan is truly appreciated and we'll have to see just how much chaos is created by their delightful contributions.

Will wait for Juan to send the finished files back and then make the naval chances detailed in the last page of the Thread then this Mod is ready for play.

Once the Treaty Mod is good then we shift gears into making sure RA 7.0 is fully done then jump to combine them with BTS.

The Mods will be uploaded to the RA Site. Need to create new pages there for each new Mod and do some serious writing and descriptive work there.

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to ny59giants_MatrixForum)
Post #: 189
RE: Between the Storms - 7/8/2014 6:42:49 PM   
Symon


Posts: 1928
Joined: 11/24/2012
From: De Eye-lands, Mon
Status: offline
Michael had some comments on the Babes air model in the War Room. I responded. No reply.

We look for interaction as much as you guys. In this particular instance we are need all the input we can get.

Just because we put out data, doesn’t mean your thoughts/experiences aren’t worthwhile, rather it means we take the issue seriously enough to address it with data in hopes it will spark some understanding and interaction.

I don’t know what Michael thinks of the new Air paradigm. That’s above my pay grade. But could you guys ccoule at least talk to us before you urinate on somethin, maybe?

Knockers up. Ciao JWE


_____________________________

Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.

(in reply to ny59giants_MatrixForum)
Post #: 190
RE: Between the Storms - 7/8/2014 9:57:06 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Symon

Michael had some comments on the Babes air model in the War Room. I responded. No reply.

We look for interaction as much as you guys. In this particular instance we are need all the input we can get.

Just because we put out data, doesn’t mean your thoughts/experiences aren’t worthwhile, rather it means we take the issue seriously enough to address it with data in hopes it will spark some understanding and interaction.

I don’t know what Michael thinks of the new Air paradigm. That’s above my pay grade. But could you guys ccoule at least talk to us before you urinate on somethin, maybe?

Knockers up. Ciao JWE



Have no idea what you speak of...


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Symon)
Post #: 191
RE: Between the Storms - 7/9/2014 12:47:04 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Juan is finishing up his off-map bases work and then I shall do final movement of wessels and aircraft then we are ready to launch Treaty 1.0 for play.



_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 192
RE: Between the Storms - 7/9/2014 1:58:11 AM   
oldman45


Posts: 2324
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Jacksonville Fl
Status: offline
With breathless anticipation we await the launch!!

_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 193
RE: Between the Storms - 7/13/2014 5:00:33 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
OK. We are IN BUSINESS! Juan has sent the files back for both Treaty and RA. Michael and I are looking them over tonight and tomorrow.

Juan & Michael: Could you Post your thoughts, reactions, and ideas here please?


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to oldman45)
Post #: 194
RE: Between the Storms - 7/13/2014 10:54:21 AM   
ny59giants_MatrixForum


Posts: 9678
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: online
I brief email exchange between Juan and me yesterday and early this morning.

quote:


Juan,

Just did a quick look at the work you did here for RA. I couldn't pull up the actual off map bases just north of San Diego. Do I need a custom pwhex file or a different map panel to do so?? I could get some info from the mouse over, but the bases don't actual show up. Since the cost to purchase the air groups is depended on the group's leader, could you adjust the cost to make certain airframe more expensive by decreasing the actual number of planes in each group??

I would eliminate the very old American fighters like the P-25 and 36 as I will buy one out to use to get some the P-38s from other groups that are restricted. Replace the P-38s with these older fighters.

Thanks,
Michael

Reply

Hi Michael,

1. This is a by product of how these bases are placed entirely into 'non-map' as opposed to 'on-map' or 'off-map' territory. There are three ways to pull up the groups;
a. Open the bases list, and as the reinforcement bases are titled (Base Name), they should always appear as the first 5.
b. Click the base on the map, and use the squadron icons in the bottom bar to go directly to a squadron.
c. Open the squadrons list, and the purchaseable squadrons should show at the top of the list due to their naming.

2. Yes, this is how the pricing is done. A heavy bomber group will often contain 8-12 airframes for the same price as a 24-32 fighter group. These can easily be adjusted later based on feedback as the only two variables are the leaders PP cost (capped at 255) and the number or airframes.

