Valid targets for KSR-5 (AS-6 Kingfish)

Take command of air and naval assets from post-WW2 to the near future in tactical and operational scale, complete with historical and hypothetical scenarios and an integrated scenario editor.

Moderator: MOD_Command

Post Reply
Windom Earle
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 2:25 pm

Valid targets for KSR-5 (AS-6 Kingfish)

Post by Windom Earle »

I don't know is it just a database issue or not... DB3000 Build 413 lists only "Surface Ships" as valid targets for KSR-5/KSR-5M missiles (various mods). Most of the sources I found also claim that the missiles can also be used against so called "radiocontrast" targets (like dambs, plants etc). Should it be reflected in the database, adding, for example, "Land Structures" in their valid targets lists?
mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: Valid targets for KSR-5 (AS-6 Kingfish)

Post by mikmykWS »

If you can post the source and we'll make the delta.

We don't just do it because somebody asks. There has be some data behind it. This is so when we get asked we can explain the change[:)]

Mike
navwarcol
Posts: 637
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 2:30 pm
Contact:

RE: Valid targets for KSR-5 (AS-6 Kingfish)

Post by navwarcol »

This source says it was also intended against land targets.

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/bomber/as-6.htm

I do not think that the Soviet Naval Aviation forces actually trained for land attack missions however.
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 11322
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Valid targets for KSR-5 (AS-6 Kingfish)

Post by Sardaukar »

CEP of 1-2 nm against land targets is probably useful for nuke only.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
Windom Earle
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 2:25 pm

RE: Valid targets for KSR-5 (AS-6 Kingfish)

Post by Windom Earle »

Russian sources:
(sorry, can't post functional links yet)
testpilot.ru/russia/raduga/ksr/5/ksr5.htm
airwar.ru/weapon/kr/ksr5.html
rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/kcr_5/kcr_5.shtml
airwar.ru/enc/bomber/tu16k26.html
CEP 1,5 - 3 km for land targets (for KSR-5?). No info for KSR-5M that should be more precise.
AlmightyTallest
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:00 pm

RE: Valid targets for KSR-5 (AS-6 Kingfish)

Post by AlmightyTallest »

Hard to find info on these, so far the only conventional land attack capable versions seem to the anti-radiation versions.

http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Rus-Cruise-Missiles.html#mozTocId753021
KSR-5/D-5 Active radar inertially guided ASCM.

KSR-5N/D-5N Active radar inertially guided ASCM with low altitude flight profile.
KSR-5NM Improved active radar inertially guided ASCM with low altitude flight profile.
KSR-5M Improved active radar inertially guided ASCM for low RCS targets.
KSR-5MV Improved active radar inertially guided ASCM for low RCS targets.
KSR-5P Antiradiation variant.
KSR-5PM Improved antiradiation variant.

The -5M is still listed as an Anti Ship Cruise Missile, and I haven't found any info on what they consider a low RCS target.
Windom Earle
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 2:25 pm

RE: Valid targets for KSR-5 (AS-6 Kingfish)

Post by Windom Earle »

The KSR-2 (AS-5 Kelt), the KSR-5 predecessor, is similar at the ways of its operating. It was also developed and tested to be used as a both maritime and a land strike weapon.

Tupolev Tu-16. Dalniy bombardirovschik i raketonosets
(Tupolev Tu-16. Long-Range Bomber and Missile Carrier)
by Yakubovich N.V., 2001
pp 140-141:
First of six test launches in July-September 1958 at a distance of 96 km scored four direct hits on target, and one, unsuccessful due to the failure of aircraft equipment, did not count. Ground corner reflectors and a partially submerged in shallow water transport "Chkalov" were used as targets.
...
In addition to surface maritime targets, it was tested the possibility of strikes at ground radiocontrast objects like hydro power plants, railway junctions and individual industrial enterprises.

Tupolev Tu-16: Versatile Soviet Long-Range Bomber
by Yefim Gordon and Vladimir Rigmant, 2004
page 41:
The following data refers to the K-16 air-to-surface missile system:
---
Combat radius of the Tu-16KSR-2* = 1900 km
Flight altitude of carrier aircraft = 4000 - 11000 m
Cruising speed with launch at 10000m = 750 - 800 km/h
Target detection range
towns and large targets = 320 - 340 km
large bridges = 250 - 280 km
large surface vessels = 200 - 220 km
Normal range of KSR-2 = 120 - 140 km
Maximum range of KSR-2 = 140 - 150 km
Proximity of Tu-16KSR-2 to target = 110 - 130 km
'Kill' probability = 80%
---
* - with two ASMs, a 75800 kg AUW, without in-flight refuelling and with 5% fuel reserves.
** - from an altitude of 10000 m with the aircraft turning away from the target.
Tu-16KSR-2 = Tu-16K-16 = Badger-G
mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: Valid targets for KSR-5 (AS-6 Kingfish)

Post by mikmykWS »

Looks like the Egyptians may have fired some along with the ARM variant during the 73 War. No idea what at.

Will look and see if the puzzle can be solved.

Mike
Windom Earle
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 2:25 pm

RE: Valid targets for KSR-5 (AS-6 Kingfish)

Post by Windom Earle »

It was a "field supply depot in the Sinai" that KSR-2 (AS-5 Kelt) was fired at.
(Robert Bock. Tu-16 BADGER in action, 1990, p.20).

And an interesting fact: Tom Cooper notes in his book (Tom Cooper. Iranian F-14 Tomcat Units in Combat, 2004, p.48) that the AS-6 Kingfish (KSR-5) missiles were used in Iraqi attacks on Khark island facilities. Iraq did buy the KSR-5 missiles in 1983-1984.
(Kamran Mofid. Economic Consequences of the Gulf War, 2005, p.99,
http://briefingroom.typepad.com/the_bri ... _73-02.pdf , p.11,
http://www.nytimes.com/1984/06/12/world ... -iran.html)
mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: Valid targets for KSR-5 (AS-6 Kingfish)

Post by mikmykWS »

Ah not exactly a precision targets. That supports the idea that their cep in not exactly ideal

Thanks for researching this!

Mike
Post Reply

Return to “Command: Modern Operations series”