3. I'm on the fence about this. Personally as I see doing the aforementioned purchasing as gamey, I view the old fighters in Reserve groups as moreso being useful in allowing one to shuffle aircraft between 'real' groups. You are free to remove them if you wish by setting their delay to 9999 if they are a problem for you.

Regards,
Juan


Since I don't have a turn in my inbox, I'm going to look more closely to RA 7.0 this morning to make sure I've done all that I can and then forward anything to John 3rd.

_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 195
Treaty READY!?? - 7/13/2014 2:44:59 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
I've downloaded the Mod Files from Juan for both the Treaty as well as RA. Michael will continue for a day or two to work RA while I tidy up Treaty.

Lew and I are going to start a Treaty Mod Campaign. Are there others who want to do some playtesting or browse through it some more?

Figure that I need about 1-2 hours of time to get everything finished on the Treaty Mod and it will be good to run. Need to put together a scenario description, do some placement changes--as we talked about on the previous page of this thread, and switch Vindictive over to the Kiwis. Air Art will be a mess for Melbourne and Vindictive but it will have to do for the moment.

Will Post when files are ready.

Any takers?


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to ny59giants_MatrixForum)
Post #: 196
HMNZS ???? - 7/14/2014 4:52:43 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
The Vindictive is becoming a New Zealand ship. Which name works better the HMNZS Wellington or Auckland? Am open to other suggestions as well.

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 197
RE: HMNZS ???? - 7/14/2014 12:10:51 PM   
oldman45


Posts: 2324
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Jacksonville Fl
Status: offline
I would go with Wellington only because it sounds better. In the words of Sgt Provo, "it sings"

< Message edited by oldman45 -- 7/14/2014 1:11:32 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 198
RE: HMNZS ???? - 7/14/2014 12:56:43 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
A classic Wayne movie line: "Provo's Privy!"

Thanks for the early morning laugh Sir.


< Message edited by John 3rd -- 7/14/2014 1:56:58 PM >


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to oldman45)
Post #: 199
RE: HMNZS ???? - 7/14/2014 1:27:06 PM   
oldman45


Posts: 2324
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Jacksonville Fl
Status: offline
I figured you would catch it.

_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 200
RE: HMNZS ???? - 7/14/2014 2:24:46 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Working my way down the list of 'to do's' with the Treaty Mod. Have 22 items needing addressing and am over halfway there. Solid progress.

Have created the Scouting Force and placed it between the Pensacola TF and the Chester TF. This is a FORMIDABLE TF: 2 BC, 2 CA, 2 CLV, and 6 DD. How 'bout that for something EXTRA!


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to oldman45)
Post #: 201
Cebu - 7/14/2014 2:31:03 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
In this Mod Arc, it appears that Cebu will become a subsidiary of Manila for the Asiatic Fleet. We've moved and AS, AV, and 6 SS there for the Opening of the War. Additionally a small Base Force, some supply, and fuel are now there as well.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 202
RE: Treaty READY!?? - 7/14/2014 2:39:57 PM   
btd64


Posts: 5605
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in OHIO
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

I've downloaded the Mod Files from Juan for both the Treaty as well as RA. Michael will continue for a day or two to work RA while I tidy up Treaty.

Lew and I are going to start a Treaty Mod Campaign. Are there others who want to do some playtesting or browse through it some more?

Figure that I need about 1-2 hours of time to get everything finished on the Treaty Mod and it will be good to run. Need to put together a scenario description, do some placement changes--as we talked about on the previous page of this thread, and switch Vindictive over to the Kiwis. Air Art will be a mess for Melbourne and Vindictive but it will have to do for the moment.

Will Post when files are ready.

Any takers?


John, I have played the beginning of 45 a few times with the art and chems map. All looks good. Waiting for the next one.... PM me the files. I have time tomorrow. GP

_____________________________

Intel i7 3.4GHz,8GB Ram,1920x1080 rez

AKA General Patton

WPO,WITP,WITPAE-Mod Designer/Tester
DW Series-Beta Tester
TotS-Alpha Tester
TOAW4-Alpha/Beta Tester

I don't like paying for the same real estate twice..Gen. George S. Patton

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 203
RE: Treaty READY!?? - 7/14/2014 4:04:36 PM   
oldman45


Posts: 2324
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Jacksonville Fl
Status: offline
John, this mod does not use the extended map does it?

_____________________________


(in reply to btd64)
Post #: 204
RE: Treaty READY!?? - 7/14/2014 11:48:19 PM   
btd64


Posts: 5605
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in OHIO
Status: online
oldman45, I'm sure john will answer, but yes it uses the extended map. GP

_____________________________

Intel i7 3.4GHz,8GB Ram,1920x1080 rez

AKA General Patton

WPO,WITP,WITPAE-Mod Designer/Tester
DW Series-Beta Tester
TotS-Alpha Tester
TOAW4-Alpha/Beta Tester

I don't like paying for the same real estate twice..Gen. George S. Patton

(in reply to oldman45)
Post #: 205
Treaty READY! - 7/15/2014 2:22:55 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Treaty Mod is complete. I spent time yesterday morning and last night going through and making little tweaks and catching small errors. Am going to ZIP all the files together and send them to our playtesters/checkers. Give this a few days then we'll shift over to RA 7.0.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to btd64)
Post #: 206
RE: Treaty READY! - 7/15/2014 3:00:07 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Have sent the Mod to playtesters so they can do a serious look-through. Will plan to release this by Friday.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 207
RE: Treaty READY! - 7/15/2014 3:10:54 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Changes made the last two days:

1. Transferred Vindictive to New Zealand and named her the HMNZS Wellington. Air Group now upgrades along the same lines as the Aussie Melbourne.
2. Moved the two Hong Kong DDs to Singers.
3. Cebu gains the USS Ely (sister of Langley) to go with an AS and 6 SS. Added supply and fuel to the base as well as an older squadron of Fighters.
4. FIXED Casablanca and Bogue Class CVE AA Issues.
5. Created the Scouting Fleet TF of BCs Ranger and Constellation, 2 CA, CLV's Charlotte and Jacksonville, and 6 DDs.
6. Moved CL Naka and DDs from Formosa to Cam Rahn Bay to provide escorts for Japanese CAVs and new CAs.
7. Changed Constitution Class 16" guns to MK 3 version as per Juan and JWE's specs.
8. Pulled BB Pennsylvania and have her arriving--damaged--on Dec 8th.
9. Damaged ships historically under repair: At PH--Cassin, Downes, and Shaw. At Manila--SS Seadragon and Sealion.
10. Concentrated the Japanese BBs at Hiroshima along with Hosho and Ibuki (sister to Hosho).
11. Disbanded TF 123/124 at Home Islands so the 56th and 2nd ID can be reloaded correctly.
12. Removed USS Mississippi from game to rflect Treaty Changes allowing the two BCs to added to US OOB.
13. Made sure the Lex and Ent have a pair of CAs for escorts.
14. Saratoga has an actual Battle Group on the West Coast to protect it when the CV sails.



_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 208
RE: Treaty READY! - 7/20/2014 3:17:21 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Just took a serious look at RA6.7 with JWE’s work and he did a FANTASTIC job! I’ve got some work to do on the Japanese Naval LCUs but that appears to be it. Think a few hours of work should get RA 7.0 completed. Integrating 7.0 and Treaty into BTS should not be too rough. Think this can safely be accomplished in good time.

Juan: I am not touching Treaty until you get your work done. Keep us informed and then I’ll send RA over to you to import the Off-Base stuff. Should be the only time you’ll have to do that because I shall copy RA 7.0 into a new folder to create Between the Storms.

Thanks for all the work team.

John


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 209
RE: Treaty READY! - 7/21/2014 6:29:57 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 16089
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
GOOD news. I had some time to work tonight and got all of RA taken care of. Treaty is FINISHED and RA is now FINISHED. Have got to shift it so the art, scenario description, and other minor items are handled but RA 7.0 will be available in days.

This means that BTS shall be ready, perhaps, a day or two after that.

How about that??!!


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 210
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: Between the Storms Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.180